This has me thinking about the 2016 video Q references several times that is titled This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected. The single biggest key to rigging our elections was exploiting our historically low voter turnout.
Building a movement as large and as active as MAGA has always been about overcoming election rigging and the 2020 election was about the long term, not just another 4 year election.
The reason China accessed our voter data ahead of the 2020 Election was because a non digital pathway to election rigging had become necessary. (See post 4688) They used the data to predict which registered voters were least likely to vote so their registrations could be used to match against a fraudulent ballot. Getting enough of those voters energized to vote was critical to making the ballot dumping operations implausible.
The reality is, we have no idea how they would vote if they are granted instant citizenship. They can’t legally vote now anyway. I don’t think it’s a big negative to want people to spend time learning what this country is really about before they’re allowed to start casting votes that could substantially change the country.
Thankfully Governor’s can’t grant amnesty for Federal crimes.
No amnesty, no path to citizenship. Penalties as a minimum, even for illegals who lived quiet lives should include:
They must report themselves and leave the country.
They can only return if they receive an approved work visa.
They are barred from applying for citizenship for 12 years or 2 times the length of their illegal stay, whichever is longer.
The second chance is based on a process that includes a deep background checks and penalties for the laws they violated by coming and staying illegally, even if those laws are Administrative in nature.
I was stationed in Germany during the mid 80’s and traveled quite a bit. It breaks my heart to see what the Globalists have done to these countries and their cultures. Hopefully the indigenous, Spaniards, Germans, French, etc., can turn their countries around and save their cultures from being destroyed.
I think I have to disagree with the Decoding Symbols guy. I think the Argentinian team represents nationalism. Argentina is one of the very few top tier teams that is not ethnically diverse. And, as a country is currently led by a conservative populist.
The European teams represent globalism. Their rosters are ethnically diverse, practically mirroring the unfettered mass immigration policies of those countries, Spain included. Let’s also not forget President Trump is engaged in public feud with the socialist government of Spain.
First, answer your question I don’t think he did un rig the World Cup
I think almost all major sports predetermine what outcome will most enrich their syndicate. There is no way the FIFA World Cup is any different. The objective is to keep the biggest spending fan bases in the mood to keep up their spending levels.
Having Argentina in the final probably made financial sense, but having them win back to back Cups didn’t. So, maybe they received some help from the officials along the way, but from what I saw of the game yesterday, what they got from the officials was the opposite of help.
I know a young couple who would constantly espouse that the United States needs to adopt the a healthcare system similar to France or the United Kingdom. As luck would have it they had an opportunity to go live and work in the United Kingdom for a couple years.
After a year of navigating the National Health Service they began to sing a different tune. The level of bureaucracy was their first level of frustration. Eventually they came to the realization the primary goal of the system was to limit spending by limiting care.
Just an opinion among millions of opinions, President Trump is negotiating with the future Government of Iran. Each stage of the negotiations is designed to flush elements of the Iran’s version of the DS into the open so they can be eliminated.
I’m not on X, so I can’t read the entire thread, but what I did read sounds like an argument based on a flawed line of thought.
When you think about the right size for a national military force you start with the specific roles needed and the number of slots per role. If the people currently filling those slots aren’t up to standard, you don’t eliminate their slot, you replace them.
Brevity is not one of my talents, but I’ll try.
Going into J6 and through the first half of the day the MAGA supporters in DC believed Mike Pence was going to lead the Republicans and stop the steal. The motivation based upon that belief would be to allow the proceedings to unfold, not disrupt them.
The only way to claim MAGA had a motive to storm the Capitol Building was to make it perfectly clear Mike Pence would do nothing to stop the steal and would actually certify the election. He did that in a three page letter he released at about 1:00 pm.
He also provided the green light for the J6 FF. The MAGA contingent in DC that day thought Pence and the Republicans were going to fight against the certification. Pence promised he would do exactly that when he campaigned for the Republicans in the Georgia Senate runoff.
A strong and wise leader would have never released a letter saying he was powerless to stop the steal prior to the certification session starting. But, without that letter there was no plausible motive for MAGA supporters to enter the Capitol Building. Why would they want to disrupt the challenges that had been promised and the potential for a contingent election that had been explained to them?
The letter had to be released before the session, no letter, no motive.
What annoys me with this clip is Bannon doesn’t once point out the MSM is employing the ubiquitous anonymous sources ploy. Instead he runs with it as if it’s gospel.
He tells his audience the White House, not just cowardly anonymous sources, but the White House, is laughing at them. Then he calls into question the wisdom of contributing to Republicans. And, concludes with you should be mad at the White House. All based on anonymous sources. It seems to me a guy like Bannon, with his connections, would be able to learn the identity of these sources with just a few phone calls.
When the MSM cites anonymous sources they can make all kinds of unsubstantial claims. And, from what I saw and heard, that video clip was just another in a long line of undisclosed sources and claims that fit the DS narrative. So, in the end, we don’t know if there’s a grain of truth in this report, or if it is a complete work of fiction.
Honest question, wouldn’t that mean Kash Patel, Blanche, Bondi, and quite possibly President Trump are participating in the coverup? Or, just as bad, someone has the skill and ability to outmaneuver President Trump, our DOJ, FBI, and Intelligence Agencies?
Either way, it doesn’t bode well for the Q Movement, MAGA, and the future of our country.
The goal of the psyop she leads is to make it appear that two things cannot be true at the same time. Her con is to make people believe that Tyler Robinson being the shooter and the existence of a larger conspiracy are mutually exclusive.
It is the equivalent of turning into the path of a torpedo before it can arm itself. Her mode of operation is to make a series of conspiracy claims her handlers know will easily be knocked down in court. Each revelation of her being wrong will result in most people shifting toward accepting Tyler Robinson actually did it; and, therefore concluding, there was no conspiracy.
Maybe the actual trial will prove me wrong, but I think the case against Tyler Robinson will be easily proven. It will lead most people to the conclusion he was a strange, gay, lone wolf. No one will pursue the possibility he was radicalized and manipulated into doing it. If that is what happens, the psyop was a success.
What’s interesting about this case is how many people seem to believe Tyler Robinson being the shooter and Charlie’s assassination being a larger conspiracy are somehow mutually exclusive. We know people are manipulated into committing assassinations and mass shootings. Why is the narrative being pushed that there was a larger conspiracy which precludes Robinson from being the shooter?
Maybe the real psyop here is getting people to expend so much time and energy fighting over whether Tyler Robinson did it, they fail to look for the people who radicalized him. And, when the evidence and testimony pile up during the jury trial people will be forced to admit he did and subconsciously conclude there was no conspiracy. Meanwhile the people who manipulated him to act move on without consequences.
My personal policy is to take what any influencer says with the tiniest grain of salt. They all have to sensationalize to make their living.
It seems to me the most important part of the case against Tyler Robinson is that he believes he shot and killed Charlie Kirk. Reporting from MSM outlets cover his conversations with his gay boyfriend and family. His text with Lance Twiggs and the note he left under the keyboard are totally damning. And, apparently, he confessed to his parents and a family friend as well.
It’s good to be skeptical about influencers and the MSM. It’s necessary to sift through what they report. Just my opinion, but his boyfriend’s testimony, their text message, and note are probably enough to get a jury past reasonable doubt.
This was already public knowledge. I remember reading the contents of this letter a couple months ago when the “influencer” crowd was rolling out their ever changing theories about Tyler Robinson. My prediction is worst case scenario, when this moves from preliminary hearings to an actual trial, the Judge might not allow this letter to be used as evidence. It won’t matter.
Apparently Robinson confessed to family members and friends who are willing to testify against him. And, it seems there is enough other evidence to support a conviction. Add in his body language and facial expressions, he will have a hard time getting any sympathy from the jury.
Hopefully, what he will remember about this year is that we were liberated and our nation was returned to its founding form. And, his memory will be based on the stories his family tells him and in a future class where our children are taught to take pride in their country.
A side note, I spent several weeks at Aberdeen Proving Ground in a joint training course that was based there. It was during the Reagan Era build up. I was in the Air Force, we were housed in an old barracks that had been vacant for years. We were upstairs and a group of Marines were downstairs. All good people who made good memories for me.
One thing that became clear in the aftermath of the 2020 election was that the DOJ, the FBI, and the Courts had zero interest in taking whistleblower accounts of election fraud. Same goes for the individuals states. Nearly everyone who pursued proving outcome determinative fraud took place has faced severe financial and career ending consequences.
Can a person really be charged for misprision when Law Enforcement and the Judiciary were proclaiming no crimes had been committed?