333
Comments (96)
sorted by:
43
10122046 43 points ago +44 / -1

What’s next is the receipts coming to light about it being a bioweapon. Dark to Light!

We are bringing the entire corrupt establishment DOWN!

💥This is War!💥

War against Systemic Communism.

13
Mr_House 13 points ago +13 / -0

Biden now calls on US 'companies' to require the vaccine.

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwR3jprd/war-of-attrition--they-want-to-e/c/

In other words - they plan to starve us all of our incomes.

3
10122046 3 points ago +3 / -0

only to upset us, we will prevail

29
amarQ144 29 points ago +29 / -0

Pfizer and others, until now, have been protected by the EUA, not vaccine liability law because it was "emergency use". It is no longer emergency use. The med community can now acknowledge HCQ/Ivermectin and provide treatment. They couldn't before as the EUA was based on "no available treatment". That could be a good thing. Pfizer is now in a spot. They can end their vax participation, or...continue and be forced to prove it's legally a vax at all and that they have met the requirements to get liability protections. Interesting move by the FDA. White hats???...we shall see

10
BatteryBaron 10 points ago +10 / -0

Interesting. We know white hats have been accelerating the deep state plan so they make mistakes.

17
amarQ144 17 points ago +17 / -0

Here is a twist. Now that Pfizer is approved, ALL EUA must end as it was predicated on "no available treatment". Kind of puts others...J&J/ Moderna in a spot too. No more EUA and they are not approved for use. Talk about going from the pot to the fire! Looks like enough liability to break the entire system.

12
pizza_lawyer 12 points ago +12 / -0

You wonder if they will turn on each other since only one of the big 3 companies got to be 'in the club'

They always eat their own.

7
RustyShackleford777 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pfizer gonna be making that money while the others get left behind, I don't doubt we'll see the other two sue the fda

6
Azarak 6 points ago +6 / -0

Couldn't the corrupt FDA still block the use of HCQ and Ivermectin in continuing support of the these clot shot BS vaccines?

5
amarQ144 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good question. Either way we now have Pfizer, so there is something formally approved. How to justify J&J and Moderna? The EUA was based on "no approved treatment or vaccine". Do they sue the FDA for approval? If they continue are they fully exposed to liability? We shall see.

2
RustyShackleford777 [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

Read the approval pdf, nowhere in there does it really state approval. It reads like a continuation of the EUA

7
qeratdemonstrandum 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sorry, this isn't true. Page 2: "On August 23, 2021, FDA approved the biologics license application (BLA) submitted by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbHfor COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older." The rest of the letter goes on to say how the EUA has been extended for the others. Not sure what purpose there is for the other jabs to continue under EUA if one has been approved. It looks like there's some verbiage in there to say that the already manufactured Pfizer jabs cannot be administered as if they were approved.

3
qeratdemonstrandum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Footnote 8 on the same page: "The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. Theproducts are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness." Man I'd love to be wrong about this.

2
amarQ144 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will do. I haven't yet and will look at other approvals for comparison as well. They are masters at word games.

2
pizza_lawyer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where is this pdf? Didn't click the link.

4
scyenceFiction 4 points ago +5 / -1

There are two, and they're different: one for BioNTech and one for Pfizer.

Note that under 16 is still EUA.

Pfizer: ​https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

BioNTech: https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

0
RustyShackleford777 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thanks for posting, I hadn't seen the BoiNTech one yet

3
RustyShackleford777 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Further down in the comments, sorry, I should have posted it when I said read it.

https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

3
Taffy333 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for this information!

24
ATLAS_ONE 24 points ago +24 / -0

Here we go. Now things get interesting. I fear we have only just begun.

3
Wormself 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct. No where near precipice, which is starting to give me mild anxiety …

14
OldManTouchyBiden 14 points ago +14 / -0

Hello lawsuits.

7
Meme_war_ii_vet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is that true? Can Pfizer and co. be sued now?

9
TheChillingEffect 9 points ago +9 / -0

They can be sued until they get Schedule 1 approval - the approval that allows them to vaccinate children in schools. At that point, they'll be indemnified again.

That's the next step. Watch.

19
6daysandrest 19 points ago +19 / -0

Still not taking the shot.

Still not letting my kids take the shot.

5
RustyShackleford777 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are we going to see any vaccine injury class action lawsuits anytime soon?

6
TheChillingEffect 6 points ago +6 / -0

I hope so, but I don't know. It needs to happen, and happen fast. Time is very short.

2
RustyShackleford777 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did see that pilots are suing United over their mandates, seems like the government is hoping all these businesses will make the call and take the heat, unfortunately that doesn't nail the problem at the root

3
TheChillingEffect 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's hope they just keep the pressure on businesses. It will mean a period of problems for patriots, but we may be able to avoid a shooting war. After the damage is realized, everything will have to be reversed.

If they decide to go house to house, there's no turning back from a civil war.

4
pizza_lawyer 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope the NY restaurants stand up against it. The free market rules how businesses behave, not government mandates. That's why we need to keep making a big scene every time one of them tries to enforce this scam on us, AND find other places to spend our money.

2
RustyShackleford777 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with you there, if that happens, you better have fortunate son queued up on the loud speaker and the C4 gnomes set up on your front porch.

11
Gammmadorf 11 points ago +11 / -0

Time to brush up on the law books friends. Don't quit. Make them fire you. Document every last thing from text msgs to memos, any phone call should be recorded [check on consent laws in your own state]. Maybe we could get a sticky of all the lawyer frens/ resources to fight this going.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
CirclebackGinger 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought they were protected from lawsuits by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, courtesy of Reagan? 🤔

3
RustyShackleford777 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's what I thought as well. I also read somewhere that the gubment has a fund that pays off vaccine injuries.

2
suave200 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think the mRNA fits the legal definition of a vaccine. I know they changed websters dictionary definition of a vaccine so they could call this crap a vaccine. That and wikipedia.

11
MAGALogic 11 points ago +11 / -0

This will be a huge legal battlefield now.

14
8
CC22s 8 points ago +8 / -0

That is crazy how this stuff lines up. This Q post it lines up with the numbers below. It’s going to get bad. Be ready.

Globally- Currently, 24.4% of the world population has both shots. 33% have 1 shot already. They are having around 34mill a day still getting the shots. Booster shots incoming for the follow up. 2billion loss

US- It says 52% vaccinated. I think the numbers are incorrect. Let’s say 25%...that is still 82.5million people will die in the US alone in the next two years.

If you run the numbers it adds up to the video below.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations

https://unshackledminds.com/banned-video-everywhere-why-friar-alexis-bugnolo-horrors-of-covid-19-vaccine/

4
WhoKnowsAnymore 4 points ago +4 / -0

So you think that’s a warning people will die? I’ve had a hard time wrapping my head around the “everyone vaccinated will be dead in next 3-5 years”. That just seems so extreme it’s hard today fathom, also have loved ones that have taken it.

6
mechdork 6 points ago +6 / -0

"PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER TO DECIDE" sounds very similar to what Trump said after recommending it...

3
sackofwisdom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Man… that totally sounds like a prediction a neural net AI like Watson might be able to make.

https://patriots.win/p/12jwR0Ljy2/-camelot--bill-wood--project-loo/c/

4
DrMcCoy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has the FDA just committed suicide?

3
MAGALogic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well the FDA is going to have a hard time existing in the future at this rate.

9
needorganization 9 points ago +9 / -0

So, people can finally sue them into oblivion for the deaths and other evil they've caused?

9
Dreadnought61 9 points ago +9 / -0

And so it begins... We have now entered a new realm of tyranny the likes of which even the most megalomaniacal scum of this earth have never seen... Be ready fellow pedes, our time to shine is upon us... Stay strong, have faith in God and Jesus and pray for the many lost souls... This war has just been upgraded... MAY GOD have mercy on their souls and may HE protect all us warriors of truth on these boards and across the world...

7
sackofwisdom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unpopular opinion but I think you can be awake without Jesus.

I do think some kind of prophesied Judgement Day is coming, and some kind of higher consciousness is involved though.

4
Dreadnought61 4 points ago +4 / -0

We all believe in our own manner and even though your opinion may be unpopular, it is your right to have that opinion... Have a blessed day and may God protect you and your loved ones.

5
WhoKnowsAnymore 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liked your first comment, sounded wise. What do you think is coming next? Here’s how I think things will play out:

  1. With FDA approval, MANY industries will begin mandating the vax over the next 3 months. If you refuse you are terminated

  2. A new “variant” comes late fall/winter that is potentially lethal to those vaccinated

  3. News tries to spin it as unvaccinated are gettting everyone sick

  4. Chaos kicks off in many major cities, with many unvaccinated being persecuted

Can’t say with 100% certainty this will happen, but it’s really starting to seem like this is how things will line up. Pray!

3
Dreadnought61 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree that it may come to that but... There are more of us than them... We are strong in our faith for God didn't create us to be weak but strong through Him... Last, we have the truth on our side and many sleepers.are awakening to the truth... God wins... God's blessing to you and.yours...

3
Glowie777 3 points ago +4 / -1

Awake yes. Truly free? No

3
031174 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not my business,but some of us see Jesus as the start of individual free choice.Basically a half human who struck a deal with that higher intelligence.Pointing to freedom from organized churches. My thoughts only.Wasn't there.

7
libtards_r_stoopid 7 points ago +7 / -0

I feel that by white hats allowing approval it pretty much exposes how corruot the FDA is by allowing the approval

5
RustyShackleford777 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem is that this is what the normies want, the narrative was I won't get it because it's only approved for emergency use, now they will all say now that it's approved, take it

4
WhoKnowsAnymore 4 points ago +4 / -0

My sister is getting it today because of this approval. She immediately scheduled an appointment. Tried to warn her and tell her to wait out the winter but she went anyway.

Really hard seeing people you love fall victim to the narratives. They call us “antivaxxers”, etc. when in reality I love my family and am trying to help guide them out of this Hell. Tough carrying the weight we all do.

3
Donny_Fiasco 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm thinking lawsuits should be able to proceed.

Bankrupt city

7
Chachiex 7 points ago +7 / -0

Clif high predicted it could never be approved

7
OntologyStudyIt 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's quite funny. Clif is such a logic based person. He probably underestimated the level of corruption we are dealing with here. I look forward to his flabbergasted speech in his next video. He has some seriously good content.

3
Taffy333 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like Clif and appreciate his insights. However, he's made several statements about what is or what will be that seem to be based only on what he thinks (not from the predictive language), often vehemently said. The more vehemently and the more often he says them, the more I consider that in these cases he may not know what he's talking about. I don't remember how vehement he was about this one, and I'm just making a general observation.

7
jimonalimb 7 points ago +8 / -1

Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download Reads like merely an extension of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). ???

5
avenger1977 5 points ago +5 / -0

^^THIS^^

"On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA."

4
RustyShackleford777 [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

It does read like an EUA extension. Thanks for posting the link. Wierd that they claim that the EUA shots will be segregated from anything moving forward, I wonder if this is for liability purposes to skate taking any heat from those that they already killed or mamed.

3
pizza_lawyer 3 points ago +4 / -1

Literally on page 12 it says that all printed material must have the following statement written on it.

This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus

2
RustyShackleford777 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

The approval isn't an approval? WTF?

4
duder56 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, what happened is they basically rebranded the Pfizer shot as "Comirnaty" which is now FDA approved. You will see throughout the document, they refer to "Comirnaty" as FDA approved vaccine. But they also say the Pfizer shot is still under EUA... THEN they say you can use the two interchangeably.... so what the fuck does that mean?

6
DiveAndBait 6 points ago +6 / -0

They're talking about using the military to vaxx us.

https://youtu.be/K3MOWufaYy4

All I can say is good luck with that since Biden doesn't control them 😃

12
6daysandrest 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is a hill I think Christians are required to fight and die on. This may very well be the mark. At a minimum, it is a precursor.

3
WhoKnowsAnymore 3 points ago +3 / -0

I keep trying to alert my fellow Christians of this, many faithful look at me like I’m crazy. Everything about this points toward the issuing of the Mark.

We will be persecuted for our beliefs over the coming months/years, that includes being against this vaccine and keeping our faith.

5
Bedminster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Law suites are loading up already.

The law firm of Dewey Cheatem & How are on the case!

5
business_narwhall 5 points ago +5 / -0

They approved Oxycontin too in the 90's.

Followed by an agressive media campaign that smeared anyone who questioned their claims that "oxycontin was not addictive".

After 20 years of lawsuits, some companies have settled.

None of that is going to bring back the dead though. Never trust them. Never forgive them.

4
RustyShackleford777 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

NYC already hopped on board mandating it for teachers and staff today with no opt out

https://t.me/disclosetv/4230

3
Ranlove 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we not say this is the same shot that has killed 13000+ and the FDA JUST IGNORED IT!

3
djmarcone 3 points ago +3 / -0

did they approve it? Or did they just modify the EUA?

https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

3
russiah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck’em and their poison. They can’t force us nothing. So I’m gonna chill.

3
Stephanie1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uh, In war when the enemy points a gun or needle at you, you aren't really going to say, "stop.....wait until I file a lawsuit", are you? Never read any genocide victim saving his life that way on the field of active slaughter. (Lawsuits are helpful....however...)

3
pedewithweed 3 points ago +3 / -0

This means hospitals across the country can mandate it, right?

If so .... praying my job accepts my coming 17 exemptions

2
SquirreleeDan 2 points ago +3 / -1

So can anyone tell me how many lines do we draw, and how many do they continue to cross, before we actually care enough to do something?

2
starjello 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes I can tell you. It is up to the individual. Most will keep drawing lines and the tyrants will keep crossing.Sadly places like this are just places to vent while the globalists take more ground.

Also too many people think lawsuits are the answer, when in reality judges are easily bought off or obey threats.

2
MisprisionIsEvil 2 points ago +3 / -1

From what I've seen in the fda.gov site. The EUA was extended. The jab has not been approved.

2
Island_Photo 2 points ago +2 / -0

AFAIC if it circumvented the process in any way, it is an "illegitimate" approval. Think parallel universe. like the election.

2
Ranlove 2 points ago +2 / -0

This from page 12 of the letter from the FDA August 23 2021. So how does this mean it’s approved?? Page 12 – Pfizer Inc. • This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older; and • The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.

3
RustyShackleford777 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yah, I didn't see anywhere in there that didn't state it was an approval, but just an extension of the EUA

2
ABrainDisease 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check the 1st paragraph of page 2. Im pretty sure that's what is being pointed at as proof of approval.

2
GoGoOptomistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course they do the Gates money maker 1st disgustingly predictable.

2
numina18 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since the rollout was not preceded by animal testing and so many thousands of people have been injured, and so many thousands have died, it is unconscionable that this poison was approved. There must be hundreds of lawyers who would like to prepare class action suits for the damages done. I know you can't sue the vax manufacturer, but can you sue the FDA and the CDC and Fauci and anyone else who pushed this stuff. Probably yes!

2
Smeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

They did NOT approve it: they re-issued the EUA.

https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

1
RustyShackleford777 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone know if it's possible to edit the title? I misspelled throat and it's bugging me. Fucking phone...

1
farpointpatriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think they did According to the letter from the FDA today, it is still under the EUA ... this is from Paragraph two of the letter:

On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA. In addition, the Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) was revised to provide updates on expiration dating of the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and to update language regarding warnings and precautions related to myocarditis and pericarditis. The Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers was updated as the Vaccine Information Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers, which comprises the Fact Sheet for the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and information about the FDA-licensed vaccine, COMIRNATY (COVID19 Vaccine, mRNA).

We REALLY need a lawfag to help on this. What does "under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA" mean?

This reads to me like the COMIRNATY shot is now included in the EUA ... and NOT "Fully Authorized".

5
RustyShackleford777 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember they like to write things in circles and keep it vague as to not assume any liability and be able to maximize how they can use it against you.

3
ABrainDisease 3 points ago +3 / -0

People are sayings its approved based on the paragraph directly above the one youve quoted.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0