So if Ivermectin and Hydroxy are both known therapeutics for the coof, doesn't that negate the EUA's for all vaccines?
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
Comments (116)
sorted by:
This👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻!
Meaning all testing, mandates, vaccinations, everything must cease immediately, today, NOW.
Not some time years from now when we have Nuremberg 2.0. People are having their lives ruined NOW.
What percentage of American colonists actively participated in the revolution that started our republic?
What percentage of military engagements did the continental army win?
What percentage of us will it require actively engaging in politics on a local level to tip the scales?
My answer to all the above is 10%.
God Bless America. Amen.
I try to bear in mind; He works through us and with us. I’m all in, and know everyone here is equally committed to restoration of the republic. 100%.
I’ve seen estimates of 3-6% of the colonists revolted.
Letter: https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/
Do you have any idea why you're attacking the messenger, just for saying the plandemic bullshit needs to stop now? You and I agree point by point on everything you wrote after that weird intro.
Maybe try decaf.
Can we just start calling these the Guantanamo Trials already?
What you and u/SgtPepper29 are missing is that vaccines aren't labeled as treatments or "curatives" - i.e. they aren't things you treat someone with after they've fallen ill, as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are (see: picture). Any physician in the world can explain you that.
Instead, vaccines fall under the label of prophylactic - i.e. they prevent or lessen the effects of a future infection. There are very few exceptions and edge cases (when a vaccine is a treatment rather than a prophylatic) such as some specific cancers.
But the NIH released a paper back in 2005 (I think) which showed that hydroxy was an effective prophylactic as well as treatment.
Hydroxychloroquine is both a prophylactic and a treatment, just in different doses and concentrations (and accompanied by zinc and a couple other things).
HCQ was also described as a vaccine
You seem to be missing the point, which is that the unapproved and untested mrna injections were given an EUA under the false premise that there were no known adequate treatments available, which these documents show were known since at least April 2020 (though we know Fauchi knew about HCQ as a prophylactic and treatment for SARS for at least 15 years), and these newly released documents are not only calling them treatments, but curatives in all stages.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
Furthermore, there are dozens of current observational data and randomized clinical studies showing both HCQ and IVM are highly effiencient prophylaxes as well as treatments, and, yet, the FDA has recently issued an EUA for mrna injections for 5+ year-olds under the same false premise of "no adequate treatments ( warning direct pdf link to FDA EUA from Jan 3, 2020).
The EUAs can not stand in the face of documented proof of three known "curatuves" in April 2020, known at least several months before the EUA-application was filed by Pfizer/BioNtech on Nov 20, 2020. . An added bonus is "the robust data" they submitted showed a 95% efficacy in preventing transmission.
Another detail I have not seen mentioned, but believe will be legally important in the future, is that this document states IVM "modulate(s) the immune response", which is considered a "vaccine" under the definition which was revised to include mrna injections.
Ivermectin was just stated to do the same thing by DARPA. With that being said, you do not need an experimental product to do what these proven medications are doing.
Nah, gonna go with what rand says to fauci every time he wants to bring up the definition/s "you changed those definitions as a lawyer speak way to circumvent your punishment" It is a vaccine, that is how it is marketed if they are marketing it wrong then that is fraud, if they change the definition without proper cause or through illegitimate means then the change did not happen
This should be our litmus test for candidates going forward.
Think about the implications here... They knew it worked back in 2020 and likely before then... It's still being attacked by the MSM and ignored by Fauci.
A working, safe, proven treatment.
This will not end well.
Fauci knew it worked in 2005.
True!
Came here to post the same. Fauci and NIH published their findings, which are now harder to find, thanks goolag. Nuremberg 2.0 ->Impalement for the guilty - partial sponsorship by Frank's redhot sauce, we put that shit on everything, including impalement spears.
Local doctors and medical professionals are all in it, mine included.
We'll see.
Meanwhile, Ms. "Because you'd be in jail" a/k/a "If that fucking bastard wins, we'll all swing from nooses!" a/k/a "Crime Against Children" a/k/a fancy-free subject of Q1 is dancing through life with an apple-cheeked grin on her face, basically out there running for [Vice] President.
wondering if we'll have a case using this and the dates on my texts when my aunt (deceased now) was fighting to get out of the hospital and I was telling my other aunt to ask for ivermectin or hydroxychloriquine (August 2021) ... the doctor that oversaw her needs to lose his damn license!
This complicit doctor needs to lose more than his license.
I believe that the pharmaceutical companies were smart enough to shield themselves from class-action lawsuits over the covid shots, but I don't think individual doctors will be able to avoid individual lawsuits over dead relatives who died because doctors prevented KNOWN treatments from being used.
CARES Act grants hospitals and staff immunity if they follow CDC guidelines. AKA genocide protocol.
This is where the military get involved, because then it isn't civilian trial, different punishments and laws if tried by military, no?
Yes, becomes RICO criminal conspiracy to commit an act of domestic terrorism, sedition,etc.
Btw, ivm is eua approved for C19 treatment now
Sauce?
Damn i saw it here but didnt archive. Ill try to find it
spez: been looking for an hour, knew I should have archived it when I saw it! There was a woman who posted on here not long ago that credited this site for showing her where in the EUA document Ivermectin was specifically ok'd, she printed it and showed it to the doc when making her case, which she succeeded at. It will eat at me until I remember exactly where I saw it and when I find it I promise I will update this comment. I also remember seeing it on a video and the producer said to archive it before it get's buried. My bad.
I think I saw somewhere that it was the WHO who had it listed as an approved treatment.
But that's like if I do something illegal and claim ignorance the police will still arrest and charge me... ignorance is not getting you out of trouble
Hippocratic oath is enough They refused to give informed consent Due diligence of information There is plenty you can go after. Also I dont remember fda or cdc getting appropriate authority to make any of these 'mandates' they are only there are suggestion machines unless given the authority which again I dont remember them getting, could be wrong
Yes, Due diligence and professional development is a must. Kind hearted doesn't exempt you from legal repercussions
It may change all at once when someone gets success. Then the law firms will suddenly want your business.
You are doing really well!
💥Sticky this💥
Why Yes it does, yes it does.
That’s why [they] suppressed it, lied about it, twisted DJTs words into “drinking bleach” and mocked it as horse paste.
While I would wager many of the faux elites, politicians, and mockingbird media were themselves taking it. REGULARLY.
I’m sure our world class brilliant autists can find their RX history when the Nuremberg trials are set to go.
In fact…I am counting on it.
Was Trump referring to Chlorine Dioxide by chance?
I think so
The people playing with words and saying there is no FDA-approved treatment had only a shriveled fig leaf to cover their crimes in the first place.
Same situation for our daughter in college. She stood her ground, never revealed her status, never complied with the mandates and never gave any info. Miraculously she was given an exemption. What a fucking clown show 🤡
I said no when asked 3 times and when I thought they were calling me into a meeting to fire me instead it was to give me another raise as apparently they can't afford to lose me right now.
Can you contribute less to the discussion? LOL
Im out here tard herding!
It aint much, but its honest work.
YES, It certainly does. This really should end it.
Been saying the same for a year, Fren. Nobody in my family wants to listen.
It's like they've all taken on a caveman stance. Shot good. Must get shot. Shot shot shot. "THEY" say (who is They btw?) shot good. Msm amazing. Yes you can still get it but not as bad. Shot good. Fauci a God.
So grateful for you guys.
I feel like the problem this past year is that the MSM has muddied the water so much on this issue. Its a very controversial topic. With the release from our own military acknowledging the effectiveness on just these two well established treatments (and we're learning about much, much more) it would seem a new can of worms has been opened. Clearly Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and other big pharma do NOT want this because it will cut a hole in their pockets, but even a left leaning pussy should be able to see the value in this information. I won't get my hopes up, but this is absolutely massive.
What are you saying? Don't be ridiculous, there's money to be made here.
It does and thus the war on using them.
I think Peter McCullough mentioned in the JRE podcast that it shouldn't because vaccines are a preventative and Ivermectin and HCQ are treatments. Therefore they technically shouldn't overlap. I may have misinterpreted his statement.
Ivermectin works as a preventative.
Per DARPA, it works throughout the entirety of the infection.
the OP and other commenters in this thread don't seem to grasp the difference between a "preventative" (something that lessens or entirely prevents the effect of a future infection) and a "treatment" (something you use to treat someone who's already ill).
By the looks of these comments it's pointless trying to explain, the mob will just downvote you.
E uthanize
U nwitting
A mericans
It not only negates it, it shows that the EUA was entered into in bad faith, indicating a type of fraud. This is similar to the FISA warrant against Trump and associates, where the FBI knowingly committed fraud to obtain a warrant.
The problem however is a bit deeper. We are not dealing simply with an issue of conflicting opinions, where the evidence could go either way. We are dealing with an institutional crisis in American and global institutions. In the most general form, this is referred to as LAWLESSNESS. Those in power have decided to coordinate efforts to achieve a preordained outcome (i.e., global government as can only be achieved by destroying the US).
So, any understanding that a particular revelation as in the present case would result in a substantive change in favor of freedom is to miss the point almost entirely. We are no longer free. Unless Patriots (Donald Trump led military) pull this off, we are in for a very very long haul, with almost complete loss of rights. Not to be bleak, but rather objective and to the point.
The FDA has already given approval though, so even though we are currently getting the old EUA formulation, it wouldn’t take long to shift gears and start labeling the Comirnaty if they really needed to. The fucking FDA is a problem. When you add the corrupt CDC and NIH it makes it almost impossible to fight them from a medical professional standpoint. Big pharma owns them all, including the major medical journals, so we are fucked until something major happens to take this cartel down.
In my opinion, that is exactly why those treatments were squashed. Can't have an effective treatment out there AND have EUA for vaccine; it's one or the other. So, get some big name medical people to talk bad about the treatments and the EUA remains.
Follow the money.
This is the main point that will sink them. Their deliberate denigration of these therapies and denial of access to them will prove their fraud which will break their liability exemptions.
Yes. The EUA is now illegal, I guess.
Yes. The EUA is fraudulent
I heard there were some doctors prescribing Ivermectin and then the pharmacy saying no. So when one corporation said yes another corporation said no. If I was a practicing doctor, I would start to cover my ass.
no because you are a racist!!!
We need original sauce without the header blurred, will come in handy to show doctors, pharmacies, lawyers, fam, sheep, etc. We are the storm, and we're pissed af
The EUA isn't void because they and fauci refuse to publicly say that it works for covid. They say there is no science to back it up and everyone else is the "moron". And their words are "LAW" and the doctors and real scientists proving it works, are dangerous conspiracy nuts, spreading "misinformation". SARS-cov1 doesn't have a treatment, cure or vaccine and it just disappeared...... they won't make that mistake again. Sars-cov1 lasted from 2002-2004 and this one will go for as long as they can
I feel like with this latest information we do NOT need their acknowledgement.
This is by far the most under-rated statement of the day. Brilliant.
Oooh, that's a bingo!
Frens — did you see this letter from a top Israeli physician/immunologist BLASTING the hubris-fueled elites for what they’ve done to our world? https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/
I feel terrible for the families of people who died because they were denied ivermectin and hydrocloriquin. they only claimed these drugs to be dangerous so they could push a vaccine. Knew this from the very beginning. I also feel sorry for all the people who bought into this crap and vaxed themselves and their families. And angry for people who felt for whatever reason they were forced into the vaccine. I pray that there are few long term side effects. I hope everyone involved pays with their lives. I believe this justifies capital punishment. Not sure if it was about money or depopulation, or both. Doesn't matter.
Yes it does that is all
Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this anything more than a General sharing his opinion in a document that was so irrelevant it didn't even received classification markings?
The source of this (paper’s letterhead) has been blurred. Please — Where is this from — and what date? Thx.
Yes.
Ivermectin seems to be the favorite big pharma medication lately.
This is the second time in the plandemic this revelation has come to light. Both releases of Fauci emails. First one literally turned out to nothing, as another commenter has said "So what?" They are acting lawlessly. Knowingly. Don't expect this to end anything. In fact, if any of you are bored, go argue with Dr Mike Simpson about this topic on Instagram. He's former GB but will argue and block if you speak about IVM or this topic whatsoever. He hates FLCCC in my opinion. Blocked me for talking about Operation Lockstep & SPARS2024