I'm going to use critical thinking to allow myself not to assume that Elon is good or bad based on his wealth or businesses.
A lot of people rag on him for his businesses but to be fair:
Tesla : Electric cars are the future regardless of any agendas, petroleum can make electricity, but electricity cant make petroleum
Satellite Systems : For driverless vehicles, so that we can dramatically reduce the cost of vehicle ownership. Dont get me wrong I like driving, but if I'm in a city or going on a super long journey, I kinda want driverless to be an option
Neural Implants : Could result in curing horrible neural diseases that drugs/therapy cant
Twitter : Buying that either will kill it (good thing) or open it up from the echo chamber it has become (good thing)
I'm not saying the above means he's a White Hat, but if we're going to critically think about this stuff then we have to look at the positives as well as the negatives.
this article is from 3 days ago
Maybe.... But to be fair shes a model. What she wears or how shes positioned in photos is unlikely to be her decision.
It's like most of these posts with people covering one eye or holding up the 666 handsign. Its less about that person being onboard with satanic stuff, and more an indicator that they are under control and within that world.
KEK
I'm not defending her but, from the article she wrote, its not her specific opinion but that of Jason Goldman
Jason Goldman, who was on the founding team at Twitter and served on the company’s board from 2007 to 2010 before joining the Obama Administration, says the tech rhetoric around free speech has become an obsession of the mostly white, male members of the tech elite, who made their billions in the decades before a rapidly diversifying workforce changed the culture at many of the biggest companies in Silicon Valley.
They “would rather go back to the way things were,” Goldman says, “and are couching that in terms of ‘free speech’ or ‘we’re not going to allow politics to be part of the conversation.'”
Goldman says it’s “naive” to believe that Musk can throw out Twitter’s guardrails without degrading the platform. “To say you’re just going to allow for any type of abuse or harassment,” he says, “is an inherently anti-speech position, because you’re going to drive out a set of users who would use your product but no longer feel safe.”
Obama's pick for the first Chief Digital Officer. I wonder why he's concerned with this 🤔
He just appeared on The Diary of a CEO podcast, and clearly stated that he just wants to be famous in the news world.
I wouldn't be surprised if they purposefully edited it in such a way that it would gain attention and have additional articles written about him. He doesn't care about if he's famous for being hated, as long as he's reported on he doesn't care what it's about.
The best way to deal with people like him is to ignore them whereever possible.
Mr Hankey entered the chat