2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most of it does, by agency, but those agencies then give out tons of these grants.

The budget is 6.7 TRILLION. Which is completely insane.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

"You're now the 'acting director' of the unemployment line. Good luck!"

5
akira2501 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Sunny Honey Home brings flavour inspiration from Morocco, Afghanistan, and Syria right to your spoon. We co-created this flavour with 8 entrepreneurs with refugee backgrounds and allies from the migrant entrepreneur community."

That's the "UK immigration" flavor. These people are completely fuckin' deluded.

2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. I've been there. Some of them are legitimately stupid.

You do realize there are more state courts than federal courts? And you're most likely to end up in one of those?

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

You've been to a court? Stupid people can be judges. There's not an IQ test or anything. You make it simple it stays simple.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you have balls, you have a Y, or because of SRY gene. Your friend has the normal X and one mutated X that's mostly a Y chromosome that didn't form correctly, but still contains most of the Y chromosome genes and critically the SRY gene.

The whole XXX and XXY or XXXX and XXXXY and all the other genetic oddities that occur are still males if it ends in a Y.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

The files won't tell you what happened on 11/23/63. The files do contain several hints about the time before that and some of the time after that.

Open questions:

Oswald went to Russia in 59. Did he actually defect, or was he running an undercover operation for ONI or CIA? There are records which will show this.

Oswald came back from Russia in 61. This is when the CIA opened his "201 file." It should have been opened in 59. There are records which show why.

Oswald seems to have had two "201 files" at CIA. This is highly unusual and the records will help show why. It might also explain why many of Oswalds files were kept in the Cuba division and not in the domestic division.

Oswald was on the list of "subversives" at the FBI in 63. He was taken off by a "flash override" message on 10/9/63. The files will help show who did this, why, and what Hoover did in response. Had he been in this file the USSS would have found him before the parade was allowed to happen or the route would have been changed.

There is a lot more. These are just some of the basics that we know will be covered when the unredacted documents that have already been partially released are fully available.

4
akira2501 4 points ago +4 / -0

The News and Schools did.

The Schools brainwash kids.

They grow up and actually model their lives after what the News tells them is good.

The News told them Trump is so bad that you have to throw away yourself completely in order to show that you repudiate him. The News told them that simply turning a blind eye or showing compassion was actually a sign that you had also become infected by the evil.

It's a play as old as Moses. Try to see through it.

5
akira2501 5 points ago +5 / -0

You could buy every "homeless" person a house for about $80 billion.

This is a gift for the CIA.

2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

are being forced to bring their secret programs to the forefront.

There is no such thing. The technology is not capable of exponential growth. What you see currently is as good as it gets. You can add 1% of accuracy for about $250 billion.

This will do nothing.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol.. look into the JFK assassination.. if they want him dead he's dead. how much time he spends at the top of the stairs is meaningless.

13
akira2501 13 points ago +13 / -0

Where was this crybaby act when he was drinking a beer with Kamala?

They thought they were invincible.

The harshest people are those without their own principles to live by.

2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're close to being functionally retarded.

Well.. as long as it's only close.

DO NOT think for a second you have any idea what this "AI" will do.

I know exactly what it will do. I understand the technology perfectly. You could too. It's not absurdly complicated. Perhaps if you did you wouldn't get your feelings hurt over the obvious.

will replace 30% of human jobs in under 5 years.

Pure fantasy. What are you basing this on? What actual analysis have you done here?

That is a very big deal

If it were true. You're here. On this forum of all forums. And you willingly believe this crap? Why?

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

You should look into "model training costs."

You have this all backwards.

This is the "better living through chemistry" retardation upgraded for a new generation. How'd that work out?

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not. Energy density is the first problem and they're two orders of magnitude out on that.

The current technology is LLMs. Who gives a fuck who controls the chat bots? lol..

AI does not exist. You're describing "training sets." Text training sets cannot detect sarcasm. And probably never will. Understanding the snake oil they're selling is important.

Garbage in garbage out, indeed.

We do not use AI. It does not exist. The people saying they're using it are lying to you. The people pretending the government cares are the ones selling language models as if they're "AI."

It's a giant sham. You will need to work the rest of your life. Do not listen to these people. They're trying to ruin your life.

1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's my point. 200GHz is not a frequency that anyone is or would be using in this application. I'm assuming he's confusing these exact two things.

view more: Next ›