Also gonna piggy back off this top comment to share one correction:
This bacteria strain is NOT rare NOR is it difficult to find. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
I have already conceded that the author was incorrect and if you read your own study, you'd have seen that they only 50 Isolates were identified from their samples in very specific soil conditions, and only 10 for study.
The 10 selected isolates were identified as the avermectin-producing strain by fermentation and characterized on ISP2 medium for aerial and reverse side mycelia color, soluble pigment color and melanin formation, in comparison with S. avermitilis DSM 41445. The best avermectin-producing isolate S1-C (10.15 mg/L) showed similar result as S. avermitilis DSM 41445, when subjected for culture characteristics analysis in different media along with biochemical characterization.
I would absolutely considered that rare and furthermore, only part of the point of the post.
If you can find where S. avermitilis that meet all of the very particular criteria of the 10 individual bacterium selected above are plentiful, please share.
If not, stop derailing, as we both know that was only a fraction of the point of the article.
It’s disinfo. “Never found again” does not equal “rare.” Furthermore, seeking out specific soil samples in Pakistan does not confirm that this specific strain of bacteria is rare. It just means they found it in these particular samples. They’ve determined that there are many environments where these strains can be found, so to assume that in these samples (and the golf course in Japan) are now the ONLY places where this can be found just because they are the ONLY places YOU are aware of is short sighted.
Nobody is claiming it is rare other than you, and you seem to base this only off the the OP’s article which has been proven false. I’m not sure how else you’d come to the conclusion that this strain of bacteria is super rare
Disinfo in an article written pre-plandemic? That"s called a mistake, faggot. Showing one article that they found TEN bacterium that meet the correct criteria is the actual definition of disinfo. Yes, it a rare are and the article you didn't read proves it. Didn't read the rest of your post because I have no time for shilling. You did gud though, boy. Hope the pharma fags give you double shekels for effort.
Piggybacking off the top comment... Ivermectin is a wonder drug and also very cheap. Why would Big Pharma not want you to have it? Maybe so they can push the clot shot and have the government pay they LOADS OF MONEY for it? If you need support, and want to learn Ivermectin and your options, use the guide:
It is really difficult to accept that many people died needlessly because of the lying and deceit of “medical experts” and “media journalists.” All of them should be help accountable and responsible for those deaths.
It's ridiculous that this can't be bought over the counter in tablet form. I am related to multiple nurses, and they all actually believe that Ivermectin has a crazy side-effect profile.... not to mention they also believe that it is merely used to treat things such as scabies and lice lol. This is what they are told in the hospital settings from their fellow doctors/nurses smh...
Then why many other countries sell it cheap over the counter? And why is it so readily available for our animals over the counter?
Can't be having citizens of the USA take their own health into their own hands. Especially when it comes to taking preventative measures. Can't have that! Pharma needs their sick and ill CUSTOMERS to slap a band-aid on with synthetic drugs...
At the moment you can't even get ivermectin for scabies. It works very well to get rid of it, way better than the prescription cream Permrthrin), which makes your skin feel like it's on fire, and you have to leave it on for about eight hours. Had a doctor tell me that they don't prescribe ivermectin because it is so dangerous, even though several years ago, during an outbreak of Scabies where I worked, they were handing them to everyone.
and less related deaths for ivermectin doses than the vaccine shoved down our throats. I mean, at this rate, why do they not allow people to try? The risk of harm is Less! If we had a proper media, this would be railed home hard.
So the article was incorrect, though I'd hardly call 50 bacterial isolates something that is everywhere and that only 10 had the necessary properties they were looking for. So very rate, and knowing that it's properties were important, also rare.
The article states that it's never been found again, which is the fact I am correcting. How often or how many times it's been found is irrelevant.
Fact is it's not that rare or tough to find. The times that it HAS been found aren't the only places it exists. If people want to find it, they can easily.
The article proves how rare it is and I keep explaining the same shit. You are out of your depth and obviously can't understand the article, so stop derailing.
Yes, it does. Since you are too fucking retarded to read the article you produced, just read the quoted part above and you should be able to gather why ( if above a room temp IQ).
Your history screams SHILL and you are not going to last much longer antagonizing everyone and offering nothing.
Yes, it does. Since you are too fucking retarded to read the article you produced, just read the quoted part above and you should be able to gather why ( if above a room temp IQ).
Your history screams SHILL and you are not going to last much longer antagonizing everyone and offering nothing.
The bacteria is not rare. It wasn’t found only once. If you say my article proves you right you have to say exactly how, because it doesn’t. It tested out its own soil samples. It didn’t test samples all over the world to determine whether or not it was rare. The samples that they tested were within a (relatively) small area of the world.
I’m sorry if you’re the author of this blog post and are upset that I called out the things about it that are wrong. I’m just setting the record straight for anyone who reads it and gets the wrong idea. I offer my own research and facts as rebuttals to posts like this.
Ill let you have the last word, because unless you actually have an argument I’m not really interested. So yeah, I am halfway out the door on this thread.
"it became, as this article says, one of the top-three all-time most important and essential drugs in human history, along with penicillin and aspirin"
I feel like I should point out a few glaring issues of this post:
First of all, it’s called Streptomyces avermitilis, not avermictilis.
Secondly, the notion that it was only found by this one scientist in Japan and never found again is laughably silly. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
Thank you for pointing out a typo, that I apologized for already (there were several you
missed, actually) but am personally very sorry. Secondly, I am well aware it doesn't need to be rediscovered and can be grown by the gallon. There are few things that do need to be rediscovered. The Holy Grail? According to the article, it hadn't been found in other soils despite actively searching for decades. I will take a look at the article you posted, so thanks for that, sincerely. The great thing about conversation is that you can add and correct things, instead of trying to censor.
The typo isn't just in your title, I'm not knocking that. The typo is throughout the blog post. At that point it goes beyond a simple typo IMO. I'm not trying to police spelling, I just tried to do some research on the strain of bacteria on my own and I was corrected in my search
According to your article, it hasn't been found anywhere else. But according to the research paper I linked, there were tests done on samples they found in Pakistan. There were other stories I found detailing this specific strain of bacteria and noted how it's not uncommon to find it. I wouldn't go off of one blog post to believe that it's only been found in one location. It's far from the "holy grail" of bacterium.
There are probably 10s of millions of specific bacterial species in the world, so I could understand it being difficult to find just one in an environment (soil), where there may be millions? of species in a single shovel-full. I used to work in a water treatment lab, and a single drop of water, when diluted out (because without dilution the numbers would overwhelm the petri dishes), there would be dozens on a single agar test, mixed with various fungi as well. There may very well be cures for every disease in the natural, microbiological world, but to test all the possibilities would probably take a 1000 years.
On another job I had in the past, I did microscopic analysis of various things, one being a water sample from a public hot tub; based on that, I NEVER go in public hot tubs! Because the tubs/spas use heated water, the chlorine is rapidly depleted, resulting in microbes feasting on dead human skin (yes, that hot water causes dead skin to slough off, and unless there is also excellent filtration to go along with high chlorination, it's a recipe for microbial soup :) ). I guess working in a restaurant kitchen has the same effect on people :)
I never tested their water, but since the temperature is lower than hot tubs, it is easier to maintain the correct chlorination level, so would tend to be better (but you have the increased organic load from all those dirty butts :) )
There are likely billions of unique bacteria and that's exactly the point, no? It's not even just finding it, but finding one of the top most useful bacterial basis of medicine today. Not only anti-parasitic properties, but anti-inflammatory properties here as well, which, imo, is the big one, for all disease.
They found 50 bacterial isolates and only 10 had the specific properties they were looking for- 10 individual bacterium.
The 10 selected isolates were identified as the avermectin-producing strain by fermentation and characterized on ISP2 medium for aerial and reverse side mycelia color, soluble pigment color and melanin formation, in comparison with S. avermitilis DSM 41445. The best avermectin-producing isolate S1-C (10.15 mg/L) showed similar result as S. avermitilis DSM 41445, when subjected for culture characteristics analysis in different media along with biochemical characterization.
I had no idea of the history of this medicine, how exciting and indeed miraculous.
Pre-plandemic article, the meat is after the long intro :)
*Excuses for the typos in the title, ITS INEXCUSABLE!
*Also, if anyone has any particular studies on the anti-inflammatory properties of ivermectin, please post. I do not have any handy, but they are out there and very important.
I developed arthritis in the past couple of years, and the inflammation associated with that is what really causes the problems, so it would be pretty cool if ivermectin could control that!
Ivermectin does look to ward off cytokine storm syndrome, I just searched rheumatology+ivermectin and came up with a bunch of new and old articles.With the new demonization propaganda, it will be harder to find, but several months ago, the studies I looked at had extremelyy low incidents of negative reactions, even mild, lower then aspirin. Not giving advice, but I would try it.
From what I have read, the dosages associated with proper use of ivermectin have virtually zero negative side effects! I now need to read a little more about the horse paste version I bought from Tractor Supply a few weeks ago :)
I don't know about all brands, but I know Duravet is 50lbs of bodyweight per notch. You should consult the frontline doctors' site for info on dosage mg/lb if using different brands and do the math. The other ingredients are inert no matter what the fear porn tells you, an edible gel and maybe a food preservative that is used in a dose you likely eat in much higher amounts daily.
Im relatively young, in late 30's, and I have arthritic pain. I've looked into this, and from what I found, Collagen is really important since our cartilage is probably thinning out. I'm taking it everyday from now on. Arthritis sucks.
I'm trying to hold out in getting the hip-replacement surgery as long as possible, but it generally aches all the time now, and if I run (and maybe even be able to run without it hurting while running), I will definitely regret it the next day, and as such, don't run any more. I'm thinking of getting a mountain bike for cardio. I was fine, no hint of arthritis, until about 3 years ago, and then it rapidly appeared and has been slowly getting worse. My grandmother had it pretty bad, but she lived to 95, so I guess things could be worse :)
Rapidly appearing might be Rheumatoid Arthritis, which is autoimmune. Not sure if you got that checked out, but I would encourage you to do so just in case.
Fish oil and Collagen is a must from the research I've done. I can't even run anymore because of my knees and ankles. Have to do very low impact cardio.
Swimming, ellipticals, and bikes are the ones to look into.
Oh and also, another one that has very good results with little side effects for pain is low dose naltrexone. No risk of addiction like painkillers, way safer than tylenol or NSAID painkillers. I take that as well. It covers your opioid receptors for a short amount of time, then your body makes more endorphins which is basically a painkiller. Maybe look into that as well if your pain is really bad.
The constant pain sucks. I have pain somewhere every single day, which puts me in a predicament of not working out... It's terrible, I feel for you.
I take this a step further though and commend the scientists for recognizing what they had. Remember, you can take all the data in the world, but if you don't know how to read it or how to interpret the data, it means nothing. For them to only get this sample once and not waste their opportunity is incredible.
Possible, my gut doesn't tell me that though. His own posts about ivermectin were censored by twitter. Imagine the nerve to censor a Nobel prize winner about his own work.
I like this idea :) Someone in the thread is trying to convince everyone this specific bacteria with an even smaller subset of properties is everywhere. In the study he keeps quoting, they found only 10 bacterium to study. Nice detailing though, I guess.
The bacteria had information that could lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton
Streptomyces avermictilis didn't kill itself
No autophages in the Clinton pages?
Also gonna piggy back off this top comment to share one correction:
This bacteria strain is NOT rare NOR is it difficult to find. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217667/
It's not something that nobody has been able to find again. The writer of this blog may not have done their proper research
So does this mean that eating dirt can be healthy?
No. Don't do that.
I'm gonna do it anyways.
Kids who play in the dirt have much stronger immune systems than those in highly sanitized environments.
God made dirt and dirt don't hurt!
Yeah probably safe to try it. Go to marshlands though.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
As long as you realize almost everything in dirt is somethings shit, go ahead. Not the best idea though.
I have already conceded that the author was incorrect and if you read your own study, you'd have seen that they only 50 Isolates were identified from their samples in very specific soil conditions, and only 10 for study.
I would absolutely considered that rare and furthermore, only part of the point of the post.
If you can find where S. avermitilis that meet all of the very particular criteria of the 10 individual bacterium selected above are plentiful, please share.
If not, stop derailing, as we both know that was only a fraction of the point of the article.
It’s disinfo. “Never found again” does not equal “rare.” Furthermore, seeking out specific soil samples in Pakistan does not confirm that this specific strain of bacteria is rare. It just means they found it in these particular samples. They’ve determined that there are many environments where these strains can be found, so to assume that in these samples (and the golf course in Japan) are now the ONLY places where this can be found just because they are the ONLY places YOU are aware of is short sighted.
Nobody is claiming it is rare other than you, and you seem to base this only off the the OP’s article which has been proven false. I’m not sure how else you’d come to the conclusion that this strain of bacteria is super rare
Disinfo in an article written pre-plandemic? That"s called a mistake, faggot. Showing one article that they found TEN bacterium that meet the correct criteria is the actual definition of disinfo. Yes, it a rare are and the article you didn't read proves it. Didn't read the rest of your post because I have no time for shilling. You did gud though, boy. Hope the pharma fags give you double shekels for effort.
Piggybacking off the top comment... Ivermectin is a wonder drug and also very cheap. Why would Big Pharma not want you to have it? Maybe so they can push the clot shot and have the government pay they LOADS OF MONEY for it? If you need support, and want to learn Ivermectin and your options, use the guide:
https://media.communities.win/post/tz5Bb4sW.jpeg
🤣
3.7 billion doses given to humans, but you have to go to a farm supply store to get it in the United States of America.
and our media just continues to bash the efficacy
Doing what they do best
It is really difficult to accept that many people died needlessly because of the lying and deceit of “medical experts” and “media journalists.” All of them should be help accountable and responsible for those deaths.
"Trust the science except when we tell you to doubt the science"
Science says the vaccine don't work at all - at least not for the reason they tell you
It's ridiculous that this can't be bought over the counter in tablet form. I am related to multiple nurses, and they all actually believe that Ivermectin has a crazy side-effect profile.... not to mention they also believe that it is merely used to treat things such as scabies and lice lol. This is what they are told in the hospital settings from their fellow doctors/nurses smh...
Then why many other countries sell it cheap over the counter? And why is it so readily available for our animals over the counter?
Can't be having citizens of the USA take their own health into their own hands. Especially when it comes to taking preventative measures. Can't have that! Pharma needs their sick and ill CUSTOMERS to slap a band-aid on with synthetic drugs...
But the mRNA vaccines certainly are SAFE!!! /s
At the moment you can't even get ivermectin for scabies. It works very well to get rid of it, way better than the prescription cream Permrthrin), which makes your skin feel like it's on fire, and you have to leave it on for about eight hours. Had a doctor tell me that they don't prescribe ivermectin because it is so dangerous, even though several years ago, during an outbreak of Scabies where I worked, they were handing them to everyone.
and less related deaths for ivermectin doses than the vaccine shoved down our throats. I mean, at this rate, why do they not allow people to try? The risk of harm is Less! If we had a proper media, this would be railed home hard.
Honk Honk!!
Maybe it is like a truffle and we need trained pigs to find it ;)
O'Donnell and Moore are on the hunt.
We need to train ManBearPig
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! Super serial!
It’s been found all over the place.
Below is a study where ten samples were tested from samples in Pakistan
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217667/
So the article was incorrect, though I'd hardly call 50 bacterial isolates something that is everywhere and that only 10 had the necessary properties they were looking for. So very rate, and knowing that it's properties were important, also rare.
The article states that it's never been found again, which is the fact I am correcting. How often or how many times it's been found is irrelevant.
Fact is it's not that rare or tough to find. The times that it HAS been found aren't the only places it exists. If people want to find it, they can easily.
The article proves how rare it is and I keep explaining the same shit. You are out of your depth and obviously can't understand the article, so stop derailing.
In what way does the article prove how rare it is?
Until you prove you read the article you produced, fuck off, you are halfway out the door already.
Yes, it does. Since you are too fucking retarded to read the article you produced, just read the quoted part above and you should be able to gather why ( if above a room temp IQ).
Your history screams SHILL and you are not going to last much longer antagonizing everyone and offering nothing.
Yes, it does. Since you are too fucking retarded to read the article you produced, just read the quoted part above and you should be able to gather why ( if above a room temp IQ).
Your history screams SHILL and you are not going to last much longer antagonizing everyone and offering nothing.
Look man I’m not gonna fall for that.
The bacteria is not rare. It wasn’t found only once. If you say my article proves you right you have to say exactly how, because it doesn’t. It tested out its own soil samples. It didn’t test samples all over the world to determine whether or not it was rare. The samples that they tested were within a (relatively) small area of the world.
I’m sorry if you’re the author of this blog post and are upset that I called out the things about it that are wrong. I’m just setting the record straight for anyone who reads it and gets the wrong idea. I offer my own research and facts as rebuttals to posts like this.
Ill let you have the last word, because unless you actually have an argument I’m not really interested. So yeah, I am halfway out the door on this thread.
"it became, as this article says, one of the top-three all-time most important and essential drugs in human history, along with penicillin and aspirin"
I feel like I should point out a few glaring issues of this post:
First of all, it’s called Streptomyces avermitilis, not avermictilis.
Secondly, the notion that it was only found by this one scientist in Japan and never found again is laughably silly. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217667/
People need to do more thorough research before things like this get stickied
Thank you for pointing out a typo, that I apologized for already (there were several you missed, actually) but am personally very sorry. Secondly, I am well aware it doesn't need to be rediscovered and can be grown by the gallon. There are few things that do need to be rediscovered. The Holy Grail? According to the article, it hadn't been found in other soils despite actively searching for decades. I will take a look at the article you posted, so thanks for that, sincerely. The great thing about conversation is that you can add and correct things, instead of trying to censor.
The typo isn't just in your title, I'm not knocking that. The typo is throughout the blog post. At that point it goes beyond a simple typo IMO. I'm not trying to police spelling, I just tried to do some research on the strain of bacteria on my own and I was corrected in my search
According to your article, it hasn't been found anywhere else. But according to the research paper I linked, there were tests done on samples they found in Pakistan. There were other stories I found detailing this specific strain of bacteria and noted how it's not uncommon to find it. I wouldn't go off of one blog post to believe that it's only been found in one location. It's far from the "holy grail" of bacterium.
Thanks for sharing!
👍
Almost like Easter egg left by God.
Well, that's kind of suspicious. How has no one ever been able to find this bacteria again?
I am merely one mortal, ask the Big Guy, I, guess :)
Headline tomorrow: Man finds S. Avermictilis in Walmart Parking Lot. 😂
There are probably 10s of millions of specific bacterial species in the world, so I could understand it being difficult to find just one in an environment (soil), where there may be millions? of species in a single shovel-full. I used to work in a water treatment lab, and a single drop of water, when diluted out (because without dilution the numbers would overwhelm the petri dishes), there would be dozens on a single agar test, mixed with various fungi as well. There may very well be cures for every disease in the natural, microbiological world, but to test all the possibilities would probably take a 1000 years.
Everyone I've known who works in water treatment has told me such disgusting stories that it almost makes me want to swear off water.
On another job I had in the past, I did microscopic analysis of various things, one being a water sample from a public hot tub; based on that, I NEVER go in public hot tubs! Because the tubs/spas use heated water, the chlorine is rapidly depleted, resulting in microbes feasting on dead human skin (yes, that hot water causes dead skin to slough off, and unless there is also excellent filtration to go along with high chlorination, it's a recipe for microbial soup :) ). I guess working in a restaurant kitchen has the same effect on people :)
How bad are like hotel pools, usually?
I never tested their water, but since the temperature is lower than hot tubs, it is easier to maintain the correct chlorination level, so would tend to be better (but you have the increased organic load from all those dirty butts :) )
You are correct on the restaurant kitchens. Not all, but some are hideous. I learned in college just how much food applebees microwaves
Horses drink water, don't be an idiot and drink horse liquid.
There are likely billions of unique bacteria and that's exactly the point, no? It's not even just finding it, but finding one of the top most useful bacterial basis of medicine today. Not only anti-parasitic properties, but anti-inflammatory properties here as well, which, imo, is the big one, for all disease.
It has been. Below is a study with samples being tested from Pakistan
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217667/
Thanks!
No sweat!
They found 50 bacterial isolates and only 10 had the specific properties they were looking for- 10 individual bacterium.
I had no idea of the history of this medicine, how exciting and indeed miraculous.
Pre-plandemic article, the meat is after the long intro :)
*Excuses for the typos in the title, ITS INEXCUSABLE!
*Also, if anyone has any particular studies on the anti-inflammatory properties of ivermectin, please post. I do not have any handy, but they are out there and very important.
I developed arthritis in the past couple of years, and the inflammation associated with that is what really causes the problems, so it would be pretty cool if ivermectin could control that!
Ivermectin does look to ward off cytokine storm syndrome, I just searched rheumatology+ivermectin and came up with a bunch of new and old articles.With the new demonization propaganda, it will be harder to find, but several months ago, the studies I looked at had extremelyy low incidents of negative reactions, even mild, lower then aspirin. Not giving advice, but I would try it.
From what I have read, the dosages associated with proper use of ivermectin have virtually zero negative side effects! I now need to read a little more about the horse paste version I bought from Tractor Supply a few weeks ago :)
Tastes like weak apple jelly.
I just tasted bitter baseline, my equine palette is clearly not as developed as others.
I don't know about all brands, but I know Duravet is 50lbs of bodyweight per notch. You should consult the frontline doctors' site for info on dosage mg/lb if using different brands and do the math. The other ingredients are inert no matter what the fear porn tells you, an edible gel and maybe a food preservative that is used in a dose you likely eat in much higher amounts daily.
CBD? That is another wonder compound and good suggestion. Or magnesium oil? Also great to try.
Ok, thanks, I'll look into it :)
Im relatively young, in late 30's, and I have arthritic pain. I've looked into this, and from what I found, Collagen is really important since our cartilage is probably thinning out. I'm taking it everyday from now on. Arthritis sucks.
I'm trying to hold out in getting the hip-replacement surgery as long as possible, but it generally aches all the time now, and if I run (and maybe even be able to run without it hurting while running), I will definitely regret it the next day, and as such, don't run any more. I'm thinking of getting a mountain bike for cardio. I was fine, no hint of arthritis, until about 3 years ago, and then it rapidly appeared and has been slowly getting worse. My grandmother had it pretty bad, but she lived to 95, so I guess things could be worse :)
Rapidly appearing might be Rheumatoid Arthritis, which is autoimmune. Not sure if you got that checked out, but I would encourage you to do so just in case.
Fish oil and Collagen is a must from the research I've done. I can't even run anymore because of my knees and ankles. Have to do very low impact cardio.
Swimming, ellipticals, and bikes are the ones to look into.
Oh and also, another one that has very good results with little side effects for pain is low dose naltrexone. No risk of addiction like painkillers, way safer than tylenol or NSAID painkillers. I take that as well. It covers your opioid receptors for a short amount of time, then your body makes more endorphins which is basically a painkiller. Maybe look into that as well if your pain is really bad.
The constant pain sucks. I have pain somewhere every single day, which puts me in a predicament of not working out... It's terrible, I feel for you.
Hope for the best for you.
I had terrible joint pain when I was even younger than you and type 2 collagen helped a lot.
Archived version of original blog post, just in case. https://archive.ph/iP05F
👍
I take this a step further though and commend the scientists for recognizing what they had. Remember, you can take all the data in the world, but if you don't know how to read it or how to interpret the data, it means nothing. For them to only get this sample once and not waste their opportunity is incredible.
Absolutely!
Perhaps he didn't find it on a golf course. Maybe it's one of the hidden cures we hear about but it got out somehow.
Possible, my gut doesn't tell me that though. His own posts about ivermectin were censored by twitter. Imagine the nerve to censor a Nobel prize winner about his own work.
The Pleaidians planted it here to speed-along the Great Awakening...maybe.
I like this idea :) Someone in the thread is trying to convince everyone this specific bacteria with an even smaller subset of properties is everywhere. In the study he keeps quoting, they found only 10 bacterium to study. Nice detailing though, I guess.
Heavenly manna?
That story is total bullshit
Very convincing commentary