it involves the possible removal of a
sitting President and Vice President of the United States
along with members of the United States Congress
This action is against 388 federal officers in their official
capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden
Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House
Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard
Pence (“Respondents”)
Check the document for the full list.
Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.
When the
allegations of a rigged election came forward the
Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be
removed from office
Writ of certiorari means they are appealing a lower court's decision. The SC doesn't have to accept it. Does anyone know if this has made it onto the docket or not?
They are arresting those who voted to certify the election. Lots of Republicans on that list but I don't think Cruz was one of them.
Edit: Ok, I jumped a gun a bit. The document is a request for SCOTUS to take the case I think. It doesn't mean the case already hasn't been taken and decided. It's just a link in the chain.
The lower court dismissed the case and wouldn't even look at it. So it's been slotted for SCOTUS to look at the case on appeal, and they must decide to either take it or not. That deadline is the 23rd. Unless they have already taken it in secret. What we know for fact is the case is sitting there to either be taken or not. No guarantee, but it's something to grasp on to.
Yes, definitely. We always have to weigh the source and credibility against what we already know or think we know. Much of what he said resonated with me because he talked about things I'd heard from other trusted sources, i.e. John Corbett and Catherine Austin Fitts. That being said, I'm also painfully aware of how much B.S. we have to sift through to find the truth.
Sometimes I sit here and wonder if Q and the boys drop a little bit of hopium to the masses via posts like this one. Out of the blue comes a SC case that practically no one in America would have any interest in. Just so happens somebody reviews SC cases and this catches his eye. Hmmmm......I'm thinking Q-boys are sprinkleing stories within GAW, Pats.win, and GodlikeProdcutions so the patriots can see something is being done for them. Will this happen? IDK, but it is "interesting" that this story comes out on the same day Trump is to have a huge announcement.
We will see. Something big is in the works or we will wait another two weeks for something to happen. Whipsawing the patriots is getting old and I think Q understands that, so he keeps Trump out in front of the masses to keep the hopium alive while we plod along to the midterm elections. Something will happen around the 23rd of Jan. but I cannot say what that might be. But if you see military vehicles running around blue states capitols and large megacities within the US, then your spidey antenneas should be perking up.
I'm pretty sure Trump's announcement of his candidacy tonight was a major let down for a lot of anons.
My thoughts on the weak substance of the announcement is that "running in '24" is cover for him to retain the appearance of neutrality and uninvolvement in what is coming.
I still believe the '20 and '22 elections are going to be rectified, cleaned up, and that the military is going to be involved, probably sometime between now and January 20, 2023.
However, if this SCOTUS case is accepted and eventually decided in favor of common sense and Patriots then the role of the military will be more to suppress rioting.
Not how it works..the next Constitutionally legal election for POTUS is '24...nothing between now and then. This "case" Brunson is flogging has been thrown out twice already. SCOTUS is not going to grant Cert.
When do we get to know if the SCOTUS will hear this.
When Trump won, they (democrats) claimed election fraud, and there was an investigation (Russia collusion) and found nothing. No investigation has been done on Biden, zero. So they may have a case, but will they listen to it?
A bunch of white buses with blacked out windows driven by marines are currently parked outside the capital building. Or at least they were earlier today.
Interesting. I'm curious OP, what prompted you to find and post this "David vs. Goliath" case today that most would expect to be routinely dismissed via any number of legal finagling techniques?
I don't know but something better fucking happen at this point. I think we are all a little sick of the "movie watching", and what ever other quotes that pepper this board constantly. If this was a real movie I would of left the theater a long time ago because it's garbage.
Oh I know it. I'm sure most of the people on here are a little sick of the cloak and dagger bullshit. I think they just don't want to say anything because they will be viewed as a doomer. I personally could care less. What are people going to do down vote me? As if that does anything to me what so ever. It's time to call out the crap.
Lord, I pray for swift action on all the wicket members of our government to be dealt with in your divine justice, and unseat them from their position.
“d) “Our courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters." Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney. 252 S.W.2d 25. 27 (Kv.1952).” Radioshack Cory, v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256.”
Since the DOJ, Congress, the false POTUS and half of the SCOTUS are corrupt, Nothing will happen until the US. Military decides to uphold their oath and END the liberal/communist COUP.
4
And even if we were to overlook this obstacle to review, Mr. Brunson’s lack
of success on the merits of his arguments relating to standing is, by itself, a sufficient
basis for affirming the district court’s judgment regardless of the merits of his
Appellate Case: 22-4007 Document: 010110749788 Date Filed: 10/06/2022 Page: 23
24
III. Conclusion
The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Check the document for the full list.
Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.
So we ask them to indict, arrest and hang themselves??
The government has investigated itself and found it has done nothing wrong
They never do anything wrong.
If they were innocent, yes.
Writ of certiorari means they are appealing a lower court's decision. The SC doesn't have to accept it. Does anyone know if this has made it onto the docket or not?
It was stamped as accepted on one of the cover pages ... but that may just mean a bureaucratic thing.
It’s just a formality showing that they literally received it.
as I thought
All it means is he filed a petition for cert from an appeal that looks like it was summarily denied.
Evidence or GTFO
Literally the post
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
Robinette 🤣🤣
Sounds like a dollar store version of Raisinets
Robbin' It
Middle name checks out.
Sounds good, but very unlikely to happen.
It names them all. Shit, I don't have enough popcorn for this one.
Didn't find Cruz on the list. So does it mean he is a good guy?
Well he voted in favor of 37.7 bil for the Ukraine soooooo I’d say what I’ve been saying for a long time.
Ted Cruz is a pedo swamp creature.
They are arresting those who voted to certify the election. Lots of Republicans on that list but I don't think Cruz was one of them.
Edit: Ok, I jumped a gun a bit. The document is a request for SCOTUS to take the case I think. It doesn't mean the case already hasn't been taken and decided. It's just a link in the chain.
I know. I went looking for his name and was surprised I didn’t find it.
Grassley is on the list.
Chuck Grassley is a 33rd degree Freemason who runs controlled opposition.
He is a traitor who can never be trusted.
Their oath to Freemasonry is held above any oath to their office.
Q specifically cited grassley as one who can be trusted
Yes, Q said “trust grassley” which can easily mean “trust that grassley will act exactly how we expect a 33rd degree Freemason to act”
https://qalerts.app/?q=Trust+Grassley
Q specifically cited grassley as one who can be trusted
Q also said disinformation is necessary.
We do not share any disinformation. Q knows that.
We shared The Truth long before Q began posting.
Who was the Anon before Q? It was US Senate Anon. What did they say to “keep digging into” before they vanished?
Washington, Paul Revere & several other founding fathers were masons, btw
What you may have learned in school is not the real history of America. It was written by Freemasons.
Who are the real Pilgrims (Society)?
We did not learn about Chuck Grassley in school.
We have direct knowledge and experience over decades including many interactions with Chuck and other top officials.
He knows what really happened to Senator Paul Wellstone.
What was Paul going to disclose in his planned campaign for President?
How did Bill Gates and so many others in big tech and big agriculture escape prosecution for extreme corruption and antitrust violations?
Washington never accepted the lodge master position he was offered.
Hamilton was painted into that lodge meeting scene despite having never been a Mason.
Masonry has been corrupted.
Don’t believe everything you see.
Yup
Yeah, I noticed that. I couldn't remember how he voted. I was surprised to see it.
So is Rand Paul.
and DJT himself according to the x factor dude
I don't trust the guy either...any of them for that matter
Cruz grew his cool Texas beard and has been LARPing as a real patriot for years. I'll never trust him, though.
Cruz objected to the certification
Boebert, Stefanik, Greene are also not on it
Were Boebert and Greene even sworn in yet?
sorry, well Stefanik isn't on it
This could be a forged document from some moron that wants to get our hopes up.
The document is linked to the SCOTUS official document dump. They would have had to have hacked the site.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
The lower court dismissed the case and wouldn't even look at it. So it's been slotted for SCOTUS to look at the case on appeal, and they must decide to either take it or not. That deadline is the 23rd. Unless they have already taken it in secret. What we know for fact is the case is sitting there to either be taken or not. No guarantee, but it's something to grasp on to.
I just listened to a podcast during which the Anon, SGAnon, talked about this. He sounded very legit to me. He talk about it sometime after the 45 minute mark, it think. A five-justice Supreme Court with a secret docket. https://rumble.com/v1ug508-prophets-and-patriots-episode-40-with-johnny-enlow-sg-and-steve-shultz.html?fbclid=IwAR2qB5-_1acDYirS2a71woo15NnQwgQWFxYgbB_3HRvhetJ9xGJyGRqkOj0
Very interesting podcast.
Is that one of those trust me bro things?
Yes, definitely. We always have to weigh the source and credibility against what we already know or think we know. Much of what he said resonated with me because he talked about things I'd heard from other trusted sources, i.e. John Corbett and Catherine Austin Fitts. That being said, I'm also painfully aware of how much B.S. we have to sift through to find the truth.
Nancy Drew, local DC woman who shows what’s going on in DC posted pics today of two buses parked outside Capitol. She said bus drivers are Marines.
Grain of salt, who knows for sure what this means, etc…
This guy was there either yesterday or today (with commentary):
https://youtu.be/vVYIU8kFVf8
Gotta be a little careful with believing P6. He lies like a rug.
Wasn't Wray undergoing questioning by congress today?
Here's a couple of links for Nancy Drew concerning the busses.
https://youtu.be/V5T5s_A6fpE?t=57
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JqsR2v-K_s
Marines “perform other such duties as the President may direct.”
Trump hasn’t not been POTUS since 2016. 👍🏻
What?
Double negative. He never stopped being president.
Sometimes I sit here and wonder if Q and the boys drop a little bit of hopium to the masses via posts like this one. Out of the blue comes a SC case that practically no one in America would have any interest in. Just so happens somebody reviews SC cases and this catches his eye. Hmmmm......I'm thinking Q-boys are sprinkleing stories within GAW, Pats.win, and GodlikeProdcutions so the patriots can see something is being done for them. Will this happen? IDK, but it is "interesting" that this story comes out on the same day Trump is to have a huge announcement.
We will see. Something big is in the works or we will wait another two weeks for something to happen. Whipsawing the patriots is getting old and I think Q understands that, so he keeps Trump out in front of the masses to keep the hopium alive while we plod along to the midterm elections. Something will happen around the 23rd of Jan. but I cannot say what that might be. But if you see military vehicles running around blue states capitols and large megacities within the US, then your spidey antenneas should be perking up.
I'm pretty sure Trump's announcement of his candidacy tonight was a major let down for a lot of anons.
My thoughts on the weak substance of the announcement is that "running in '24" is cover for him to retain the appearance of neutrality and uninvolvement in what is coming.
I still believe the '20 and '22 elections are going to be rectified, cleaned up, and that the military is going to be involved, probably sometime between now and January 20, 2023.
However, if this SCOTUS case is accepted and eventually decided in favor of common sense and Patriots then the role of the military will be more to suppress rioting.
But he didn't actually say 2024. Go to 27:27 in here... https://rumble.com/v1udtj8-live-president-donald-j.-trump-holds-special-announcement-at-the-mar-a-lago.html
His FEC filing says 2024...so it's 2024.
So we get him then, too. We won't have to wait is the point.
Not how it works..the next Constitutionally legal election for POTUS is '24...nothing between now and then. This "case" Brunson is flogging has been thrown out twice already. SCOTUS is not going to grant Cert.
I read that this is a petition to the Supreme Court to pick up the case. They receive a ton of them but only take a few.
I have always wondered the same
I think the same thing. I need to find his District court case. Was his the one that was still winding its way through?
I think so. Did a search on the guy's name. Saw this entry from June 2021
https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams-2
Then this one from October 2021
https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams
There's probably more. I just wanted to see who he is. I briefly scanned over it. He's asking for a bunch of $$ too. Tax free.
Oh ho. Matt Gaetz is not listed. And he tweeted saying he was not going to Trump’s address tonight because of weather.
Lone Survivor?
Weather.
I haven't dared get my hopes up.
Not going because of weather...
Stormy weather
"Designated Survivor"
Yeah he survives.
The first round.
that would make him acting president?
Gaetz isn't in the chain of succession.
Damn, I just ODed on hopium.
Thanks a lot. Now I have to change my pants.
Lucky you. I got 3 days.
Interesting. I wouldn't count on the SCOTUS to do the right thing willingly... but they might be pressured into it.
Roe v Wade was a sign of things to come.
The enemy willingly surrenders their promises, but their tribute to Moloch? No, that was a show of who is in charge now.
They could be been pressuring it on a election year so it would motivate dems to vote
And yet they still had to ballot stuff.
I would hope the pressure to NOT act correctly will be relieved and them shielded from it.
Tom Cotton, Chuck Grassley, and Young Kim listed among the defendants. This is intriguing but what standing does this Brunson guy have?
He's a taxpayer.
quo warranto:
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/quo+warranto
He is a voter, and wants what happened reversed or at least investigated properly.
His “standing” is actually addressed in the document. Not really about him being a taxpayer.
Ok, I am intrigued.
Looks like yesterday.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2022TermCourtCalendar.pdf
Wait are they hearing this already? Or what do you mean?
looks like they have to get back by next week: https://certpool.com/dockets/22-380
It was heard without oral arguments then.
I saw it mentioned somewhere else that they have until 11/23/22 to respond.
https://certpool.com/dockets/22-380
Anybody know where Biden, Harris, and Pelosi are right now?
Was there some story earlier today about Biden being ill and missing some engagement? (Idk I've been working for once)
c'mon guys, we gotta put 2 and 2 together and see if they add up to 17!
Biden was supposed to be at a G20 dinner cancelled because of " health reasons"
God help me, I've started to wonder the same thing.
Well, I guess we'll know soon... one way or the other.
Isn’t Biden at the G20 wearing his Mao shirt?
don't know but that's a good question
That's a very, very good question.
Yesterday, Trump said Nancy was already leaving the country
step by step. They will all fall for their treason.
Oooh, great find! Let's see what SCOTUS decides to do with it.
The first arrest triggers a mass awakening?
Thoughts? (It's on the docket).
Nope.
u/#q3717
edit: Don't downvote, inform. Plus this is a nice find, the PDF that OP linked.
Good correction - thanks.
https://qalerts.app/?q=First+arrest
first arrest could be the entire congress
A bunch of white buses with blacked out windows driven by marines are currently parked outside the capital building. Or at least they were earlier today.
This guy was there either yesterday or today (with commentary):
https://youtu.be/vVYIU8kFVf8
OMG! I'd wet my pants if they did that! They have been behaving very badly. This is an awesome thought. The first arrest will be a big one!
Only with the most powerful military backing can this be executed
Interesting. I'm curious OP, what prompted you to find and post this "David vs. Goliath" case today that most would expect to be routinely dismissed via any number of legal finagling techniques?
Because Trump can't run in 2024 as it would amount to a concession of 2022. Also, it would undermine devolution.
It has to be something BIG.
His FEC filing paperwork is for the 2024 election.
Right.
Have you had eyes on this case for a while now or did you just recently stumble onto it?
Well he just announced. So what gives?
Trump hasn't announced anything yet. You okay fren?
Hair trigger.. plez forgive
I don't know but something better fucking happen at this point. I think we are all a little sick of the "movie watching", and what ever other quotes that pepper this board constantly. If this was a real movie I would of left the theater a long time ago because it's garbage.
You ain't alone fren. It's very frustrating.
Oh I know it. I'm sure most of the people on here are a little sick of the cloak and dagger bullshit. I think they just don't want to say anything because they will be viewed as a doomer. I personally could care less. What are people going to do down vote me? As if that does anything to me what so ever. It's time to call out the crap.
I agree with you. This was the moment. This was perfectly done to corner them. And nothing...
They hype this up, and this is what we get? We already fucking knew you would run. This is some weak ass shit.
Why can’t each and every one of us do this? Class action?
Did I just have a small orgasm?
The timing is very interesting as it was filed back in Oct of this year.
this post aged terribly
unforuntately we havent reached the precipice yet
At least it didn't take 2 weeks. We've improved greatly
This document is a fucking nuclear bomb in the context of 2020 election fraud. I'm actually sweating reading this.
He's lost this case twice already..SCOTUS isn't going to grant Cert.
Where have we seen this before? “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters."
Watch for the possible suicide of Mr. Brunson. I'm calling it now, Raland J Brunson did not kill himself.
Josh Hawley isn't named....
Lord, I pray for swift action on all the wicket members of our government to be dealt with in your divine justice, and unseat them from their position.
“d) “Our courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters." Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney. 252 S.W.2d 25. 27 (Kv.1952).” Radioshack Cory, v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256.”
Where have I heard this before?
Holy ShitBalls! 👀 This is unreal! Please let this take them all to jail at the same time 🙏 please Lord!
Praying this is true!! 🙏
God is great , hope the miracle comes true. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
Since the DOJ, Congress, the false POTUS and half of the SCOTUS are corrupt, Nothing will happen until the US. Military decides to uphold their oath and END the liberal/communist COUP.
This was filed on 10/20/22.
10/20/20 - Set condition 1 SQ for strategic missile launch.
https://yarn.co/yarn-clip/8b64b97c-f7e2-45d7-821a-0e4829c0eb6f
u/#q4903
On top of the court case file, it says 22 - 380
Q drop #22
u/#q22
u/#q380
4 And even if we were to overlook this obstacle to review, Mr. Brunson’s lack of success on the merits of his arguments relating to standing is, by itself, a sufficient basis for affirming the district court’s judgment regardless of the merits of his Appellate Case: 22-4007 Document: 010110749788 Date Filed: 10/06/2022 Page: 23 24 III. Conclusion The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Misspelling,
Page vii / Appendix
"10th CIRCIUT"