Distraction / nothingburger. Allocated funding can be re-earmarked and back-rolled into existing budgetary cycles due to unforeseen contingency expenditures. There is no evidence and no reason to believe the original funding was designated "Covid 19" at that time, not to mention that would have made zero sense to anyone at the time and would simply raise too many questions that would only continue to be raised as 2020 unfolded.
I dont think they meant that it was earmarked for covid 19 only that huge funds were paid out for infectious disease spending ahead of their plan. Could mean nothing. Have they done this large size amount in the past? Or with all states doing it together at once in 2019? I don't personally know, but it warrants looking into since we know it was pre-planned so an open ended budget to prepare government to lock us down ahead of time makes sense - kind of.
Here is my challenge to you. Tell me what you propose to be the course of action that will free our world from the grips of evil, that does not involve Q.
Why do people always "challenge" people to provide solutions they themselves have zero intention of even attempting to think of themselves?
Critical thinking requires you provide counter-solutions to your own. Steelman them so to speak.
Someone who "challenges" you to do this without providing ANY evidence they've attempted to do this themselves isn't arguing in good faith.
You've probably noticed the same error in thinking in people who argue for masks.
"I challenge you to provide evidence masks don't work." - said by a person who NEVER questioned it at all themselves and isn't arguing in good faith.
People who are do not ask questions in THAT WAY.
You're doing the intellectual equivalent of "debunking" as done in bad libtard science magazines.
I challenge YOU to think of a few ways YOURSELF.
And if those arguments are not convincing enough to yourself to AT LEAST enough to get you to have to think hard, you're doing a disservice to your own viewpoint which you could be making stronger and stronger.
Instead you're relying on ME and other internet randos to HOPEFULLY be smart enough to think of good steelmans for you.
And I don't know why the FUCK you would trust anyone but yourself to do that
We are here, in this site because we have exhausted every other possible way to defeat the evil and have learnt with our eyes open that this is the only way.
If you are making fun of the "Plan", then clearly you believe there is an alternative. Hence, it's on you to engage in a debate by providing the alternative.
But the very fact my simple question triggers you so much tells me much about you.
If you came here to shill then sorry to say that your career as a shill will be very short. If you came here to learn something, then sorry to say that you will probably not gain anything from this site. If you came here hoping to "teach" people here something with what you must consider is your superior intellect, it will be amusing to watch your frustration.
If you came here for anything else, well good luck finding what it is you are looking for. If you want to engage in productive conversations, you will find plenty here as long as you step down from that high horse!
Have to downvote preceding comment, simply to get this one on top.
I want to facepalm SO MUCH when I see these blunders.
We're better than this. Ain't we?
(Similar nonsense about the so-called BILL in congress that was passed for C19 funds in 2019. Complete misunderstanding and misinterpretation of how bills are managed, repurposed and eventually voted on.)
Just sayin fwiw, Q post 691 in Feb 2018 “This has to mean China did this” refers to DoD Law of War Chapter 6 Sec 9 “Biological Warfare” and then April 2018 that China was releasing a virus. DoD Law of War Chapter 11 Sec 15 “Public Health and Hygiene” and next three posts were China u/#q691
I don't think you're interpreting this correctly. State health departments contract with the CDC for multi-year cooperative agreements for surveillance/response. The first year of the contract was in 2019---it looks as though HHS used second year of the contract (7/20) to dump COVID money into the contract.
No, but such things can and are updated as they move along.
Like the 2019 Bill in congress that was eventually repurposed during 2020 and then decalred by some smart (not) cookies that hey! Look! A bill about covid 19 but it was tabled in ..... (dan dan daaan) 2019!!!!
So, this is how the funding goes. Each state Health Dept. executed a 5-year Cooperative Agreement with the CDC/HHS for Epidemiology & Surveillance of Emerging/Infectious Diseases. The first year of the contract was 2019. Each subsequent year's contract may have new work plan/funding added, but is considered a "continuation" of the original contract (2019). When COVID response money was given to HHS for surveillance and response, the govt. wanted to get it out fast and dumped the money into the existing Cooperative Agreements. If you follow the link from Ron's original post, there was no activity on this additional funding until summer of '20. The epidemiology cooperative agreements between the CDC & state Health Depts. have been using this type of cyclical funding via Cooperative Agreement since the 1980s.
I think perhaps the wrong thing was circled? Anyone else notice that the end date for the contract was July of 2024? Good to know how long they are planning to drag this thing out.
Distraction / nothingburger. Allocated funding can be re-earmarked and back-rolled into existing budgetary cycles due to unforeseen contingency expenditures. There is no evidence and no reason to believe the original funding was designated "Covid 19" at that time, not to mention that would have made zero sense to anyone at the time and would simply raise too many questions that would only continue to be raised as 2020 unfolded.
Think this one through.
I dont think they meant that it was earmarked for covid 19 only that huge funds were paid out for infectious disease spending ahead of their plan. Could mean nothing. Have they done this large size amount in the past? Or with all states doing it together at once in 2019? I don't personally know, but it warrants looking into since we know it was pre-planned so an open ended budget to prepare government to lock us down ahead of time makes sense - kind of.
Nobody will think this through. As per the rules. We trust the plan.
Here is my challenge to you. Tell me what you propose to be the course of action that will free our world from the grips of evil, that does not involve Q.
That sounds like it would be a challenge to YOU.
Why do people always "challenge" people to provide solutions they themselves have zero intention of even attempting to think of themselves?
Critical thinking requires you provide counter-solutions to your own. Steelman them so to speak.
Someone who "challenges" you to do this without providing ANY evidence they've attempted to do this themselves isn't arguing in good faith.
You've probably noticed the same error in thinking in people who argue for masks.
"I challenge you to provide evidence masks don't work." - said by a person who NEVER questioned it at all themselves and isn't arguing in good faith.
People who are do not ask questions in THAT WAY.
You're doing the intellectual equivalent of "debunking" as done in bad libtard science magazines.
I challenge YOU to think of a few ways YOURSELF.
And if those arguments are not convincing enough to yourself to AT LEAST enough to get you to have to think hard, you're doing a disservice to your own viewpoint which you could be making stronger and stronger.
Instead you're relying on ME and other internet randos to HOPEFULLY be smart enough to think of good steelmans for you.
And I don't know why the FUCK you would trust anyone but yourself to do that
We are here, in this site because we have exhausted every other possible way to defeat the evil and have learnt with our eyes open that this is the only way.
If you are making fun of the "Plan", then clearly you believe there is an alternative. Hence, it's on you to engage in a debate by providing the alternative.
But the very fact my simple question triggers you so much tells me much about you.
If you came here to shill then sorry to say that your career as a shill will be very short. If you came here to learn something, then sorry to say that you will probably not gain anything from this site. If you came here hoping to "teach" people here something with what you must consider is your superior intellect, it will be amusing to watch your frustration.
If you came here for anything else, well good luck finding what it is you are looking for. If you want to engage in productive conversations, you will find plenty here as long as you step down from that high horse!
A blackpill shill on a fresh account doesn't qualify as "we".
My thoughts exactly.
Have to downvote preceding comment, simply to get this one on top.
I want to facepalm SO MUCH when I see these blunders.
We're better than this. Ain't we?
(Similar nonsense about the so-called BILL in congress that was passed for C19 funds in 2019. Complete misunderstanding and misinterpretation of how bills are managed, repurposed and eventually voted on.)
Just sayin fwiw, Q post 691 in Feb 2018 “This has to mean China did this” refers to DoD Law of War Chapter 6 Sec 9 “Biological Warfare” and then April 2018 that China was releasing a virus. DoD Law of War Chapter 11 Sec 15 “Public Health and Hygiene” and next three posts were China u/#q691
Wow! Great find! Before Covid was even off the ground here! Trump wouldn’t have known about this either being a standard budget issue.
NSA would have though.
Is NSA as non-partisan as the FBI and CIA?
Head of NSA met with Trump unannounced and right after, Trump relocated his incoming team to his property in Bedminster, NJ during the transition.
I believe it was 10 days after the election of 2016 which is about how long it takes to set up a SCIF
Admiral Rogers noticed how much the FBI and it's contractors were pinging the NSA database to query individuals.
He was most certainly a white hat. After he retires, IDK if his replacement was as fair and honest.
That could be Trump getting our defenses up for what they knew was the inevitable.
If you’re trying to kill a bunch of ppl why do this?
Dem money coffers were empty...that could be a reason
I absolutely could see that for any other reason that doesn’t include financing something that thwarts their plan for world dominance
Or it’s white hats preparing for the inevitable.?.
I mean, do they have it all or not?
I don't think you're interpreting this correctly. State health departments contract with the CDC for multi-year cooperative agreements for surveillance/response. The first year of the contract was in 2019---it looks as though HHS used second year of the contract (7/20) to dump COVID money into the contract.
August 2019.
Before COVID 19 was even coined as a term.
Was this a retroactive contract?
No, but such things can and are updated as they move along.
Like the 2019 Bill in congress that was eventually repurposed during 2020 and then decalred by some smart (not) cookies that hey! Look! A bill about covid 19 but it was tabled in ..... (dan dan daaan) 2019!!!!
Facepalm.
So, this is how the funding goes. Each state Health Dept. executed a 5-year Cooperative Agreement with the CDC/HHS for Epidemiology & Surveillance of Emerging/Infectious Diseases. The first year of the contract was 2019. Each subsequent year's contract may have new work plan/funding added, but is considered a "continuation" of the original contract (2019). When COVID response money was given to HHS for surveillance and response, the govt. wanted to get it out fast and dumped the money into the existing Cooperative Agreements. If you follow the link from Ron's original post, there was no activity on this additional funding until summer of '20. The epidemiology cooperative agreements between the CDC & state Health Depts. have been using this type of cyclical funding via Cooperative Agreement since the 1980s.
Ahhh, well, that clears it up! Thank you for that.
And for MSM zombies here is The CDC Saying it started as an unknown pneumonia in Wuhan in December 2019 which is 4 months later.
Payoff for election results
How effed over do you feel, my fellow Arizonans? Many states were given the same funding no doubt.
Dude…HUUGE!!!
I think perhaps the wrong thing was circled? Anyone else notice that the end date for the contract was July of 2024? Good to know how long they are planning to drag this thing out.
Bill Gates told you it would be 5 years
Cause he's in on it.
This is what bought the actions of the governors the following years.
Can we get a screenshot or link to the document for people not on Telegram?
https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_NU50CK000511_7523
Yep. Sort by action date and the grants commence 7/08/19
I don't have telegram and the link posted opens up to the content without needing an account or signing in to view the documents.
Get the rope!
It’s more about where that money actually went once it was given.....
No funding is given in our political system unless there are kickbacks to the politicians giving it.....!
WWG1WGA
How many states got this? A wee bit too coinky dinky...
Arrest them now for theft, bribery, misuse of public funds, murder, and treason.
Who is in charge of Arizona Health Services Department? What are their connections? Is it related to the Arizona election? Or is it at all political?
https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_NU50CK000511_7523
Plandemic alright
The only time the government is that efficient is when they are stealing.