Bullshit. Russia would then in turn just wipe Kiev off the map. FAFO style. Their must be a reason Rothschild.....EHm ehm.. I mean France and UK want kiev dissapeared from the history books along with Romania.
The globalists want a WWIII... but with full U.S. participation (and subsequent destruction).
Globalists do NOT want a WW II 1/2, in which the U.S. declines to participate, NATO splits apart, portions of the EU refuse to fight... and the UK and France (and possibly Germany) have to sleep in the bed they made.
The UK & France arming Ukraine with a nuke... would be a deal breaker for U.S. being in NATO.
From my understanding Russia, as did the USSR, retains the right of preemptive first strike. It does not benefit Russia for Kiev to be nuked, so why are nukes brought into the bingo card?
What territorial integrity is Ukraine basing its claims as a nation state / "democracy"?? When in modern political history was Ukraine a nation state?
Kyiv's Role in Czarist Russia
Historical Context
Kyiv, known as Kiev in Russian, has a long history as a significant city in Eastern Europe. It was the capital of Kievan Rus', a powerful medieval state, until its decline in the 13th century due to Mongol invasions. After this period, Kyiv's importance diminished, and it became part of various states, including the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Integration into the Russian Empire
In the late 18th century, Kyiv was incorporated into the Russian Empire following the partitions of Poland. It became a provincial capital, but its status was relatively low compared to other major cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg. Despite this, Kyiv remained a cultural and religious center, particularly for the Ukrainian population.
Economic and Cultural Development
During the 19th century, Kyiv experienced industrial growth, becoming an important center for trade and commerce. The city was home to various educational institutions, including St. Vladimir University, established in 1834. This period saw a revival of Ukrainian culture and identity, even as the city was under Russian control.
Conclusion
While Kyiv was not the capital of the Russian Empire, it played a crucial role as a regional center and maintained its significance through cultural and economic developments during czarist rule.
And when it happens, what do you want to bet Zylensky has that Larry Silverstein luck? He’ll just happen to be elsewhere and probably collects a nice insurance check in the process.
‘Pull it’!!
Oh, goody goody. Armageddon just right around the corner. If Russia nukes Keiv do you think President Trump will toss a nuke onto Moscow? Or will he just say "Yea, I told you not to FAFO! Idiots".
That sets the stage clearly about who wants what for humanity, in any case. Nuclear weapons will be neutralized if they're successful, but the process of giving a mad man the hammer of Thor just shrieks desperation.
Ukraine already had the third biggest nuclear arsenal after the fall of the Soviet Union, they denuclearized on the premise of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and other agreements, Ukraine transferred these weapons to Russia for dismantling by 1996 in exchange for security assurances from the U.S., UK, and Russia.
Absolute giga KEK, "give me your weapons please, I promise I won’t use them on you." And then turn around to start an invasion barely 20 years later.
Can you not read? It’s pretty straight forward. They disarmed because of false promises and are getting fucked now, doubly so for even thinking about arming themselves again.
How can this be a foreign concept to any American? Ukraine should have said molon labe after the fall of the USSR but instead they believed in "international treaties", gave their weapons away and are helpless as a result.
After WWII, borders were changed, Russia transferred Crimea to Ukraine as part of a peace settlement.
In 2014, the Obama admin financed a color revolution in Ukraine and set up a puppet government.
This pushed the people in the Donbas region of Ukraine to pass a referendum in 2014 to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia. Remember, this was once territory that belonged to Russia and these were Russian people living there.
This was followed by the Azov battalion of Ukrainian armed forces bombing its own people in Donetsk. Ukraine did not want this territory going back to Russian control, so they decided to kill everyone living there. Estimates were 10,000 people died in Donetsk, killed by their own government.
Does Ukraine have the right to kill the Russian people living in this region? Russia didn't think so. So, Russia stepped in to save the lives of the people living in Donetsk/ Donbas region.
Negotiations for peace in the Ukraine / Russia war continue because of the disagreements over Russia controlling this region of Ukraine. Russia wants it, Ukraine refuses to give it up.
Please explain your rationale for blaming Russia for this war.
Yes I can read, but apparently you’re not able to think. Read the excellent response by u/jhartz39 and try to comprehend that Ukraine is a deep state lair, the instigated the war together with NATO at the time.
You're aware that they couldn't use any of them right? They only had them from physically having them when they became independent, their usage was reliant on active codes from Moscow. So they had a bunch of paper weights.
Yes, I am aware but it doesn’t matter though. Is it better to give your ammo to the neighbor with a gun? Of course it‘s going to be fine as long as he promises not to use it on you, trust me bro.
3rd largest nuclear arsenal -> denuclearize bro I won’t do anything I promise -> lol invasion time. It's the most obvious development to anyone with eyes. Never give up your guns, nuclear warheads or whatever someone promises not to use on you if you do.
Except they weren't nuclear warheads, they were paper weights lol.
It would be like me giving you a gun, without a proprietary firing pin, that was made by me. I'm never going to give you the proprietary firing pin. You have no way of getting one. You don't have a gun. You have a paper weight.
Man this is a really tough concept for you to grasp lol.
Maybe you should take it up with Ukrainian leadership, there's a reason why Ukraine has long been known as the poorest and most corrupt country in Europe.
I think thats enough reason to bring down both governments. And maybe russia will just nuke kyiv first? But, I think russia is too civilized for that These people are desperate. Ukraine cant mean that much.
And... the SUM OF ALL FEARS comes into view
Especially if this bomb is made with Killaries Uranuim One materiel
They will do no such thing. It puts the target on them .POUS and Putin won't fall for these obvious paper tiger plays
Yeah FAFO style
Putin is no paper tiger bro. He can back any threat
That's what they say about Trump, so there's that
Bullshit. Russia would then in turn just wipe Kiev off the map. FAFO style. Their must be a reason Rothschild.....EHm ehm.. I mean France and UK want kiev dissapeared from the history books along with Romania.
Russia nuking kyiv would be a permanent cover up for sure. Plus it would put russia in the international shithouse for 100 years.
Very interesting strategy.
Ha! Faggits!
Let me guess....They're getting their asses thrown out of Iran and now they're turning their attention to KEEV
If this is true (IF), then this would be an unprecedented provocation and the globalists might just get the war they are so desperate for.
That is the intent.
The globalists want a WWIII... but with full U.S. participation (and subsequent destruction).
Globalists do NOT want a WW II 1/2, in which the U.S. declines to participate, NATO splits apart, portions of the EU refuse to fight... and the UK and France (and possibly Germany) have to sleep in the bed they made.
The UK & France arming Ukraine with a nuke... would be a deal breaker for U.S. being in NATO.
Yes.
From my understanding Russia, as did the USSR, retains the right of preemptive first strike. It does not benefit Russia for Kiev to be nuked, so why are nukes brought into the bingo card?
What territorial integrity is Ukraine basing its claims as a nation state / "democracy"?? When in modern political history was Ukraine a nation state?
Kyiv's Role in Czarist Russia
Historical Context
Kyiv, known as Kiev in Russian, has a long history as a significant city in Eastern Europe. It was the capital of Kievan Rus', a powerful medieval state, until its decline in the 13th century due to Mongol invasions. After this period, Kyiv's importance diminished, and it became part of various states, including the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Integration into the Russian Empire
In the late 18th century, Kyiv was incorporated into the Russian Empire following the partitions of Poland. It became a provincial capital, but its status was relatively low compared to other major cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg. Despite this, Kyiv remained a cultural and religious center, particularly for the Ukrainian population.
Economic and Cultural Development
During the 19th century, Kyiv experienced industrial growth, becoming an important center for trade and commerce. The city was home to various educational institutions, including St. Vladimir University, established in 1834. This period saw a revival of Ukrainian culture and identity, even as the city was under Russian control.
Conclusion
While Kyiv was not the capital of the Russian Empire, it played a crucial role as a regional center and maintained its significance through cultural and economic developments during czarist rule.
👏👏👏
Kiev was also the centre of the Russian Orthodox Church for centuries, before moving to Moscow.
Would they nuke their own and blame Russia??? Yes. Get out of Kyiv while you can...
Absolutely, they would do it in a flash. Or, maybe a hot second. They would do it for sure, though.
And when it happens, what do you want to bet Zylensky has that Larry Silverstein luck? He’ll just happen to be elsewhere and probably collects a nice insurance check in the process. ‘Pull it’!!
Giving an idiot a nuclear weapon doesn't seem like a good idea to me! They do know Russia has thousands of nukes, don't they?
Ukraine had the third biggest nuclear stockpile after the USSR fell and they gave all of it to Russia under promises of safety…
They had safety until Obama led the revolution and installed the DS puppet that started the war in the Dombas killing those that were pro Russia.
Trump needs to take the UK and France behind the woodshed.
Oh, goody goody. Armageddon just right around the corner. If Russia nukes Keiv do you think President Trump will toss a nuke onto Moscow? Or will he just say "Yea, I told you not to FAFO! Idiots".
That sets the stage clearly about who wants what for humanity, in any case. Nuclear weapons will be neutralized if they're successful, but the process of giving a mad man the hammer of Thor just shrieks desperation.
Only at the precipice will people find the will to change.
Ukraine already had the third biggest nuclear arsenal after the fall of the Soviet Union, they denuclearized on the premise of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and other agreements, Ukraine transferred these weapons to Russia for dismantling by 1996 in exchange for security assurances from the U.S., UK, and Russia.
Absolute giga KEK, "give me your weapons please, I promise I won’t use them on you." And then turn around to start an invasion barely 20 years later.
WTF are blabbing about?
Can you not read? It’s pretty straight forward. They disarmed because of false promises and are getting fucked now, doubly so for even thinking about arming themselves again.
How can this be a foreign concept to any American? Ukraine should have said molon labe after the fall of the USSR but instead they believed in "international treaties", gave their weapons away and are helpless as a result.
Ukraine instigated the Russian invasion.
After WWII, borders were changed, Russia transferred Crimea to Ukraine as part of a peace settlement.
In 2014, the Obama admin financed a color revolution in Ukraine and set up a puppet government.
This pushed the people in the Donbas region of Ukraine to pass a referendum in 2014 to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia. Remember, this was once territory that belonged to Russia and these were Russian people living there.
This was followed by the Azov battalion of Ukrainian armed forces bombing its own people in Donetsk. Ukraine did not want this territory going back to Russian control, so they decided to kill everyone living there. Estimates were 10,000 people died in Donetsk, killed by their own government.
Does Ukraine have the right to kill the Russian people living in this region? Russia didn't think so. So, Russia stepped in to save the lives of the people living in Donetsk/ Donbas region.
Negotiations for peace in the Ukraine / Russia war continue because of the disagreements over Russia controlling this region of Ukraine. Russia wants it, Ukraine refuses to give it up.
Please explain your rationale for blaming Russia for this war.
Yes I can read, but apparently you’re not able to think. Read the excellent response by u/jhartz39 and try to comprehend that Ukraine is a deep state lair, the instigated the war together with NATO at the time.
And don’t forget about the biolabs too.
BUH bye Lil-shill.
“The smallest shill”?
That you liddle Z?
Helpless by design to be extorted by the likes of Biden
You're aware that they couldn't use any of them right? They only had them from physically having them when they became independent, their usage was reliant on active codes from Moscow. So they had a bunch of paper weights.
Yes, I am aware but it doesn’t matter though. Is it better to give your ammo to the neighbor with a gun? Of course it‘s going to be fine as long as he promises not to use it on you, trust me bro.
3rd largest nuclear arsenal -> denuclearize bro I won’t do anything I promise -> lol invasion time. It's the most obvious development to anyone with eyes. Never give up your guns, nuclear warheads or whatever someone promises not to use on you if you do.
Except they weren't nuclear warheads, they were paper weights lol.
It would be like me giving you a gun, without a proprietary firing pin, that was made by me. I'm never going to give you the proprietary firing pin. You have no way of getting one. You don't have a gun. You have a paper weight.
Hmm right that’s why everyone was scrambling to get my paper weights, and promising me security in exchange for them.
Man this is a really tough concept for you to grasp lol.
Maybe you should take it up with Ukrainian leadership, there's a reason why Ukraine has long been known as the poorest and most corrupt country in Europe.
"...lacks independent verification..."
Ok im ready for russia to flex something
Nuclear non-proliferation treaties have never amounted for much.
I think thats enough reason to bring down both governments. And maybe russia will just nuke kyiv first? But, I think russia is too civilized for that These people are desperate. Ukraine cant mean that much.
I wonder if Trump could use tariffs to strongarm the world into denuclearization. Doubtful, but I can dream.
He won't have to strong-arm anyone. Denuking is the next step in global awakening
Yo Z. You do that and we are switching sides.
Language handshake. There are many ladies here.
Also, rabbi, it’s “has nukes”. You need to brush up on your English.
They always play the joo card eventually
This clown again.