287
CodeMonkey has question (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by winn ago by winn +287 / -0
Comments (75)
sorted by:
82
MidnightDriver 82 points ago +82 / -0

Don't know if I've Evergiven this a thought...

21
Fraternal_Excellence 21 points ago +21 / -0

???

4
Higgins77 4 points ago +4 / -0

Love it?

31
18
Bedminster 18 points ago +19 / -1

My feeling is there are a LOT of Club-K missiles in the US already. We can track incoming missiles into our airspace but we can't track missiles fired within the US. I would bet white hats have captured some in the US (think California) and also are tracking them.

16
DontTreadOnIT 16 points ago +16 / -0

Every empty lot or construction site in the country could be a potential launch site.

Pretty horrifying.

10
Greekish 10 points ago +10 / -0

Like the one that hit the Pentagon 9/11 ?

3
Factfiler 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. Because there was no plane.

3
Darth_KEK 3 points ago +4 / -1

At least for Building 7, I knew folks who saw the plane hit from Staten Island. (I used to live in NY for 4 years)

17
TheJake 17 points ago +17 / -0

Club K missile system...the perfect storm...looks like a normal container, remote capable stinger missile system. Could be anywhere you've ever seen a shipping container.

12
inquimous 12 points ago +12 / -0

Which is everywhere a truck can go.

9
TheJake 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bingo

10
4
DiveAndBait 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit, missed this. Sounds like a act of war to me.

3
Megadeth 3 points ago +3 / -0

With China occupying the White Hut right now, I don't know if it is technically an act of war. I'm sure top communist sympathizers all over the world would agree with me on that! :-p

23
winn [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

CodeMonkey has nother question >> https://files.catbox.moe/zfidr5.jpeg

Militarize merchant marine vessels https://files.catbox.moe/l2a7lw.jpeg

12
Lapstrake 12 points ago +12 / -0

Why would China attack Atlanta? It would destroy their economy to be in a hot war with us. They have two aircraft carriers, we have eleven.

11
bubble_bursts 11 points ago +11 / -0

there would be a cover story, ofc

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
IveHadAllsICanStand 7 points ago +7 / -0

And don't forget that big, juicy dam they've got that's just sitting there with all that potential.

5
JeremiahKassin 5 points ago +5 / -0

You have to wear a clothespin on your nose in case you sneeze to work around that thing.

5
negative_entropy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. We'd just block the straits of Malacca and they would be out of oil in months. 90% of their imports from the middle east go through there.

5
DiveAndBait 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why do you think we have this hoaxathon in India right now?

The timing of all the supposed covid cases and deaths 3-4 weeks before the G7?

Maybe the globalists were angling India to negiotiate.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
Mrxshow 10 points ago +10 / -0

Oddly specific, I think he knows the answer. I bet Raffy and Sterling know the answer also.

10
propertyofUniverse 10 points ago +10 / -0

I've never felt comfortable about all those container ships off California last year due to docker strikes or something.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
GAMAGABOI 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hold up can u go further into this? I live in atlanta and u got me shook lol

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, Think if they were able to bring them in under Obama they could be driven and stored anywhere in The country. Brought out when needed.

5
CMAnon 5 points ago +5 / -0

How about carrying vials of Covid 21??

5
MAGA_100X 5 points ago +5 / -0

THAT's probably where the silent war is, nowadays.

6
Boozy_McFuckFace 6 points ago +7 / -1

If you use the ADSB plane tracking site you can see some fishy activity. I have been seeing weird P3-P8 activity directly off cape canaveral, Port of Long Beach area, and in the strait of Juan de fuca for months. In particular the cape canaveral activity has been unsettling. Every single day for months I have been seeing military surveillance aircraft and UH60s looking in roughly the same area. Not normal.

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been using my ears and eyes, and the same is true in Southern California. Daily military helicopters of all types flying low up and down the coast. Never seen it before the pandemic, but common now.

2
MAGA_100X 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes sense.

Could be a rogue nuclear sub, for example.

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yesterday I saw two Apaches and a Dolphin searching up and down the Carolina swamp coast.

We know China, Russia, Iran, and others have drone subs capable of traversing shallow water. If they can get a nuke on one of those things...

3
Tnlunatick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, I guess the answer to his question would depend on whether you consider Long Beach to be an American city.

3
Europa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Always wondered if something like this happened January 6th and changed the trajectory of the plan.

1
Jackno8d 1 point ago +1 / -0

That video of trump opening the military red folder anthem they were singing happy Birthday to his son right before he gave the speech sent chills down my spine.

3
Loquitur_Veritatem 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unwittingly could cause the club K containers to be buried under other containers, would cause a launch problem. Of course, if they sent enough of them there'd be some on top.

2
andyottito 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm excited for it to come out that Ron Watkins is NOT Q and that HBO doc was just a desperate attempt to pin Q on somebody.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a damn great question

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Long beach?

1
Pollycracker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Club K NWO reality

-4
Cyphr -4 points ago +3 / -7

Everyone with their panties in a twist about this type of missile deployment does not understand the concept of "mutually assured destruction".

Any strike against the US would be answered with the total destruction of the country that launched the attack. That concept is what has prevented nuclear war since the end of WW II. Nothing has changed in that regard.

The DS might be evil and stupid enough to launch an attack under those circumstances, but no nation-state would do so, for their own survival.

8
Boozy_McFuckFace 8 points ago +9 / -1

Stop being a smooth brain. MAD doesn’t work when you have corrupted the government and compromised the nuclear response. Why do you think China is so eager to compromise everyone at the very top? They want to delay the immediate nuclear response, and probably had a decap strike in the works. That’s all they need. A delay to the response. That would be enough for them to succeed by destroying our capability to respond.

6
Southern_Belle 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let me add this:

Some people don't care about MAD.

If they go down, they want to take you with them.

Same idea with: if I can't have it, neither can you.

On a practical note: that's why you have to be so careful when unveiling a narcissist. Some are actually psychopaths and will kill everyone around them, including themselves, to avoid discovery.

Imagine if these people had nukes.

6
onedongerlonger 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sounds like Israel's "Samson Option"

Which is exactly why we should never trust those fuckers. False flags were born in Israel.

1
BlockadeRunnerMZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a great book series called Burning Skies. It tells of a Chinese stealth midget sub, only 10 warheads, but it launches from right off the US coast. No time to shoot down, no clue who the aggressor is. US unable to respond. Then the Chines located in Canada and Mexico swoop in for "humanitarian aid"... It's quite a chilling story.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
overrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

It also doesn't work if you cannot positively ID the bad actor(s).

3
Jackno8d 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when trump and Hillary were debating and she gave out our nuclear response time?

-2
Cyphr -2 points ago +1 / -3

Bullshit. Explain how any of that gibberish that would prevent sub-launched nuclear reprisals against the nation-state responsible for an attack on the US.

7
KHo3P0 7 points ago +7 / -0

No mutually assured destruction. That's just racist. Probably homophobic, too. Definitely misogynistic. No. Biden would probably just give them pallets of cash. That's way more inclusive.

6
MAGAngelo 6 points ago +6 / -0

How do you rely on MAD when you don’t know who fired the shot?

At least with nukes, we have no doubt and immediate warning.

With these K-Clubs, they’re already around AND inside of our fence. With no formal flag on it signifying it’s owner.

Think logically, playboy. MAD will not help in this instance.

5
DontTreadOnIT 5 points ago +5 / -0

MAD might have been a deterrent during the Cold War (though I think fear and greed can always trump logical self-preservation), but it no longer plays a role in geopolitics.

Modern weapons are capable of completely preventing an opponent from launching an effective counter-attack. A Pearl Harbor-style surprise attack is once again a viable military strategy.

Instead of conventional bombs, the modern Pearl Harbor would incorporate cyber-attacks, EMPs, DEWs, nukes, bio-weapons...along with tech we don't even know exists.

-1
Cyphr -1 points ago +1 / -2

Bullshit. Complete Bullshit.

MAD is based on nuclear weapons. All the other weapons you mention will escalate to nuclear weapons being used, which is where MAD acts as the deterrent.

modern weapons are capable of completely preventing an opponent from launching an effective counter-attack

More bullshit. Explain how sub-launched nuclear missile counter attacks can be prevented.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

NOT ALL WOULD BE SOME THEORETICALLY COULD BE IF THE ENEMY HAS GOOD HUNTING ABILITY WITH TNEIR FAST ATTACKS. Sorry about upper case. Got this far didn't want to retype.

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, definitely sounds like you're speaking from a 1980's perspective.

3
inquimous 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the containers were within the US it might take a couple of minutes to figure out their origin, and that would be too long.

-1
Cyphr -1 points ago +1 / -2

Bullshit. MAD is based on nuclear counter-attacks as reprisals. There is no time limit on those reprisals. The US military would have all the time they needed to determine which nation-state is responsible for an attack, and then completely destroy them.

5
BarefootRunDMC 5 points ago +5 / -0

In order for MAD to work, your enemies have to think there just might be enough crazy in you to follow through. Trump had that. Biden does not.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea is we launch immediately because the enemies first.launch will be to take out every missle sight we have before the next wave kills all the cities to prevent our launch. That only leaves airborne and submarine delivered nukes. It would do some damage but not like our entire arsenal.would. sort of a use it or lose it.