Welcome to Erik Carlson on Breaking the System:
https://rumble.com/v76u40u-breaking-the-system-episode-2.html
I don’t have much to add to this, but there is definitely one point for anons to be aware of, with our recent Israel-oriented posts…
Erik, just a bit before the 17:00 mark (the intro ends at 8:18. Funny, you guys.), points out;
Lately a lot of people within the MAGA and fake MAGA “inflooencers” (Property of: u/FractalizingIron) attacking Trump. They say he’s controlled by the Jews and it’s all just “the Jews, the Jews, the Jews,” right? These people that are saying that.. listen to if they ever, ever talk bad about the City of London and MI6. What they’re doing, if you want to protect the head of The Snake, you have to sacrifice the tails.
“We don’t like that he’s just breaking the system, because we want to see people get punched in the face.. we want our pound of flesh.. but in the long run, it’s better if we focus on fixing the system, and taking the pound of flesh would get in the way of that.”
Apply that to say, posters on a forum, for example.
Now then, about that City of London. Who’s running it again? Do we have a good org chart? Is the public one actually the real one?
Where’s all the frogs with deep dives on Ye Auld Londinium?
How about jews who live in London.
Bingo. And they use the Jews in Israel as fodder for hate, and too many people fall for it, kek.
Somehow I feel like the Israelis never forgave the Bride for working against the New Israelis purposes in the early days....
And perhaps they took over London Finance as a result.
What I do know is that we need to prevent the Islamic from taking over our financial system as it moves to be Texas based. There is a reason why they are working to set up Islamic Neighborhoods in Dallas/Ft.Worth.
https://youtube.com/shorts/o7lkbFmxCi0
Just ran into something really neat while doing another dig out of this video.
One thing that say, Libertarians never really touch on much is the original American system of synergistic government cooperation with American business. “How is that different from socialism?”
Well, I don’t know, but it surely is somehow. Maybe it diverges in ownership vs operational assistance? As “the people” voluntarily aid the government, a business endeavor antithetical to the interests of the people could be rejected? Just spitballing, but I digress…
They mentioned “merchant marines” - a term some of us have likely heard, but far fewer are familiar with. Public / private partnership between government and naval commerce, of which one note that I saw claimed that we have scarce little left and Trump may be rebuilding. (Relevant to this thread in that - ties between Straight of Hormuz and Lloyd’s of London - and we couldn’t insure shipments because […])
Bumped into the old term “Shanghaiied” - or “impressment” - basically grabbing people from a landing and forcing them to work on a ship. This practice was a serious issue in San Francisco and Portland, after having been a problem in some towns back East previously.
The practice, which was effectively a form of slavery, was ended by a populist Democrat (LaFollette, who’d previously been a Republican, seriously challenging Taft and T.R. And Coolidge for president, and opposing WW later, but I’m trying to give them some credit, here).
Funny how we basically aren’t taught anything about this. “How does that not end up as ‘cronyism’?” I don’t know! Just a crayon eater sitting here trying to figure things out.
The difference between "original American system of synergistic government cooperation with private American business" and the current day communism is: In communism there is no private businesses. All businesses are state owned, and hence the idea of cooperation with private business is moot.
And the difference between that original system and current day public-private partnerships is: Public-Private partnerships do not have direct government control and hence are outside all sovereign checks and balances. Also, the "public" part refers to funding from the government, and "private" part represents private individuals amenable to the agenda.
The original American system (which is also what Trump is bringing back) is market driven, and fully under government checks and balances.
Kek, well when you put it that way, it’s a bit more obvious!
appreciation for holding the line on this!
Do the Brits refer to non-Brits as “mudbloods” or some shit I’m missing? They generally seem pretty cucked to me, by comparison.
Hmmm, need to watch « Snatch » again.
That’s actually a great idea.
Note the opening scene.
This one?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=en2asa1ayck
This is the exact sort of discernment I’m trying to encourage with this post! 🤣
https://files.catbox.moe/6aexk4.png
Relevant? Or just cuz it's a great movie with cool accents?
It has hilarious gangsterish Londinian Jews.
Small doubt they’re involved. Likely even prominently. Probably a good chunk of those are from the Edom line, too. Where’s the CoL digs showing who’s running things?
Seems like Rothschild made Rockefeller and other American moneyed families in the late 1800’s, and Rockefeller made several modern wealthy families (Gates). Where does Londinium fit in this, and who’s running it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_England_(1066–1290)#Massacres_at_London_and_York_(1189–1190)
Odd that the whole thing started because people around York started losing all their property to loans that couldn’t be repaid. Also odd that they call the events at York a “massacre” when everyone who died either killed themselves or their own families…. That’s not what Daniel nor anyone going into Babylonian captivity did, not what happened when a new Pharaoh arose in Egypt and made them all slaves.
Why would they choose to do this here? Was it to create a story? To hide something? If so, what?
Child Sacrifice
Maybe. Could have been one of many things.
Kek I accidentally hegelianed here.
How do you effectively communicate a Venn diagram in one word in English? (“Definitely not what the Kamala psyop about Venn diagrams was trying to tell us”)
Or the interplanetary jews from Uranus dipshit
Its both. People need to learn the history of zionism, and how the zionist jewish terrorists took over Britain in the 19th-20th century.
Yup, everyone reading this post should have thought of the Balfour Declaration and realized there’s not much daylight between the two groups. Indeed, I believe that the major Jewish families like the Rothschilds married into the British Peerage families as their fee for the “financial work” they’ve done for the City of London. So really it’s one big family with lots of offshoots: Jewish, British, and Italian Black Nobility.
Its a long read but stick with it,. It started in 1290 when Edward 1st expelled all Jews from Britain. This does not mention blood libel or child sacrifice but does give a good overview: https://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/02.htm
It’s the Zionist Juice 13 families who Control the City of London (Finance/Banking Cartel) and 98% of the business/media along with the politicians….
I haven’t seen a chart of a Deep State hierarchy (other than the overall Illuminati pyramid) which specifically identifies the 13 families of who’s who and their respective rank within each and what they specifically control… that would be a really interesting chart of exposure!
There is an org chart built out of the Kabbalah tree. Names lots of groups and organizations but no specific names
https://files.catbox.moe/k54ebj.jpeg
There’s a bigger copy floating around somewhere.
I don't think the Vatican is as central to the power structure anymore. Most Catholics don't give a shit what the pope thinks. The vast majority of Christians definitely don't.
Kek Protestants unknowingly care a lot more about what the popes have decreed than they think 🤣
(I don’t consider myself either one)
Take a deep dive scroll through this. Its posted on the side for future reference. I havent found a better source that brings so many names and organizations together into charts like this one.
https://throughthelookingglassnews.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/q-anon-learn-to-read-the-map/
That's because the city of London isn't really a single entity. Just orgs that have run the show for centuries.
I did look up once how it was at least partially structured around guilds.
Names, possibly, but no details.
What I find funny is how the shills say its always the jews but then expect Trump to be a one man army who calls them out at every opportunity and constantly rails against them. Do they not understand how impossible that would be? He has to play the game while strategically dismantling it. Nobody has had the balls to do what Trump has done and received the level of rage he has from the deep state and the globalists. Yet they think he should be antagonising them even more?
The Jews are just an easily manipulated and oldest proxies for the City of London. But like Globalist infiltrators in any government, it isn't 100% of the Jewish population. I would say the Jews are just over represented as a group when considering Globalist collaborators. And due to specifics about their culture and biblical references, they've been selected as the public face of the ultimate baddies during this final battle.
Sadly, we have no idea who is behind the City of London. The Rothschilds and Phoenician families are there for sure. But ultimately, it is just a catch all for everyone above Israel and the Zionists in the pyramid.
Yeah. I haven’t looked deeply, but don’t recall seeing a lot of obvious Jews around City of London’s public control listings at a glance - granted, they weren’t explicitly being searched for, and if even the king of England has to ask permission to enter the city, but they also won’t be slapping the top names on a website under “board of directors”.
Their rep in parliament is the Rembrancer who sits near the speaker of the house. He is not allowed to speak so can only pass notes to the speaker, he is there to stop any bill that would degrade the city's profits and to enhance any bill that would maximise the City's profits.
https://thelondonwanderer.co.uk/2023/04/the-citys-shadowy-figure-in-the-under-gallery/
One thing you gotta give them - their titles are awesome.
My neighbour works at Parliament as security, both psysical and electronic, his official title is "Keeper of the Great Clock" namely Big Ben. As Parliament is a royal palace they can torture citizens in the dungeons, but need royal approval for this, guess who the one of the torturers would be?
The king himself, the princes, or the remembrancer?
Only the King can give the permission to torture a citizen but my neigbour will be one of the torturers.
Yikes!
The Jews in the city of London
CoL
The "Crown" as explained by Jordan Maxwell: Who runs the 1 mile square "City of London" called, "The Crown"
The Crown Corporation owns the Bank of England, who owns the Federal Reserve and ALL banking institutions of the world.
The Cayman Islands, "Euro-Dollars", financial slight of hand.
The power of the City of London (Black Nobility) can be best understood by watching this video
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️ LOTS of nuggets in this one... including the 🤡 bank, BCCI in relation to CoL...The Panama Papers...etc
The 13 Dragons guarding the City boundaries the 13 Great Livery companies of London.
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
What's with all the dragon, St George, "lamb of God" with flag symbolism? Why are they found in stained glass on churches?
Where else have you seen the CROWN & CROSS symbolism? What organizations use it?
Note:
In the interest of not “While you were distracted”ing, here’s some:
Keep them coming!
Also.. Lloyd’s of London was founded in 1688… just after the Glorious Revolution, where English and Scottish kings lost control of the throne to Prussia.
Forget names, it’s a clique of its own which has many of « thems » but not most. Most Jews or Britbongs are decent people. A few are greedy and deranged and make the noise which attracts your attention.
What’s a “britbong”? I kinda suspect whoever runs the CoL isn’t actually either of those groups, but have never seen any data on it, so just a wild guess on my part.
That is how Anons call the British people on 4chan.
Yeah, for good reason too. The perfume of London ain't tanners now. It's weed.
what's public, at the top level that we can see: it's jews (i.e. most banks, most executive-level corporate positions or government positions, NGOs, the biggest activism groups, the biggest charities*, etc.).
secret societies like City of London, if not full of jews in their leadership, are close. but below jews, because most of the time in secret societies their beliefs are from some off-shoot or a direct derivative of judaism.
still all one big club.
what's not publicly known and speculation at this time: whoever it is that are above jews. could be satan or judaism-adjacent beings, another tribe, a combination of other known groups, or just more jews. or something else entirely
A few thoughts.
As the fog clears, you start to see the landscape in the distance
Caution / Care in evaluation is always warranted
The Real Prize is freedom
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASG9f2xvR/the-latest-layer-the-fog-the-car/
[FREEDOM! meme here]
The City of London with Brits of Celtic and Norman and Germanic descent with some Jews https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/jews-in-england-1066/#
here’s a not-so-well known book on the kabbalist hidden teachings incorporated in royal philosophy (Francis Bacon: The New Atlantis is better known) -
& pdf archive, archive can read it aloud, one of my British friends listened toall 842 pages https://archive.org/details/restoring-the-temple-of-vision-cabalistic-freemasonry-and-stuart-culture-by-marsha-keith-schuchard/page/729/mode/2up
and Robert Lomas, contemporary freemason wrote numerous books on how the teachings of these guys permeated the Royal Society https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/51754.Robert_Lomas
a timeline showing how Jews do not control it all
Timeline of Integration 1066: Initial Arrival: William the Conqueror encouraged Jewish merchants from Rouen, France, to settle in London.
The "Why": The King needed financiers and merchants to stimulate the economy. As Christians were forbidden from charging interest (usury), Jewish lenders filled a vital financial gap for the Crown.
1290: Expulsion: After their wealth was depleted by heavy royal taxes and legal restrictions, King Edward I expelled all Jews from England.
1656: Readmission: Oliver Cromwell informally allowed Jews to return to London. The "Why": Cromwell aimed to improve trade and global economic standing by leveraging the international merchant networks of Jewish families in Holland, Spain, and Portugal.
1697: The "Jew Brokers": The City allowed a strictly limited number of 12 Jewish brokers to trade on the Royal Exchange.
The "Why": Despite formal exclusion from City "freedom" (citizenship), their expertise in bullion and international trade was too valuable to ignore. ——
The Milner Group with Lord Cecil Rhodes during the British Empire carried out British imperialism (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy & Hope) and the CFR with Rockefeller, Bush, Clintons, Cheney all stemmed from this “round table group”
on the continent, balance of power politics was played out from the Council of Vienna 1814-1815 after the defeat of Napoleon.
there are a lot of interest groups, the Vatican, Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction (their symbols abound but their #s & influence seem to have waned or peterd out) Continental Grand Orient Freemasonry and they were a strong influence on the League of Nations system.
French masons supported the Kerensky government after the overthrow of the Czar. Brits response: “Oh yeah? watch this … we’re (and our allies) sending Trotsky from New York and Lenin from Switzerland to upstage … and so the balance of power politics played out. (John Daniels, Scarlet & the Beast volume One https://dn720708.ca.archive.org/0/items/ScarletAndTheBeastJohnDaniel1995/Scarlet%20and%20the%20Beast,%20John%20Daniel%20(1995).pdf)
Antony Sutton: How Wallstreet Built the Soviet Union https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/238474.Antony_C_Sutton and all the other stuff WallStreet did
This is some tasty stuff for sure!
I bet there’s something to “New” York having once been “New” Amsterdam, when both places where seats of power for the East India Company (“the Dutch East India Company”) , whose controllers we don’t know deeply enough, and which was a huge piece of the imperial corporate structure behind the “British” empire.
Then you take the whole Hanseatic League thing out of the Prussia region, and it’s all focused on maritime trade, with the first beast of revelation being the beast of the sea, and we’re under maritime law, and there’s definitely plenty of stuff to look at.
For God and country!
excellent maritime identification!
Promethean Action tells it all on their YouTube channel
They’re definitely diving on this topic. I would like to see the dive I noted though, and may do it - structural and people organizations within CoL.
The original comment wasn’t so much that “nobody is” as it was that “some people [deliberately] won’t”.
ALL these guys are GREAT. Watch ALL their shows on Rumble. Dave from NEWSTREASON echo,s my longstanding views on this current matrix we are in. Have not wasted my time on listening to fools for a long time but getting the current zeitgeist is important. Dave and co do that for me while interpreting everything in line with Q as I do. CANNOT recommend more highly.
Is that no longer the case?
I get it; be an adult, don't be mean / overtly offensive, etc., but what I'm talking about is way worse than that.
Is this now a "safe" topic to discuss here? (respectfully & civilly, of course & as always)
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASG9bdET2/the-jews-are-the-smartest-people/
Seems to be the same with God's chosen people. I don't need to remind everyone of the % of senators / congress who are not only jewis, but have dual citizenship with one specific country.
I get, understand and appreciate the overall message of "Are the Jews just a red herring" but I'm really not sure that I agree.... still researching though.....
"What is called Judaism is very different from the Old Testament and in fact they have nothing in common. Judaism is Cain styled worship that began during the Babylonian exile and solidified itself in rebellion after the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D.
The Jews and Israelites who understood the Old Testament converted to Christianity because the truth is that Christianity is the continuation of the Hebrew scriptures, not Judaism. Those who rejected Christ and followed in the rebellion of their fathers are the ones who established Judaism."
These are not my words as I'm nowhere near knowledgeable enough to piece that together with all the enormous underlying context it contains (trying to learn though).
Ehhhhhh, a bit yes a bit no. Modern Judaism is definitely off the track, as is most of modern Christianity. Reform Judaism is absolute rubbish - and makes up over 35% of Judaism adherents, while Orthodox is around 10-18%. Even where they aren’t totally off-track it will still differ from Biblical Torah observance due to the conversion of the constructed temple to the temple not built by man.
Yes, though some have drifted closer to the teachings of Christ than they’re aware of, while still rejecting him nominally, kek. Others have tried to fill the gap themselves, with absurd results.
Maybe they're both. Israel/jews themselves want the Ukraine, don't they? Are they abandoning the Middle East by taking all of Europe for themselves? Are we compromising rather than getting our pound of flesh?
When do the Edomites enter the chat?
"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing: that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."
With regard to the City of London, or the Crown Corporation, or how those interplay with the Fed, IMF, WB, etc? How high up are they internally? Which of the controlling “Jews” are Edomites? What other people and groups are involved? (Per that org chart, it’s a LOT, but still relatively few compared to the rest of us)
I don’t have the answers, my interest is in learning to winnow.
“The dividing line between good and evil runs squarely through the center of a man’s heart.”
Thank you for your reply. Yes, it is a LOT. I wish I could post more resources but would probably get banned. I've received too much from GAW to go against the rules.
My now 88-year-old father is alive 100% because of GAW. I saved his life while he was hospitalized during "covid" by using stealth (the hospital staff had no idea) and twice a day giving him high doses of all the protocols I learned about from here. He was discharged from the hospital the day Colin Powell died who presumably had access to the best medical care in the world. Powell didn't have GAW though.
The Big Jews. Israel. Khazarians. European banksters. The Venetians. The Praetorian Guard. The Jesuits. The Muslim Brotherhood. The Vatican. The Prussian Army. The intelligence agencies. The cartels. More I'm not thinking about.
These are all tentacles. At the core are the Globalists, and their current capital is the City of London. The above are all their servants.
One of their favorite tricks is to shine the spotlight on a tentacle and get everybody to focus on it, so you don't see the Shoggoth at the center.
So the answer to your initial question: Yes.
Synagogue of satan
Quick label, devoid meaning.
Plus, if you know the history of the Kazarians who "adopted" Judaism because the Czar was going to wipe them out.
"Khazarian Jews"
Also aware. Lots of stuff trying to trace them. MAG has a lot of great comments on that subject.
There is still not a monolith.
Only if you don't know your bible
Revelation 3:9 King James Version 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Revelation 2:9 King James Version 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Do you actually think anyone on this board hasn’t seen those verses at this point?
so how is it devoid of meaning?
You are either assuming, or trying to get people to assume, that all “Jews” are the “Synagogue of Satan”, or simply dully stating it as if it has a value. There are certainly such people among the “Jews”. There are also people who call themselves “American”, but are a “Synagogue” (“Congregation”) of “Satans” (“Adversaries”), for there is nothing new under the sun.
Too wide a net has as little value as one that is too narrow, and a simple term is a poor net.
Never ever said all jews! Some have taken Judaism - hence the " which say they are Jews, and are not' part
However, there is almost always one of those Jews at the bottom of every rabbit hole.
and the Talmud has lots of issues
And thus you see the low value of the simple term for conveying meaning. 😁 Sorry to keep you waiting, folks. Complicated business!
Here, yes quite often. City of London, I have no idea.
Would EU or UK takedown be biblical?
Yes (sorta).
A coupla more thoughts.
One, my Telegram feed threw this one up at me, as if by design. Watched it all, which is saying something; these days I have a very short attention span for videos. This one, however, was kind of intriguing, as I have a variety of connections to China, Japan, and so forth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q34Nb7Gy7q4
How One Jewish Family Built Shanghai & CONTROLLED China's Opium Trade (Rothschild)
I haven't checked the information in the video, except for a bit of dig here and there, but it looks pretty legit on the surface (see aforementioned bits of dig). Lol, tho, the information has NOTHING to do with the Rothschilds, and I'm guessing it was thrown into the title for click reasons.
Two, someone (was it you) linked me to a series of videos presenting an audio version of
"A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind" By Stephen Goodson. Listening to "Chapter 4 - A Century of Struggle: Rothschild versus the People" and doing my customary 'a bit of digging' and on the surface of it, the information in this seems pretty bogus.
Not exactly certain if the main bogusness comes from the video creator or the book itself (eg. the Video creator makes typing mistakes in the names of certain references he cites, and misnames certain individuals (calls Nathan Rothschild his dad (Mayer Amschel Rothschild) by mistake, but even superficial digs suggest its a good amount of hokum.
Example, the assertion that Nicholas Biddle 'first made contact with the Rothschilds in paris in 1804 while secretary to the US Ambassador to France, and then "acted as point man for James de Rothschild who was the bank's principal investor".
But according to surface digs, James de Rothschild was only 12 years old in 1804, and the first Rothschild bank in France was founded by him in 1817 (one year after the Second Bank of the United States was founded in 1816.
No real sources for Biddle meeting any Rothschilds in France in 1804, as they had not set up shop there. By real source, it looks like, according to Grok, primary sources are absent. I.e. letters, contracts, etc, documents from the actual period. Most of the assertions are 'modern' theories.
This has me thinking about: How much of the "Rothschilds rule the world" narrative is smokescreen?
Often, responding to queries about this or that fact or assertion, Grok comes back and frequently quotes "these theories are often associated with antisemitic tropes about Rothschild's controlling blah blah"
But there also is the 'antisemitic trope' being used in associated with theories that accuse the Rothschilds of being the source of evil.....
I suspect that the reality is more slippery than Brer Rabbit in a brier patch.
Three, my personal angle. How we view history is strongly shaped by our perception or beliefs around the meaning of history, which in the case of religious believers (i.e. people who practice a faith) is also influenced by theological ideas.
I tend to shy very strongly away by too many "biblical" based interpretations, including the Last Days, the Anti-Christ, and standard Christian eschatology, because I think they are pretty much off the mark. If we really understood scripture in the way God understands it, the fragmentation of Christianity into hundreds of denominations would not be a reality.
My own view is that the "anti-Christ(s)" have come and gone, the Beast in revelation is indeed the modern satanic control systems (but no 'anti-Christ' ala Hollywood), that the truth of the Last Days is that they are the last days of Satan's kingdom and control over the world when sovereignty of the world is restored back to God, that prophecies about the last days in the gospels are delivered in terms of symbols, not literal, that the return of Christ is going to happen in a way that 99% of believers do not expect, because God's ultimate goal is to establish the Kingdom of Heaven on earth, not by supernatural means, but by restoring the human heart to God and the sovereignty of the world to God, also (which involves kicking out Satan, once Satan's claim on the sovereignty is extinguished).
That's a mouthful.
I guess that, for me, interpretations of what is happening based on limited (traditional) Christian theology are going to miss the mark in significant ways.
Even Paul wrote; "now we see dimly as in a mirror" emphasizing that even he really didn't grasp the full picture. Jesus said "I have many things to tell you, but you cannot bear them now" - all these things point to the idea that for 2000 years, we've not really had the full basis to understand the truth behind what scripture is telling us.
Humility goes a long way. Above all, the scripture is intend to guide us to prepare our hearts to resonate with Christ and lay a foundation for him in our hearts and in our world, not to give us accurate knowledge of the things Christ didn't (couldn't) reveal 2000 years ago.
I hope there are some good digs on the CoL, as you put it. There's a lot of foam to wade through, i suspect.
Man, the total inability to trust any information… like, are the people putting this stuff together just that sloppy, or did they get that information from someone else who was supposedly a valid source, but was wrong. What if the “official source” is wrong and how would we know that?
That’s exactly why, though I’m obviously in my own mode of thinking that differs quite a bit from say, a Presbyterian, I try hard to refuse to claim “a denomination”, though there’s certainly a name for my church.
“Blessed is he who comes in the Name of The Lord”
De- (removed from) nomin (name) -ation (action)
No thanks.
The questions that follow after that are, for starters, something like, “Well ok, but if I don’t segment myself off from those HERETICS over there, and their HERESIES would send me to hell, what then?”
Well, good question.
100%. I suspect we are in the first, possibly in or entering the second, or possibly just seeing the threat the second would pose? First has definitely been here for a while though.
Maybe the whole reason we can’t verify anything is because ideally, we aren’t meant to, and this whole season of disinformation is training? In a kingdom, the king keeps the records. He knows who is stewarding what, has which claims, has what obligations, and ensures they’re kept.
Right now, we are clearly under a foreign king, but what would it look like if that was removed? Would we still be able to go to “the source of authority” at the tax office? The tax office wouldn’t exist!
If that’s the case though, what’s up with all the new suburbs and roads being built? Every single state currently has a major road building project underway (been meaning to do a dig on it).
It’s confusing. It’s clearly supposed to be, for whatever reason.
Amen.
Mind. Blown.
woah. de-nomin-ation. It's so totally inverted. Assigning names to all these cliques, schools and sects, but actually removing the Name of the Lord (in the sense that, the center subtly shifts and becomes the clique, school, sect, or theological college, rather than Christ)
That's insane. I never thought about denomination in that way.
Even so, Lord Jesus. Come quickly.
Here’s a crazy one - say you’re in a small county that’s 97% “white” (“Divide yourself by skin color! Divide!” Say, who do you suppose is pushing that?), and you go down to a government office. The office will be 85% black. Odd, but ok. Maybe that’s the only people who look to get employed there, but where did they come from when supposedly almost everyone in the county is white? Weird.
Later on, you find out that the office is overseen by an elected official, and that the people elected to the position can’t fire the people who in the office, and that they almost can’t even get the people to act in the way they want to run things.
Well that’s even weirder.
Wait, the manager of those people is trying to force a bond to be put out for a major upgrade, driven at some level outside the elected office, that the elected official doesn’t want?
What the crap is going on here? Who IS running this show, and how?
Not that they dont deserve it many times, but CofL has a history pf blaming Js, to remain hidden.
In my best Dr Sean Hross voice "THEY'RE ALL PHARAOH'S YA KNOW "
I found a video not long ago that detailed a portion of how the Hebrews went from living like kings in Egypt to being slaves for 400 years, from a reconquest of the lower Nile by the upper Nile.
There were at some point a group of cousins called the Hyksos who came into Egypt and turned the native Egyptians into slaves.
It hasn’t been clear exactly who the Hyksos were or how they did it.
The sun worship circle seems to have flown from Egypt to Babylon to Rome to don’t tell anyone but we seem to have lots of it in America now too (Statue of Liberty, lots of pyramids and obelisks).
Yep. The Statue of Liberty is quite the rabbit hole, isn't it? And the Washington Monument? Oh my.
Edit: With the Statue of Liberty as a gift from France, and it being built after the French Revolution, how could that rabbit hole be a false tinfoil conspiracy to anyone with a shred of awakening? : )
Found it!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=I6tuTuoU3Bk
u/MW_Freedom
Lots of posts on this board running defense for the long-nosed crooks who have destroyed our world.
“YOU CAN ONLY BE EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THEM, AND MUST CONSIDER THEM AS A MONOLITH.”
No thanks. How about I try to be more granular and keep my “side” to being For God, For Righteousness, For Freedom, and For America.
1 Corinthians 5:13 - But those who are outside, God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Begone, ye shill of bad faith.
Most of the problem-aligned ones don’t even have the nose of which you refer.
I’m really happy that this narrative is emerging. The UK is not our friends and they never have been.
The people are. The foreign, ruling powers who conquered them several centuries ago are not.
Thanks for posting this.
How many countries have they been kicked out of?
***It’s the Joooz, or I should probably say “Khazars”.
The City of London was established by the Khazar “Jews” during their extermination from Khazaria nearly 1,000 years ago, and was named ‘London’ at the time. And yes, I know the Romans had been there first. The city of London, with the Bridge and Harrods, and the fish and chips and the people driving on the wrong side of the road, was established much later, adopted the same name, and gradually expanded with population until it completely surrounded the Jewish enclave of the City of London.
Edit: there’s “probably” an interdimensional being behind the Joooz / Khazars and the hold they managed to get on the world. But,,, that’s a whole different rabbit hole and it’s better we don’t go down that on this post.
Claims, but got sauce?
Nope, just stating what I’ve read and what “feels” to be true, it’s up to Anons to determine legitimacy.
There’s ample amount of resources online showing the Joooz called the City of London home for a very long time.
Old Jewry Street, City of London
There is a time where not providing sources is valid, e.g. if the person is not doing any legwork or operating in bad faith:
https://files.catbox.moe/0ce7i5.webp
…And there is a time where the person not wanting to provide the sauce is the one in error.
😎
I’ve gotten lazy in my ol’anon age
I’ve got the arthritis to show I have put in my work!
Still,,, you’re heard!
Arthritis is a valid excuse lol
Age is unascertainable when we all just look like a bunch of letters and frog emojis!
Truth.
I regret not taking the advice this place has given for years to back everything up. Had I done that this would be a different conversation.
I’ve got a lot, but I was lazy and did most through screen shots, talk about a chaotic mess🫤
I’m thinking I want to have a fancy coffee table book made from them, showing the history / progression of an Anon / Q op.
What do you think, will there be a time when enough ppl would want to buy something like that??
Click on link to establish Joooz presence in the City of London since William the Conqueror (1066 - 1087)
That is wiki, so there’s that..
I just wonder how much of all this BS would disappear if we did away with NGO taxpayer funding?
With everything being linked as it is, it’s probably not that easy. A lot would, undoubtedly.
No difference
All of the above.
They use one another because of convenience. Both are evil.
"It's the same picture."