Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

661
Speaker Nancy Pelosi will not hand over video coverage and emails from Jan 6 per a FOIA request.  Pelosi based her decision on “sovereign immunity.”   Pelosi and Democrats know if they release the 14,000 hours of footage from security cameras on January 6 it will blow apart their narrative.  (dcweekly.org) 🚔 Crime & Corruption 💸
posted 4 years ago by Eternallife 4 years ago by Eternallife +661 / -0
108 comments share
108 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (108)
sorted by:
▲ 69 ▼
– placekicker17 69 points 4 years ago +69 / -0

If you have truth on your side, then you have nothing to hide, Nancy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 59 ▼
– Yagbar147 59 points 4 years ago +59 / -0

Could it be that Nancy is Correct ?

IF….Washington DC is a separate entity within America (as in Sovereign State) Is it in fact Foreign Territory and therefore cannot be compelled to release that footage.

I have seen many people repeatedly point out that she has used this argument but…..NO ONE !! Has ever explained why that statement may be correct.

I wonder why that is 🤔

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– MaxdOut 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

Then Invade!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– inspoken 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

exactly! This might have been the 5D chess move Trump was forcing her to make

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Hillinsider 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– davidwilcox 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Let's wait until the midterms and see if state-level election reforms are working.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SkepButOpen 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Well, even if we sweep, it might be because there were just too many votes against them to rig the system credibly. I mean I think it’s going to be a bigger victory in the midterms than Trump had in 2020 by quite some margin. I want to believe that the reforms are working, but I still don’t trust that they are even if we crushed them in November.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Araket 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Now that's some funny shit!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– davidwilcox 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Actually wasn't a joke. There have been, and are continuing to be, state-level vote reforms. They barely stole the election last time, so there is hope. We sit here as anons chatting how all that's left is war but there are lawyers and other people on our side trying to figure out how to keep 2020 from happening again. So many people here say there is no hope but the midterms are only a few months away. There is -zero- chance of us ever organizing a revolution from scratch and being successful. However, there is a legitimate chance that within a year we could take back both the House and Senate. Don't forget ALL House members are up for re-election this year. If these reforms had no chance then I assume people with more knowledge than us would not be putting resources into them. So maybe we should start trying to get fired up for the midterms instead of abandoning hope.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Araket 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Old One Eye was just re-elected in Texas. That means that they can even pull it off in Texas now, and you think they will just, what? Give up? In no way am I saying don't vote, but they are going to steal 2022 just like 2020. Election laws obviously work as well as gun control laws and stacking more on top of the existing ones in hope that they "work better" this time is as ludicrous as the reasoning for mounting firearm regulations or even putting up a sign telling illegal aliens that they are not allowed to cross the river into our country.

Criminals don't give a shit about laws, that is what makes them criminals. If we had enforced the existing voting laws, you know, things like the Constitution of the USA, then we would not be where we are now, so how do new laws make a shit of difference? That is the sad part in all this, we just continue to trust the system that fucks us in the ass every single time.

Really, I hate the doomer crap, but at some point, people need to open their eyes. The system is rigged, that is the bottom line. 2016 caught them off guard and they won't let that happen again. Without fixing 2020 there will never be an honest political election in this country again. That is the sad truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– inspoken 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

It's checkmate

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Yagbar147 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

We all understand the sidetrack 😂 cos there is just too much goin on and not enough time to cover it all.

Happy Hunting Fren. 👍😎

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– redhawk 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I heard in another article that congress has some provision where their work can be partially immune to FOIA so it was filed under some other law

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– 2ndenthusiast 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Devolution is getting uncomfortable for the swamptards, they're breaking cover.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MICHIGANisRED 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I believe you are correct

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– dty6 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

this!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– placekicker17 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Great thought…

permalink parent save report block reply
View 6 more comments
▲ 8 ▼
– GottaCatchAMall 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Exactly. Anyone who fights to withhold information obviously has something to hide! Guilty as sin!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SpaceManBob 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

This comment almost reads like a satire of police officers trying to guilt-trip/coerce people into consenting to a search of their property or giving up a bunch of personal information about themselves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SpaceManBob 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

This reads the same as "if you have nothing to hide, then you'll let me search your car"

This isn't a good argument. There are plenty of better arguments for why Nancy should stop being a cunt and comply with the will of the people. This ain't it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– harkk 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

How does she qualify as a "sovereign"? Outside of her own mind?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– impera 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

It was not too long ago that the 'sovereign citizen' thing was being described as a lawless terrorist insurgency. Maybe that assertion was far more right than they know.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– SuckaFree 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

In regards to D.C. and the lawless insurgency currently ongoing, then this is accurate AF.

Time to move the seat of U.S. Govt out of D.C.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– impera 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Mar-a-lago and FL to be the new capital? Love to see it..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ceegeegee 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I have never heard if this. What do you have to do?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– harkk 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Too bad we don't have any decent judges in DC that would give her a big, legal smack over this crap.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– impera 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Dick Cheney did the same thing once upon a time.. asserting that he and by extension the then-VPs office was a '4th branch' of government and is unaccountable to controls and legislation that governs the other three. In relations to refusing FOIA type requests.

And he got away with that too. If anything 20 years later, the DC judges are probably far swampier now than they were previously.. so this assertion by pelosi will probably derail any further push.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Phishhed44 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I can’t believe that bastard got away with that!! Gggrrrr 😡

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– FEARNOT 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

Ask the Chinese to leak it. Pelosi and her crew are to damn dumb to have any real IT security. SwallowsWell has a little shrimp fried rice delivery girl that can probably help.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– jc99ta 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Honestly, I'd have banged Fang Fang too especially were I as mongoloid-looking as Swallowswell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– inspoken 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

That's really insulting to all the mongoloids out there

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– FEARNOT 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

To bad she didn't take him to her homeland and harvest his organs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Phishhed44 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Nice!! 😂☝🏼

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Texastornado 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

I wasn't sure i understood what "sovreign immunity" definition is, so looked it up: "the official exemption of a ruler or state from certain types of civil suit and criminal prosecution" further says "sovreign immunity does not apply if the government or an employee infringes on the US Constitution"...hmmm, interesting how this will play out...wonder if Space Force recorded/intercepted all of it anyhow? perhaps a trap for nancy?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– repeatoffender 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Sovreign Immunity applies to rulers (e.g. kings, queens, dictators), not Representatives.

What Nancy is claiming is that she and the House of Representatives are rulers of the USA and not representatives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ITOLDYOUSO 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The idea is that Federal Government cannot be sued. I don't think sovereign immunity would apply to a situation like this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– repeatoffender 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The Federal Government CAN be sued. And so can the representatives and appointees that operate said government.

This is very different from a monarchy/dictatorship where attempting to bring a lawsuit against the dictator results in the execution of your entire family. That's what sovereign immunity means.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– ITOLDYOUSO 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

First sensible comment

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Lenguado 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

She is neither A Sovereign nor has sovereignty, nor does she have immunity.

Trial. Then whatever comes after that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– summerstormAK 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

How the heck could she have sovereign immunity?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– yoohoo 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

RINOs gonna RINO.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Up vote for that one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NOT_ADMIN 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Most republicans are the same as democrats. Just people chasing power wherever they can get it. They do their minimum part to keep that power by tricking the masses that they are who they pretend to be. Both are 2 sides of the same coin.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– OkieBowhunter 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Okay, but why does she need "sovereign immunity" to protect evidence that should favor her?

Hmmmmm, what could it be? I wonder? Hmmmmmm

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Oblakhan 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

She'll stall as long as she can. She denies the request and now they file suit to get it. After appeals go all the way to the SC then she'll give it up or go to prison.

How much longer do innocent people sit in prison?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Jacurutu99 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

How do you feel about these fools openly calling for wetworks, an elederly p*do ending a "speech" with GOGETHIM! and using the 9/11 anniversary to say "sure 9/11 was bad and all....but it wasn't like 1/6?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CMAnon 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Sovereign Immunity? Who the fuck's the Sovereign here? You work for us bitch. If she doesn't hand it over, the NSA should give it up and then the military should send Pelosi on a permanent trip to GITMO.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– nolasquid33 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

fuck this drunk clown.......

one of these days alice......

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– WinsAnon 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0 stickied

This is a delaying tactic, with no real expectation it will succeed. The Supreme Court will ultimately hold that officials cannot thwart investigations and FOIA requests by simply asserting sovereign immunity. The idea is clearly contrary to a government for the people and by the people.

In typical swampy fashion, Pelosi is buying time while the narrative that Trump organized an attack on the Capitol gets driven deeper into morons’ tiny brains.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– kp2552 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Congress is not subject to FOIA. Here is the Judicial Watch actual release.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/pelosi-congress-claims-immunity-in-court/

Here is the relevant passage if you don't want to read the whole thing.

Congress exempts itself from the Freedom of Information Act. Judicial Watch, therefore, brought its lawsuit under the common law right of access to public records. In opposing the broad assertion of secrecy, Judicial Watch details Supreme Court and other precedent that upholds the public’s right to know what “their government is up to:”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Hodar 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Why doesn’t COLOR OF LAW being applied?

Under TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 we can show that Ashley Babbitt was murdered under Color of Law; and EVERYONE involved qualifies for the Death Sentence

Every …. Single…. Person

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– navycuda 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Can you explain this more?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CIngone 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Sovereign has nothing to do with the Constitution or the law of the US. She knows she has to release it and is just stalling to try to get past the mid-terms

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Magnify 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Arrest Nancy Pelosi now. She is charged with High Treason and war crimes against Humanity

Burn this luciferin witch at the stake.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

It sounds like Nancy Pants is obstructing justice and should be arrested. She she also be charged with treason. Why not give her the same treatment that she said she'd do to Pres. Trump if he didn't leave the White House after the election. Do you remember?

She said this: “I’m counting down the hours ‘til he’s gone,” Pelosi said, according to a Tuesday Politico report. “I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands, and his feet.”

Let's give Nancy Pants the same courtesy, shall we?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– EarOfCornpop 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Regarding the "Sovereign Immunity" question --

The 'District of Columbia' is a special legal entity, as is the Vatican within Rome, and as is the 'City of London' district within London.

Is Nancy claiming to belong to an entity outside the US, and this gives her 'Sovereign Immunity?' Is this her excuse for refusing to produce the video from 'the insurrection'?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Wtf_socialismreally 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

If you claim sovereign immunity as a reason to avoid giving evidence for a crime someone else supposedly committed...

...then wouldn't that imply that the evidence implicates you?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SkepButOpen 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

What - you don’t trust a drunken witch who schemes and lies CONSTANTLY? Come on, man!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– VetforTrump 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

She has deep-seated immunity. We need to vanquish Washington. Burn it down. Salt the earth and bury the swamp people in their own swamp. We can keep arlington.. the rest is nothing but a testament to evil.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Jacurutu99 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Bless her little heart, she doesn't have a choice.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hope70 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Those documents are the people’s documents because they all work for us. Their salaries are paid by We The People, including Capitol Police. She either turns them over or Congress needs to start legal proceedings against her. What they are doing to the people from January 6, who are sitting in prison for 14 months is illegal, whether they are innocent or guilty, Left or Right, Republicans or Democrats.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Miztivin 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Sovereign Immunity.

So shes admitting she exsist above the law.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SuckaFree 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

WTF does "sovereign immunity" have to do with releasing Jan 6th footage?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– yoohoo 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

She must think she's Queen Nancy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– VetforTrump 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Wanna bet someone already has it?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– needorganization 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

How about if it... just... you know... leaked out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– WinsAnon 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It’s astonishing that no one in the media will even utter that this Jan 6 Commission is an unconstitutional government assault on the right of free speech and assembly.

Add to this the DHS declaration that it is domestic terrorism to question election results or the effectiveness of vaccines, and the Left’s agenda couldn’t be more clear.

They are trying to make it illegal to think and speak independently. In a time when they are defunding police and failing to prosecute true criminality, they are all in on prosecuting free speech.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– rottn 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

How can this one POS individual be immune to the FOIA rules that the rest of us Americans have to obey? I just had to disclose a bunch of personal info to a bank just for declaring a beneficiary according to that rule or law or whatever it is.

And why does everyone else in charge play along like she can do this?! 🤡🌎 (and soon they will probably take away these emojis so that we can't hurt their feelings when we use them)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Decimusunum 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Take it to the supreme court

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CokeOrPepe 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Oh yeah that will do it 🙄

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Phishhed44 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It’s pretty sad that that’s funny, eh? Unreal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RetiredWarrior 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

If ever there was a person I wanted the Eighth Amendment to not apply to, it's her.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Brickyard 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

There are people in jail right now. This could be the spark that ignites the revolution.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Juice 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

She thinks she's a sovereign.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– downwithuppish 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Wonder if this is related to the rumoured Ukrainians that were brought over to cause trouble. Were they given assurances they wouldn't get be investigated?

permalink save report block reply
View 12 more comments

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy