Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

365
Breaking: Supreme Court Chief Justice Releases Statement on Unprecedented SCOTUS Leak – Confirms Its Authenticity – Launches Investigation (www.thegatewaypundit.com) BREAKING NEWS
posted 4 years ago by larrythepatriot 4 years ago by larrythepatriot +365 / -0
54 comments share
54 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (54)
sorted by:
▲ 39 ▼
– deleted 39 points 4 years ago +39 / -0
▲ 18 ▼
– MAGA_Patriot_1776 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

My guess?

He is 100% in on the leak. Astro turf protesters and "fencing" all of it set up in advance. They are trying to put abortion into law, and this is a way to fire up their base. No pun intended on the fire. That's coming too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Hoshi 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

He is forced to vote yes by party and no by deep state so the next best thing to do is leak it to try to kill it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NoApologyTour 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I think this is all theatre. A few of them voted yes to get it to this point, and they will retract their vote later in the process. In the meantime they will fire up the left with the one issue that their base cares about more than not being able to afford food and gas.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– SvixGale 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

"Those who speak the loudest..."

This is so totally, completely, fundamentally, and constantly true... It's a literal law of human nature.

"Methinks she doth protest too much...."

The bard was 1,000,000% spot on....and I'm sure whoever enunciated this before him....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– numina18 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Like your name. Sorry you were robbed, but you got it back!! Lost a friend, though, I'll bet......

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KickingPugilist 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

To be honest, I'd probably be looking too if I was at a party. That being said, the same thing happened to me and the dude looking hard for it was the culprit when he "found it" in the place I had checked 5 times already.

So good rule of thumb, but still room for exceptions. But then again, that's true for most things 🤷‍♂️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TheTroof 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I had a co-worker steal $20 from me once. He denied it, but I knew he was the only one that had access to my envelope that had cash in it. I almost chalked it up to me forgetting how much was in the envelope, but something just felt off. A week later I set a trap. I laid out $600 in $100s on a stand, then pretended to go in and shower. I heard him go into my room, then leave the hotel. So, I turned the water off, walked into my room, counted the cash, then walked out to the balcony where I saw him walking to his truck. I yelled at him to give me my money back. He knew he was stone cold busted, so he did. He never did it again, though. He was the biggest liar and thief I have ever worked with.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– KickingPugilist 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Glad you set the trap and it went over well, $600 is quite a bit of cash to lay as a trap, I admire your commitment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TheTroof 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

His job was on the line, so I had no worries. ;o) Also, had it only been a single $100, he probably wouldn't have taken it. I made it easy for him to think I wouldn't notice one missing. hehe

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– qeratdemonstrandum 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Whoever smelt it, dealt it. - my 8 year old self

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– Island_Photo 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

investigate Epstien's client list

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BoatingAccident 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

They already know since it’s them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GAWker 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Fucking THIS^^

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– TNBanjoMan 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Don't forget, we are watching a movie. Popcorn is available in the lobby.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– BoatingAccident 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Nothing wrong w real butter. It’s good for you. That fake movie butter is poison however.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ToxicLibertyism 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I once left a mostly empty bucket of that fake butter stuff out in the weather for a few months, figuring rain, and nature would clean it out- I didn't want it melting in my garbage bag. Wrong. That stuff turned into a rubbery, gummy, latex looking shit. I never ate that crap since.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CQVFEFE 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Mmmmmmm....

Buttery M&Ms

Gllhghggllgghh

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– NitroxNova 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

theyll investigate themselves, find no evidence of wrongdoing, and say the russians did it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AmericanVictory 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Don't forget President Trump!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– amarQ144 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

w0w...this could lead to a resignation of a low level lib

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Fefifofumdrum 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Anyone else find this confirmation to be odd?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– georock 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

hey Roberts, while you are investigating things, may want to look into that guy who stole your identity when flying the Lolita Express

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BoatingAccident 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Because he is compromised by child sex blackmail photos.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MAG768720 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

... it does not respresent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case.

(a) Look for a criminal working within Alito's office as the leaker. How else would someone get their hands on his particular writings?

(b) Enough pressure could be put on that they will NOT rule to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Don't assume anything.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– JessWithTheMess 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Also considering this is Alito’s words to everyone else on the SC makes me a little more hesitant to believe this will rule in our favor.

I thought Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Thomas gave their approval/supported this draft.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DarQ2light 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

One of the biggest Auntie defamation lawyers in the country called him a pedophile and he didn't say a thing. That tells you everything you need to know.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GimmeMemes 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I hate it when people defame my Auntie!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Jet_Morgan 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Roberts - Fugitive from Gitmo hangman's noose.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 1814LoveWins 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Was probably him. Didn't he over see the fake impeachments?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NeuroticFisherman 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It's the chief supreme court justice's constitutional job to precede over impeachment trials. Just as it's the supreme court chief justice's job to swear in the presidents. I doubt Trump's impeachment and this current news is directly related or anything.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CaptainChrisPBacon 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Never in the history of the SCOTUS has a document been LEAKED. Why was it leaked and who leaked it. What purpose was it to leak it. To change the news cycle away from Covid the war in Ukraine Hunter Biden's Laptop Hillary Clinton President Obama's FISA Spying of President Trump?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CaJuN-Polak 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The FBI won't find anyone.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Oskar64 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Shouldn't take him long to find it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Binome169 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Thomas Becket strategy...... those young impressionables within the halls would take very little ‘pushing’ .....

WWG1WGA

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mister_Winston 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Oh man, he's releasing the MARSHALL OF THE SUPREME COURT on this! That guy's a true Eliot Ness! He'll be kicking in doors and dragging suspects into the deepest darkest cells for old style rough-'em-up interrogation!

Or nothing will happen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AmericanVictory 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

"OOOH, an INVESTIGATION . . . .that's uh-LITERALLY like, uh-SO uh-scary-uh!"

. . . said the braindead libtard moron . . .

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BeaconOfLight86 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Yea, Roberts and the FBI to the rescue 🙄

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MAGAdeburger 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Chief Justice determines who gets to author the majority opinion, so the CJ tends to make sure he's in the majority opinion. Consider this: Roberts did not join in the majority and this was going to be or is a 5-4 ruling (Alito, Thomas, Barrett, Kavanuagh, Gorsuch vs. Roberts, Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor). Then as senior Justice, Thomas chooses majority opinion writer. He'd choose Alito, obviously. Now that Alito's absolutely nuke of an opinion is out there, perhaps Roberts changes his mind to side with the majority so he could choose himself to write the majority opinion and try to make it far less of a nuke to Roe? He'll try to side with Mississippi but not outright overturn Roe let alone declare that there is no constitutional right of abortion, unlike Alito who demolished all of that bullshit.

Could this have all been a trap to expose Roberts? 🤔

And consider this, perhaps the Court is utterly compromised and the "majority" was not going to uphold the MS law, let alone overturn Roe and declare that there is no 14th Amendment abortion constitutional right? Perhaps only Alito and Thomas are clean? Perhaps they leaked this opinion to show the TRUTH that was going to be suppressed? Perhaps this is a warning to the other "conservative" Justices, that if they somehow changed their votes, if they won't agree with Alito, then it's a bullet to the head for them? 🤔

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– GA_Logic 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

"Investigation"

Sure.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– raytheater 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I hope that they impeach the Justice leaker.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– numina18 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

That bum.....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bubble_bursts 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Confirming this leak, in may ways, is worse than the leak itself.

The intent is to provide ammunition to the left even before the actual judgement is made, and confirmation is more official than just a leak because leak has plausible deniability.

They are hoping to galvanise rioting and use that as cover to force the opposite judgement.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– huhWHAThuh 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I think it's a big distraction while they ATTEMPT to pull us into WW3.

Zelenskyy has agreed to concessions on several occasions, only to pull back under NATO (USA) pressure.

The politicians pushing this better be willing to go get THEIR asses shot off, because I don't think people here care what happens over there. Russia and Ukraine have been in conflicts for Centuries.

If NATO or the EU push Russia too hard and get attacked, people here DON'T CARE. Pull back and STAY OUT OF IT.

Nobody here is going to go, or send their children over there on the orders of a crooked walking corpse like Biden.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy