Co-defendants unsealed in SDNY case against Epstein: Beyonce, Kanye West, Disney, Miramax, amongst a multitude others
(media.greatawakening.win)
See Mod comment.
Comments (94)
sorted by:
Why did this get stickied again?
https://qalerts.app/?n=4484
For your Daily Delta Reminder. Thats why!
(Speaking of DDR)
Sauce: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369.2.0.pdf
Case: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/
Please read the case, its chilling.
It also says this is a civil complaint on the first page and filed by someone Pro Se (self represented).
This has nothing to do with the criminal proceedings. Need to be careful to weed out fake news targeted at us.
the second link indicates this case was dismissed as frivilous ... yeah thats the sdny
that was to indicate the original person couldnt be found to tell them it was dismissed
reading comprehension also helps
It is requested that all communication be sent electronically as the USPS mail delivery system has been extremely disrupted and almost inoperable in use for me to receive mail in traditional formats for the past 2 % years. The USPS failure to deliver or process mail for more than 2 years is a separate, but ongoing, issue that would also make it necessary to use the ECF system.
If you're going to get on people about reading, you should practice what you preach
Thanks! I thought this was recent. It’s back from 2020
It was unsealed just yesterday
This is good fiction. Latham filed this shit Pro-Se (without any attorney), asked the court to waive the filing fee (REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS) which is fine, I've done that myself against criminal collection agents and credit bureaus, but not against half of New York City, and asked to be awarded $500,000,000. The COMPLAINT offered ZERO evidence. None ... NONE! This shit is embarrassing that we are wasting our time with it.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff Charlene Y. Latham and note service on the docket. The complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/18/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Entered: 09/25/2020)
Thank you. I knew if I scrolled through the comments long enough I'd see the real sauce on it.
A lot of ridiculous things have been getting stickied lately.
So, if I'm understanding correctly, this is good fodder for conspiracy theories, but it's not confirming anything.
correct
Typos in 'New Yok' ...
This was never sealed...
Holy shit.
How much you wanna bet the 'Does' are Britney Spears and he kids???
I got the impression that the "Does" are all grandkids of the plaintiffs. I might be wrong, gotta read it again
So how is this a habbening if the case was dismissed?
Sounds more like the Kar'trash'ians
I'm not sure what significance we're supposed to be giving a lawsuit that has been dismissed as frivolous.
Anyone can file charges against anyone for anything.
Explanation needed please
Needed on what, exactly?
How is it a dismissed frivolous case?
Because the judge involved in hearing the case dismissed it as a frivolous case...
Black Cube is a Saturn worship cult no?
It's Ice Cube's company.
Or, it's a private security company comprised of former MOS operatives. They are known for dirty tricks and harassment. Weinstein used them. Does Ice Cube have a company called Black Cube?
Yes
Yep
Asking @moderators (u/catsfive) to unsticky this. This case has a few problems:
This case was filed pro-se and dismissed as frivolous, last year
The latest update to the docket was supposed to be the unsealing of the names - but there is no clear indication whether the names were just unsealed or not - the docket site says the latest update date is possibly due to RECAP users download the docket from the PACER system (whatever that means)
As always, this community does a great job digging and weeding out possible misinformation, thanks to u/chickyrogue, u/Chucklez, u/ImaSueDeNym and more!
However, this does not mean the complaint outlined is of no use to the Anons. People could represent themselves pro-se if no lawyers dares to go against the Cabal, and the Judge could very well be captured as well. The complaint seems to lay out the techniques used by these people pretty well, and I doubt this is actually frivolous - perhaps desperate. However, not worth the sticky for something so controversial.
I read the complaint and it doesn’t appear to be reasonable...ramblings of a drugged person because...there is also a claim of theft of unique intellectual property and trade secrets. But! The plaintiff claims they were drugged, and I would assume abuse at this level would make any person crazy...so who the heck knows? There obviously needs to be at least a fact finding investigation to see if this is happening or not because regardless if this particular plaintiff is being completely honest, we know that many of these names are involved with sex trafficking.
And regardless of the scenario, this Charlene needs prayers, certainly.
Source you got this from?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/
Pretty sure we saw this several years ago, no?
Scratch. A year ago.
100 John Does, Jane Does, and Corporation Does???
Employees, Executives etc belonging to companies
Yes placeholders for other potential defendants?
WAY too many names not on that list. This looks like people they are willing to throw to the wolves to protect the major players. Where is Gates, clintons, obama? Seems sus to me. Not saying the people on the list dont belong there but even if you factor in the "Does" (3-300 of them) it still seems incomplete and why does anyone get immunity from disclosing the name when they name out a few dozen others. This makes no sense.
Those are probably going to be unsealed in Ghislane's case.
I believe the deadline was October 11.
the list is long...but not long enough.........
Remember, the judge in Ghislane's case has also ordered the unsealing of the co-consiprators and it should be coming soon.
Did you see how many more names there are?
John does.
Jane does.
Corporation does.
Hundreds of names there alone, I think for the sake of paper work and or sealed indictments they just listed the first batch of names they want associated with this case.
I dunno really just speculation.
I also could just be reading it wrong.
no your right but there is many more that should be on it......
https://bad-boys.us/
How about 300k?
Yeah, they are master psychological manipulators. But all the employees of those companies who wilfully helped them in this scheme - I hope they are rot in hell as well
Unsticky this garbage
Why? Fake or old?
definitely not new news and it appears from proper analysis by farpointpatriot above that case was dismissed for being frivolous
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff Charlene Y. Latham and note service on the docket. The complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/18/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Entered: 09/25/2020)
So this morning I looked at the list and thought I would go through will skip the obvious ones 1)is Epstein Trust 3) Jay Z 4) & 5) are the captains for Epstein 7)owned by beIN media grp, paramount pic, Disney corp, Colony Capital, Nasser Al-Khelaifi, 9) The island def jam music group, Universal Music Group, Rick Rubin, Russell Simmons, 10)Live Nation, Sony Music Entertainment Jz 11) Vivendi, Univ. pictures, Seagram, Panasonic
Think how much money the defendants have combined. If the plaintiffs defeated them, it would change the world. By making this public, it helps. They won’t be able to walk down the street.
So many John’s, Jane’s, and Corporations. How are businesses involved with Epstein? Those are a few of the largest entertainment companies around.
Right off the bat i see black cube.
That's satan worship and immediately points to that little strip of land in the mediterranian sea that were not allowed to criticize.
Shame you can’t edit your title to actually match the information.......
WWG1WGA
This explains Kanye's recent Sunday service tours. He's trying to repent lol.
It's a civil case that was dismissed then re-filed by Latham pro se (Self-represented). As nice as it would be, this is fake news and has 0 to do with the actual criminal case.
Thanks for the clarification.
Or trying to con us. If he was serious, I believe he would have blown the lid off and shined the light on all the darkness he knows about.
He won't. He doesn't want to end up a martyr, he's too afraid.
We’re at the top now, strap in boys, rollercoaster’s starting!
Uhh... this is kinda big..?
I heard this was fake news to get us all circulating the old stuff, when the new stuff with the actual criminals in it isn't due by the FBI to the court's until the beginning of October.
It is requested that all communication be sent electronically as the USPS mail delivery system has been extremely disrupted and almost inoperable in use for me to receive mail in traditional formats for the past 2 % years. The USPS failure to deliver or process mail for more than 2 years is a separate, but ongoing, issue that would also make it necessary to use the ECF system. At the bottom
John Does Jane Does Corporation Does 1-100 Come on let's have the names!
NYPD huh, wow, didn't see that coming. I guess that's why all those officers who saw that video on Weiner's laptop were murdered. They couldn't hide it when regular cops saw it so they had to snuff them out. Wonder who all the "Does" are.
Trump-supporting, career-risking Kanye is a defendant in this
smh
Kanye West? I thought he and Trump were friends.
PLEASE not Kanye 🤧😰😭
If I'm understanding correctly, this was filed last year, but the co-defendants were just listed?
JayZ
NYPD listed as a defendant, fuck yeah. Not anarchist, but getting closer from all the bullshit I read surrounding the police and what they do. Fuck them all.
Nos. 36 - 38
Exactly 100 John Does, 100 Jane Does, and 100 Corporation Does?
Seems an awfully suspiciously round number, esp. 3 times in a row
Also - I thought Kanye was a friend and admirer of Trump's, wore the red hat, visited the Oval Office,...WTF
I like how they added the NY accent when naming the City of New York :)