August 2023 in Rockford, Illinois: 61 year old teacher grooming 16 year old student
Yes, the resident cheated. And Trump and team decided on "the pause." Nobody's going to go along with that again. And it's getting harder and harder for them to do the cheat--especially on that level. When Fox news has to do a bullsh!t court settlement to give Dominion money, then I'd say Dominion is running low on funds. And if President Trump's EO from Dec 17, 2017, is still in effect (which it is) then it makes sense that these globalists are running out of money. The Rothschilds just did a big auction of some of their stuff. They're running out of funding to do this stuff. And if these black hats are consistent in anything it's that they don't do anything for free--everything has a price. Minions don't work for nothing.
That leaves CCP in China as their last best hope. But China's economy isn't exactly in stellar shape at the moment. And they're not stupid--if they think the white hat military will step in before allowing a 2020 replay, is that an investment they're going to be willing to make? I don't think so. And if they DO make that investment, that's not a silent war anymore, that's open warfare then. And then all bets are off.
Well, that explains it! All they have to do is survive Biden until August and then they'll appoint Newsom without any rigamarole. And there will be the honeymoon period for the Dems with Newsome that will carry through to the election. Hence the debate between Newsom and DeSantis. Though apparently Newsom said that neither of them will be the 2024 nominees for their party. We shall see.
It won't work. I don't think their rules finagling is going to matter in the end. And even if we make it to a 2024 election, which I don't think we will (I think the military will step in before that and delay the election.), Newsom has only survived recall in California by cheating. He can't cheat his way into the white house. If California doesn't even want him, you can be sure that the vast majority of the rest of the country isn't going to support him and I don't think Newsom has the backing to fund the level of cheating it would take. Then again, maybe that's what his California get-together with Xi was about.
Sounds like we're closing in on showtime.
Edit to add: check out the comments on this tweet. Lots of people explaining why nobody in America wants Newsom. Hilarious!
Digital ammo for anybody who wants to post Pizzagate info on Twitter/X:
https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/
Let's do this, frens!
Ammo here, anons!
He is on Nino's channel a lot. Easiest way to follow him is a few channels on Telegram that post up his own interviews and some of the pieces he sometimes talks about. The one I follow the most is t.me/JUANOSAVIN107 . There's also t.me/JuanOSavinArchive , which is also good, but a little slower to put stuff up. But this latter one puts up the full interviews when sometimes the other one just does clips. Also, Jennifer Mac has a Telegram channel that posts some stuff. There are also Rumble channels that archive his stuff.
He categorically has said flat earth is/was a psyop created by DARPA to track influencers on the internet. He's said it multiple times to multiple hosts. Flat earth is, in fact, one of the few things that actually gets him irritated. You are implying he believes the earth is flat. That is completely untrue.
Yes, according to some people who were on the truth tour with him when he got sick, his oxygen was low due to the flu in combination with other health issues he had in the background; he went to the hospital to get oxygen and gave strict instructions that he wasn't to be given remdesivir OR put on a ventilator. Apparently doctors came in pushing both; he got very vocal about his view of that and those pushing that line and they sedated him. Then the doctors went to a family member and scared/coerced them into agreeing to the ventilator since RDS was now unconscious. The ventilator got him. There are a lot of doctors in America who have a lot to answer for.
Is The New York Times going soft on the Jan. 6 rioters? Maybe beginning to doubt its lopsided coverage of the events of that day? Starting to think the Justice Department’s investigation into the protests, deemed “the biggest criminal inquiry in the Justice Department’s 153-year history,” is just a bit over the top?
Or is the Times worried that newly released footage will reveal a different story than that told by the biased House investigation used to impeach former President Trump?
Thanks to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Americans have an opportunity to challenge Democrats’ accusation that many hundreds of Trump supporters engaged in a violent “insurrection.” The new Republican Speaker of the House recently released 44,000 hours of video tapes, including security video from the Capitol Hill police, affording us another look at what actually happened that day.
Continue reading
This we know: 63 days after the election of 2020, supporters of Trump marched to the Capitol. Some were armed and dangerous, intent on disrupting the peaceful transfer of power to newly elected Joe Biden. Others were not, but believed that Democrats stole the election, and followed the throngs who headed toward Congress ready to protest the theft. Some got caught up in the moment, stayed clear of the violence that followed but were later hunted down and imprisoned.
One such participant is the subject of a lengthy and compassionate story published by the Times two days after the release of the new tapes. It concerns a Wisconsin man thrown in jail because his son turned him into the FBI. The father, Brian Mock, is introduced as a political moderate, a landscaper who occasionally voted Republican but who also voted for former President Obama. He is portrayed as an utterly decent and law-abiding man who is an “advocate for the homeless” and who supported his son when he came out as gay.
In the article, Mock, who was convicted of 11 charges relating to the riot but has not yet been sentenced, is trying to make his son understand how he got caught up in the rowdy crowd and why he is photographed pushing a police officer. He has been warned by his lawyers that he could spend several years in prison, even though he never set foot inside the Capitol and, according to him, only laid a hand on the cop when he thought he was going for his weapon.
Watching video of the event, he says, “There were throngs of people, like a river. You’re in the current. You’re getting pushed … I had a concussion grenade go off and explode right on me. … Can you see how that would provoke a crowd?”
“I’m not some lunatic frothing at the mouth. I got in a bad situation for about five minutes. Do you see where I’m coming from?”
A great many Americans will see where Mock, who went to D.C. after hearing Trump declare the election stolen, is coming from. In a CNN poll conducted this past summer, only 29 percent of Republicans and right-leaning independents thought Biden’s election was legitimate, while 69 percent did not. Of the country overall, 38 percent think Biden is an illegitimate president. Given the concerted effort by the liberal media to squash such doubts and the ongoing vilification of “election-deniers,” that figure — roughly the same as it was on Jan. 6 — is troubling.
Through Aug. 4, more than 1,100 people faced criminal charges related to the events of Jan. 6; 967 for “Entering or remaining in a restricted federal building or grounds,” of which 104 were also charged with carrying a weapon; 372 for “Assaulting, resisting or impeding officers or employees”; 310 for “Corruptly obstructing, influencing or impeding an official proceeding or attempting to do so”; 115 for stealing or destroying government property; and 42 for conspiracy.
In an era when career criminals are often released without bail, large-scale theft is tolerated and progressive district attorneys refuse to prosecute even low-level felonies, the aggressiveness of the FBI in pursuing the Jan. 6 attendees hits a nerve. Many consider it politically motivated and yet another example of what some call our “two-tiered system of justice.” Biden’s campaign rests on depicting “extreme MAGA Republicans,” as he calls them, as an existential threat to our democracy; nothing suits that pitch better than locking up hundreds of “insurrectionists.”
Coverage from the liberal media, and the made-for-TV depiction of events skillfully put together by House Democrats for the second impeachment trial of Trump, tell one story. Certain videos, some of which were released by Tucker Carlson in April, tell another. It is clear that Democrats cherry-picked the evidence that painted Trump and his supporters in the worst possible light. Commentators on the right have done the opposite. Legitimate questions persist.
For instance, some protestors are shown being uncuffed and fist-bumped by cops, suggesting that there were undercover FBI or police in the crowd, whom some accuse of purposefully instigating the storming of the Capitol. That issue was raised last spring by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, who wrote a letter to the Metropolitan Police Department asking about the presence of “plain-clothes officers.”
When Rasmussen polling asked in April (after the Tucker release): “How likely is it that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol riot?” 59 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of Republicans and 74 percent of independents agreed it was likely.
When Johnson announced he would abide by an earlier promise and make the tapes public, Democrats were furious, accusing him and his GOP colleagues of breaching the security of the Capitol. Their complaints make it look like they have something to hide and further the distrust they have sown.
Make no mistake — the riot on Jan. 6 should never have happened. But voters doubt they have the whole story; they are probably right. Maybe the Times will lead a more balanced review.
Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim & Company. Follow her on Twitter @lizpeek.
Your last point: "6. Perhaps most of all, learn some humility. Learn that maybe you could be fundamentally wrong and learn to accept failure. If you can't do that much, you won't grow."
That is spot on. What I have observed from 2016 to now is that what the people I know who walk around in a Trump-Derangement-Syndrome daze all have in common: they're arrogant. Big egos. The remind me of the Biblical quote: "Pride goeth before a fall."
The irony of this is that if these guys showed up in any part of Wisconsin that is not ultra-blue Madison or ultra-crooked Racine, they would get their asses beat. Lots of Wisconsinites are of German descent and they are more adamantly anti-Nazi than the average American. German is STILL taught in the middle schools of much of Wisconsin. Hitler is not a source of pride for Americans of German descent anymore than he is a source of pride for people in Germany. Nazi isn't just an abstract concept to many people of German descent. It's a blight on their family name and heritage.
Also, I don't know why the Fed bois are trying to stir up the leftists in Madison, they've got that part of Wisconsin voting blue already and, newsflash for them, Madison isn't actually that big. Had the votes not been stolen via Zuckerberg's operations, Wisconsin was solidly a Trump win in 2020.
The reason these Fed bois don't try this shit in someplace like Milwaukee (or Kenosha) is because they would get the shit kicked out of them--and that would be them getting the shit kicked out of them by their own team, so to speak.
Yes, it does. Very well written. I'm saving it to come back to. I have been reading The Forgotten Books of Eden (Rutherford H. Platt's compilation) which describe Adam and Eve and the deception that ripped us from our connection to God. Your description is very aligned with it. The book makes so vivid how painful the loss of their connection to God was for Adam and Eve. And how determine God was to help us find our way back to him.
Thank you for taking the time. I consider this a gift. Blessings to you, fren.
Well, I think this is all helpful information. But I feel this: I'm done being afraid of these f-cking @ssholes. There are lots of people bringing us information who are not anonymous. Their names and faces are known and they keep going. I'm just one anon, but more and more anons keep joining us. We are a sea of anons which is expanding by the hour. Where do they start? I doubt they'll want to come for me since they have much bigger fish to fry. But I'm not bowing down to this f-ckers if they do. I am staunchly in the Patrick Henry camp: Give me liberty or give me death. If it's the latter, they're just sending me Home. And, to quote The Terminator: "I'll be back." F*ck these fascists.
"(by developing a binding connection with the spiritual center of evil)"
I've not thought of selling one's soul to the devil as a metaphor before. I've seen it for quite some time as literal, which is ironic in retrospect since there was a period of my life where I didn't believe in the devil/Satan at all.
When you say "by developing a binding connection with the spiritual center of evil", what do you mean by that? I'm not quite following.
I agree with you that people's roles can change due to a change in circumstances--many of which we now know are manipulated. I'd say that the "masked actor" theories can be discounted for the present because whether these people are the real people or not currently doesn't matter since the world accepts them as the real people and they are, therefore, functionally so.
If/when the day comes that the masses become aware that there are stand-ins of whatever sort for these people, then ignoring it won't be an option. At some point we will all want to know that the people making decisions on our behalf that we voted for to do so are, in fact, the people we voted for and not a stand-in puppet on a string.
The thing that I see as the undoing of all the deep state players is that they cannot help themselves: their own personal interests are always paramount, so even when the shit is hitting the fan for the globalist/deep state agenda, if they can sell out one of their deep state competitors to get a bit ahead, they'll do it. They're not capable of assessing their situation in an objective way--mostly because they're narcissists: self-aggrandizing, lacking introspection, arrogant, manipulative, needing control.
Erik the Viking: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097289/ (This is actually a hilarious movie courtesy of some of the Monty Python crew.)
Time Bandits: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081633/ (Another hilarious movie courtesy of some of the Monty Python crew.)