He's being downvoted because he's calling Trump Jesus Christ.
He's literally saying Trump has died.
He's literally saying Trump will rise from the dead in 3 days.
The amount of delusion this guy has is off the charts -- the wrongs of discussing flat earth or chemtrails is childsplay compared to the idiocy coming out of that whack job's mouth.
So when you're proven wrong (that Trump is not actually Jesus).
And when you're proven wrong that Trump didn't actually die ...
Will you self-banish yourself from here in complete disgrace?
Oh wait, you left an out for yourself (like you always do). You said he'll be resurrected. Oh how convenient ... I suppose when Trump next shows up on TV you'll claim he actually died but came back to life.
Convenient how you always leave an out for your ridiculous prophecies.
What I don't get is how he has 9 upvotes and only 1 downvote.
Makes me think he's running alt accounts.
If Trump is actually Jesus, what do you want as a prize for predicting it?
A cookie or a straightjacket?
You're not doing any favors to Q or the Q community by being a complete retard in our midst.
You're tainting everyone else here as a retard to newcomers who think we might agree with your bullshit.
The degree of how wrong you are is more than I care to address. I will say, however, that the sheer smugness of your delusion certainly has earned you the ratio thrashing you've received.
There is a heavy-handed and obvious psyop being conducted on GAW.
People who should know better being completely oblivious to Trump's obvious posturing regarding Epstein.
4+ year accounts acting like they've never read a Q drop in their entire life, tossing Trump under the bus for supposedly not focusing on Epstein -- even while Epstein has 100x the focus he's had since his supposed death and it's all because of Trump's posturing.
Trump's Jedi mind tricks work too well on democrats, so much so that they're pounding the door demanding the list be released.
You wouldn't happen to be a democrat, would you?
If I'm steel-manning your argument properly, you're saying Q is perfectly capable of spreading disinformation to patriots. Specifically in the case of no one walks from this (implying some people who did bad things actually are going to get away with it). Also specifically in "we have everything" (defining everything as being all the info needed to bring the bad guys down, and you're challenging that Q may not actually have this). Not absolutely, but a possibility.
Taking the position that Q could lie to patriots isn't new. I've heard the argument many times -- people calling Q "Operation Trust 2.0". They say Q is nothing more than an operation to lull patriots into doing nothing, when they should have done something -- namely picked up their arms and started a civil war. I can't even count the times I've seen detractors lament the fact that we didn't all pick up our guns and storm the white house.
There's a hard limit of how much you're actually allowed to challenge Q's intentions -- the above example got people deported left and right. The rule of the forum on display in the right column is "Q supporters ONLY" -- emphasis moderators. Challenging the intent behind the Q psyop as being negative will get people deported. Disparaging Q is off-topic for GAW.
That's the extreme. I'm not saying you're challenging Q to that extent, neither is the guy I originally responded to.
Nonetheless, characterizing Q as allowing bad guys to get away with it (as in some will walk away from this), or that Q doesn't have the intel/information necessary to deliver (they don't have it all), likely disparages Q's plan enough to be considered that anyone making these claims is not actually a Q supporter.
There's enough information about Q out there, enough proofs, where someone can make an solid educated guess on whether Q is what they present themselves to be, or whether they are a disinformation psyop with the intent of deceiving patriots.
GAW isn't the place for those who swing toward the latter.
Are you even able to characterize your position in a way that isn't a blackpill? State how Q deceiving patriots into thinking everyone will be held accountable (as a lie) is anything other than a disparagement of the Q plan -- same goes for Q not actually having the info necessary to actually put people away. It all sounds like blackpill to me.
Taking Q literally because you think you know exactly what Q meant all the time
I said, Q said nobody walks from this, and I also said Q has everything.
I never claimed to know what Q meant all the time. But the two statements above are phrased to be taken at face value, there's nothing ambiguous about either statement.
Now how about you?
only to have everyone’s hopes dashed when their lawyers get them freed?
I'm assuming, because you're responding in this subthread, that you are taking the guy's side that I replied to -- that you believe focusing on Epstein is dumb and we should forget about it?
I always found that people who insist the entire Q community only focus on one thing to be odd, as if we all couldn't both focus on Epstein and Comey at the same time.
What, do you think that Q was there to tell you exactly what is going on? An oracle?
No. Not an Oracle. Not at all.
If I tell you that tomorrow, I will wear a blue shirt -- when tomorrow comes and I'm wearing a blue shirt --
Does that make me a prophet?
Does it mean I've built a time machine and saw that I would be wearing a blue shirt?
Have I constructed a super-impressive AI that predicts the future?
Or maybe I know what is happening because I made it happen.
When Q told us that McCain would be "in the news", and he died exactly one month later, to the exact minute and accounting for the complex daylight saving nuances of Arizona ... do I think an Oracle told Q that was going to happen?
No. That was the date they scheduled to kill the traitor, and they controlled the exact time to be fed to the MSM.
Project Looking Glass is a government plan to meticulously orchestrate future events, while "calling the shots" that would happen before hand so accurately that the casual observer would believe it were prophesized by an Oracle. But in reality, they just knew they were going to wear a blue shirt.
Q said nobody walks from this.
Q said they have it all.
Do you think Q are liars?
Crimes against children unite all humanity [cross party lines]?
The plan involves exposing what is going on, which pushes the population to the precipice.
If military is the only way, who cares what muh lawyers think? They going to get them out of a military tribunal?
When Trump said "Nah, don't focus on Epstein" ... did you really believe it? You don't think Trump was baiting?
FORGET EPSTEIN!!
And do you think people get arrested or not arrested based on what we remember or forget here on GAW?
All the dozens of blackpill junkie doomers who coordinated the massive "Trump is compromised" and "I guess Q isn't real" with the 4+ year aged accounts that crawled out of the woodwork when the Epstein psyop kicked in should be ashamed of themselves -- if they're not AI bots.
If they had believed the switch-out was possible, from properly following the Q boards
Didn't Kash once say he was having dinner with Q? They knew exactly what they were getting into.
Why is it all the Jew haters also automatically hate Trump and Q?
I think you were tasked with too many psyops to push at once.
1st class decode with zero ambiguity.
Name doesn't check out.
Why do people think that’s OK?
Prosecutors cut deals in regular every-day America, deals obtained through leverage of the crime committed, all day long every day of the week.
Bad guys are turned into informants (having their bad deeds leveraged against them) in regular every-day America all day long, every day of the week.
Judges cut people slack after having evaluated their extenuating circumstances (cooperation obtained through leverage of crimes committed) in regular every-day America, all day long every day of the week.
But Trump does it and you clutch your pearls?
They catch some low level drug dealer and, instead of utilizing his testimony to catch those above him -- you're only interested in him being publicly humiliated and not interested in providing incentive for him to cooperate?
They tell McCain -- admit for posterity on video the things you have done, provide testimony about your handlers and you get to die with a level of dignity as we execute you -- not justice in your eyes? Not without the public humiliation aspect? Executed isn't good enough for you ... has to be executed + humiliated or it doesn't count?
Are the prosecutors and judges also just as bad as the perpetrators? If you think using evil deeds as leverage makes the person leveraging just as bad as the perpetrators -- you have a warped sense of right and wrong.
Where's the "every. single. time." peanut gallery?
I'm waiting for their unhinged "Jews told the Muslims to do it" hot take.
Arresting them and shipping them back home is free education.
Did Anons Forget
To be fair, the group that put all their eggs in the Axios basket are bots, not anons.
Missed opportunity to put the X over her face.
What's going to happen is word will spread to the brokers that their deliveries are going to be held up and they're going to eat the loss on the delayed shipment, the towing, the storage of the vehicle until another driver can show up ...
Once this happens a few times, they'll see it as a liability and stop hiring illegals, at least ones that can't read.
If no client list is ever released, will you apologize?
The whole premise of Q is that there is a plan. Q told you and everyone else about Epstein before he was on anyone's radar.
That's your clue in neon flashing lights. If you can't see it, why in the hell are you on a Q board? Just fuck off already.
There's a massive crowd of people who don't believe Q is a thing -- go there where they hang out and post with them.
There's a ton of potential explanations.
-
Trump could be creating distance between himself and inevitable prosecutions so that it doesn't appear he's targeting political rivals.
-
Trump could be making it appear (with Elon's help) that he's on the list and thus create a demand on part of the democrats to see the list.
-
It could be a reverse psychology gimmick, where Trump says he wants to move on from talking about Epstein and thus all the MSM focuses on extending discussion about it.
-
It could be that Trump is inviting the MSM to mock him in regards to the Epstein files in order to bring the discussion to the forefront in arenas it would never be discussed.
-
It could be that Trump wants the guilty parties to feel at ease, which gives them more rope to hang themselves and prevents them from covering their tracks or enacting counter-measures.
-
It could be that Trump is baiting supposed allies into revealing themselves as traitors.
-
Optics are everything, if the Epstein files are followed up on because of democrats demanding that it be so, it opens a large amount of American citizens to have their eyes opened who would never consider it real if Trump spearheaded its release.
We all owe Trump a mountain of deference. We owe Trump the benefit of the doubt. Anyone who would throw Trump under the bus because of that ridiculous Axios memo were already against Trump. You look at the post history of all these accounts and they are super sus. They're here with an agenda to consensus crack and spread FUD.
I demand an apology from all the blackpill doomtards in this thread https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpfVCtv/breaking-doj-and-fbi-have-conclu/
As well as all the DARPA AI bots who hadn't posted in 6+ months but were dusted off to enhance the psyop.
/u/TrueFlagPatriot420 u/LockedandLoaded
As well as the dual-psyop bots that not only threw Trump under the bus over the Axios memo, but also aren't afraid to have 90% of their comments deleted for hating Jews.
/u/KeeperOfTheGlizzy u/Condor819
And a special shout out to all the glowie glow fags whose recommended course of action was to grab your guns and storm Trump's whitehouse.
If you were crying because the sky was falling and I didn't give you a personal shout-out -- you're probably a DARPA AI bot so I'm sure you don't care.
You suspect. Suspecting is fine. If someone suspects that something might be the case, I'll listen to it and maybe even consider it a possibility if it's not too far fetched. Even if it is far fetched, I'd (at most) leave a comment stating I think it may be far fetched and leave it at that.
But that's not what JohnTutor17 does. His guesses are presented as statements of irrefutable fact, with a side-helping of demeaning anyone who dare challenge him as not being able to comprehend muh comms.
He posted a thread literally saying Trump is dead. He literally states its ok because Trump will be back in 3 days.
Somehow flat earth, chemtrails and moon landing are taboo on GAW -- but JohnTutor17 could claim a meteor is going to hit the earth in a week, but we'll be saved by aliens who destroy it with lasers coming out of their asses and that's somehow ok to post here.