It's funny until you stop and think that this is where all the Soros DA's are coming from. Dumb doesn't matter if they keep getting installed in positions of authority. Imagine when 5/9 supreme court justices are like this.
The lefties have maneuvered themselves into a corner with their woke BS, where anything they now say, is self-contradictory. They seem to be caught in a möbius loop with no escape.
Libtards suck. They have no humor. They don't laugh. Always so serious about their feelings.
At least we can laugh at ourselves and make jokes. These people are so demonically controlled, Satan took the damn joy out of them. Their only response to anything is lying, violence, or sexual gratification through weird means. Gross.
I really don't like libtards whatsoever anymore. I used to feel bad for them. But now, it is a mix of narcissistic entitlement with laziness. They don't do research, they know nothing about history. Their ONLY guiding principle is going off of their feelings. Nothing else. No data. No past results. Just feelings. Retards
They think they're clever with this BS. What's the context? Credit Hawley for giving a sane answer, but why is a professor asking a senator questions like this? Hearing of some sort?
Herein lies the thing we fight: lefties play word games. They manipulate language to create an alternate reality advantageous for them, and then try to trap everyone else inside the confusion.
I think people are fed up with this silly-ness. Lefties are exhausting everyone with this shit, frustrating to be around, blind to their own stupidity, and ignorant of their shocking smallness.
From a game plan perspective, where else can they go? They are seemingly out of ideas once this idiocy plays out...
What if I told you English itself is a fictional language who definitions are owned by the queen whose courts also invented another foreign language called "legalease" which is also a fictional language.
Why fictional? Well, the second yiu have multiple meanings of words, changes in the meaning of words over time amd made uo new words (ebonics etc) you have a fake language that is unstable and useless for conveying truth.
Contracts use legalese, tell me you truly have understood all the contracts you have signed? It's deliberate and legally, the fixtional.langyage rendered all contracts fraudulent by deceptive language.
Quantum grammar on blockchain. All lawyers get to learn to code amd we get to handle our own contracts and using quantum English do it in a truthful way. Ironclad.
Some day we will get the chance to opt out of the queens guild of legal obfuscation and lawyers will make minimum wage as a secretary should. All they are is highly trained clerks. Most not even very bright.
I remember hearing the name of the guy that allegedly "discovered" that, but aside from the legalese bullshit used today enforced by Britain, I find "quantum English" to be kinda silly.
Tell me whatbexacybyiy understand about quantum English. It's mathematical and always means what it says. No private interpretation by some corrupt judge 5 years down the line.
1 Corinthians 1:18
The message of the cross is foolish to those who are headed for destruction! But we who are being saved know it is the very power of God.
Yes we deny they exist because to us theybare invisible. All I can muster for them is the compassion you would have for any mentally ill person who is spiritually lost.
What does exist is a sick mind that needs help not affirmation of their dark place.
The funniest thing was watching this lunatics eyes rolling around in her head constantly as she was speaking, would have sworn she had spent some time with Hunter before the hearing. Probably too old.Way too old
The "Q&A" equivalent of a black criminal being held by a cop: "let me go, I didnt do nothing, let me go, its not my weed, its my cousins car..." Just a bunch of nonsense non-answers that seem like logic to the beehive of insanity inside that "professors" head.
This argument about "existence" is such a straw man to disarm criticism.
No one denies that mental health disorders exist.
But the left has been seriously trying to selectively use sex and gender as fluidly as they try to say gender is based on how they need it for whatever argument they're using it for
Are there people that believe they are another gender? Yes.
Are they therefore that other gender? No.
Some people think they can fly, when they jump off a building, regardless of how strong their mind and bodies tell them that they can fly, reality does not change to fit with a person's mental instabilities. An thus they fall.
Yes, I am denying that trans people exist. They are delusional. They are men and women just like us, and to pretend to be the opposite sex is really stupid. No one should go along with this insanity.
Hawley was barely containing himself. He knew she was making herslef a fool acting like a petulant child who thinks they are always smarter than everyone.
Diveristy hires, all the same. Useless for anything except window dressing.
I think the basic response to this especially in a legal setting where linguistics are of extreme importance is to respond with an extremely basic trap. Ask them what they mean by absolutely any word other than something related to gender. If they respond with what is essentially the dictionary definition then you have successfully trapped them, if we are to agree on the meaning of any words we must have a common definition of them, if you choose to source some words from one dictionary and others from another than we cannot communicate in any meaningful way. Currently male and female are very well defined words in any dictionary, and even Trans people agree that when they start changing things the intention is to change from a very definite thing "male or female" to another very definite thing "female or male". The funny thing too is that if they try to escape this trap by saying that they cannot define any word, then they have stepped right into the trap once again, as now nothing they say means anything, all terms they use are undefined and thus are simply grunts and groans. So there we go, we have caught them in a linguistic trap, they cannot communicate in any meaningful way if they want to change definitions of words willy nilly.
I think it's quite obvious she's trying to pull a "Gotcha" trap linguistically by bringing up Trans people, but what she doesn't realize is that this is the equivalent of her diving head on into the mother of all linguistical traps: not having a commonly agreed definition for any word! What language is she even speaking in? Some weird new fangled English?
“Never believe that [redacted] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The [redacted] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
Berkeley law prof... And we think the sheeple are dumb.
And then thinking your “education” makes you better than “the uneducated”
Right. Their fancy words do NOT make them smart!
It's funny until you stop and think that this is where all the Soros DA's are coming from. Dumb doesn't matter if they keep getting installed in positions of authority. Imagine when 5/9 supreme court justices are like this.
The lefties have maneuvered themselves into a corner with their woke BS, where anything they now say, is self-contradictory. They seem to be caught in a möbius loop with no escape.
And they can’t even laugh at themselves anymore
Libtards suck. They have no humor. They don't laugh. Always so serious about their feelings.
At least we can laugh at ourselves and make jokes. These people are so demonically controlled, Satan took the damn joy out of them. Their only response to anything is lying, violence, or sexual gratification through weird means. Gross.
I really don't like libtards whatsoever anymore. I used to feel bad for them. But now, it is a mix of narcissistic entitlement with laziness. They don't do research, they know nothing about history. Their ONLY guiding principle is going off of their feelings. Nothing else. No data. No past results. Just feelings. Retards
My husband always says "If they can get you to deny basic facts, like gender, they can get you to do anything." I think that's true.
If they can get you to believe absurdity,
they can get you to commit atrocity
That's it! And it is so true.
It's actually very manipulative, it's why gaslighting works so well.
If you can be convinced to accept the most egregious reasoning, you will make the most egregious reasons for you actions.
They think they're clever with this BS. What's the context? Credit Hawley for giving a sane answer, but why is a professor asking a senator questions like this? Hearing of some sort?
Herein lies the thing we fight: lefties play word games. They manipulate language to create an alternate reality advantageous for them, and then try to trap everyone else inside the confusion.
I think people are fed up with this silly-ness. Lefties are exhausting everyone with this shit, frustrating to be around, blind to their own stupidity, and ignorant of their shocking smallness.
From a game plan perspective, where else can they go? They are seemingly out of ideas once this idiocy plays out...
What if I told you English itself is a fictional language who definitions are owned by the queen whose courts also invented another foreign language called "legalease" which is also a fictional language.
Why fictional? Well, the second yiu have multiple meanings of words, changes in the meaning of words over time amd made uo new words (ebonics etc) you have a fake language that is unstable and useless for conveying truth.
Contracts use legalese, tell me you truly have understood all the contracts you have signed? It's deliberate and legally, the fixtional.langyage rendered all contracts fraudulent by deceptive language.
Quantum grammar on blockchain. All lawyers get to learn to code amd we get to handle our own contracts and using quantum English do it in a truthful way. Ironclad.
Some day we will get the chance to opt out of the queens guild of legal obfuscation and lawyers will make minimum wage as a secretary should. All they are is highly trained clerks. Most not even very bright.
I remember hearing the name of the guy that allegedly "discovered" that, but aside from the legalese bullshit used today enforced by Britain, I find "quantum English" to be kinda silly.
Tell me whatbexacybyiy understand about quantum English. It's mathematical and always means what it says. No private interpretation by some corrupt judge 5 years down the line.
Leaving aside legalese, how is it different from the English we use today?
1 Corinthians 1:18 The message of the cross is foolish to those who are headed for destruction! But we who are being saved know it is the very power of God.
Why do we havr these hearings at all. Pointless
So they can hear themselves talk and oat each others backs for being so educated and sophisticated. It is called vanity.
They prioritize questions over answers.
Sea lion’ing
Yes we deny they exist because to us theybare invisible. All I can muster for them is the compassion you would have for any mentally ill person who is spiritually lost.
What does exist is a sick mind that needs help not affirmation of their dark place.
Trans forum question: should trans people disclose their trans status to potential dates?
Trans responses: hell no! real women don’t disclose, and im a real woman!
tricking straight guys is a huge fetish and turn on for these people. straight bait and luring is very much a thing in the lbgt community.
Sick
Lol, the irony is that you can always tell
And they wonder why they get the living shit beat out of them, then say they are being persecuted.
You're a man trying to trick another man into having sex with you. You're playing a dangerous game with your life being the stakes.
In their own minds
That's good because I wouldn't want to see them visibly bare.
So true- rather than putting mentally ill on a pedestal and bashing and criminalizing sanity, they should be hospitalizing the sick
The correct answer.
No man has ever turned into a woman and vice versa.
It really goes back to the old saying, “You can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig”. That sums up the entire trans movement.
Another word is ABOMINATION
The funniest thing was watching this lunatics eyes rolling around in her head constantly as she was speaking, would have sworn she had spent some time with Hunter before the hearing. Probably too old.Way too old
Got a link to this by any chance please? Would be good to see :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU7nzwbJ-Hk
WOW! That was something. Totally deranged.Many thanks!
Pleasure now watch those loony eyes roll hahah
Hawley is just outstanding, thanks for putting that up.
The "Q&A" equivalent of a black criminal being held by a cop: "let me go, I didnt do nothing, let me go, its not my weed, its my cousins car..." Just a bunch of nonsense non-answers that seem like logic to the beehive of insanity inside that "professors" head.
Evasive and obviously hiding something like a child, spot on.
This argument about "existence" is such a straw man to disarm criticism.
No one denies that mental health disorders exist.
But the left has been seriously trying to selectively use sex and gender as fluidly as they try to say gender is based on how they need it for whatever argument they're using it for
Yes, I am denying that trans people exist. They are delusional. They are men and women just like us, and to pretend to be the opposite sex is really stupid. No one should go along with this insanity.
That retard is a LAW PROFESSOR.
Can you imagine being a straight white guy sitting in her law cla...wait a minute, it's Berkeley.
Never mind, every male there is ether a pedo, tranny or a faggot. Or all three.
First Tiara and now Khiara……bringing shame to black women around the world.
Sounds pretty stupid for a law professor.
"No, I'm denying that your assertions are accurate and I am asserting that you're a nutbag."
Hawley was barely containing himself. He knew she was making herslef a fool acting like a petulant child who thinks they are always smarter than everyone.
Diveristy hires, all the same. Useless for anything except window dressing.
Here is a law professor who supposedly is very smart, but comes across as dumber than a brick.
Is she admitting trans people are men?
I think the basic response to this especially in a legal setting where linguistics are of extreme importance is to respond with an extremely basic trap. Ask them what they mean by absolutely any word other than something related to gender. If they respond with what is essentially the dictionary definition then you have successfully trapped them, if we are to agree on the meaning of any words we must have a common definition of them, if you choose to source some words from one dictionary and others from another than we cannot communicate in any meaningful way. Currently male and female are very well defined words in any dictionary, and even Trans people agree that when they start changing things the intention is to change from a very definite thing "male or female" to another very definite thing "female or male". The funny thing too is that if they try to escape this trap by saying that they cannot define any word, then they have stepped right into the trap once again, as now nothing they say means anything, all terms they use are undefined and thus are simply grunts and groans. So there we go, we have caught them in a linguistic trap, they cannot communicate in any meaningful way if they want to change definitions of words willy nilly.
I think it's quite obvious she's trying to pull a "Gotcha" trap linguistically by bringing up Trans people, but what she doesn't realize is that this is the equivalent of her diving head on into the mother of all linguistical traps: not having a commonly agreed definition for any word! What language is she even speaking in? Some weird new fangled English?
-Sartre
Berkeley Law... The same Uni that is responsible for someone saying that, due to intricacies of numbers that 2 + 2 will not always come up 4.
No they do not.
Twisted logic.
Abominations exist-
Josh Hawley should have responded -- 'Putting wings on a pig will not make it fly'.
Men can't get pregnant. Transwomen can't get pregnant.
Most women can get pregnant. Most transmen who still have their uterus and ovaries can get pregnant.
Is not rocket surgery.