The cabal's puppets were in love with Elon and the apparent moves he was making right up until he stole their mouthpiece and started talking about freedom of speech.
Now freedom of speech is just to dangerous for them to allow him to turn his mouthpiece over to the people, and Elon is one of those evil billionaire that should give away his wealth, and not allowed to own Twitter.
I don't know whether he is a whitehat or not. I did not like some of his research on connecting humans to his envisioned net, but at this point I'll give him a break and watch closely his actions. What people say and what people do is vastly different, and you'll know the truth by their actions. So far he is only saying the right things now.
I think he wants it all. His ideals say free speech should be allowed and he's okay with people being negative toward his ideas, but he'll keep pressing towards his other ideals of technology pushed to its wildest limits, even to the point of changing the way the Creator has intended his creation to be, because to him, God is not in the equation; or if God does exist for him, He is not something to be taken into account on a moral basis. Edited to add: I just watched a video where Elon says religion and science probably cannot co-exist. I think that is a problem.
Humanity is at a crossroads techwise. Freedom of speech at least allows a discussion on where it is going and for people to opt out if they incline and not be bullied into it like the WEF wants
And yet some religions have internationally renown Physics professors, Neural designers; all working to improve life. The more you understand Quantum Physics, Entanglement, String Theory, Black hole theory, relativistic theory and even chaos; the more evident God becomes.
When you begin to understand the complexities that make life possible, the trillions of complex things that had to happen - just right, at the precise moments in time, the harder it is to believe that we are just 'happen stance".
The biggest problem religion plays, is it's inflexibility in grasping ideas from a different perspective. I offer the number of lives that were tortured to death, for daring to state that the earth is not the center of the universe.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but at what price? What kinds of things do you need to agree to to be part of the neural network, capable of receiving the latest version?
Your edit reminds me of a friend who expressed fear of the evil living forever through Tech.
I laughed, cause even as a spiritualist he is, I managed to explain that God (or whatever created us) is like a parent. And as parents. It is natural to want and witness our spirit becoming greater than ourselves. That one day we will all move on to a new level of the spirit. Leaving behind this level of the Mortal coil behind.
And the evil? They're attempting to evolve horizontally. They will never ascend.
It seems to me that Elon WANTS to be challenged on his ideas at the very, very least. Twitter being a propaganda platform that stifles open discussion, by its very nature, eliminates challenge unless its the 'wrong' politics.
Same with Trump. Same with everything. Same with the Jesus vote in the nineties. It's all just to get visibility to have name recognition with voters to get their vote.
The problem is those 2 items are not mutually exclusive. Musk can believe in all those things and also support freedom of speech. All of those technologies are so that he can go to Mars. That is what drives him. People assume that because those technologies can be used for the globalist agenda, that is why Musk is doing it.
I think Musk is just Musk. He is a narcissist...neither globalist nor whitehat. He will support whomever he feels is most able to make his legacy in the history books tell the story of how he was the one who got us to Mars.
Time will tell if he has an agenda other than that. For now, I don't put him in either camp. Binary thinking that everyone is either for us or against us is exactly what has caused this crisis. You are either a Republican, or you are a Democrat. Except I'm neither. The purely binary model is a dangerous way to view the world.
I'm going to use critical thinking to allow myself not to assume that Elon is good or bad based on his wealth or businesses.
A lot of people rag on him for his businesses but to be fair:
Tesla : Electric cars are the future regardless of any agendas, petroleum can make electricity, but electricity cant make petroleum
Satellite Systems : For driverless vehicles, so that we can dramatically reduce the cost of vehicle ownership. Dont get me wrong I like driving, but if I'm in a city or going on a super long journey, I kinda want driverless to be an option
Neural Implants : Could result in curing horrible neural diseases that drugs/therapy cant
Twitter : Buying that either will kill it (good thing) or open it up from the echo chamber it has become (good thing)
I'm not saying the above means he's a White Hat, but if we're going to critically think about this stuff then we have to look at the positives as well as the negatives.
I don't know why some of you are so afraid of "transhumanism"
It already started as soon as we began to be able to redefine death. Clinical, brain, etc. What used to be a death certificate is now a code that many times results in survival
Transhumanism already exists, the telephone, the airplane, the computer, the smartphone. Proof.
Transhumanism already exists. Stephen Hawking , Ronnie Coleman, Usain Bolt. Proof.
And if for a second you think Q team probably doesn't use transhumanist technologies, you'll be sorely disappointed. If the time traveler theory is true, we have nothing to fear as far as tech goes
I, for one, post Q, will gladly lay on a medbed and happily augment myself or extend my life or
whatever a liberated science without corruption can offer
It won’t be about giving me a long, happy, and peaceful life. How we take care of our seniors and our homeless makes that clear.
It will be about maximizing productivity and minimizing costs. I will be programmed to stay focused at work, like the children in China who wear headsets at school that confirm how focused they are, and notify their parents if they yawn. It will be about minimizing my carbon footprint, perhaps by making me allergic to red meat via some minor gene editing.
What does your CEO imagine their ideal employee to look like? What does Amazon imagine the ideal consumer to look like? That is the direction transhumanism will go.
Some of us believe God is the creator, and we are not supposed to alter his creation.
I do my best not to eat GMO foods (when I eat out, I do my best to avoid junk but no it's not 100% guaranteed) and I have not gotten a vaccination since I've been an adult.
My red line is well below transhumanism, merging tech with mankind.
I am asking you because I have heard this argument before in places i could not ask about it. I'm legitimately asking for illumination of your position.
A summary of my understanding of scripture is that God didn't just create us, He created all things. He then gave us dominion over all He created, including ourselves.
Why would our given dominion allow us to farm the earth, log the earth, mine the earth, alter plants (non-modern, selective harvesting and weeding going back as far as we have records), alter animals (again, non-modern - husbandry going back as far as we know), alter our function (milk drinking, eye glasses, hearing aids, hunting weapons, etc), build any and all technology (houses, dog kennels, in addition to previous mentions) --- all of this is okay --- but adding a bionic arm is too far? Adding protein to a random bean is against His plan?
And, like I prefaced, I am asking this for illumination. In my view, our dominion is uncontested in His scripture - our actions and intentions are not. My illustration is this: Giving a blind baby, say, a bionic eye that happens to be able to do more than a normal eye is good intention and use of technology.
Giving Elon Musk the same eye knowing that he wants to explode the moon with it is bad intention and where the line is drawn for me.
Money, Power, Technology and more can all be used to fight for our rights for freedom; to declare what is right, just and enlightening.
No man is perfect, we are all on a journey to make things better in this world or destroy it.
The Establishment, the Elites, and the Predatory Corporations loved Elon Musk; but now he is exposing them. What did he find out? Did we realize this censorship fight was a fight for our very voice? I didn't. Did we know it was truly a war with elite predators? I was not sure, but I now have NO DOUBT.
Elon Musk is calling out Soros' dark money. Soros is forcing advertisers to pressure Twitter with their dollars. 26 NGOs are encouraged to participate. (how many of the NGOs belong to Soros? How many belong to Obama? How many belong to the Clinton foundation, Teacher's Association and Unions?)
Musk is fighting against this mountain of evil who have done so much damage all over the world - and continue to do so. That makes him a good man in my book. And a brave one too. He must know what he is up against, right?
Biden's Homeland Disinformation Cartel assembled 2 days after Musk bought twitter because they are afraid of him, in fact, one day after Biden's HHS cartel assembled, a document came out from the EU and the international community regarding global internet governance called the "Declaration of the future of the Internet".
Once you read that document, it will show how much they want to shut Musk down, NOW. How much they want to SHUT US DOWN before their corruption is made known to the masses. Before we discuss 2000 Mules and the stolen election, before Durham's upcoming trial with Sussman exposes the lawlessness. And Durham's request for Clinton's emails regarding Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe even expose the money laundering going through Ukraine?
Before the information gets out that Biden's administration "could have" secretly given away our US Sovereignty to the WHO? What have these crooks done during the "pandemic"? They don't want us to know, much less discuss it.
So my support is with Musk until he proves otherwise.
Biden's Homeland Disinformation Cartel assembled 2 days after Musk bought twitter because they are afraid of him, in fact, one day after Biden's HHS cartel assembled, a document came out from the EU and the international community regarding global internet governance called the "Declaration of the future of the Internet".
Pope Francis called for something to be done in January, and Obama reiterated his message right around the time Musk made the move to purchase Twitter.
Pope says fake news, disinformation on COVID, is human rights violation
While I agree that we should keep at least one eye on Elon, I ask the question....if he is/was not planning on increasing free speech on Twitter, why buy it at all?
All of the liberals are extremely opposed to this, and not just the politicians. Musk has even called out Soros and his “dark money groups”.
The globalists don’t give a shit about saving the planet and net zero. Yes, that’s what they say, but in reality they are after control over energy and resources. They want people to be dependent on them. If Tesla is able to mass produce electric vehicles at an affordable price it destroys the globalist agenda.
We don’t have to pick sides with Elon just yet. He might not be either a white hat or a black hat. At this point he is saying all of the right things and he’s certainly dropping some red pills along the way.
I’m interested in seeing how this all plays out. The jury on Elon is definitely still out.
I've thought Elon was on our side for a long time now. Don't care that he makes electric vehicles. Don't care about the brain chips. I know we're supposed to be programmed to react negatively to "transhumanism" (whatever that even is) but I don't care.
I don't believe anyone. What I DO believe is that he's buying an enemy brainwashing platform and changing it in ways that supremely piss off the exact right people. If people who LIVE on Twitter are pissed off he's buying Twitter, ITS A GOOD THING.
I don't know yet what to believe about Musk, but the unhinged reaction of the left over his acquisition of Twitter is a clear sign that the move didn't please them. Even so, the jury's still out. The screamers are just minions. There is no telling whether it pleases the masters. The cabal operates like the faufreluches of Dune. Plans within plans within plans, distractions and secret moves to position their pieces, even when they are desperately trying to save their system of theft. A credible attempt on Musk's life would tell me he's not playing their game. God keep him safe if that's the case.
my 1st thought was, "yay! i can get back on!" my second thought was, "what a great way to draw out influencers -patriots and go after them when they think they can get away with it."
Anyone who is incredibly wealthy and has a lot to lose if patriots win should be looked at very closely.
The cabal's puppets were in love with Elon and the apparent moves he was making right up until he stole their mouthpiece and started talking about freedom of speech.
Now freedom of speech is just to dangerous for them to allow him to turn his mouthpiece over to the people, and Elon is one of those evil billionaire that should give away his wealth, and not allowed to own Twitter.
I don't know whether he is a whitehat or not. I did not like some of his research on connecting humans to his envisioned net, but at this point I'll give him a break and watch closely his actions. What people say and what people do is vastly different, and you'll know the truth by their actions. So far he is only saying the right things now.
I think he wants it all. His ideals say free speech should be allowed and he's okay with people being negative toward his ideas, but he'll keep pressing towards his other ideals of technology pushed to its wildest limits, even to the point of changing the way the Creator has intended his creation to be, because to him, God is not in the equation; or if God does exist for him, He is not something to be taken into account on a moral basis. Edited to add: I just watched a video where Elon says religion and science probably cannot co-exist. I think that is a problem.
Humanity is at a crossroads techwise. Freedom of speech at least allows a discussion on where it is going and for people to opt out if they incline and not be bullied into it like the WEF wants
And yet some religions have internationally renown Physics professors, Neural designers; all working to improve life. The more you understand Quantum Physics, Entanglement, String Theory, Black hole theory, relativistic theory and even chaos; the more evident God becomes.
When you begin to understand the complexities that make life possible, the trillions of complex things that had to happen - just right, at the precise moments in time, the harder it is to believe that we are just 'happen stance".
The biggest problem religion plays, is it's inflexibility in grasping ideas from a different perspective. I offer the number of lives that were tortured to death, for daring to state that the earth is not the center of the universe.
I see nothing wrong with being able to control a replacement bionic limb with your brain.
There’s a Q drop about research for just such a thing and Q links to additional info showing it was about MK Ultra at the time.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but at what price? What kinds of things do you need to agree to to be part of the neural network, capable of receiving the latest version?
Your edit reminds me of a friend who expressed fear of the evil living forever through Tech.
I laughed, cause even as a spiritualist he is, I managed to explain that God (or whatever created us) is like a parent. And as parents. It is natural to want and witness our spirit becoming greater than ourselves. That one day we will all move on to a new level of the spirit. Leaving behind this level of the Mortal coil behind.
And the evil? They're attempting to evolve horizontally. They will never ascend.
It seems to me that Elon WANTS to be challenged on his ideas at the very, very least. Twitter being a propaganda platform that stifles open discussion, by its very nature, eliminates challenge unless its the 'wrong' politics.
Same with Trump. Same with everything. Same with the Jesus vote in the nineties. It's all just to get visibility to have name recognition with voters to get their vote.
OR they realised it was dying on its arse and developed a cunning plan ...
If he doesn't open it up we aren't any worse off and he's out billions
True. Control of Twitter isn't a deal breaker.
But it’s a game changer if it happens
The problem is those 2 items are not mutually exclusive. Musk can believe in all those things and also support freedom of speech. All of those technologies are so that he can go to Mars. That is what drives him. People assume that because those technologies can be used for the globalist agenda, that is why Musk is doing it.
I think Musk is just Musk. He is a narcissist...neither globalist nor whitehat. He will support whomever he feels is most able to make his legacy in the history books tell the story of how he was the one who got us to Mars.
Time will tell if he has an agenda other than that. For now, I don't put him in either camp. Binary thinking that everyone is either for us or against us is exactly what has caused this crisis. You are either a Republican, or you are a Democrat. Except I'm neither. The purely binary model is a dangerous way to view the world.
Nothing wrong with keeping a close eye on EVERYONE
I'm going to use critical thinking to allow myself not to assume that Elon is good or bad based on his wealth or businesses.
A lot of people rag on him for his businesses but to be fair:
Tesla : Electric cars are the future regardless of any agendas, petroleum can make electricity, but electricity cant make petroleum
Satellite Systems : For driverless vehicles, so that we can dramatically reduce the cost of vehicle ownership. Dont get me wrong I like driving, but if I'm in a city or going on a super long journey, I kinda want driverless to be an option
Neural Implants : Could result in curing horrible neural diseases that drugs/therapy cant
Twitter : Buying that either will kill it (good thing) or open it up from the echo chamber it has become (good thing)
I'm not saying the above means he's a White Hat, but if we're going to critically think about this stuff then we have to look at the positives as well as the negatives.
I don't know why some of you are so afraid of "transhumanism"
It already started as soon as we began to be able to redefine death. Clinical, brain, etc. What used to be a death certificate is now a code that many times results in survival
Transhumanism already exists, the telephone, the airplane, the computer, the smartphone. Proof.
Transhumanism already exists. Stephen Hawking , Ronnie Coleman, Usain Bolt. Proof.
And if for a second you think Q team probably doesn't use transhumanist technologies, you'll be sorely disappointed. If the time traveler theory is true, we have nothing to fear as far as tech goes
I, for one, post Q, will gladly lay on a medbed and happily augment myself or extend my life or whatever a liberated science without corruption can offer
I can explain why I am afraid if you like.
It won’t be about giving me a long, happy, and peaceful life. How we take care of our seniors and our homeless makes that clear.
It will be about maximizing productivity and minimizing costs. I will be programmed to stay focused at work, like the children in China who wear headsets at school that confirm how focused they are, and notify their parents if they yawn. It will be about minimizing my carbon footprint, perhaps by making me allergic to red meat via some minor gene editing.
What does your CEO imagine their ideal employee to look like? What does Amazon imagine the ideal consumer to look like? That is the direction transhumanism will go.
Some of us believe God is the creator, and we are not supposed to alter his creation.
I do my best not to eat GMO foods (when I eat out, I do my best to avoid junk but no it's not 100% guaranteed) and I have not gotten a vaccination since I've been an adult.
My red line is well below transhumanism, merging tech with mankind.
I am asking you because I have heard this argument before in places i could not ask about it. I'm legitimately asking for illumination of your position.
A summary of my understanding of scripture is that God didn't just create us, He created all things. He then gave us dominion over all He created, including ourselves.
Why would our given dominion allow us to farm the earth, log the earth, mine the earth, alter plants (non-modern, selective harvesting and weeding going back as far as we have records), alter animals (again, non-modern - husbandry going back as far as we know), alter our function (milk drinking, eye glasses, hearing aids, hunting weapons, etc), build any and all technology (houses, dog kennels, in addition to previous mentions) --- all of this is okay --- but adding a bionic arm is too far? Adding protein to a random bean is against His plan?
And, like I prefaced, I am asking this for illumination. In my view, our dominion is uncontested in His scripture - our actions and intentions are not. My illustration is this: Giving a blind baby, say, a bionic eye that happens to be able to do more than a normal eye is good intention and use of technology. Giving Elon Musk the same eye knowing that he wants to explode the moon with it is bad intention and where the line is drawn for me.
My apologies for the brick wall of text.
Money, Power, Technology and more can all be used to fight for our rights for freedom; to declare what is right, just and enlightening.
No man is perfect, we are all on a journey to make things better in this world or destroy it.
The Establishment, the Elites, and the Predatory Corporations loved Elon Musk; but now he is exposing them. What did he find out? Did we realize this censorship fight was a fight for our very voice? I didn't. Did we know it was truly a war with elite predators? I was not sure, but I now have NO DOUBT.
Elon Musk is calling out Soros' dark money. Soros is forcing advertisers to pressure Twitter with their dollars. 26 NGOs are encouraged to participate. (how many of the NGOs belong to Soros? How many belong to Obama? How many belong to the Clinton foundation, Teacher's Association and Unions?)
Musk is fighting against this mountain of evil who have done so much damage all over the world - and continue to do so. That makes him a good man in my book. And a brave one too. He must know what he is up against, right?
Biden's Homeland Disinformation Cartel assembled 2 days after Musk bought twitter because they are afraid of him, in fact, one day after Biden's HHS cartel assembled, a document came out from the EU and the international community regarding global internet governance called the "Declaration of the future of the Internet".
Once you read that document, it will show how much they want to shut Musk down, NOW. How much they want to SHUT US DOWN before their corruption is made known to the masses. Before we discuss 2000 Mules and the stolen election, before Durham's upcoming trial with Sussman exposes the lawlessness. And Durham's request for Clinton's emails regarding Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe even expose the money laundering going through Ukraine?
Before the information gets out that Biden's administration "could have" secretly given away our US Sovereignty to the WHO? What have these crooks done during the "pandemic"? They don't want us to know, much less discuss it.
So my support is with Musk until he proves otherwise.
Pope Francis called for something to be done in January, and Obama reiterated his message right around the time Musk made the move to purchase Twitter.
Pope says fake news, disinformation on COVID, is human rights violation
https://archive.ph/fqkaa
u/#q3597
While I agree that we should keep at least one eye on Elon, I ask the question....if he is/was not planning on increasing free speech on Twitter, why buy it at all?
Exactly, it's just business as usual if he makes no changes - it, right now, is not supportive of free speech. It's pretty simple.
I'm willing to see if it improves. It's slight hope over absolutely no hope. Don't believe him. Proof is in the pudding.
I was saying that for weeks now.
Those who were so enthusiastic then - go and ask him to promote 2000 Mules. Isn't it important now?
Doing it (asking for it) is like you're saying "Call" in poker so you can see what their cards are.
A few points to make:
All of the liberals are extremely opposed to this, and not just the politicians. Musk has even called out Soros and his “dark money groups”.
The globalists don’t give a shit about saving the planet and net zero. Yes, that’s what they say, but in reality they are after control over energy and resources. They want people to be dependent on them. If Tesla is able to mass produce electric vehicles at an affordable price it destroys the globalist agenda.
We don’t have to pick sides with Elon just yet. He might not be either a white hat or a black hat. At this point he is saying all of the right things and he’s certainly dropping some red pills along the way.
I’m interested in seeing how this all plays out. The jury on Elon is definitely still out.
I've thought Elon was on our side for a long time now. Don't care that he makes electric vehicles. Don't care about the brain chips. I know we're supposed to be programmed to react negatively to "transhumanism" (whatever that even is) but I don't care.
I don't believe anyone. What I DO believe is that he's buying an enemy brainwashing platform and changing it in ways that supremely piss off the exact right people. If people who LIVE on Twitter are pissed off he's buying Twitter, ITS A GOOD THING.
I don't know yet what to believe about Musk, but the unhinged reaction of the left over his acquisition of Twitter is a clear sign that the move didn't please them. Even so, the jury's still out. The screamers are just minions. There is no telling whether it pleases the masters. The cabal operates like the faufreluches of Dune. Plans within plans within plans, distractions and secret moves to position their pieces, even when they are desperately trying to save their system of theft. A credible attempt on Musk's life would tell me he's not playing their game. God keep him safe if that's the case.
my 1st thought was, "yay! i can get back on!" my second thought was, "what a great way to draw out influencers -patriots and go after them when they think they can get away with it."
Anyone who is incredibly wealthy and has a lot to lose if patriots win should be looked at very closely.
at best, he's a wild card.
We’ll see how he responds to the Disinformation board
Where is the real Elon Musk? Caribbean vacation?
Why is the left going fucking ape shit over him buying twatter? That should tell you what you need to know.
I Know bonkers but there you go. Too many musk fan boys on here
Owning a Tesla and getting neural implants is not a requirement to use Twitter.
Your grocery store sells vegan and gluten free foods. You don’t have to buy them to buy beer, steak and papas.
Results and facts are all that matter. We just need to ask the right questions.
Is Twitter less restrictive and prone to ban individuals for speech now? Why?
Did Elon flatly reject tax incentives for charging stations and demand it be deleted from consideration? Why?
Is the left going completely batshit bonkers, unglued at the seams, hysterically shrieking against Elon Musk as if their world has ended? Why?
Is Musk experiencing death threats now? Why?
Hint: The "Why?" is the most important question.