1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't we have a discussion on here a week or two ago glorifying teacher complaints about how students can't be taught because of latest craze of blaming social media and cell phones for everything?

13
Ausernamegoeshere 13 points ago +13 / -0

People need to stop putting music on these things. And other old man complaints!

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a lot of projection. The truth isn't bitter, it is what it is, and I've excelled in life.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's because they were self absorbed c*nts. You were expected to be responsible for yourself so that they wouldn't be bothered with you. Most of them will never miss an opportunity to tell you you are trash compared to themselves, and never practiced what they preached about money and restraint.

Now they carry themselves away with virtue signals and keeping up with the Joneses because it makes them feel good, f anyone else, which matches the character they've had for their 80 years of life.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't releasing the data set unless you are a journalist or "researcher". That means they want to control it and shape the narrative without people being able to call them on it.

Does anyone have the source available so that it can be dug through?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +4 / -2

Ah, yes. Teachers. They constantly complain about everything. You can't hold them accountable for testing results. Or student behavior. And now even to teach at all. And every time they complain, it's the kids and whatever new fangled bullshit the kids have. I remember the news reports on those slap bands destroying kids minds and how they couldn't concentrate for 3 minutes because of them. Before that, it was drugs. I also remember have too much sex, listening to the wrong music, parental oppression, parental destruction of self and so forth

Forgive me if the latest crusade spearheaded by NGOs getting fat off our tax dollars doesn't impress me.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +3 / -0

The lies about their identity are all they have because they believe that supporting your spouse and kids is a heinous subjugation.

6
Ausernamegoeshere 6 points ago +6 / -0

"My mother had a good experience with cancer doctors 40+ years ago, therefore everyone else will too."

Great, now look at all of the doctors who aren't in your ivory towered circumstance, doctor. I don't use them anymore because every single one I go to takes my questions as an insult to their intelligence. And then they try to strong arm me into their newest drug. I'm 15 pounds overweight? I'm obviously suffering from the prediabetes. I need whatever $300/month drug treats that this patent cycle.

My disabled wife's newest doctor straight up told her that I needed to get a better job so that she could prescribe a $1,200/month medication for her.

Yeah. RFK Jr has it wrong. Not you poor white lambs in the halls of 'evidence based care'.

5
Ausernamegoeshere 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's because there's a large wedge of people out there who use autism as a trendy diagnosis for their child so they can feel like they matter, much like ADD was used in the 90s.

If you take the non verbal and you lift them higher with a treatment, it means their close to normal children should also show signs of improvement - but they won't. And also, they can't improve because then the parent won't be special anymore.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I care that he's friendly with the defendent, but I really don't care that he likes comfortable shoes and hipster threads when out and about.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is disingenuous. People are spending their food benefit money on coke and Pepsi. That's not a government subsidy. That's people being stupid. There is an argument to be made that these should not be purchasable on snap and related benefits, but it's not a subsidy.

This is the same as stupid people going "herf, the government subsidizes oil companies by letting them depreciate assets like every other company" that ran around during Obama's time.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't put it past CCP to kill their population, but they have spent 40 years building ghost cities to make themselves look prosperous. Can anyone add context beyond that to these places?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Last year you had property valued at $100. This year, your property is valued at $130. Your tax amount went up 30% even though you still pay only 1% of the assessed value.

And value assessments are ridiculous. Two residentially zoned houses sold for 500,000 last year, so this year every other house in the zip code is worth more.

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seems fake. The UK wouldn't let a white toddler have an assault bear onsie like that.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

On what? I've read the current research regarding pole shifts and he's going through the worst possible interpretation.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy is like the global warming alarmists. Doom and gloom. The worst is def gonna happen about a mechanism that we have poor understanding of.

There are numbers all over this sort of event based on several dozen studies. He thinks the magnetic poles eill just peter out by 2050 and we'll be exposed to hard radiation all the time enough that 'electricity won't work'. News flash, we used hardened electronics for many, many things. Including being in space, with electrical devices.

Others think each shift takes 7000 years from start to finish - in which case we have about 6000 years to go before the shift actually happens and we are just seeing a somewhat weaker field at the moment.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Illegals can't. They use everify. And they take way less in wages than minimum wage.

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whites 'dont want to do the work' for slave labor wages. Ftfy

5
Ausernamegoeshere 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is it actually political pressure or is it that their DEI functions are no longer paid for by the tax payer?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can speak on the general utility and pros vs cons of something. LPG/LNG is a niche that doesn't fit too many roles.

But you seem like you want it, so I'm happy to say that you can find a conversion kit for many gasoline engines and convert your ride right now.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Smaller vehicles are terrible to run on anything other than gas or diesel. Even using E85 robs you of efficiency and shortens the life of your engine.

The only reason that you see like forklifts running on LPG or LNG is because they stay in a warehouse and they won't kill everyone inside with eventual carbon monoxide poisoning. But even there, compressed gas fuels are less desirable from a pure machinery efficiency, power, and utility point of view. (Obviously people breathing outweighs that)

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if we use our own natural gas for energy production, we still need oil for moving the equipment and machines. LNG is still less dense energy-wise than gasoline or diesel.

We should definitely capture it and use it versus burning a good portion of it off, though.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›