3
gg102 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thinking about this a bit further:

If "beguiled" takes on the meaning of seduced, then אָכַל (to eat) wouldn't make sense. Since אָכַל is a root word, in the primitive might take the meaning "to bring into" or to "take into the body", "to nourish", or "to nourish life", then that changes EVERYTHING.

8
gg102 8 points ago +9 / -1

Gen 3:13  And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. 

The word eat:

אָכַל

'âkal

aw-kal'

A primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively): - X at all, burn up, consume, devour (-er, up), dine, eat (-er, up), feed (with), food, X freely, X in . . . wise (-deed, plenty), (lay) meat, X quite.

However, the word beguiled can mean deceived or seduced. Relatively similar.

I am familiar with this theory, and it can make sense. The problem is that the words (that we can look up) don't follow closely. I'm not able to read Hebrew so I'm not able to be definitive on this topic. Perhaps someone who can do better than I can.

6
gg102 6 points ago +6 / -0

Isn't there something in the law that says that items can not be classified to cover up another crime?

That items can not be withheld if they coverup another crime or something like that?

This "judge" may have committed a crime by covering or withholding items that cover up a crime.

4
gg102 4 points ago +4 / -0

WTH is "‘Fundamentally Law-Abiding’ Looters." Is that the same as "Mostly peaceful protesters?"

6
gg102 6 points ago +6 / -0

Under their theory, can I sue the sandwich shop who claims "Best sandwich in the country?" I think not.

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll go with excessive harassment. Seems fitting. Works for me!!!

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course they're withholding Brady information. Who didn't expect that? They did with the J6 defendants. Why expect anything different with Trump?

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's interesting!

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

Point well taken, fren.

4
gg102 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have no fear of the receiver. If you have fear, be it of the transmitter. The DS could transmit anytime. That's where your fear should be focused.

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, Not buying it.

I find this hard to believe. No way Pelosi would want her conspiratorial conversations recorded. That's called evidence. She would want no evidence of her treason.

4
gg102 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump doesn't have enough time to be speaker. He has evidence to put before a court in 4 trials, while running for President and collapsing the DS and ending the FIAT currency and bringing in asset backed currency. He doesn't have enough time to be speaker.

5
gg102 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reminds me of Q Post 4414 June 4 2020

EAM LOYALISTS:

RED1: POTUS twitter removal

RED2: Central communications blackout [continental US]

---> RED3: CLAS movement PELOSI or PENCE

RED4: Movement of MIL assets [10th Mountain_1st Marine_CPSD_Marine_QVIR] to central locations under guise of citizen riot control.

RED5: NAT MIL COM CEN

RED6: SEC OF DEF _instruct1

USSS

CASTLE_ROCK Q

5
gg102 5 points ago +5 / -0

Replacing the currency away from the Rothschild central banks will in fact make the debt disappear. Face it, there's no way any country could repay $33T. This extreme debt is all about destroying the bank and subsequently currency.

9
gg102 9 points ago +9 / -0

IMHO The military is the very last resort. If they move in, things will have to be nearly lost. It won't be pretty. So far, things are moving in the right direction, so I'm thinking they are OK with waiting. MORE IMPORTANT, this is NOT JUST THE USA. This includes the entire world. Our military could move in and fix things in a week. Since the entire world is involved, that complicates everything.

4
gg102 4 points ago +4 / -0

Possible, but there's a lot of moving parts in that.

1
gg102 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been using distilled water for decades now. Can't recommend it HIGH ENOUGH. Healthy, no crap.

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

From CHAT GPT:

Certainly, here are words starting with the letter "I" that can connote negative meanings:

Ignominious: Deserving or causing public disgrace or shame.

Inimical: Hostile; harmful in effect.

Iniquitous: Grossly unfair and morally wrong.

Invasive: Tending to intrude or encroach, especially in a disruptive or undesirable way.

Invidious: Likely to arouse resentment or anger in others.

Irresponsible: Lacking a sense of responsibility; careless.

Insidious: Proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with harmful effects.

Indolent: Wanting to avoid activity or work; lazy.

Intractable: Hard to control or deal with; difficult or stubborn.

Insipid: Lacking flavor; dull; not at all stimulating.

Inefficacious: Not producing the desired effect; ineffective.

Intransigent: Unwilling or refusing to change one's views or to agree about something.

Intolerant: Not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own.

Incorrigible: Not able to be corrected, improved, or reformed.

Inopportune: Occurring at an inconvenient or inappropriate time.

Inculpate: To accuse or blame.

Illicit: Forbidden by law, rules, or custom.

Inane: Lacking sense or meaning; silly.

Insolvent: Unable to pay debts owed.

Impudent: Not showing due respect for another person; impertinent.

My favorite is: incontinence

18
gg102 18 points ago +18 / -0

I confess, I'm NOT looking.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›