If a civilian is working on behalf of an enemy government to inflict damage on the United States, aren’t they considered an unlawful enemy combatant? This was a topic Lindsey Graham shined a light on during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
I have thought for a long time that President Trump is supported by a team who has access to a powerful war gaming platform. I also believe that is the primary reason we were told we are watching a movie. Their ability to predict what different people will do is so accurate that each move and countermove feels scripted.
So, to avoid cognitive dissonance, I think he knew how Barrett would turn out. Maybe the rulings where she sided with conservatives were worth it? Like overturning Roe v. Wade. Maybe there is more going on behind the scenes than even we imagine?
The one interesting thing about the recent questionable and disappointing SCOTUS rulings is they seem to be packaged with instructions on how to work around current laws. It also seems Kavanaugh plays a role in writing those instructions. We’ve seen this in the tariffs case, the Nationalizing the National Guard case, and now the Birthright Citizenship Case.
Spot on!
This statement from the article was a very convoluted way to say just that, but make it sound benign:
It. . . was also documented in groups with strict hierarchies in which it could build alliances and avoid aggression within the group.
The common sense interpretation of that statement is the dominant males and females sexually forced themselves on same sex group members as a way to enforce the pecking order. So, it really isn’t about sex, it’s about dominance.
I can’t help, but wonder if there are comms here about liberating Cuba?
President Trump might not lead an actual, physical charge up a Cuban hill, but he has been leading a charge against a more formidable opponent than the Spanish were in 1898. And, he’s been leading the charge for over a decade now. Based on his actions and rhetoric regarding Cuba, it is definitely part of the larger plan.
POTUS posted this earlier, it details a Plan B on banning Birthright Citizenship. I’m curious if the SCOTUS ruling contains language that leaves the door open for an Act of Congress to change the parameters for birthright citizenship?
When it comes to the SCOTUS, I’m always prepared to be disappointed. The context of why the 14th Amendment was written should be enough, but Barrett and Roberts are prone to convenient interpretations. It isn’t hard to imagine them saying the Amendment doesn’t specifically say former African slaves.
I hoped the Administration team would have dug in deeper on the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” instead of accepting the standard definition. I believe it means much more than just being governed by the laws of the United States, or owing allegiance to it. The African descended slaves were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in a way no other class of people were.
They were seen as subjects with limited or no individual rights, or worse, they were legally considered subhuman, and classified as chattel property. Foreign nationals who entered the United States, legally, or illegally had more rights than an African descended slave.
Anyway, no reason to re-litigate this, just needed to vent about the lack of common sense, and courage in the American Judicial Branch.
I know several people who live in France and it is uncharacteristically hot there. As u/Munchaussen/ says most homes are not air conditioned so triple digits make for a pretty uncomfortable day.
Having said that, it’s certainly not the first time they’ve had a heatwave. I was stationed in Europe in the 80’s and spent several days in Paris one summer. It was easily in the upper 90’s the whole time I was there. So, if there is anything fake going on here it is acting like a heatwave in France is something new and a valid reason to deprive someone from having a cool beer
Window air conditioners and dehumidifiers top my list. They used to work for decades, now it’s like they are designed to die within three years. They claim to be more energy efficient, but if you add in the energy to manufacture them, the energy they consume running at suboptimal levels, and whatever energy is consumed scrapping them, there is no way they’re more efficient.
Himmlischer Vater, bitte segne unseren Freund mit Deiner Gnade und Deiner heilenden Kraft. Amen
Anmerkung: Mein Deutsch ist ziemlich eingerostet, daher habe ich eine Übersetzungs-App verwendet. Ich hoffe, dass der Sinn der Botschaft in der Übersetzung erhalten geblieben ist.
Maybe Switzerland is a total decoy and the talks are being conducted elsewhere. These are very sensitive negotiations with a large number of groups who would dearly love to sabotage them. It would be a security nightmare to hold these talks in a location known to the world.
Part of me says don’t waste your time and part of me says we do have to engage with these people. So, I would answer their question with a question/statement and it would be:
The only way I can answer that question is if you explain to me what you believe we already had?
If you try to answer them, without understanding their frame of reference, they have a wide open field to refute every point you make. If you know their frame of reference, then you have the ability to tick off what’s different and they can only debate on the basis of what they defined.
Your post reminds me of when I was a fairly average high school football player. Sometimes on defense I would get faked out because I failed to focus on my key, which in my case was the tight end.
I think there is really only one key to follow in this scenario and that is POTUS himself, and, I would say, by extension Scavino. The farther you move away from POTUS and his inner circle, the more you have to sift through the bits and pieces of information to find a few flecks of golden truth.
I get that some people are adverse to putting all their eggs in one basket like that. My reasoning is if somehow President Trump is not the ultimate white hat we believe he is, we are totally screwed anyway. Don’t get me wrong, I think for myself and consult other sources. Usually when things don’t initially make sense to me, or wasn’t forecasted in the Q drops.
As for who to vote for? My opinion is the people POTUS endorses have been carefully studied to know if they will support the MAGA agenda, or ride the claim they are mavericks who vote on principle. Even when those principles have them voting with the Dems.
He sounds like a broken record. He made an almost identical speech last September. I do understand his reverence for the role of biblical Israel in the history of the world, but the modern state of Israel is hardly the same thing. And, as a Christian minister he should be well aware of that.
I will say he always sounds upbeat and positive when he is speaking, regardless of the topic. I would like to read the entire speech transcript before I render a more harsh judgment on his comments.
Comey was arrested. Bolton was arrested and pled guilty. Letitia James indicted. Fulton County Election Commission raided, DNI active in the investigation. Maricopa County avoided a raid and chose to cooperate in being investigated.
As for the Epstein files, I believe the President was saying the way the Democrats portrayed them was a hoax. Out of 3+ million documents dropped were there really any new revelations? Maybe Epstein‘s ties to the DS scientific community. I also recall there was some evidence that Bannon had closer ties to Epstein than most people realized.
My personal belief on the really damning Epstein material is that was gathered, cleaned up, and hidden away by the clowns a long time ago. If they had lost containment of that core material there would have been no need for Epstein to die, the damage would have already been done.
A little off topic, but my favorite moment of amazement by a foreign visitor was their reaction to needing medical care in the United States. I work for a French owned company and one of their managers needed medical care while visiting our facility. I explained our Immediate Care facilities and drove her there.
When she came out she was in total amazement at how efficient the process was compared to France. She went from being afraid of our medical system based on the propaganda she had heard, to admitting it was much better than the care in France.
If you stop to consider the overarching objective and the strategy employed, there is no reason to panic. The objective isn’t to just get the current Iranian Government to capitulate, it is to cut the Cabal’s strings and truly liberate Iran.
The strategy employed should actually put people’s minds at ease. There was no conventional saber rattling. No build up to justify a boots on the ground invasion and occupation. Instead there were crippling strikes against their command and control, and their military. Next, was the equally crippling blockade that has a stranglehold on Iran’s oil industry and economy.
But, that blockade isn’t just impacting the economy of Iran. It is impacting the EU, the UK, and Israel. Those impacts aren’t collateral damage, they are intentional, they are leverage to eliminate the NWO’s control over the corrupt Iranian regime and by extension the people of Iran.
That’s my opinion and analysis, for what it’s worth. Knowing what is at stake, I don’t mind paying more for gas now, because we’re going to be living in a better version of the world when this is done. And, gas prices are going to plummet when the Strait of Hormuz reopens.
Remember when Graham asked very specific questions about Unlawful Enemy Combatants to then SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh? I can’t find the video clip, but I think about it occasionally.
I don’t understand Graham’s role in all of this, but POTUS seems to still have some use for him. And, given the choice between the two, I’ll follow POTUS over Flynn.
Amen brother!!