1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boy, is that ever true.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is that much of this evidence came out two years ago, was presented to the courts, and the lawyers and courts sneered at all of it and basically said, "So what? Frankly we don't give a damn."

Their sneering was hidden behind several legal subterfuges, a popular one was the judicial judgement call that a plaintiff did not have standing. Another was that the filing was not timely.

Who went to jail for ten or twenty years?

Who was tried for sedition?

See anything on Fox about trials for treason?

No?

So what must change to overhaul our electoral system? and what force will be REQUIRED to drive this great upheaval?

I do believe that Q-Trump has given us the answer to these questions on several occasions: Military is the ony way.

And last - what is the required trigger event?

More evidence?

Sure. More evidence will help, will be a factor, but I don't think more evidence is going to trigger the upheaval.

I wish I knew the answer.

5
jfunction 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks that way.

Waiting to see if other versions of different length appear.

If this is the official "Trump" version it qualifies as confirmation of the new series of Q posts for me.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well , , , partly to piss everyone off.

There's other reasons to vote for him.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

The hot war in Ukraine contradicts 1) & 2).

Plus there is plenty of hot war going on in the US. Mostly it's hidden but not always.

Don't know what you base 3) on.

I don't see any guarantee on the outcome, on who's the victor or when. That's why it's a war and is taking a long time. Both sides are fairly evenly matched. If you got some secret guarantee I'm sure we'd all like some of it.

This war has been going on for quite some time and has had a few different names: WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, etc.

That's a partial list.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. The critical moment in which the DS loses is in the indefinite future. It is indefinite because no one knows for sure what is coming. Not Q or Trump or any anon.

Meanwhile we've been told we have two years coming that are going to be a lot worse than the last two years.

There will be increasing economic hardship and maybe famine. The US is not exempt. In my opinion the death toll from the vaccines is just getting going.

Against this bleak view there are a few bright spots of hope. We have the House. We might get the Senate.

Investigations are beginning their tedious, uncertain and often useless course.

It's not a bright picture and those among us who took the injection, lost a child, a parent, or a loved one (or perhaps several), lost a job or have had their lives ruined in other ways - and have begun to see a thousand yard stare looking at them from the mirror - may be understood and forgiven for their reservations about the sanctity of the plan.

Of course there were other ways to go at every fork in the road.

Whether the very best course of action was always taken is something it will never be possible to know. No one will ever know that.

7
jfunction 7 points ago +7 / -0

I guess she's directing her gratitude toward her beloved CIA.

But Elon cuts her off at the knees,

12
jfunction 12 points ago +12 / -0

Cast in different moulds but from the same metal.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

. . . and that's the problem. He's my senator and I very much admire his intellect but, well, where's the beef?

They must find the way to be EFFECTIVE.

Failing that they are just - ineffective.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pompeo's communications for the past two years have been so heavily laced with the Biblical that all the quoting and praying have lost their feeling of sincerity and genuineness and have taken on the appearance of hiding behind a Christian facade and using prayer to pre-exonerate himself.

The question then becomes, what is he trying so hard to protect himself from?

In his position as former CIA chief and former SOS he had plenty of opportunities for secret treason.

My impression of his fat-to-thin alter boy image makeover is that he is sweating bullets.

. . . and when he was SOS I thought he'd make a fine running mate for DJT when the time for that came.

My impression of him has evolved.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

Definitely was an attack on a NATO country and definitely was made by Ukraine.

Not going to trigger Article 5 because NATO has become an instrument of the NWO.

11
jfunction 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump's MO is to manipulate a situation so that he is in the middle of it as though he were the eye of the storm itself. Then he allows the storm to spend its energy.

In the present case I believe his announcement of his candidacy for '24, with only fleeting reference to the fraudulent elections, is a maneuver to preserve the appearance of neutrality for himself while some version of the storm rages all around him. In this way he remains "untainted" for election in '24.

After all he gave MAGA Patriots lots of very broad hints on TS in the two days prior to his announcement. Those shouldn't be ignored.

This announcement is the "false front" he has to assume to take leadership when the time comes.

And by the way, where are JB, KH and NP? I wonder if we are going to see them again soon - and in what context.

6
jfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm pretty sure Trump's announcement of his candidacy tonight was a major let down for a lot of anons.

My thoughts on the weak substance of the announcement is that "running in '24" is cover for him to retain the appearance of neutrality and uninvolvement in what is coming.

I still believe the '20 and '22 elections are going to be rectified, cleaned up, and that the military is going to be involved, probably sometime between now and January 20, 2023.

However, if this SCOTUS case is accepted and eventually decided in favor of common sense and Patriots then the role of the military will be more to suppress rioting.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of them are living under death threats (Feinstein bracing Murkowski for example - and McTurtle's unexplained injuries also deaths of Gowdy's people).

I don't know what Trump could have on anyone that would be more serious that what the cabal has on them.

4
jfunction 4 points ago +4 / -0

What I would love to see is Trump speaking from behind the Presidential Seal.

3
jfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

Greatness is our nature. In fact oneness with God is our nature.

If we do not realize this oneness we don't know ourselves, we fail to understand ourselves as we truly are.

The great game of life is to understand that this parenthetical time each of us has is a manifestation of what it came from and of what it vanishes into.

What it came from and what it vanishes into did not begin and does not vanish.

How do we come to understand that we are this timelessness?

Leave everything tainted by doubt and what remains is our nature. It has no fear or desire.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looking inspiring.

Let's see what happens.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

There will be a lot of shill support for a new "Patriot" party.

They're trying to frag our foxhole.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fragmenting the Republican vote is a sure path to defeat in '24.

It's the electoral process that needs buried.

Hawley is one of my senators too and I disapprove of this approach to our present predicament.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›