Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
NoNewNormal
MillionDollarExtreme
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
Win uses cookies, which are essential for the site to function. We don't want your data, nor do we share it with anyone. I accept.
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

398
Congress to be arrested? Goes to SCOTUS and 45 announcement tonight? (www.supremecourt.gov) 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
posted 80 days ago by Jimmy_Crack_Corn 80 days ago by Jimmy_Crack_Corn +404 / -6
201 comments share
201 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (201)
sorted by:
▲ 55 ▼
– Sadness 55 points 80 days ago +56 / -1

it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress

This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)

Check the document for the full list.

Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.

When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– PelosiStock 29 points 80 days ago +29 / -0

So we ask them to indict, arrest and hang themselves??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– American-Patriot 24 points 79 days ago +24 / -0

The government has investigated itself and found it has done nothing wrong

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

They never do anything wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– stevethefish76 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

If they were innocent, yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– metapriest 14 points 80 days ago +15 / -1

Writ of certiorari means they are appealing a lower court's decision. The SC doesn't have to accept it. Does anyone know if this has made it onto the docket or not?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Sadness 9 points 80 days ago +9 / -0

It was stamped as accepted on one of the cover pages ... but that may just mean a bureaucratic thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Madrashro 9 points 80 days ago +9 / -0

It’s just a formality showing that they literally received it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sadness 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

as I thought

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Toiletlaw 6 points 80 days ago +8 / -2

All it means is he filed a petition for cert from an appeal that looks like it was summarily denied.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -11 ▼
– metapriest -11 points 80 days ago +3 / -14

Evidence or GTFO

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Libraritarian 10 points 80 days ago +10 / -0

Literally the post

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TripleBlack 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– NCPatriot34_ 14 points 80 days ago +14 / -0

Robinette 🤣🤣

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 79 days ago +20 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– ObviousStatementMan 9 points 79 days ago +10 / -1

Sounds like a dollar store version of Raisinets

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Hoosierdaddy 14 points 79 days ago +14 / -0

Robbin' It

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HonestBobbin 4 points 79 days ago +4 / -0

Middle name checks out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– scoripowarrior 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

Sounds good, but very unlikely to happen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 40 ▼
– SaltyBrit 40 points 80 days ago +40 / -0

It names them all. Shit, I don't have enough popcorn for this one.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– aumone 6 points 80 days ago +6 / -0

Didn't find Cruz on the list. So does it mean he is a good guy?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– BigMikesHairyDong 23 points 80 days ago +26 / -3

Well he voted in favor of 37.7 bil for the Ukraine soooooo I’d say what I’ve been saying for a long time.

Ted Cruz is a pedo swamp creature.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ravonaf 9 points 80 days ago +11 / -2

They are arresting those who voted to certify the election. Lots of Republicans on that list but I don't think Cruz was one of them.

Edit: Ok, I jumped a gun a bit. The document is a request for SCOTUS to take the case I think. It doesn't mean the case already hasn't been taken and decided. It's just a link in the chain.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BigMikesHairyDong 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

I know. I went looking for his name and was surprised I didn’t find it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Autobotsunited1776 1 point 80 days ago +2 / -1

Grassley is on the list.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 7 points 80 days ago +11 / -4

Chuck Grassley is a 33rd degree Freemason who runs controlled opposition.

He is a traitor who can never be trusted.

Their oath to Freemasonry is held above any oath to their office.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– redlotus69 16 points 80 days ago +17 / -1

Q specifically cited grassley as one who can be trusted

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– fatmilf 6 points 80 days ago +10 / -4

Yes, Q said “trust grassley” which can easily mean “trust that grassley will act exactly how we expect a 33rd degree Freemason to act”

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 8 ▼
– dty6 8 points 80 days ago +8 / -0

https://qalerts.app/?q=Trust+Grassley

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– redlotus69 7 points 80 days ago +9 / -2

Q specifically cited grassley as one who can be trusted

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 9 points 80 days ago +12 / -3

Q also said disinformation is necessary.

We do not share any disinformation. Q knows that.

We shared The Truth long before Q began posting.

Who was the Anon before Q? It was US Senate Anon. What did they say to “keep digging into” before they vanished?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– inspoken 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

Washington, Paul Revere & several other founding fathers were masons, btw

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 7 points 80 days ago +7 / -0

What you may have learned in school is not the real history of America. It was written by Freemasons.

Who are the real Pilgrims (Society)?

We did not learn about Chuck Grassley in school.

We have direct knowledge and experience over decades including many interactions with Chuck and other top officials.

He knows what really happened to Senator Paul Wellstone.

What was Paul going to disclose in his planned campaign for President?

How did Bill Gates and so many others in big tech and big agriculture escape prosecution for extreme corruption and antitrust violations?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– GetsTheNogginJoggin 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

Washington never accepted the lodge master position he was offered.

Hamilton was painted into that lodge meeting scene despite having never been a Mason.

Masonry has been corrupted.

Don’t believe everything you see.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PelosiStock 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Yup

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ravonaf 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I noticed that. I couldn't remember how he voted. I was surprised to see it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nothingelsematters 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

So is Rand Paul.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

and DJT himself according to the x factor dude

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MrBig4575 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

I don't trust the guy either...any of them for that matter

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– seagoatz 10 points 80 days ago +10 / -0

Cruz grew his cool Texas beard and has been LARPing as a real patriot for years. I'll never trust him, though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MrBig4575 7 points 80 days ago +7 / -0

Cruz objected to the certification

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

Boebert, Stefanik, Greene are also not on it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

Were Boebert and Greene even sworn in yet?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

sorry, well Stefanik isn't on it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– stray502 2 points 80 days ago +13 / -11

This could be a forged document from some moron that wants to get our hopes up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– ravonaf 22 points 80 days ago +22 / -0

The document is linked to the SCOTUS official document dump. They would have had to have hacked the site.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 79 days ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ravonaf 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

The lower court dismissed the case and wouldn't even look at it. So it's been slotted for SCOTUS to look at the case on appeal, and they must decide to either take it or not. That deadline is the 23rd. Unless they have already taken it in secret. What we know for fact is the case is sitting there to either be taken or not. No guarantee, but it's something to grasp on to.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– FTrooper2 7 points 80 days ago +8 / -1

I just listened to a podcast during which the Anon, SGAnon, talked about this. He sounded very legit to me. He talk about it sometime after the 45 minute mark, it think. A five-justice Supreme Court with a secret docket. https://rumble.com/v1ug508-prophets-and-patriots-episode-40-with-johnny-enlow-sg-and-steve-shultz.html?fbclid=IwAR2qB5-_1acDYirS2a71woo15NnQwgQWFxYgbB_3HRvhetJ9xGJyGRqkOj0

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Knotnow 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

Very interesting podcast.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

Is that one of those trust me bro things?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FTrooper2 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

Yes, definitely. We always have to weigh the source and credibility against what we already know or think we know. Much of what he said resonated with me because he talked about things I'd heard from other trusted sources, i.e. John Corbett and Catherine Austin Fitts. That being said, I'm also painfully aware of how much B.S. we have to sift through to find the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– FuckNewsom 30 points 80 days ago +30 / -0

Nancy Drew, local DC woman who shows what’s going on in DC posted pics today of two buses parked outside Capitol. She said bus drivers are Marines.

Grain of salt, who knows for sure what this means, etc…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ilovetrump4 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

This guy was there either yesterday or today (with commentary):

https://youtu.be/vVYIU8kFVf8

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– dty6 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

Gotta be a little careful with believing P6. He lies like a rug.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– scoripowarrior 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

Wasn't Wray undergoing questioning by congress today?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tradox 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

Here's a couple of links for Nancy Drew concerning the busses.

https://youtu.be/V5T5s_A6fpE?t=57

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JqsR2v-K_s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– PatriotSkorzeny -4 points 80 days ago +7 / -11

Marines “perform other such duties as the President may direct.”

Trump hasn’t not been POTUS since 2016. 👍🏻

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AZTrumpette1776 8 points 80 days ago +8 / -0

What?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– DagnyDocket 13 points 80 days ago +13 / -0

Double negative. He never stopped being president.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– Tynyyn 22 points 80 days ago +23 / -1

Sometimes I sit here and wonder if Q and the boys drop a little bit of hopium to the masses via posts like this one. Out of the blue comes a SC case that practically no one in America would have any interest in. Just so happens somebody reviews SC cases and this catches his eye. Hmmmm......I'm thinking Q-boys are sprinkleing stories within GAW, Pats.win, and GodlikeProdcutions so the patriots can see something is being done for them. Will this happen? IDK, but it is "interesting" that this story comes out on the same day Trump is to have a huge announcement.

We will see. Something big is in the works or we will wait another two weeks for something to happen. Whipsawing the patriots is getting old and I think Q understands that, so he keeps Trump out in front of the masses to keep the hopium alive while we plod along to the midterm elections. Something will happen around the 23rd of Jan. but I cannot say what that might be. But if you see military vehicles running around blue states capitols and large megacities within the US, then your spidey antenneas should be perking up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– jfunction 6 points 79 days ago +6 / -0

I'm pretty sure Trump's announcement of his candidacy tonight was a major let down for a lot of anons.

My thoughts on the weak substance of the announcement is that "running in '24" is cover for him to retain the appearance of neutrality and uninvolvement in what is coming.

I still believe the '20 and '22 elections are going to be rectified, cleaned up, and that the military is going to be involved, probably sometime between now and January 20, 2023.

However, if this SCOTUS case is accepted and eventually decided in favor of common sense and Patriots then the role of the military will be more to suppress rioting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bloggerchick 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

But he didn't actually say 2024. Go to 27:27 in here... https://rumble.com/v1udtj8-live-president-donald-j.-trump-holds-special-announcement-at-the-mar-a-lago.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ARNG-Vet 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0

His FEC filing says 2024...so it's 2024.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bloggerchick 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0

So we get him then, too. We won't have to wait is the point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ARNG-Vet 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0

Not how it works..the next Constitutionally legal election for POTUS is '24...nothing between now and then. This "case" Brunson is flogging has been thrown out twice already. SCOTUS is not going to grant Cert.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AZTrumpette1776 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

I read that this is a petition to the Supreme Court to pick up the case. They receive a ton of them but only take a few.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Papatriot12 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

I have always wondered the same

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– horseyPatriot 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

I think the same thing. I need to find his District court case. Was his the one that was still winding its way through?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DesertBrat 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

I think so. Did a search on the guy's name. Saw this entry from June 2021

https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams-2

Then this one from October 2021

https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams

There's probably more. I just wanted to see who he is. I briefly scanned over it. He's asking for a bunch of $$ too. Tax free.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– horseyPatriot 18 points 80 days ago +18 / -0

Oh ho. Matt Gaetz is not listed. And he tweeted saying he was not going to Trump’s address tonight because of weather.

Lone Survivor?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Cuetardian 9 points 80 days ago +9 / -0

Weather.

I haven't dared get my hopes up.

Not going because of weather...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BitcoinPatriot 6 points 80 days ago +6 / -0

Stormy weather

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Power2Tread 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

"Designated Survivor"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Deplorable_Doofus 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

Yeah he survives.

The first round.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MrBig4575 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

that would make him acting president?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

Gaetz isn't in the chain of succession.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Elcycs 16 points 80 days ago +17 / -1

Damn, I just ODed on hopium.

Thanks a lot. Now I have to change my pants.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 80 days ago +22 / -8
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 80 days ago +10 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 80 days ago +5 / -4
▲ 3 ▼
– Ddrake517 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Lucky you. I got 3 days.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 80 days ago +3 / -3
▲ 14 ▼
– Retaining_H2O 14 points 80 days ago +15 / -1

Interesting. I wouldn't count on the SCOTUS to do the right thing willingly... but they might be pressured into it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Deplorable_Doofus 5 points 80 days ago +6 / -1

Roe v Wade was a sign of things to come.

The enemy willingly surrenders their promises, but their tribute to Moloch? No, that was a show of who is in charge now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– queue-anon 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

They could be been pressuring it on a election year so it would motivate dems to vote

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

And yet they still had to ballot stuff.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Bender4Prez 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

I would hope the pressure to NOT act correctly will be relieved and them shielded from it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– RaymondBPanelli 14 points 80 days ago +14 / -0

Tom Cotton, Chuck Grassley, and Young Kim listed among the defendants. This is intriguing but what standing does this Brunson guy have?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Jimmy_Crack_Corn [S] 13 points 80 days ago +13 / -0

He's a taxpayer.

quo warranto:

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/quo+warranto

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– proforma1 8 points 80 days ago +8 / -0

He is a voter, and wants what happened reversed or at least investigated properly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Eph612 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

His “standing” is actually addressed in the document. Not really about him being a taxpayer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– GhostOfReeeev 13 points 80 days ago +13 / -0

Ok, I am intrigued.

  1. Who is Raland Brunson?
  2. When do we get to know if the SCOTUS will hear this.
  3. When Trump won, they (democrats) claimed election fraud, and there was an investigation (Russia collusion) and found nothing. No investigation has been done on Biden, zero. So they may have a case, but will they listen to it?
permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– dudehat 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

Looks like yesterday.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2022TermCourtCalendar.pdf

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GhostOfReeeev 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Wait are they hearing this already? Or what do you mean?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

looks like they have to get back by next week: https://certpool.com/dockets/22-380

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– horseyPatriot 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

It was heard without oral arguments then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 45-4KAG 1 point 80 days ago +1 / -0

I saw it mentioned somewhere else that they have until 11/23/22 to respond.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– inspoken 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

https://certpool.com/dockets/22-380

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Cuetardian 12 points 80 days ago +12 / -0

Anybody know where Biden, Harris, and Pelosi are right now?

Was there some story earlier today about Biden being ill and missing some engagement? (Idk I've been working for once)

c'mon guys, we gotta put 2 and 2 together and see if they add up to 17!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– LadyBoothall 11 points 80 days ago +11 / -0

Biden was supposed to be at a G20 dinner cancelled because of " health reasons"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Deplorable_Doofus 6 points 80 days ago +6 / -0

God help me, I've started to wonder the same thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Cuetardian 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

Well, I guess we'll know soon... one way or the other.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– schiff_for_brains 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

Isn’t Biden at the G20 wearing his Mao shirt?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cuetardian 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

don't know but that's a good question

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Vindicator63 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

That's a very, very good question.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– inspoken 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

Yesterday, Trump said Nancy was already leaving the country

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 12 ▼
– The3rdKey 12 points 80 days ago +12 / -0

step by step. They will all fall for their treason.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– BigMikesSaggyBaggins 9 points 80 days ago +9 / -0

Oooh, great find! Let's see what SCOTUS decides to do with it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Jimmy_Crack_Corn [S] 7 points 80 days ago +13 / -6

The first arrest triggers a mass awakening?

Thoughts? (It's on the docket).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– HoneyBakedDurham 34 points 80 days ago +35 / -1

Nope.

First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.

u/#q3717

edit: Don't downvote, inform. Plus this is a nice find, the PDF that OP linked.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Jimmy_Crack_Corn [S] 12 points 80 days ago +12 / -0

Good correction - thanks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dty6 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

https://qalerts.app/?q=First+arrest

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– inspoken 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

first arrest could be the entire congress

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ravonaf 7 points 80 days ago +8 / -1

A bunch of white buses with blacked out windows driven by marines are currently parked outside the capital building. Or at least they were earlier today.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ilovetrump4 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

This guy was there either yesterday or today (with commentary):

https://youtu.be/vVYIU8kFVf8

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– HardWorkinPatriot 6 points 80 days ago +6 / -0

OMG! I'd wet my pants if they did that! They have been behaving very badly. This is an awesome thought. The first arrest will be a big one!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Bibloop 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

Only with the most powerful military backing can this be executed

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Morpheus11 5 points 80 days ago +8 / -3

Interesting. I'm curious OP, what prompted you to find and post this "David vs. Goliath" case today that most would expect to be routinely dismissed via any number of legal finagling techniques?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Jimmy_Crack_Corn [S] 14 points 80 days ago +16 / -2

Because Trump can't run in 2024 as it would amount to a concession of 2022. Also, it would undermine devolution.

It has to be something BIG.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ARNG-Vet 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0

His FEC filing paperwork is for the 2024 election.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Morpheus11 1 point 80 days ago +3 / -2

Right.

Have you had eyes on this case for a while now or did you just recently stumble onto it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– PelosiStock -4 points 80 days ago +2 / -6

Well he just announced. So what gives?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– McSimply 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Trump hasn't announced anything yet. You okay fren?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– PelosiStock -1 points 80 days ago +1 / -2

Hair trigger.. plez forgive

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Beltway 5 points 80 days ago +5 / -0

I don't know but something better fucking happen at this point. I think we are all a little sick of the "movie watching", and what ever other quotes that pepper this board constantly. If this was a real movie I would of left the theater a long time ago because it's garbage.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Woefully_Inept 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

You ain't alone fren. It's very frustrating.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Beltway 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

Oh I know it. I'm sure most of the people on here are a little sick of the cloak and dagger bullshit. I think they just don't want to say anything because they will be viewed as a doomer. I personally could care less. What are people going to do down vote me? As if that does anything to me what so ever. It's time to call out the crap.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jammyjams 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

I agree with you. This was the moment. This was perfectly done to corner them. And nothing...

They hype this up, and this is what we get? We already fucking knew you would run. This is some weak ass shit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TCPatriot 4 points 80 days ago +4 / -0

Why can’t each and every one of us do this? Class action?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MoLibertyson 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Did I just have a small orgasm?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GA_Logic 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

The timing is very interesting as it was filed back in Oct of this year.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– fatmilf 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

this post aged terribly

unforuntately we havent reached the precipice yet

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JustifiedTrumpian 1 point 79 days ago +1 / -0

At least it didn't take 2 weeks. We've improved greatly

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– catchlightning 3 points 80 days ago +4 / -1

This document is a fucking nuclear bomb in the context of 2020 election fraud. I'm actually sweating reading this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– ARNG-Vet -3 points 80 days ago +1 / -4

He's lost this case twice already..SCOTUS isn't going to grant Cert.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Scorpion76 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

Where have we seen this before? “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– oldtruthseeker 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Watch for the possible suicide of Mr. Brunson. I'm calling it now, Raland J Brunson did not kill himself.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Merica1779 3 points 80 days ago +3 / -0

Josh Hawley isn't named....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– xchainlinkx 3 points 79 days ago +3 / -0

Lord, I pray for swift action on all the wicket members of our government to be dealt with in your divine justice, and unseat them from their position.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Throwawaysgareblue 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

“d) “Our courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters." Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney. 252 S.W.2d 25. 27 (Kv.1952).” Radioshack Cory, v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256.”

Where have I heard this before?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GDZeus 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

Holy ShitBalls! 👀 This is unreal! Please let this take them all to jail at the same time 🙏 please Lord!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Joys1Daughter 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

Praying this is true!! 🙏

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Godisglory1 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

God is great , hope the miracle comes true. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BufordXL 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

Since the DOJ, Congress, the false POTUS and half of the SCOTUS are corrupt, Nothing will happen until the US. Military decides to uphold their oath and END the liberal/communist COUP.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GDZeus 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

This was filed on 10/20/22.

10/20/20 - Set condition 1 SQ for strategic missile launch.

https://yarn.co/yarn-clip/8b64b97c-f7e2-45d7-821a-0e4829c0eb6f

u/#q4903

On top of the court case file, it says 22 - 380

Q drop #22

u/#q22

u/#q380

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– stopthebullshit 2 points 79 days ago +2 / -0

4 And even if we were to overlook this obstacle to review, Mr. Brunson’s lack of success on the merits of his arguments relating to standing is, by itself, a sufficient basis for affirming the district court’s judgment regardless of the merits of his Appellate Case: 22-4007 Document: 010110749788 Date Filed: 10/06/2022 Page: 23 24 III. Conclusion The district court’s judgment is affirmed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Nightcereus 2 points 80 days ago +2 / -0

Misspelling,

Page vii / Appendix

"10th CIRCIUT"

permalink save report block reply
View 27 more comments

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: -ensuring the safety & well-being of the population -shifting the narrative -removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success -defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes -freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities -kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. -should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing! >

No doomers or shills: If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.

General Rules:

-Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

Please direct all complaints to modmail first!

Resources

  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qposts.online) others 1 2 3 4
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • QANON__17
  • McFartington
  • Archon69
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • and 10 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.04.02 - c762w (status)

Copyright © Communities, LLC 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy