This is epic. She copied McAfee. About 25 yrs ago, when McAfee first started, he gave every Congress member a free computer. They didn't know he had installed his spyware tracking software. He had all the goods on them and gave it to the white hats. It's why they hated him so much and probably why he disappeared himself to this very day. He didn't kill himself.
Celena@lenac2009
Ahh the fireworks have started and it’s beautiful to watch!!! Think of all the people on both sides s-talking Pam Bondi and how she hasn’t been doing her job. How do you approach a wild animal? Sneak up from behind.
Think how insane it is that we’re 11 years into this thing, and even on GA there are still people who go around groaning, “Wah! Wah! This random billionaire who’s only succeeded in 8 different business sectors, and has the full backing of at least military intelligence, still doesn’t know how to hire people because things aren’t happening how I want them to happen!”
I think part of it is also to make them feel comfy & cozy, thinking they're perfectly safe. Like baiting the trap without springing it, until they're used to coming up and taking that bait and then one day you also spring the trap and SNAP!, got 'em!
Many will scream she’s violating classified material handling protocols. Wrong. Look closely at those photos. Is there: Confidential, Secret or Top Secret stamped anywhere on those pages?????? Bondi knew exactly what she was doing, legally. Enjoy the show!!!!
Not to say what she did was wrong at all. But the stamp is not what makes information classified. It's the content. Classified information SHOULD be marked. But if it is not, that does not make it not classified. You still have a legal requirement to protect that data. But honestly, I have no idea what classification this information is.
Exactly! As Eagledriver said everyone is getting their panties all wadded up over what? Bondi knows exactly what she’s doing. Besides, didn’t the exposed members of Congress (Jayapal) who looked at the files have to go to a secure site, use government equipment and before they entered the Files, have to push a key to acknowledge they are using government computers and as such are subject to monitoring???? 🤔🤔 I guess they forgot about that? So Bondi shows them one of the many files in DOJ custody during the hearing and they get mad? Not sure what they’re worried about?? 🤔😲😆🤣
Congress can scream all they want about being 'spied' on. I promise you, there is a disclaimer every time they turn on their computers that warns them they are using/accessing a government information system and therefore are subject to routine monitoring. Heck, I get that disclaimer and I work for a private company. As a federal contractor, every government site I access has that disclaimer.
This is it exactly. You are using a government computer. You consent to monitoring every time you use it. Being a member of Congress does not make you exempt. If they honestly do not understand this they have no business being given access to government information to begin with, regardless of who they are.
All these elected powderpuffs screaming about privacy while we need to understand that SMART METERS, street cameras, APPS, phone cameras and mics are all perfectly fine. Welcome to our world you buncha evil idiots.
It's possible, with the corruptocrats in Congress, there are Fisa warrants on every sitting member because of their past crimes, they may already be under indictment, who knows what is really going on. You can bet, it is all being done legally. We were told that specifically.
So wait... I wake up in the morning, and watch HGTV (don't judge me) on my smart TV which monitors my viewing habits and makes "suggestions" for what I would like. I drink my coffee, and check Facebook, which monitors me to make sure I think correctly, and shadow bans me if I don't.
Then, I drive to work past traffic cameras at every mile of highway, go through a red light camera intersection..complete with cameras... then can get a ticket if I go too fast past a speed camera.
I stop for coffee at a drive through coffee shop, who has cameras all around the perimeter of their business. Also inside, where the barista is being videoed/audio recorded for "safety".
I go to work and swipe my badge so they know I am there, to not only get in the door but to also clock in. Cameras in the hallways make sure I am moving about properly.
Then I open my computer to start the day, and log in past the company 'start' page, complete with a warning I will be monitored.
I didn't agree to any of this... does that mean I can scream and cry too? What made them think they would not be monitored, just because they are special? It's just what we've agreed to in this overstimulated and over monitored society.
This is the normal way computers work.... Everything I do on my work computer is tracked by the company I work for. Everything I do on the internet is logged by the NSA. . . These people are stupid.
This opinion will probably be a little controversial, but it is true. Whether Bondi or the FBI is carrying out a sting operation or not is interesting but not the real story here.
The Attorney General of the USA just exposed clearly-marked LES (Law Enforcement Sensitive) information to the world on live TV. Sting or not, she has to go.
I asked Google what the penalty would be if an Attorney General did that...
AI Overview
If an Attorney General (AG) reveals Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES) or otherwise protected documents on live TV, they could face significant legal, professional, and political penalties, depending on whether the information is classified, privacy-protected, or related to ongoing investigations.
Legal and Criminal Penalties
Misdemeanor Charges (Privacy Act): If the disclosed documents contain personally identifiable information (PII) protected by the Privacy Act, a willful disclosure to unauthorized persons is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 per violation.
Disclosure of Classified Information: If the LES documents are also designated as national security information, disclosure can violate 18 U.S.C. § 798, which carries penalties of fines and up to 10 years imprisonment.
Obstruction of Justice/Contempt: Disclosing sensitive information about an ongoing investigation could be interpreted as obstructing justice or interfering with a court order, potentially leading to criminal contempt charges.
State-Level Penalties (e.g., Texas): In some jurisdictions, knowingly disclosing confidential information by a public official is "official misconduct," punishable by up to six months in jail and fines.
Professional and Administrative Sanctions
Removal from Office: While a federal AG is appointed, Congress can initiate impeachment proceedings, or the President can remove them for cause. State AGs can face similar removal actions.
Loss of Security Clearance: A major violation would result in the immediate suspension or revocation of security clearances.
Disbarment: Because an AG is a licensed attorney, revealing confidential, sensitive, or sealed information could trigger violations of state bar rules regarding confidentiality, leading to the loss of their license to practice law.
Civil and Political Consequences
Lawsuits: Individuals or entities harmed by the disclosure (e.g., victims, witnesses, or subjects of an investigation) could file civil lawsuits against the AG in their personal or official capacity.
Contempt of Congress: If the documents were shielded from public view, the AG could be held in contempt by a congressional committee.
Loss of Public Confidence: Such an act would almost certainly trigger a political crisis, forcing a resignation or leading to intense congressional hearings.
In the case of a federal Attorney General specifically, a 2026 memo indicates a shift in DOJ policy to aggressively pursue "improper leaks" of protected government information, suggesting a high likelihood of prosecution if such an event occurred.
Sorry. Invalid argument. Look at photos again and please tell the world EXACTLY where the CLASSIFIED RATING is on them???? Do we see “Confidential”? Do we see “Secret”? Do we see “Top Secret” on the Top or bottom (in red ink) or any Document file numbers of those pages????
Sure. I'm sure he has everyone's back. He may overlook this, or he may have to act. He has overlooked a few things already. At some point though he could end up having to act because she is a member of his cabinet and runs a very important agency. Remember - he is no fan at all of people that leak. It will be interesting to see what he says - if anything. I completely trust him to do the right thing - whatever that ends up being.
Unfortunately that decision could end up being between having her back or having the backs of everyone serving under her, who are just trying to work this case. I don't envy him if he has to make that decision. He will know what to do though.
AG Pam Bondi, under intense fire from the Trump Deranged Radical Left Lunatics, was fantastic at yesterday’s Hearing on the never ending saga of Jeffrey Epstein, where the one thing that has been proven conclusively, much to their chagrin, was that President Donald J. Trump has been 100% exonerated of their ridiculous Russia, Russia, Russia type charges. Actually, it is the SLIMEBALL Democrats, many of them big Donors and Politicians, that have been proven GUILTY! “Republican” Loser, Sanctimonious RINO Congressman, Thomas Massie, made a total fool of himself yesterday, fighting aimlessly against a hopeless agenda of Hate and Stupidity, as most clearly stated by his crashing Job Approval Numbers in the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky, where a Military Hero Opponent, Ed Gallrein, is crushing him in the Polls. He is now in “Wacky” Liz Cheney territory! Nobody cared about Epstein when he was alive, they only cared about him when they thought he could create Political Harm to a very popular President who has brought our Country back from the brink of extinction, and very quickly, at that! In fact, this attempt by the Democrats to take away attention from tremendous Republican SUCCESS is backfiring badly. Maybe they should focus on their quest to Open our Borders to the World’s Greatest Criminals, have Transgender for Everybody or, get Men, no matter their size or strength, to play in Women’s Sports. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
Well - she is the top law enforcement person in the country (not counting her boss - POTUS), runs the DOJ, and she exposed Law Enforcement Sensitive material on an active investigation. People in this thread seem to think that because it doesn't say Secret or some other DoW classification on it, it isn't sensitive or controlled. One thing almost nobody knows is there are actually some things at the DoW that are classified as UNCLASSIFIED/SCI (kind of like this UNCLASSIFIED/LES). I have processed that when I worked in comm centers while I was in the USAF. They are really rare (most SCI is TS,some is Secret, and a tiny bit is Confidential) but I've processed all of them while I was at the Pentagon. Even though UNCLASSIFIED/SCI is not classified, the SCI part demands control. Same as U/LES.
I had an active TS/SSBI with SCI and a Q clearance for 17 total years of my life. I had to have training on handling classified/sensitive info every year I had a clearance. Pam could be in real trouble for letting that doc be captured on TV, and not just criminal, impeachment, or being fired. She could easily be disbarred because of what she did and who she is - and remember the bar is overflowing with lefties. They already went after some of Trump's lawyers. I'm pretty sure taking down an AG would be a huge feather in their cap. There will also be enormous pressure on Trump to do something, and on CONgress to impeach her. The left wants distractions and they have one now.
Once the media picks up on the fact that she released an LES doc dealing with an active international criminal investigation it will flood the news like that stupid Malaysian Airlines flight disappearance.
Pam should resign on her own, before POTUS has to fire her, before CONgress goes after her, and before the whole investigation grinds to a halt while the DOJ does damage control. I can't see another outcome for this. An agent or some desk jockey might get slapped, but the AG is way different, and has to know better. This wasn't a mistake - it was planned.
I absolutely loved it, until I realized she used a sensitive doc to do it. Then I realized the shit-storm this will cause in the media, in CONgress, and in the judiciary whenever anyone is finally indicted. Cue the activist judges for their injunctions that will surely come.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying I agree with him. My gut agrees that they aren’t that stupid and this is intentional. What I’m saying is that he has good points that are well presented and should be answerable as to how things might be about to play out or what this might be intended to expose if what he’s saying is correct.
The question then becomes that of testing - is my (our) gut feeling correct, and if so, what’s the map from his statements to that position, or where is he wrong, or what is he overlooking?
I know. Some of these newer people on here don't use reason or won't accept anyone else's opinion if it contradicts their ideas. It was a bloodbath last night. It won't stop me from putting out what I see or believe though. Thank you for noticing - I appreciate it.
It can - even though the disclosure was very minor. This stuff happens in the DoD/DoW a fair amount but not usually with the Secretary or higher-up leaders. If it did though, typically we hear phrases such as "lost confidence" or lack of leadership and then someone is gone.
I expect that here. It's not the value of the disclosure, but rather it is the fact that she was so careless that she risked compromising a massive international investigation.
PROPHETIC WORD – SEATS ARE BEING VACATED IN UNPRECEDENTED WAYS
[Word heard – February 4, 2026]
For I the Lord this day am telling you My children someone in My David’s administration is about to step down. This person will make it look like it’s their decision when it’s not. These are the days where seats will be vacated one right after another – seats that traitors sat in, seats that snakes and deceivers sat in, seats that wolves sat in. Seats are being vacated in unprecedented ways. Some even in the House and Senate. Also judges will step down and say they are retiring. Attorneys General and Governors will step down. More will come out and say they are not seeking re-election. They do not have a choice to stay where they are because they’ve been caught red-handed in treasonous acts and there is no way to lie or bribe their way out of what is coming to them.
Pam Bondi will soon be replaced. Susie Wiles will be replaced. John Thune will be replaced.
A great shaking will take place in the Senate and many GOP House Representatives will be replaced because the Deep State is about to be hit unexpectedly with truth they do not have any protection from.
A Spiritual Leader in My David’s camp will be removed. Both political camp and spiritual camp of My David are being shaken now and many forcibly removed. Traps were set and your enemies fell right into them with arrogance and pride not even seeing it was a trap.
A great shock is coming and someone very close to Pres Trump will betray him in a very unprecedented way.
The Great White Wolf will begin to make bold steps out of his hiding place of looking like he’s on My David’s side. Slowly and gently he will start to side against him where he wouldn’t lose too many of the MAGA voters because the Deep State is signalling him to go with the plan to help turn MAGA against Pres Trump. My children MAGA has been infiltrated in a major way.
Honestly I don't know much about Julie. I tend to stay away from the whole prophet thing. I usually equated them to the rich TV preachers flying around on their own planes while senior citizens send their savings to these people and end up broke. My grandmother fell for the Jim and Tammy Faye Baker con while I was growing up - and so did a lot of other people.
I don't know if Julie falls into that box or not, but it is really interesting if she mentioned those things and specifically mentioned Bondi. Thanks for posting it.
God is the same yesterday, today and forever. He used prophets back in the old testament to warn His people and I believe He is using them now. Julie is careful to always use the written word to encourage and reveal that the time we are living in right now, the Lord revealed in and throughout His word. It is amazing to be alive during this epic moment in human history. It should make all of us wonder what our role is to play and why were we born for such a time as this?. Some are called to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers. We must use discernment and test the spirits. If it is not backed up with scripture I tune out. I know this for sure the Lord is the ruler over all the earth, He will raise up one and take down another. I do believe He is calling His sons and daughters to arise and shine for your light has come! The glory of the Lord is risen upon you...Isaiah 60:1-3 is worth visiting. His glory is going to fill the earth! From all that i have witnessed Julie does not "fall into that box" she never asks for donations and warns that there are channels posing as her and it is not her. Johnny Enlow is another that I incline my ear to hear what he has to say about the times we are living in. People in the old testament era stayed away from the whole prophet thing and it did not fair so well for them. We need to know the word of God and pray for discernment and follow Him. Love and peace dec3169
That's good to know. I'll look into her. I have watched Kim Clement before.
I do want to point out something you may not have considered with one thing you said:
People in the old testament era stayed away from the whole prophet thing and it did not fair so well for them.
I just want to point out the actual prophets didn't have You Tube and weren't trying to get clicks or thumbs-up. We don't know if any of the current prophets are real or getting clicks. It was much easier when the old prophets were actually teaching in front of you and you could determine their authenticity in person by their words and actions.
By the way - I really liked this line:
It should make all of us wonder what our role is to play and why were we born for such a time as this?
I've contemplated this for decades. By all rights I should've died easily 6 times - maybe more. Drowning (Aunt pulled me off the pool drain), certain auto accident where I avoided sliding under a Tractor Trailer at 50mph and being decapitated by somehow spinning my car into a ditch and around the truck back up on the other side (as a 16yo brand new driver), trailer caught fire when I was 5 and I got out just before the water heater exploded on the other side of the wall right behind the head of my bed, ending up on a terrorist hit list after the guy I replaced in Turkey was blown up by Islamic Jihad, narrowly avoided drowning as a 2yo during a massive hurricane with bad flooding, being struck by lightning, appendix burst, and twice surviving a fever as high as 105.9 (once as an infant and once as an adult). Instead I've had visions since I was 6, I had whatever it is called when you suddenly smell the strong odor of funeral flowers - and find out a close friend or relative is either in the ICU or has just died, and many other experiences.
The fact that I was struck by lightning through my bedroom window while sleeping, pulled a blanket over my head like it would protect me, had a heart attack with zero damage (other than the high levels of Troponins) and a perfect EKG, and walked away fine amazes me. Everything happened in slow motion. I saw a white light and thought we were being nuked - and all I could think to do was grab my blanket and pull it over my head. My thumb was sticking out and I got struck there. The blanket I pulled up ended up with large wood splinters and some nails from where the blast blew the stud across my bed and onto the opposite wall. My driveway from my window to across the street was covered with bits of brick from the side of the house - but my car (parked in the middle of the driveway) had no debris or even dust on it. It was all around it, and as far away as 30 feet from my house. All my electronics were fried, much of the wiring in the house was fried, and some of it caught fire and burned inside the walls. The explosion was so loud I couldn't hear anything for several minutes, until I finally heard the smoke detectors and my neighbor banging on my door.
That's when I started to really wonder why I am still here. I accept that I'm probably still here because God has some sort of a plan for me. I'd surely like to know what it is before something else happens to me. Ultimately it's His plan and His call so I just have to be ready - and patient.
Were [they] almost caught before, but managed to use this trick to get out of it, and this situation could be being used to get that instance overturned, reopened, and brought to light?
Are there any circumstances under which this procedure could be amended or overturned? Who would need to do and approve that? Under what/whose authority do these codes fall? Are there valid reasons for them? Are the limits on them not correct? Was what was exposed irreparably compromising? Are we sure the underlaying investigation is ongoing?
I see what you’re saying as to the label U/LES label, that label is only on the map. I recognize Epstein and Maxwell of course. Epstein - “dead” and Maxwell in jail. Don’t have to worry about active investigations into either of them. I don’t recognize the other faces, I’m sure others might, even with their names redacted. Other faces and names have been redacted. Can you tell me, who the unredacted faces are, and if active investigations are ongoing into those people?
No idea on who they were, but I'm sure one we could see was that UAE sultan I mentioned. Massie figured out his name before the CONS were allowed to read the unredacted parts and DAG Blanche actually confirmed it. So - his name was out before Pam showed that document.
Everything who said? I'd love for all the names to be released, but not until prosecutions start. If the names are released before charges there could easily be other names we don't know of yet and they would certainly disappear. I want to see all of them sent to prison at a minimum.
I was surprised when Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem's name came out as the one telling Epstein he liked the torture video. I doubt we will ever see any justice on him here. He will certainly want to sue Massie and/or Blanche (Deputy AG) for releasing his name (and was on the paper Bondi exposed as well). We might not ever see him again though, since the UAE won't like being associated with Epstein and torture. I think he is doomed. Remember what happened to Al Waleed after the Vegas shooting - and he is a Saudi prince. This dude is just a Sultan and an international businessman bringing this stuff into the UAE. They jail people for PDA.
Note - I went to Dubai for a few weeks in 2005 (King Fahd of Saudi Arabia died while I was there), doing some training for them and device installations of computer security equipment in one of their most recognized businesses. I loved it there, and I had a blast. So did my wife (I brought her on that trip). We had zero problems. In fact a member of the ruling family took us dune jumping, camel riding, and even drove us to Oman (to a friend's business) so my wife could get a good rug at a very fair price compared to the Souks in Dubai.
She was leaving the next day (I had a week left) and didn't realize the tourist places were closed on Fridays, so the Hilton manager called "a friend" and he took us all over in his Land Rover. The manager later told us who he was, but I had already figured it out when we were stopped at the Oman border and rather than asking for our passports the armed border guards came to attention and the gate was opened. I asked him who he was and he told me. Let's just say he was high up back then, and much higher up now. He told me he loves taking tourists out to see his country and tried to do it anonymously but two freaked-out border guards gave it away. They didn't even stop us when we came back in about an hour.
I liked the UAE so much that I heavily considered taking a contract job there when the nuclear plant was finished in Abu Dhabi. The only thing that stopped me was we had 2 young daughters, and 3 dogs at the time.
Wouldn't it technically be the tv stations that "spied" in on the document?
No. She exposed a controlled document, possibly for a publicity stunt or a gotcha moment. She didn't cover her ass at all - she disclosed information and she is a cabinet member as the head of the DOJ. It was an unbelievably stupid thing to do given her position.
The news can publish it without recourse thanks to the Pentagon Papers precedent.
I guess we will all know what is going to happen soon. I truly don't see this going well for her. She has already had a fair amount of gaffes (like the whole binder thing, the files are on my desk, and some other stuff). I don't see much more time left for her as AG. I just hope Trump doesn't have to take a gazillion questions for the next week because of this. He has far more important stuff going on. He will have to address this quickly though.
SOME on this comment string are pulling at NOTHING and getting NOTHING...PDJT put Blondie Bondi in Charge and having been in CLASSIFIED AREAS, Blondi Bondi did the right thing...
BY NOT PUTTING ANY CLASSIFICATIONS ON THE DOCS SHE OPENED THE DOCS FOR INSPECTION(S) by the CONG CRITTERS...
Stop splitting hairs on something that was done LEGALLY!!!!!!! The shenanigans these critters have done to this country needs to be investigated and that is what she is doing---HER DAMN JOB@!!!!
Stop getting the panties in a wad and look at the documents at face value and try not to read her mind.....
I respectfully disagree. She absolutely did not do the right thing. Whether she pulled that stunt and did the disclosure on purpose or accidentally it resulted in a disclosure of controlled information. She had no reason to pull that doc out where the people and the press could see it but she did. We all cheered. I stopped cheering when I saw the (LES) marking and realized what she did.
Also - she did put a classification on the doc - it clearly said (U)/(LES). If you have been inside classified areas and are familiar with markings you would know the (U) is the classification. Unclassified. The (LES) is the control or restriction telling you how it is to be handled - like NOFORN, SCI, LIMDIS, CI, FOUO, and yes - LES.
Your last 2 sentences are interesting. I agree those people need to be investigated. But she wasn't doing her job "legally". I'd like to have the investigation pan out, rather than have it fail because of a leak. And reading her mind? Accomplishes nothing. I don't care what she was thinking when she showed that doc. I care that she showed it. If she is fired/impeached/disbarred/ or criminally charged they will care what she was thinking so they can establish intent.
I just want the damn government to stop releasing stuff to benefit themselves (if she in fact did this on purpose and not accidentally).
Rep. Pramila Jayapal has accused the Department of Justice (DOJ) of spying on her during her review of unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, after a photograph from a House Judiciary Committee hearing showed Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a document labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History."
The document, visible in photos from the hearing, listed Epstein files that Jayapal had searched, including file numbers and brief descriptions.
Jayapal stated that she was not informed the DOJ was tracking her search history and called the practice a "violation of the separation of powers".
She described the DOJ’s actions as "spying" and said Bondi had a "burn book" — a reference to opposition research — containing her search activity, which she believes was used to prepare for the hearing.
Jayapal emphasized that lawmakers should be able to review documents without surveillance, and she demanded an end to the tracking.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican, also condemned the monitoring, calling it "inappropriate" and stating lawmakers should have the right to review files without being tracked.
Other lawmakers, including Republican Nancy Mace and Democrat Jamie Raskin, echoed concerns, with Mace claiming DOJ staff monitored her every move and tracked all documents she opened.
The DOJ has not responded to requests for comment, but previously stated it logs searches to protect victim information, though this justification has been widely challenged.
Irrelevant. All government computers have a disclaimer that you must click OK on prior to logging in, which explicitly states that ALL activity is logged and monitored. As such they have justification to monitor everything happening on those computers.
For those of you that have replied to my comments - whether you thought I am correct or not - I'm sorry you guys are getting downvoted. It's sad that there is some loon going around and downvoting everyone that comments to me. There is a lot of that going on lately. In this case I assume it is just someone that either doesn't want anything about this getting out, or someone who REALLY likes Bondi - or it's just another shill. It is an easy way to control a narrative.
If someone says something and someone else doesn't like it they can downvote the original person. If that person ignores it and others comment the person downvotes them as well because that usually stops people from commenting and any debate or conversation just goes away. Mods catch most of them eventually.
saw this in comments
This is epic. She copied McAfee. About 25 yrs ago, when McAfee first started, he gave every Congress member a free computer. They didn't know he had installed his spyware tracking software. He had all the goods on them and gave it to the white hats. It's why they hated him so much and probably why he disappeared himself to this very day. He didn't kill himself.
Celena@lenac2009
Ahh the fireworks have started and it’s beautiful to watch!!! Think of all the people on both sides s-talking Pam Bondi and how she hasn’t been doing her job. How do you approach a wild animal? Sneak up from behind.
Think how insane it is that we’re 11 years into this thing, and even on GA there are still people who go around groaning, “Wah! Wah! This random billionaire who’s only succeeded in 8 different business sectors, and has the full backing of at least military intelligence, still doesn’t know how to hire people because things aren’t happening how I want them to happen!”
I think part of it is also to make them feel comfy & cozy, thinking they're perfectly safe. Like baiting the trap without springing it, until they're used to coming up and taking that bait and then one day you also spring the trap and SNAP!, got 'em!
Rope-A-Dope comes to mind. And GEOTUS is a master at that.
Many will scream she’s violating classified material handling protocols. Wrong. Look closely at those photos. Is there: Confidential, Secret or Top Secret stamped anywhere on those pages?????? Bondi knew exactly what she was doing, legally. Enjoy the show!!!!
I loving this part! Moar popcorn needed! 🍿🍿🍿
Right, like a top lawyer would make such a mistake.
Not to say what she did was wrong at all. But the stamp is not what makes information classified. It's the content. Classified information SHOULD be marked. But if it is not, that does not make it not classified. You still have a legal requirement to protect that data. But honestly, I have no idea what classification this information is.
Exactly! As Eagledriver said everyone is getting their panties all wadded up over what? Bondi knows exactly what she’s doing. Besides, didn’t the exposed members of Congress (Jayapal) who looked at the files have to go to a secure site, use government equipment and before they entered the Files, have to push a key to acknowledge they are using government computers and as such are subject to monitoring???? 🤔🤔 I guess they forgot about that? So Bondi shows them one of the many files in DOJ custody during the hearing and they get mad? Not sure what they’re worried about?? 🤔😲😆🤣
Congress can scream all they want about being 'spied' on. I promise you, there is a disclaimer every time they turn on their computers that warns them they are using/accessing a government information system and therefore are subject to routine monitoring. Heck, I get that disclaimer and I work for a private company. As a federal contractor, every government site I access has that disclaimer.
This is it exactly. You are using a government computer. You consent to monitoring every time you use it. Being a member of Congress does not make you exempt. If they honestly do not understand this they have no business being given access to government information to begin with, regardless of who they are.
https://nitter.poast.org/FriendsFeisty/status/2022096321600229477
Thanks I love it.
Bet the DHS still investigates regardless
AG Bondi doing things Pres.Trump/MAGA way!
All these elected powderpuffs screaming about privacy while we need to understand that SMART METERS, street cameras, APPS, phone cameras and mics are all perfectly fine. Welcome to our world you buncha evil idiots.
It's possible, with the corruptocrats in Congress, there are Fisa warrants on every sitting member because of their past crimes, they may already be under indictment, who knows what is really going on. You can bet, it is all being done legally. We were told that specifically.
So wait... I wake up in the morning, and watch HGTV (don't judge me) on my smart TV which monitors my viewing habits and makes "suggestions" for what I would like. I drink my coffee, and check Facebook, which monitors me to make sure I think correctly, and shadow bans me if I don't.
Then, I drive to work past traffic cameras at every mile of highway, go through a red light camera intersection..complete with cameras... then can get a ticket if I go too fast past a speed camera. I stop for coffee at a drive through coffee shop, who has cameras all around the perimeter of their business. Also inside, where the barista is being videoed/audio recorded for "safety". I go to work and swipe my badge so they know I am there, to not only get in the door but to also clock in. Cameras in the hallways make sure I am moving about properly. Then I open my computer to start the day, and log in past the company 'start' page, complete with a warning I will be monitored. I didn't agree to any of this... does that mean I can scream and cry too? What made them think they would not be monitored, just because they are special? It's just what we've agreed to in this overstimulated and over monitored society.
lol. Good job.
Unfortunately now I have that stupid South Park episode in my head - HumancentiPad.
Of course you can scream and cry too, but just like them it wouldn't do any good ;)
This is the normal way computers work.... Everything I do on my work computer is tracked by the company I work for. Everything I do on the internet is logged by the NSA. . . These people are stupid.
They're not stupid. They're being intentionally obtuse.
u/#q4763
This opinion will probably be a little controversial, but it is true. Whether Bondi or the FBI is carrying out a sting operation or not is interesting but not the real story here.
The Attorney General of the USA just exposed clearly-marked LES (Law Enforcement Sensitive) information to the world on live TV. Sting or not, she has to go.
I asked Google what the penalty would be if an Attorney General did that...
AI Overview If an Attorney General (AG) reveals Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES) or otherwise protected documents on live TV, they could face significant legal, professional, and political penalties, depending on whether the information is classified, privacy-protected, or related to ongoing investigations. Legal and Criminal Penalties
Professional and Administrative Sanctions
Civil and Political Consequences
In the case of a federal Attorney General specifically, a 2026 memo indicates a shift in DOJ policy to aggressively pursue "improper leaks" of protected government information, suggesting a high likelihood of prosecution if such an event occurred.
Sorry. Invalid argument. Look at photos again and please tell the world EXACTLY where the CLASSIFIED RATING is on them???? Do we see “Confidential”? Do we see “Secret”? Do we see “Top Secret” on the Top or bottom (in red ink) or any Document file numbers of those pages????
Next time do your own work. I never said the word Classified/secret/ts/etc. LES is not allowed to be disclosed.
https://files.catbox.moe/7o71o3.jpg
It is marked (U)/(LES)
Either you dont Trust Trump and Bondi or you do.
Not quite - I trust Trump. I don't trust Bondi. Yes Trump appointed her, but he wanted Gaetz. He couldn't know Bondi would expose an LES doc on TV.
Bondi has been with Trump since 2016. I think he has her back!
Sure. I'm sure he has everyone's back. He may overlook this, or he may have to act. He has overlooked a few things already. At some point though he could end up having to act because she is a member of his cabinet and runs a very important agency. Remember - he is no fan at all of people that leak. It will be interesting to see what he says - if anything. I completely trust him to do the right thing - whatever that ends up being.
Unfortunately that decision could end up being between having her back or having the backs of everyone serving under her, who are just trying to work this case. I don't envy him if he has to make that decision. He will know what to do though.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFhTfgNG/trump-on-bondis-performance-yest/c/
🎯🎯🎯
She has to go???😂 Well sure, since you say so anon.😂
Well - she is the top law enforcement person in the country (not counting her boss - POTUS), runs the DOJ, and she exposed Law Enforcement Sensitive material on an active investigation. People in this thread seem to think that because it doesn't say Secret or some other DoW classification on it, it isn't sensitive or controlled. One thing almost nobody knows is there are actually some things at the DoW that are classified as UNCLASSIFIED/SCI (kind of like this UNCLASSIFIED/LES). I have processed that when I worked in comm centers while I was in the USAF. They are really rare (most SCI is TS,some is Secret, and a tiny bit is Confidential) but I've processed all of them while I was at the Pentagon. Even though UNCLASSIFIED/SCI is not classified, the SCI part demands control. Same as U/LES.
I had an active TS/SSBI with SCI and a Q clearance for 17 total years of my life. I had to have training on handling classified/sensitive info every year I had a clearance. Pam could be in real trouble for letting that doc be captured on TV, and not just criminal, impeachment, or being fired. She could easily be disbarred because of what she did and who she is - and remember the bar is overflowing with lefties. They already went after some of Trump's lawyers. I'm pretty sure taking down an AG would be a huge feather in their cap. There will also be enormous pressure on Trump to do something, and on CONgress to impeach her. The left wants distractions and they have one now.
Once the media picks up on the fact that she released an LES doc dealing with an active international criminal investigation it will flood the news like that stupid Malaysian Airlines flight disappearance.
Pam should resign on her own, before POTUS has to fire her, before CONgress goes after her, and before the whole investigation grinds to a halt while the DOJ does damage control. I can't see another outcome for this. An agent or some desk jockey might get slapped, but the AG is way different, and has to know better. This wasn't a mistake - it was planned.
I absolutely loved it, until I realized she used a sensitive doc to do it. Then I realized the shit-storm this will cause in the media, in CONgress, and in the judiciary whenever anyone is finally indicted. Cue the activist judges for their injunctions that will surely come.
Lots of downvotes on what seems to be a knowledgeable and reasoned position.
It’s insane that a criminal investigation could even potentially be derailed by that tiny of a mistake.
Come on, we all know neither Trump or Bondi are that stupid. That document was intentionally shown to the cameras.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying I agree with him. My gut agrees that they aren’t that stupid and this is intentional. What I’m saying is that he has good points that are well presented and should be answerable as to how things might be about to play out or what this might be intended to expose if what he’s saying is correct.
The question then becomes that of testing - is my (our) gut feeling correct, and if so, what’s the map from his statements to that position, or where is he wrong, or what is he overlooking?
I agree fren, and did not downvote ya
I know. Some of these newer people on here don't use reason or won't accept anyone else's opinion if it contradicts their ideas. It was a bloodbath last night. It won't stop me from putting out what I see or believe though. Thank you for noticing - I appreciate it.
If the Great Awakening isn’t about Truth, regardless of what we want or feel like or preconceive, then what the hell are we doing?
I have partaken of your downdoots.
My first thought was that this poisons the well.
It can - even though the disclosure was very minor. This stuff happens in the DoD/DoW a fair amount but not usually with the Secretary or higher-up leaders. If it did though, typically we hear phrases such as "lost confidence" or lack of leadership and then someone is gone.
I expect that here. It's not the value of the disclosure, but rather it is the fact that she was so careless that she risked compromising a massive international investigation.
JGM – LIVE WITH JULIE - [12 February 2026]
PROPHETIC WORD – SEATS ARE BEING VACATED IN UNPRECEDENTED WAYS
[Word heard – February 4, 2026]
For I the Lord this day am telling you My children someone in My David’s administration is about to step down. This person will make it look like it’s their decision when it’s not. These are the days where seats will be vacated one right after another – seats that traitors sat in, seats that snakes and deceivers sat in, seats that wolves sat in. Seats are being vacated in unprecedented ways. Some even in the House and Senate. Also judges will step down and say they are retiring. Attorneys General and Governors will step down. More will come out and say they are not seeking re-election. They do not have a choice to stay where they are because they’ve been caught red-handed in treasonous acts and there is no way to lie or bribe their way out of what is coming to them.
Pam Bondi will soon be replaced. Susie Wiles will be replaced. John Thune will be replaced.
A great shaking will take place in the Senate and many GOP House Representatives will be replaced because the Deep State is about to be hit unexpectedly with truth they do not have any protection from.
A Spiritual Leader in My David’s camp will be removed. Both political camp and spiritual camp of My David are being shaken now and many forcibly removed. Traps were set and your enemies fell right into them with arrogance and pride not even seeing it was a trap.
A great shock is coming and someone very close to Pres Trump will betray him in a very unprecedented way.
The Great White Wolf will begin to make bold steps out of his hiding place of looking like he’s on My David’s side. Slowly and gently he will start to side against him where he wouldn’t lose too many of the MAGA voters because the Deep State is signalling him to go with the plan to help turn MAGA against Pres Trump. My children MAGA has been infiltrated in a major way.
Honestly I don't know much about Julie. I tend to stay away from the whole prophet thing. I usually equated them to the rich TV preachers flying around on their own planes while senior citizens send their savings to these people and end up broke. My grandmother fell for the Jim and Tammy Faye Baker con while I was growing up - and so did a lot of other people.
I don't know if Julie falls into that box or not, but it is really interesting if she mentioned those things and specifically mentioned Bondi. Thanks for posting it.
God is the same yesterday, today and forever. He used prophets back in the old testament to warn His people and I believe He is using them now. Julie is careful to always use the written word to encourage and reveal that the time we are living in right now, the Lord revealed in and throughout His word. It is amazing to be alive during this epic moment in human history. It should make all of us wonder what our role is to play and why were we born for such a time as this?. Some are called to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers. We must use discernment and test the spirits. If it is not backed up with scripture I tune out. I know this for sure the Lord is the ruler over all the earth, He will raise up one and take down another. I do believe He is calling His sons and daughters to arise and shine for your light has come! The glory of the Lord is risen upon you...Isaiah 60:1-3 is worth visiting. His glory is going to fill the earth! From all that i have witnessed Julie does not "fall into that box" she never asks for donations and warns that there are channels posing as her and it is not her. Johnny Enlow is another that I incline my ear to hear what he has to say about the times we are living in. People in the old testament era stayed away from the whole prophet thing and it did not fair so well for them. We need to know the word of God and pray for discernment and follow Him. Love and peace dec3169
That's good to know. I'll look into her. I have watched Kim Clement before.
I do want to point out something you may not have considered with one thing you said:
I just want to point out the actual prophets didn't have You Tube and weren't trying to get clicks or thumbs-up. We don't know if any of the current prophets are real or getting clicks. It was much easier when the old prophets were actually teaching in front of you and you could determine their authenticity in person by their words and actions.
By the way - I really liked this line:
I've contemplated this for decades. By all rights I should've died easily 6 times - maybe more. Drowning (Aunt pulled me off the pool drain), certain auto accident where I avoided sliding under a Tractor Trailer at 50mph and being decapitated by somehow spinning my car into a ditch and around the truck back up on the other side (as a 16yo brand new driver), trailer caught fire when I was 5 and I got out just before the water heater exploded on the other side of the wall right behind the head of my bed, ending up on a terrorist hit list after the guy I replaced in Turkey was blown up by Islamic Jihad, narrowly avoided drowning as a 2yo during a massive hurricane with bad flooding, being struck by lightning, appendix burst, and twice surviving a fever as high as 105.9 (once as an infant and once as an adult). Instead I've had visions since I was 6, I had whatever it is called when you suddenly smell the strong odor of funeral flowers - and find out a close friend or relative is either in the ICU or has just died, and many other experiences.
The fact that I was struck by lightning through my bedroom window while sleeping, pulled a blanket over my head like it would protect me, had a heart attack with zero damage (other than the high levels of Troponins) and a perfect EKG, and walked away fine amazes me. Everything happened in slow motion. I saw a white light and thought we were being nuked - and all I could think to do was grab my blanket and pull it over my head. My thumb was sticking out and I got struck there. The blanket I pulled up ended up with large wood splinters and some nails from where the blast blew the stud across my bed and onto the opposite wall. My driveway from my window to across the street was covered with bits of brick from the side of the house - but my car (parked in the middle of the driveway) had no debris or even dust on it. It was all around it, and as far away as 30 feet from my house. All my electronics were fried, much of the wiring in the house was fried, and some of it caught fire and burned inside the walls. The explosion was so loud I couldn't hear anything for several minutes, until I finally heard the smoke detectors and my neighbor banging on my door.
That's when I started to really wonder why I am still here. I accept that I'm probably still here because God has some sort of a plan for me. I'd surely like to know what it is before something else happens to me. Ultimately it's His plan and His call so I just have to be ready - and patient.
Were [they] almost caught before, but managed to use this trick to get out of it, and this situation could be being used to get that instance overturned, reopened, and brought to light?
Are there any circumstances under which this procedure could be amended or overturned? Who would need to do and approve that? Under what/whose authority do these codes fall? Are there valid reasons for them? Are the limits on them not correct? Was what was exposed irreparably compromising? Are we sure the underlaying investigation is ongoing?
I see what you’re saying as to the label U/LES label, that label is only on the map. I recognize Epstein and Maxwell of course. Epstein - “dead” and Maxwell in jail. Don’t have to worry about active investigations into either of them. I don’t recognize the other faces, I’m sure others might, even with their names redacted. Other faces and names have been redacted. Can you tell me, who the unredacted faces are, and if active investigations are ongoing into those people?
No idea on who they were, but I'm sure one we could see was that UAE sultan I mentioned. Massie figured out his name before the CONS were allowed to read the unredacted parts and DAG Blanche actually confirmed it. So - his name was out before Pam showed that document.
Release everything they said
Everything who said? I'd love for all the names to be released, but not until prosecutions start. If the names are released before charges there could easily be other names we don't know of yet and they would certainly disappear. I want to see all of them sent to prison at a minimum.
I was surprised when Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem's name came out as the one telling Epstein he liked the torture video. I doubt we will ever see any justice on him here. He will certainly want to sue Massie and/or Blanche (Deputy AG) for releasing his name (and was on the paper Bondi exposed as well). We might not ever see him again though, since the UAE won't like being associated with Epstein and torture. I think he is doomed. Remember what happened to Al Waleed after the Vegas shooting - and he is a Saudi prince. This dude is just a Sultan and an international businessman bringing this stuff into the UAE. They jail people for PDA.
Note - I went to Dubai for a few weeks in 2005 (King Fahd of Saudi Arabia died while I was there), doing some training for them and device installations of computer security equipment in one of their most recognized businesses. I loved it there, and I had a blast. So did my wife (I brought her on that trip). We had zero problems. In fact a member of the ruling family took us dune jumping, camel riding, and even drove us to Oman (to a friend's business) so my wife could get a good rug at a very fair price compared to the Souks in Dubai.
She was leaving the next day (I had a week left) and didn't realize the tourist places were closed on Fridays, so the Hilton manager called "a friend" and he took us all over in his Land Rover. The manager later told us who he was, but I had already figured it out when we were stopped at the Oman border and rather than asking for our passports the armed border guards came to attention and the gate was opened. I asked him who he was and he told me. Let's just say he was high up back then, and much higher up now. He told me he loves taking tourists out to see his country and tried to do it anonymously but two freaked-out border guards gave it away. They didn't even stop us when we came back in about an hour.
I liked the UAE so much that I heavily considered taking a contract job there when the nuclear plant was finished in Abu Dhabi. The only thing that stopped me was we had 2 young daughters, and 3 dogs at the time.
But who revealed it? She's allowed to have that folder with that information, and she is permitted to open said folder.
Wouldn't it technically be the tv stations that "spied" in on the document?
I think she did it in a way that covers her ass legally. Kind of from the dem playbook if you ask me.
No. She exposed a controlled document, possibly for a publicity stunt or a gotcha moment. She didn't cover her ass at all - she disclosed information and she is a cabinet member as the head of the DOJ. It was an unbelievably stupid thing to do given her position.
The news can publish it without recourse thanks to the Pentagon Papers precedent.
I guess we will all know what is going to happen soon. I truly don't see this going well for her. She has already had a fair amount of gaffes (like the whole binder thing, the files are on my desk, and some other stuff). I don't see much more time left for her as AG. I just hope Trump doesn't have to take a gazillion questions for the next week because of this. He has far more important stuff going on. He will have to address this quickly though.
SOME on this comment string are pulling at NOTHING and getting NOTHING...PDJT put Blondie Bondi in Charge and having been in CLASSIFIED AREAS, Blondi Bondi did the right thing...
BY NOT PUTTING ANY CLASSIFICATIONS ON THE DOCS SHE OPENED THE DOCS FOR INSPECTION(S) by the CONG CRITTERS...
Stop splitting hairs on something that was done LEGALLY!!!!!!! The shenanigans these critters have done to this country needs to be investigated and that is what she is doing---HER DAMN JOB@!!!!
Stop getting the panties in a wad and look at the documents at face value and try not to read her mind.....
I respectfully disagree. She absolutely did not do the right thing. Whether she pulled that stunt and did the disclosure on purpose or accidentally it resulted in a disclosure of controlled information. She had no reason to pull that doc out where the people and the press could see it but she did. We all cheered. I stopped cheering when I saw the (LES) marking and realized what she did.
Also - she did put a classification on the doc - it clearly said (U)/(LES). If you have been inside classified areas and are familiar with markings you would know the (U) is the classification. Unclassified. The (LES) is the control or restriction telling you how it is to be handled - like NOFORN, SCI, LIMDIS, CI, FOUO, and yes - LES.
Your last 2 sentences are interesting. I agree those people need to be investigated. But she wasn't doing her job "legally". I'd like to have the investigation pan out, rather than have it fail because of a leak. And reading her mind? Accomplishes nothing. I don't care what she was thinking when she showed that doc. I care that she showed it. If she is fired/impeached/disbarred/ or criminally charged they will care what she was thinking so they can establish intent.
I just want the damn government to stop releasing stuff to benefit themselves (if she in fact did this on purpose and not accidentally).
Did this really happen? Or is this fiction?
Holy shit
I run errands all day and come back and all holy hell has broken loose. Totally missed the whole kraken.
If she's implicated in something would that be justification to monitor what shes searching for?
Irrelevant. All government computers have a disclaimer that you must click OK on prior to logging in, which explicitly states that ALL activity is logged and monitored. As such they have justification to monitor everything happening on those computers.
I hope the next file is Jayapal Images from front facing camera with timestamps
Followed by all the rest if the biometric data collected during the searches
😸
It might be interesting to see who votes for the SAVE act out of who might have expected to vote no ;)
The cope in the comments is delicious
A whole lot of of these people have investigations open on them. They have surveillance warrants open, many even have FISA warrants.
You have no right to privacy when you are committing crimes.
For those of you that have replied to my comments - whether you thought I am correct or not - I'm sorry you guys are getting downvoted. It's sad that there is some loon going around and downvoting everyone that comments to me. There is a lot of that going on lately. In this case I assume it is just someone that either doesn't want anything about this getting out, or someone who REALLY likes Bondi - or it's just another shill. It is an easy way to control a narrative.
If someone says something and someone else doesn't like it they can downvote the original person. If that person ignores it and others comment the person downvotes them as well because that usually stops people from commenting and any debate or conversation just goes away. Mods catch most of them eventually.
Been paying attention to that all week. It's really impressive.
Wow. Just wow.