3
Stinky_Stork 3 points ago +3 / -0

[spit take] you win GAW today, sir.

4
Stinky_Stork 4 points ago +4 / -0

Something I've been saying for a while: "you don't have to support everything someone says and does to welcome good deeds from an individual".

Glad to see that message taking hold here.

5
Stinky_Stork 5 points ago +8 / -3

Bitcoin has crashed about every 2 years since its inception and has always come back much higher following about 6 months of downtime. usually precipitated by geopolitical events that drive a nation to adopt bitcoin in bulk - usually at a grassroots level. Suicide dude should have been aware of this history before he put his life savings on the line.

1
Stinky_Stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

fertility is so low especially among wealthy non black families that demand for adopting non black babies far surpasses "supply"... Demand for adopting black babies is much lower though. #RacistFacts

the demand is so great often times a mother who isn't a drug whore can get paid quite a bit by the future prospective parents to take care of herself while pregnant if she agrees to give the child up for adoption before birth. There is rarely any concrete agreement in place either - she is free to change her mind and walk away with her baby and the money... but she opens herself up to getting sued.

I lived thru this firsthand as a dumbass twentysomething who impregnated a woman i shouldnt have. She said she would give the child up for adoption and I was in no place to argue or support a child at the time so i let it go. later i found out she decided to keep our child (after accepting money from somebody) and now she wont respond to my attempts at contact. cant say i blame her but im in a better spot now with a stable home and good income and really feel like shit about not being able to meet my daughter... especially feel bad for my legitimate daughter who cant meet her big sister.

3
Stinky_Stork 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't cost to give a child up for adoption thats the cost for prospective parents. The conclusion doesn't fit the facts.

1
Stinky_Stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

i just spent 15 minutes listening to Peppermint Commie on the Whitehouse Youtube trying to find this quote and timestamp the video because it would have gone very far to convince my pro-life but otherwise libtard family members that Xiden is a piece of shit... unfortunately this is a misquote. This is not even close to what she said.

https://youtu.be/aPblc6nC21o?t=1190

2
Stinky_Stork 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then why is the left shitting their britches over the idea of him owning twatter?

The way I see it is there is only one direction he can take twatter... its not like he can make it any worse.

4
Stinky_Stork 4 points ago +4 / -0

The minute hand is clearly pointing at a 9 or a 4 and the hour hand is slightly out of frame. its tough to tell which hour due to clock being tilted and mostly out of frame. but you can use the context of what is in frame to deduce where the hour hand is.. how did you conclude 6:46?

im thinking its 6:44. or 1844... the post is relevant too:

FAKE NEWS consolidation [propaganda arm of the D party]. Define Antitrust Law(s). https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws The Sherman Act outlaws "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade," and any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize." https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws "The FTC's competition mission is to enforce the rules of the competitive marketplace — the antitrust laws. These laws promote vigorous competition and protect consumers from anticompetitive mergers and business practices." Reconcile. +GOOG +FB +TWITTER [CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN] Q

1
Stinky_Stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

My idea is to have the US government issued Social Security Number serve as the anonymous identity. in Blockchain terms the SSN would be the public wallet ID. At the beginning of each election every SSN would receive 1 "coin" aka VOTE. the blockchain app would allow people to select their candidate and it would be immutable and verifiable.

This would serve to maintain anonymity, and ensure only citizens get to vote. Edit: after thinking this over, i see a few issues.. employers know SSNs, and what would stop Dems from grabbing SSN's from dead people? there would need to be another layer of obfuscation added involving SSN, but the blockchain addresses couldnt be the SSN themselves. Edit2: these are minor issues that can be addressed. setup correctly anybody could go back and confirm their vote was counted for the candidate they intended, and see every other vote in anonymous form within the blockchain - which is always publicly accessible. back to the bitcoin example: every time anybody has transferred any bitcoin to another is visible today within the blockchain ledger.. made anonymous because it only shows wallet id's that consist of random letters and numbers. Only the exchanges that convert them to Dollars know who belongs to those wallet ID's. a wise bitcoin user can obfuscate beyond this but i wont detail the process here.

6
Stinky_Stork 6 points ago +6 / -0

This right here ^^ .. USPS filed a patent in late 2018 to do exactly this. Once the normies all become aware of the depth of fraud in our current election system there will be a lot more support for rolling this type of system out.

Problem is most people dont understand blockchain and when they hear the word they just think bitcoin which they also dont understand and because of lack of understanding they think its some sort of scam. They dont trust it. They hear horror stories of exchanges "getting hacked" and peoples money disappearing and think its the fault of the underlying tech vs the other systems and people around it.

Good news is more and more people are coming to understand and therefore trust the tech

1
Stinky_Stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

worst case scenario Patriots waste some time on twitter posting truth and find themselves getting censored again. wont take long to figure out whether Elon is for real or not. Edit: if my main twitter account got reinstated i'd give it a shot for a while. might be fun to engage with the libs on there again for a while. I'll be able to tell very quickly if speech is free on there.

9
Stinky_Stork 9 points ago +9 / -0

they get a nice return on their investment. they would have had to already be wealthy to get a big enough return to make a huge difference. people that invested 500 a few months ago get around 700 back. big whoop.

12
Stinky_Stork 12 points ago +12 / -0

right in the middle of a formula shortage no less

2
Stinky_Stork 2 points ago +2 / -0

The left's hypocrisy on full display here. They usually celebrate this stuff....

5
Stinky_Stork 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is why Bill Gates bought up so much farmland... to idle it and rake in passive income from the feds...

by BQnita
5
Stinky_Stork 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Reparations" is their favorite word

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›