I half agree. He is a civilian leader of the military. And by being the leader, commander in chief, he is part of the military. The only military leadership position to be civilian.
Musk said during a Miami tech conference in May that he may have never voted Republican and overwhelmingly voted Democrat throughout his life.
"You know [Musk] said the other day 'Oh, I've never voted for a Republican,'" Trump said during a Saturday rally in Anchorage, Alaska. "I said 'I didn't know that.' He told me he voted for me. So he's another bullshit artist."
Trump also said he knew the Musk Twitter deal would fall through. In May, he said that Musk would not buy Twitter at such a "ridiculous price."
"Elon is not gonna buy Twitter. Where did you hear that before? From me," Trump said.
Musk had been slated to purchase Twitter for $44 billion, but notified the SEC on Friday that he would no longer be acquiring the social media company. Twitter, who said Musk is contractually obligated to follow through with the deal, said they will be taking Musk to court.
Trump called Musk's contract with Twitter a "rotten deal."
"He's not going to be by buying it," Trump said. "Although he might later. Who the hell knows what's going to happen? He's got a pretty rotten contract. I looked at his contract. Not a good contract."
I like the connections, too numerous for coincidence.
Grammarfags sometimes drive me nuts on this board, but listening to someone mispronounce a name "Alwaleed" as "Alaweed" EVERY time when the spelling is right in front with the narration distracted me.
Grammarfags sometimes drive me nuts on this board, but listening to someone mispronounce a name "Alwaleed" as "Alaweed" EVERY time when the spelling is right in front with the narration distracted me.
I hear you anon, but if I let it get to me, I'd be driven clinically insane.
Gotta pick those battles very carefully. Grammarcopping the internet is the most annoying waste of time since "gematria". ;)
My pet peeve is the ones who go about spouting grammar and spelling rules that are wrong. WTF? If you don't actually know, then there's no requirement to comment on it; just leave it. :p
I think it's possible there may be a little agitation/psyop at work with the mispronunciations sometimes. It shows intentional disrespect and dishonor to the subject.
With the GWP article exposing the Jan 6 BS, this ties in the CWray aspect.
Curious to learn the FBI ties to alWaleed, 9/11, Twitter, and Jan 6. Seems like the 9/11 financier (Dopey) must have spilled the beans once captured to save his ass. When normies learn this, well... maybe they stay asleep, but some will have to see the light. Huge connection on this one.
I remember a recent post about chess where in the game a pawn can or must become the king (or was it the queen?). I know nothing about chess but what I have learned from a couple of movies. But that post and discussion struck me as an obscure, but important piece in the story, like those throw-away incidents in mystery novels which are the key to solving something. Does that rule in chess relate to this?
It's probable. You have four choices when a pawn of yours reaches the end row on your opponents side- you can go with a knight, bishop, rook or queen. Your queen is often the best choice, because not only can she move in all the ways the rook and bishop can (both diagonally and straight across ranks and files) but she can move as far as they can. There are times it is more advantageous to choose a knight, but most will queen.
Good explanation. I have played chess for over 40 years. The only way I would ever choose a knight would be if it immediately gained me a checkmate. It can happen, but I would say 99.9% the queen is taken.
AWESOMENESS! excellent decode explanation !
MUCH better than a cut/paste with arrows and circles all over. Interesting to see if Tesla ends on 711 today. current price is ~709.
Yep, sometimes the high IQ anons don't realize it's difficult for some of us not so high IQs to look at posts with arrows.going every which way and understand them. I try not to complain as I appreciate their work and effort.
yup. I am a.d.d low IQ but I appreciate every frens efforts. I spend too much time trying to figure out all the arrow stuff and still come up empty. kek
The one caveat to the Q 711 post is it states -- "King to pawn". Then, Elon Musk's post showing Chuck Norris' pictured with the chessboard, we see this matches Q 711, in which "King to pawn" is confirmed. At the bottom of Elon's post, it says -- "Chuckmate", not 'checkmate'. However, it infers 'checkmate'. Note, that the chessboard setup is not a 'checkmate'; not yet anyway.
Also, note, Chuck Norris is depicted behind a single white King piece, while the other side has ALL of its black chess pieces. I have no idea the meaning of this or why the display contains this arrangement. Why wouldn't a single black pawn be used with a white king piece instead? The same confirmation would be true, no? Or there could be a variety of other chess setups to which the "King to pawn" setup would also hold true. Is there more to this message than meets the eye?
If you look at Musk's posting, it infers Chuck Norris' white King piece is the one that will be checkmated, not the other way around. So, what other meaning does "Chuckmate" mean other than Chuck Norris?
I was thinking Chuckmate was to describe the picture of Mr. Norris with one pawn against the blacks full board. Chuck would win in this scenario...because Chuck.
Hey fren, sorry but you keep using "infer" when you mean "imply" or "suggest". Quick help: the person delivering the message or the message that's being delivered may imply or suggest something. The person receiving the message is the one who infers.
On the contrary, stranger. The word I used is indeed the word I meant to use. The word "imply" is a synonym of the word I used.
Since you offered me writing advice I'd like to reciprocate and state -- Rule #1. Never appear [emph. added] to be giving advice when it is not asked for. It's better to ask questions. In my case, what did I mean by this? It's a softer volley and Dale Carnegie would say it provides an 'eager want'. Thereto, let's look at your use of the slang "fren" (ergo, 'friend'). I never use this word, because it is plainly a falsehood. I don't really know anyone here well enough to call them a "fren" (ergo, 'friend'). Most individuals at GAW I interpret as being of similar minds, but they are certainly not friends. In fact, you and I are 'strangers'. Take note that this is why I used this word above. A "fren" (ergo, 'friend) is an individual that has earned the trust of another human. Earning trust is an outcome that takes a long time, and absolutely requires use of all the human senses. The old maxim --- 'The eyes are the windows to the soul' really does have an important meaning for friendship to ever occur.
So stranger, the word 'infer' is suitable for what I intended. You provided its synonym -- "imply", which is also suitable.
Haha, fren/friend or not, you misused "infer." Twice. "Infer" is not a synonym of "imply" any more than "speak" and "listen" are synonyms. The speaker suggests or implies something and the listener infers or interprets what is said. Do you really not get this concept? Do I have to explain what a synonym is too?
There it is emboldened for you, stranger. You're being petulant and clearly incorrect and erred. From your reply, I sense you won't admit it though. It appears your objective is to obfuscate the message of my original post by raising a trite and insignificant squawk. Perhaps, it's time for you to refresh your grade schooling. How pathetic. Now please go away. I'm moving on to important things.
LOL there are 5 descriptions of synonyms listed on that page and only one of them seems to suggest you have a case. It is well regarded everywhere English is spoken that the two words carry different meanings. Your attempt at verbosity to dissuade me from my insistence that you've got this part of your vernacular wrong is laughable at best. I only majored in English, and literally everywhere you look except for subsection (4) proves my point.
If you want to be a clear communicator, do us all a favor and make the distinction between infer and imply that the english language deserves. You still sound like a fucking idiot, just a prideful one now.
I predicted it. Your pathetic response validates my point. Your desperation is displayed by your feeble claim of having an "English" major. I don't believe you. Go away.
"King to pawn" might imply that this former king has been reduced to a simple "pawn in the game". Playing a critical part in the game, but notably not one of the main pieces of high-level interest.
My interpretation: He's provided information against one or more of the higher-level pieces.
Not sure why Stormy connected the 711 with 117, though. I get that "one is reverse of the other", but there are so many posts ..... to think that every pair of posts with reversed numbers is connected is just WAY TOO MUCH for me to believe. I mean, if this IS true, someone with more free time than myself should start looking for similar connections between the rest of the posts.
Yes that was an unfortunate leap and unnecessarily desperate stretch to connect things. It's things like that that make us seem like we are grasping at straws.
He should have ended the video with the first half which was incredible decode.
Great decode. I hesitate to think something will happen today, because if we know the date, so does the enemy. But in the future something will line up with this decode. Or perhaps it's just disinfo to throw the enemy off. Hard to say.
Trump conveniently calls out Musk for being a liar at the same time. Sour the optics for plausible deniability regarding comms with Musk?
I believe that is exactly right.
Is Elon Musk part of the Q team???
Q-918 You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.
Its possible, but I think unlikely. Only 3 non-military in the group.
I think those 3 people are Nunes, Kash, and Scavino. GEOTUS is CiC, thus military.
But... I believe there are many involved in many ways. Just not part of the core group that calls themselves Q/Q+.
Excellent thought experiment regardless.
Kash is military though... Cmon guys lol
u/#trumpwrong
I will never get over this gif. Top kek
POTUS actually remains a civilian and is not a member of the military.
Commander in Chief is at the top of the military chain-of-command.
Correct. And he remains a civilian, not a military member.
I half agree. He is a civilian leader of the military. And by being the leader, commander in chief, he is part of the military. The only military leadership position to be civilian.
Except for the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and that Secretary of Defense dude...
Military has civilian leadership.
Those are all part of the Joint Chief of Staffs who's primary role is to advise the president. They are not in the leadership chain of the military.
Patel Patriot breaks it down quite well in part 9 of his devolution series.
The second part is accurate. He's a civilian, not part of the military. Even though he is CiC.
Generals Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower were also considered civilians when they were president.
Well, at least we moved on from JFK jr.
Musk said during a Miami tech conference in May that he may have never voted Republican and overwhelmingly voted Democrat throughout his life.
"You know [Musk] said the other day 'Oh, I've never voted for a Republican,'" Trump said during a Saturday rally in Anchorage, Alaska. "I said 'I didn't know that.' He told me he voted for me. So he's another bullshit artist."
Trump also said he knew the Musk Twitter deal would fall through. In May, he said that Musk would not buy Twitter at such a "ridiculous price." "Elon is not gonna buy Twitter. Where did you hear that before? From me," Trump said.
Musk had been slated to purchase Twitter for $44 billion, but notified the SEC on Friday that he would no longer be acquiring the social media company. Twitter, who said Musk is contractually obligated to follow through with the deal, said they will be taking Musk to court.
Trump called Musk's contract with Twitter a "rotten deal."
"He's not going to be by buying it," Trump said. "Although he might later. Who the hell knows what's going to happen? He's got a pretty rotten contract. I looked at his contract. Not a good contract."
Yes!
Coming news concerning C. Wray? Related to Gateway Pundit release, maybe? (Since we're making connections here...)
Its an absolutely amazing stack of "coincidences".
Yes, thanks for slinging this along to us here. Guy in video: "Is there news of Chris Wray coming?". Me: "šā"
Yes... UNREAL!
Seems 711, 117 all had to do in some way with Talal.
Didnāt Q say āTrust Wrayā?
Joe is one of the best. Always on point and a good BS filter.
Yes. No big leaps of faith required.
I like the connections, too numerous for coincidence.
Grammarfags sometimes drive me nuts on this board, but listening to someone mispronounce a name "Alwaleed" as "Alaweed" EVERY time when the spelling is right in front with the narration distracted me.
Grammarfags are what stand between you and verbal chaos/confusion.
š
I hear you anon, but if I let it get to me, I'd be driven clinically insane.
Gotta pick those battles very carefully. Grammarcopping the internet is the most annoying waste of time since "gematria". ;)
My pet peeve is the ones who go about spouting grammar and spelling rules that are wrong. WTF? If you don't actually know, then there's no requirement to comment on it; just leave it. :p
Do you have any "Chipolte" peeps in your circle? I sure do and it drives me nuts.
This!
I think it's possible there may be a little agitation/psyop at work with the mispronunciations sometimes. It shows intentional disrespect and dishonor to the subject.
Not always, but sometimes.
Looks like a solid decode.
With the GWP article exposing the Jan 6 BS, this ties in the CWray aspect.
Curious to learn the FBI ties to alWaleed, 9/11, Twitter, and Jan 6. Seems like the 9/11 financier (Dopey) must have spilled the beans once captured to save his ass. When normies learn this, well... maybe they stay asleep, but some will have to see the light. Huge connection on this one.
This is actually one of the best decodes I've seen to date.
Definitely high on the list.
Whoop, Happy Monday!!
This is BIG.
This is the rare, genuinely good decode. There does seem to be something here.
This is fucking insane!!
Very interesting and if nothing else, entertaining.
I remember a recent post about chess where in the game a pawn can or must become the king (or was it the queen?). I know nothing about chess but what I have learned from a couple of movies. But that post and discussion struck me as an obscure, but important piece in the story, like those throw-away incidents in mystery novels which are the key to solving something. Does that rule in chess relate to this?
It's probable. You have four choices when a pawn of yours reaches the end row on your opponents side- you can go with a knight, bishop, rook or queen. Your queen is often the best choice, because not only can she move in all the ways the rook and bishop can (both diagonally and straight across ranks and files) but she can move as far as they can. There are times it is more advantageous to choose a knight, but most will queen.
Good explanation. I have played chess for over 40 years. The only way I would ever choose a knight would be if it immediately gained me a checkmate. It can happen, but I would say 99.9% the queen is taken.
Thanks. My son plays chess online (and before COVID Plandemic hit, in tournaments). I learned a little along the way, but no where near as much as he.
AWESOMENESS! excellent decode explanation !
MUCH better than a cut/paste with arrows and circles all over. Interesting to see if Tesla ends on 711 today. current price is ~709.
Yep, sometimes the high IQ anons don't realize it's difficult for some of us not so high IQs to look at posts with arrows.going every which way and understand them. I try not to complain as I appreciate their work and effort.
yup. I am a.d.d low IQ but I appreciate every frens efforts. I spend too much time trying to figure out all the arrow stuff and still come up empty. kek
Love that he did this in six minutes. Some of these videos take an hour to tell you one thing. Love this guy.
The one caveat to the Q 711 post is it states -- "King to pawn". Then, Elon Musk's post showing Chuck Norris' pictured with the chessboard, we see this matches Q 711, in which "King to pawn" is confirmed. At the bottom of Elon's post, it says -- "Chuckmate", not 'checkmate'. However, it infers 'checkmate'. Note, that the chessboard setup is not a 'checkmate'; not yet anyway.
Also, note, Chuck Norris is depicted behind a single white King piece, while the other side has ALL of its black chess pieces. I have no idea the meaning of this or why the display contains this arrangement. Why wouldn't a single black pawn be used with a white king piece instead? The same confirmation would be true, no? Or there could be a variety of other chess setups to which the "King to pawn" setup would also hold true. Is there more to this message than meets the eye?
If you look at Musk's posting, it infers Chuck Norris' white King piece is the one that will be checkmated, not the other way around. So, what other meaning does "Chuckmate" mean other than Chuck Norris?
I was thinking Chuckmate was to describe the picture of Mr. Norris with one pawn against the blacks full board. Chuck would win in this scenario...because Chuck.
I take "King to pawn" to be literal. Taking a "King" or perhaps a Prince and making him a normal person or a pawn. They took away most of his fortune.
My other theory is somehow Q used the King of SA as a pawn to make something happen.
Leaning more towards the 1st option.
Hey fren, sorry but you keep using "infer" when you mean "imply" or "suggest". Quick help: the person delivering the message or the message that's being delivered may imply or suggest something. The person receiving the message is the one who infers.
On the contrary, stranger. The word I used is indeed the word I meant to use. The word "imply" is a synonym of the word I used.
Since you offered me writing advice I'd like to reciprocate and state -- Rule #1. Never appear [emph. added] to be giving advice when it is not asked for. It's better to ask questions. In my case, what did I mean by this? It's a softer volley and Dale Carnegie would say it provides an 'eager want'. Thereto, let's look at your use of the slang "fren" (ergo, 'friend'). I never use this word, because it is plainly a falsehood. I don't really know anyone here well enough to call them a "fren" (ergo, 'friend'). Most individuals at GAW I interpret as being of similar minds, but they are certainly not friends. In fact, you and I are 'strangers'. Take note that this is why I used this word above. A "fren" (ergo, 'friend) is an individual that has earned the trust of another human. Earning trust is an outcome that takes a long time, and absolutely requires use of all the human senses. The old maxim --- 'The eyes are the windows to the soul' really does have an important meaning for friendship to ever occur.
So stranger, the word 'infer' is suitable for what I intended. You provided its synonym -- "imply", which is also suitable.
Haha, fren/friend or not, you misused "infer." Twice. "Infer" is not a synonym of "imply" any more than "speak" and "listen" are synonyms. The speaker suggests or implies something and the listener infers or interprets what is said. Do you really not get this concept? Do I have to explain what a synonym is too?
Infer -- verb (used with object), inĀ·ferred, inĀ·ferĀ·ring. Definition: (4) to hint; imply; suggest. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/infer
There it is emboldened for you, stranger. You're being petulant and clearly incorrect and erred. From your reply, I sense you won't admit it though. It appears your objective is to obfuscate the message of my original post by raising a trite and insignificant squawk. Perhaps, it's time for you to refresh your grade schooling. How pathetic. Now please go away. I'm moving on to important things.
LOL there are 5 descriptions of synonyms listed on that page and only one of them seems to suggest you have a case. It is well regarded everywhere English is spoken that the two words carry different meanings. Your attempt at verbosity to dissuade me from my insistence that you've got this part of your vernacular wrong is laughable at best. I only majored in English, and literally everywhere you look except for subsection (4) proves my point.
If you want to be a clear communicator, do us all a favor and make the distinction between infer and imply that the english language deserves. You still sound like a fucking idiot, just a prideful one now.
I predicted it. Your pathetic response validates my point. Your desperation is displayed by your feeble claim of having an "English" major. I don't believe you. Go away.
Lol gladly. Keep inferring your points lol. Faggot.
Related stuff: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqsnmZFx/did-wray-setup-the-fbi-to-be-exp/c/
Yes, my man u/bubble_bursts is always thinking outside the box!
"King to pawn" might imply that this former king has been reduced to a simple "pawn in the game". Playing a critical part in the game, but notably not one of the main pieces of high-level interest.
My interpretation: He's provided information against one or more of the higher-level pieces.
Not sure why Stormy connected the 711 with 117, though. I get that "one is reverse of the other", but there are so many posts ..... to think that every pair of posts with reversed numbers is connected is just WAY TOO MUCH for me to believe. I mean, if this IS true, someone with more free time than myself should start looking for similar connections between the rest of the posts.
Did I miss something?
Yes that was an unfortunate leap and unnecessarily desperate stretch to connect things. It's things like that that make us seem like we are grasping at straws.
He should have ended the video with the first half which was incredible decode.
When I think Dopey, I think Snow White, then I think CIA supercomputers.
Great decode. I hesitate to think something will happen today, because if we know the date, so does the enemy. But in the future something will line up with this decode. Or perhaps it's just disinfo to throw the enemy off. Hard to say.
Doesn't Chuck Schumer have Covid today?
He did "get covid" today.
Imagine if Wray is removed today, or the like. So what if the enemy knows. They do evil no matter the day. ;-)