I mean, how do you know that "most did notice"? Getting offended over the perceived slight that "OP thinks you didn't notice" is a pretty nitpicky complaint that goes nowhere except into mindless arguments and misplaced offence.
Some noticed. Some didn't. It's not an all or nothing thing. Awareness is important, not whatever this is. You're on the internet; there are much, much worse things that you can choose to be offended by.
I never used Twitter before Musk took over. The day that he did, I logged in using my (unfortunately necessary) google account, and it turns out that I was already permanently suspended. Literally my first time logging into Twitter, and I was already banned.
Rather than dooming and wallowing in disappointment, what do we need to do, who do we need to contact to change things in two years?
Was there not a red wave across the lower elections? Do we not now have the House? No, not everything is perfect, but we are at a net positive.
It's alright to be demoralized or disappointed for now, but please don't give up altogether. Don't wait on "hopes" and "maybes"; this announcement was severely overhyped, not by Trump, but by us. Focus on what is, and what can be. Trust in God, and trust in each other. Trump is a great man, and he is a source of hope, but don't place everything on him or on Q.
Despite what they would have us believe, the media does not, in fact, declare the winners and losers of elections. They are not king makers or crown bearers, they are the jesters waving banners to distract and draw attention, and they are nothing more than that.
It would help to have something more than "he's jackass". Cite your sources and reasoning and provide the actual content, or else comments like this are just so much spam that do nothing except distract and divide. No one else is in your head. We don't know what you're thinking.
Well, yeah, Trump is a drag on the ticket. He's a drag on the Democrat ticket. Ryan might have an R next his name, but he's fully in bed with the other side, and he needed Democrats in office so that they could cover his ass and to maintain the status quo.
Under normal circumstances he wouldn't necessarily be wrong. After all, the system is designed to be balanced by different mindsets and viewpoints. As it currently is, however, there is no balance. One side is so far to the left in their disgusting and anti-human viewpoints that their center of balance is going to topple the country not unlike a disbalance drops a spinning top, while the other side, which is meant to counterbalance them, is recessive and is being pulled to the left.
We understand that, but he's not speaking to us. He's speaking to the people who don't actually understand what's going on, and using the basic logic of balance to try to sway them to a return of balance. The top must keep spinning; once it stops, we're done.
...okay, so? He's been dead for 160-170 years. What does this have to do with what the church actually teaches, and the church today?
People who base their religious believes only on men are nothing but fools. If people want to reject the message of a church based on stories of the actions of men who have been dead for the better part of two centuries, and who themselves are not the subject of worship, then that doesn't say much for their understanding of the religion in the first place, it only speaks for their lack of it.
Okay, so what?
Seriously, was Twitter some paragon of freedom? No, Twitter only has two routes going forward: Remain a hellhole, or get better. It can't get any worse, because it's already horrendous and untrustworthy as it is.
Now, complaints against Musk buying Twitter and being a potential black hat might have merit if this was related to a bid for political office, but as far as I'm aware that isn't even on the table.
So really, what are people complaining about? Someone buying a shitty company and saying that he's for free speech? Twitter's already against free speech, so at worst, nothing actually changes.
That's fine and all. I suppose my original sticking point was that you announced him as the New York Terrorist, which goes directly into what I'm saying. He may be guilty, or he may be innocent, but in going about this manner, if he is innocent, then he's still going to be "guilty". Just like Rittenhouse was "guilty", and Sandmann, and Trump. The media have declared him guilty already, and it's already being played to as though that's the truth.
So these.... "people" are saying that they want to look at an infant girl's crotch and see a bulge?
Those things are going to get nasty and dirty, and they'll chafe and cause infections. Everything about this is disgusting.