Tucker admits he and Hunter Biden are friends, and has made excuses for not exposing him. I have seen very close warm and friendly emails between them.
What kind of a person would be friends with a guy like Hunter Biden?
Cucker is dead to me, along with all of faux news. After the 2020 election, and paul, eddie muster, rhino ryan joined the board, they're gone. I can honestly say I have not watched the channel in over a year. Cucker's fate was sealed when on the air, he told everyone to back off on hunter. Then shortly afterwards, the emails were released that shows cucker is friendly with the bidens off set. There was an email of general favors being asked for a relative. His dad is also a clown, assumed he is retried, but none the less, a full-blown clown.
Cucker was my favorite on faux. Hannity and his crying wolf each and every time and then delivering nothing, got old after the 300th time. Stopped watching him long before I killed off the channel all together. TV in general is a waste of time. I broke free of its chains a year ago and it really freed up a lot of time and freed up my mind. We are the news now.
Mediaite, a journolist shithole throwing shade on the idea that TC sucked up to Hunter Biden. Think about that for a moment, maybe say it out loud, then draw your own conclusions.
Does anybody read the articles anymore or just post opinions as soon as they can??? This article is about the J6 committee pointing out how that Tweet is misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany.
GP: "This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
Agreed. It's McEnany who did a great job as press sec. and the fact that not thinking and reading carefully is how we get defeated. Willful ignorance is not becoming of a Great Awakening. This, that GP is writing about is a hit piece on her. Well all know about Hannity. Why is this post and another on here today completely spinning the GP article and smearing her with Hanity? [They] are trying to break down our unity and taint reputations.
"Does anybody read the articles anymore or just post opinions as soon as they can??? This article is about the J6 committee pointing out how that Tweet is misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany.
GP: "This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
The commentor above obviously won't get what you are trying to say. He spins his own version of the one or two sentences he read. Of course the texts were released to divide. The media and the deep state are also working overtime to create a false divide between President Trump and Governor DeSantis.
I have other issues with Hanity and while appreciate you coming down on me hard over something I might have gotten wrong, I wonder why you didn't mention anything about OP injecting their bias in the post title...
Your beef should be with OP, not those of us commenting.
Maybe Hannity just wanted an interview about something else and he did not want the interviewee wandering off into another area? Why not have an understanding of the desired content prior to appearing on TV?
I understand..who owns FAUX news?? Who controls 90%+ of the media..that should answer your question..I am on your side...Hannity is complicit or black mailed into their plans..
I've been listening to Hannity on and off for over a decade and I do believe the guy has a genuine love for his audience and what he believes is best for the country. The problem is he is easily influenced and he isn't very intelligent. There isn't blackmail on him and he isn't a pedophile or a devil worshiper. He just doesn't have a lot of experience outside of entertainment and news media. Yes, he worked blue collar jobs when he was young and got his start on the radio in his 20s. But that's it. Hannity started radio in his 20s and now hes 60 and hasn't worked any real jobs since then! He has very little exposure outside of this and he's become a bit disconnected from reality and is just there to repeat the same old over and over again. Reagan good, republicans good, democrats bad, liberals bad!
Yea i always thought it was sus how she went to fox right after the election was stolen. Disappointing for sure. Have no interest in anything she'd say anymore. Hope she doesnt come back w trump. Cant be trusted with her reply to Hannity.
Read the article. GP is pointing out that the person who made the tweet was intentionally misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany. The OP here either didn't read it or is intentionally spreading a hit piece on McEnany.
I read that story last night. Of course they were released to hurt Hannity and McEnany. But nowhere does it say the tweets were false or made up. This is what she said. I think she has some explaining to do. Like I said, don't trust ANYONE on Fox.
"Hannity texted Kayleigh a five point plan for talking to Trump on January 7th
Two of the points:
No more stolen election talk
Yes, impeachment and the 25th amendment are real, and many people will quit
Kayleigh responds with “Love that. Thank you. That is the playbook” pic.twitter.com/PqOeG6ZWTb"
GP's article is about how the J6 committee misconstrued information. The Tweet give no context or direct connect between these comments. This is classic fake news. Without context their comments mean nothing but people hear are falling for it.
I want to see exactly what this 'cia' pin is before I judge Hannity. I no longer listen to him because he wouldn't stop praising Dr. Fauci in 2020, but still have nothing against him.
Do you realize the GP article is saying that the tweet that they are writing about is an intentional attack on hannity and McEnany and that it is not accurately representing either of them?
GP:
"This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
Ah ... but I listened to Hannity a bit longer. Since 08. And he has not changed his stripes.
But to leave old drowned cows where they are, I will just mention his fervent defense of a totally compromised FBI, pointing towards the one percent during the 2016 - 2020 period, despite his detailed coverage of the hoax against President Trump. He is deep big pork state.
Yeah, I believe he is part of the Plan. He probably got compromised at Fox News - had to sell his soul - and because I think he truly loves America - he is helping Trump and company.
I also have a hunch that he divorced his wife to keep her safe as this played out. That seemed odd given their love story. I will be curious to see if we ever learn the truth about the ones who risked their lives to save our country.
ouuu not good. but for us...it's good as I have known who the media 'assets' are....I refer to them as azzhats. Yes, Hannity is one.
Right on down to your local large newspapers....the political editors...etc. Telling everyone who to vote for...it got so bad the newspapers were no longer allowed to 'endorse' candidates. So they do the section people cut and take to the polls,
they refer to it now as 'recommends'...The Times Recommends...
Yes, still an endorsement, just using another word to continue to tell the stoopid public who to vote for....the media is the virus.
I changed my cable subscription to streaming on Philo because I don't want my money going to "Subscriber fees" to Fox, Turner networks, etc. Subscriber fees are fees from your cable subscription that go to those networks whether you watch them or not, you're paying for the opportunity to watch them.
We all know that fox is a failed network. The ratings cratered after it was clear they were part of the steal with calling arizona, let alone the hundreds of other things they have done. They have rino ryan on the board and rupert's kids, who run it are known liberal activists. If hannity, cucker ingrahm or any of the other commentators were serious for the conservative cause, they would have bailed. Associate with liberals, earn the label.
The game changer will be Truth Social, Trump's network. I am looking forward to seeing what they will do for news. As mentioned prior, I use to watch news a good 4 plus hours a day, but after the election, shut off the TV. I do not see going back to that many hours, but excited at the prospect of truth and overall collective of pants shitting that will happen once he goes on air with Truth Social. Hope it does take off and is successful.
On the media aspect, if he really wants to fuck over commiecast and the other providers, he only needs to carry individual channels that can be subscribed to individually, versus blocks of channels that commiecast and att does, this will break the back of the monopoly and at the same time defund money going to shit channels that shouldn't be around other than being fed money not by our choice in the packages we need to select to get one or two channels we want.
Not sure about Tucker, but FAUX News and Hannity def. are..they don't name the true enemy. NAME THEM!!
Tucker admits he and Hunter Biden are friends, and has made excuses for not exposing him. I have seen very close warm and friendly emails between them.
What kind of a person would be friends with a guy like Hunter Biden?
A pedo. That's who.
You forgot that he also is a frequent visitor of Comet Ping Pong
Tucker visits comet ping pong? Gross! I did not know that. I suspect that anyone on tv is in the sick club.
Those guys Re caught. All act.
Cucker is dead to me, along with all of faux news. After the 2020 election, and paul, eddie muster, rhino ryan joined the board, they're gone. I can honestly say I have not watched the channel in over a year. Cucker's fate was sealed when on the air, he told everyone to back off on hunter. Then shortly afterwards, the emails were released that shows cucker is friendly with the bidens off set. There was an email of general favors being asked for a relative. His dad is also a clown, assumed he is retried, but none the less, a full-blown clown.
Cucker was my favorite on faux. Hannity and his crying wolf each and every time and then delivering nothing, got old after the 300th time. Stopped watching him long before I killed off the channel all together. TV in general is a waste of time. I broke free of its chains a year ago and it really freed up a lot of time and freed up my mind. We are the news now.
This...and a few days after the election tucker announced there was no steal.
Shit- completely forget about that and to be honest, that is more of a "Kiss of Death" to me than the loser hunter. F Cucker.
this
He can' t name his non-goy bosses without discovering how his mixed martial arts training is defeated by eh..... more compelling arguments.
Easy there, goyim!
Oy vapors
Here's mediaite (leftoid twat aggregator) unable to verify that TC sent an email to Hunter Biden for help getting his kid into Georgetown-
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/alleged-email-from-tucker-carlson-to-hunter-biden-i-cant-thank-you-enough-so-nice-of-you/
Mediaite, a journolist shithole throwing shade on the idea that TC sucked up to Hunter Biden. Think about that for a moment, maybe say it out loud, then draw your own conclusions.
MIne is that TC swims in the DC privilege tank.
Tucker is a frequent visitor of Comet Ping Pong.
Does anybody read the articles anymore or just post opinions as soon as they can??? This article is about the J6 committee pointing out how that Tweet is misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany.
GP: "This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
We don't need to read the article to know Hannity's controlled opposition.
Agreed. It's McEnany who did a great job as press sec. and the fact that not thinking and reading carefully is how we get defeated. Willful ignorance is not becoming of a Great Awakening. This, that GP is writing about is a hit piece on her. Well all know about Hannity. Why is this post and another on here today completely spinning the GP article and smearing her with Hanity? [They] are trying to break down our unity and taint reputations.
You can add TGP, Breitbart, Steve Bannon, and Alex Jones to this list as well. There's more to who really funds these people than you may know.
Limbaugh was in that group also
Hannity: "Guys, we need a clear path to land the plane in 9 days. He can't mention the election again. Ever."
That was 9 days before the inauguration.
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1484223625850875905/photo/2
Tic MF tock
Times up
I'm glad I never completely bought into him.
TO quote another poster here @yldngo
"Does anybody read the articles anymore or just post opinions as soon as they can??? This article is about the J6 committee pointing out how that Tweet is misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany.
GP: "This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
The commentor above obviously won't get what you are trying to say. He spins his own version of the one or two sentences he read. Of course the texts were released to divide. The media and the deep state are also working overtime to create a false divide between President Trump and Governor DeSantis.
I'm sorry, who are you to question my character?
Oh that's right, no one of any relevance or importance.
I have other issues with Hanity and while appreciate you coming down on me hard over something I might have gotten wrong, I wonder why you didn't mention anything about OP injecting their bias in the post title...
Your beef should be with OP, not those of us commenting.
I'm actually just para-quoting another poster, not coming on you hard just sharing another point of perspective here.
Also another link you might wanna check out: https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1484223625850875905/photo/2
Also the quote I posted is from another poster directly replying to the OP so I guess someone else is coming on him hard.
So was Hannity President or was this regarding talking points if Hannity did an interview?
Maybe Hannity just wanted an interview about something else and he did not want the interviewee wandering off into another area? Why not have an understanding of the desired content prior to appearing on TV?
Pretty sure that bit of censorship came from over Hannity's head.
He's a part of them...he is high enough to call most of his own shots.
Just saying the topic is banned for everyone on that channel. I think Watters mentioned it once. Once.
I understand..who owns FAUX news?? Who controls 90%+ of the media..that should answer your question..I am on your side...Hannity is complicit or black mailed into their plans..
Oy vey, goyim!
Hannity is a POS pussy
I've been listening to Hannity on and off for over a decade and I do believe the guy has a genuine love for his audience and what he believes is best for the country. The problem is he is easily influenced and he isn't very intelligent. There isn't blackmail on him and he isn't a pedophile or a devil worshiper. He just doesn't have a lot of experience outside of entertainment and news media. Yes, he worked blue collar jobs when he was young and got his start on the radio in his 20s. But that's it. Hannity started radio in his 20s and now hes 60 and hasn't worked any real jobs since then! He has very little exposure outside of this and he's become a bit disconnected from reality and is just there to repeat the same old over and over again. Reagan good, republicans good, democrats bad, liberals bad!
He tells you enough that you believe he is on your side..the problem with Faux in general..they never name (((them)))..=controlled ooposition
He wears the punisher pin like he's into Q
Yeah, the whole thing is confusing as hell.
I want to hear McEnany's explanation for her gushing reply. Working on getting her Fox gig? NO ONE from Fox is trustworthy. No one.
Yea i always thought it was sus how she went to fox right after the election was stolen. Disappointing for sure. Have no interest in anything she'd say anymore. Hope she doesnt come back w trump. Cant be trusted with her reply to Hannity.
Yeah. Other Trump people stayed on with Trump. Why didn't she?
Read the article. GP is pointing out that the person who made the tweet was intentionally misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany. The OP here either didn't read it or is intentionally spreading a hit piece on McEnany.
I read that story last night. Of course they were released to hurt Hannity and McEnany. But nowhere does it say the tweets were false or made up. This is what she said. I think she has some explaining to do. Like I said, don't trust ANYONE on Fox.
"Hannity texted Kayleigh a five point plan for talking to Trump on January 7th Two of the points:
GP's article is about how the J6 committee misconstrued information. The Tweet give no context or direct connect between these comments. This is classic fake news. Without context their comments mean nothing but people hear are falling for it.
Muh blackbelt tecovas
Hannity is a weasel
I want to see exactly what this 'cia' pin is before I judge Hannity. I no longer listen to him because he wouldn't stop praising Dr. Fauci in 2020, but still have nothing against him.
Every night it is on his left side lapel..for years.
But I want to see it in good enough resolution to judge for myself what it is.
I'm looking around for high resolution pics of it.
yep, we spent quite a lot of time discussing this on searcvoat.co
Link? Would love to see the talking points..i tried searching searcvoat.co and nothing.ty ahead of time
try this.
https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2823592
And take it from there.
You might want to try QRV too.
Here https://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2019/05/21/931/524/694940094001_6039135162001_6039150293001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
Do you realize the GP article is saying that the tweet that they are writing about is an intentional attack on hannity and McEnany and that it is not accurately representing either of them? GP: "This is criminal activity. The Jan 6 Committee takes text messages, likely illegally, and uses them in a hit job on Hannity and McEnany. (Maybe someday Hannity will have me on to share, from an international audit executive’s perspective, the massive amount of evidence showing that the election was stolen.)
These texts were released to hurt President Trump, Hannity, and McEnany. Of course Democrats stole the election. The Mueller sham proved they would do anything for power. The Jan 6 committee is another example."
Ah ... but I listened to Hannity a bit longer. Since 08. And he has not changed his stripes.
But to leave old drowned cows where they are, I will just mention his fervent defense of a totally compromised FBI, pointing towards the one percent during the 2016 - 2020 period, despite his detailed coverage of the hoax against President Trump. He is deep big pork state.
God bless.
Hannity cut his deal with trump. Exposure and shame are his punishment. Who still views him as a source of fact?
Yeah, I believe he is part of the Plan. He probably got compromised at Fox News - had to sell his soul - and because I think he truly loves America - he is helping Trump and company.
I also have a hunch that he divorced his wife to keep her safe as this played out. That seemed odd given their love story. I will be curious to see if we ever learn the truth about the ones who risked their lives to save our country.
Love stories have a tendency to not work out
ouuu not good. but for us...it's good as I have known who the media 'assets' are....I refer to them as azzhats. Yes, Hannity is one.
Right on down to your local large newspapers....the political editors...etc. Telling everyone who to vote for...it got so bad the newspapers were no longer allowed to 'endorse' candidates. So they do the section people cut and take to the polls,
they refer to it now as 'recommends'...The Times Recommends...
Yes, still an endorsement, just using another word to continue to tell the stoopid public who to vote for....the media is the virus.
Yes..listen stupid Goy to the fancy man on the Tell-lie-vision.
This news might be a psyop conducted by the DS
I changed my cable subscription to streaming on Philo because I don't want my money going to "Subscriber fees" to Fox, Turner networks, etc. Subscriber fees are fees from your cable subscription that go to those networks whether you watch them or not, you're paying for the opportunity to watch them.
He's a Clown, but thru affiliation, not any actual training. And he talks about it constantly.
We all know that fox is a failed network. The ratings cratered after it was clear they were part of the steal with calling arizona, let alone the hundreds of other things they have done. They have rino ryan on the board and rupert's kids, who run it are known liberal activists. If hannity, cucker ingrahm or any of the other commentators were serious for the conservative cause, they would have bailed. Associate with liberals, earn the label.
The game changer will be Truth Social, Trump's network. I am looking forward to seeing what they will do for news. As mentioned prior, I use to watch news a good 4 plus hours a day, but after the election, shut off the TV. I do not see going back to that many hours, but excited at the prospect of truth and overall collective of pants shitting that will happen once he goes on air with Truth Social. Hope it does take off and is successful.
On the media aspect, if he really wants to fuck over commiecast and the other providers, he only needs to carry individual channels that can be subscribed to individually, versus blocks of channels that commiecast and att does, this will break the back of the monopoly and at the same time defund money going to shit channels that shouldn't be around other than being fed money not by our choice in the packages we need to select to get one or two channels we want.