The rush for green energy is not unlike the desired outcome of Operation Warp Speed with the vaccine initiative. The end result of these agendas is showing the public how utterly incompetent the Pharmaceutical and Energy industries are when they chase woke agendas.
I have no doubt in my mind that once we achieve full Awakening status across the globe, countless patents will be released from the locked achieves that will dwarf our present energy output with oil and coal. I am a firm believer in the work of Tesla, and how his many energy related inventions were not only ignored, but placed under lock and key for over a hundred years.
Before we can achieve Tesla's vision, we must first indulge the communists in their green energy utopia long enough for the general public to come to an understanding that the entire premise is a fraud and a scam on the people of the world.
Tesla's patents will never be released under his name, they may see the light of day masquerading around as someone else's invention, who claims intellectual property rights.
Or intentionally destroyed, as scornful retribution when we hunt down and exterminate the cabal traitor murderous scum.
If tesla's patents/inventions are destroyed, the physics that enables them are forever.
If they were discovered hundred+ years ago, they can be rediscovered today.
We shouldnt treat tesla's inventions as the "holy text", he found and learned of fantastic machinery, thats all.
I hear you my brother, and having studied overunity in it's many forms, I understand that science servers the natural laws it obeys alone, and I agree, Tesla but worked within the bounds of Maxwell's laws.
And yet to this day, we struggle to understand and replicate his work. Will his equal eventually come, probably, would it be a lost to loose all he has discovered, absolutely...
The wheel need not be reinvented, every time we need a wheel.
Exactly, and even Tesla talked about the disconnect between theoretical physics and actual experimentation.
A problem today comes down to the level of funding someone would need to create comparable labs to perform the experimentation, even starting with what we know of his inventions and expanding from there...
If you've ever heard of the 'antigravity lifters' (just the search term in youtube, the scientific term is something like asymmetric capacitance. Anyway, those ones use very high frequency DC to create 2 magnetic fields such that the stronger one is repulsing from the bottom and attracting at the top, so the weight 'lifts' the object.
I believe that, in time, he will be viewed as more significant than Einstein.
Even though I haven't repeated personally, the experiments I've seen documented by so many disparate people that all reference his work as inspiration is more than enough to know that it would be society changing if not suppressed.
Elon doesn't even like solar for space use it sounded like from Rogan's more recent podcast episode with him.
Definitely not supposed to be a main use. Elon likes solar, but also believes it can't be more efficient than it is now.
So that presents an interesting problem if he's correct. Investment into solar was always based around a future promise of better efficiency, to get the infrastructure in place and improve on it over time.
But when we are talking about scaling it to millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, billions of people, there's just not enough surface area and probably not enough material on the planet to sustain it.
It's worse if it can't operate at high temperatures either -- which is kind of important since the best places for solar tend to be places with higher temperatures.
Solar's best use case, after it comes down more in cost, is for supplementary power on an individual's home basis, and for preppers / off the grid living.
Powering an electrical grid? We need something far more efficient. Nuclear is clearly the future technology of the past that needs to be further developed, as it has near limitless energy potential. We just need to figure out how to get rid of the waste, as right now we store it in expensive containers permanently to the best of my knowledge.
Solar is neat but inefficient. Hydro is expensive and requires heavy construction and maintenance. Aero is clearly the worst, as it is even more conditional than solar and way more destructive to the environment than hydro, and requires a lot of land.
I believe they've actually developed nuclear plants that actually run off of nuclear waste, but the really useful innovation will never happen until the laws banning the building of home fission reactors...
I get the safety arguments, etc, but My thought is smaller reactors would produce less waste and call less fallout if they failed.
actually, I've been playing with the idea of making a small solar/nuclear hybrid, base on a video I saw a long time ago, think it was kipkay. He took a small bit of nuclear material from an old smoke detector and fastened over the end o of a webcam so you could see the radioactive decay. He had this idea you could use it as an actual random number generator, based on the data from the webcam.
I'm wondering if you could do something similar with a solar panel and the same material. Obviously you couldn't power a house or anything like that, but a portable phone charger that always had juice would be pretty cool. (dunno if it would be feasible, of course, just an idea...)
nuclear waste issue has been mostly solved. just the narrative and lack of political & investment interest holding it back.
i'm just going by memory, but do look into it for yourself:
thorium reactors, molten salt reactors, small modular reactors... all that technology is largely ready to go. very safe, meltdown safeguards built-in. thorium & some uranium can be recycled back into more energy-generation up to a point where the resultant waste is miniscule & can be disposed of as bricks. radioactive sludge waste products not so relevant anymore.
This. Any serious energy engineer will tell you that the only current clean energy technology available to serve our massive power needs is nuclear. The safety issues have been drastically improved and are very manageable. Wind and solar have a horrible ROI, but are largely driven by $cience. Ramp up our domestic oil and gas industry to serve our needs in parallel with a massive 10 year deployment of nuclear. Global warming, I mean Climate change is a hoax, but that doesn’t mean we should not have a responsible, non-political long term energy strategy.
Yeah, but solar was also treated as a space exploration technology due to the lack of atmosphere inhibiting direct rays. Fact we can't even really use it that way definitely detracts from the promise of a solar array.
I used to defend solar based on future potential, but the only one pushing for space exploration doesn't believe in it getting more efficient than it is.
And of course while Elon isn't an expert in every field personally, I would definitely say he has some of the world's brightest minds employed.
TL;DR: Solar really kinda sucks for 9/10 use cases. Can't even charge an electric vehicle to any substantial degree under optimal conditions. Green New Deal fetishists should go back to the drawing board and stop wasting our time and money.
Absolutely, and when I was in school, all the data and spec sheets for solar and wind made it absolutely clear that, outside of a few geographically specific locations, that no renewable project at grid scale should be implemented.
Since then, I've seen job postings for 'BESS' systems, where they take solar arrays to charge massive lithium battery banks that power up a 16kV 'mini' grid to power things like bases outside of grid range, research stations, etc. (I actually wanted that job, in spite that it was effectively a 'grid' with a 'bomb' as a key component to its operation).
Main problem I have with solar is that after 15 to 20 years no longer efficient maybe less.
I asked a solar guy salesman how are you going to get rid of these in 15 years when they dont work anymore. He said we hope we will figure it out but then lol.
Geothermal is better investment imho. Underground will always be cold.
In areas where the water table isn't high geothermal is the better option. But in areas where the water table is high geothermal is not a viable option (eg Florida).
honestly, a steam engine run off of solar power would probably work better, especially during hot weather, though there's a risk of explosion if the pressure gets too high...
What a load of crap. I'm on a stand alone solar system. Not connected to the grid at all. Consistently get temps over 40c in summer and my system hasn't failed once in 5 years/summers.Got the system checked by a technician last year just as routine maintenance and he said it was all in excellent condition.
I haven't looked it into too much regarding to personal home solar systems but I do know that in Florida they do hold up despite the high heat temps we experience. Basically if you are using the power to heat your water, appliances or basics electronics you should be fine IMO.
I'm in Aus. In summer I find my batteries are fully charged by about 9 am ,in winter by about 11 am. I use gas for hot water but run 2 water pumps,a household of the normal appliances like washing machine ,fridges ,dryer ,TV ,modem ,charge my appliances etc .Plus we have a man shed/ granny flat out back and it runs that as well.
Even a day like today where we have a severe weather warning for intense winds, thunderstorms and a lot of rain and it's very dull/ overcast I'm still getting a 1.3 kw charge.
I am not for the nonsensical green deals and rush to renewable energy. However i am a fan of the technology. Obviously fields full of used windmill blades is a bad idea.
But solar panels are legit in allot of ways, we should be investing in the technology but it’s foolish to blame the oil industry. We could and should mine our own fossil fuels for 300 years right here in America. But the commies don’t want us to do that.
I think I’m 100 years we could really get some good renewable energy producers but it doesn’t need to be rushed. We need allot of batteries and allot of materials it’s not going to happen by 2030 this isn’t the 2020 movie we aren’t going to burn up on a summer day it’s all a crock of shit that makes solar and renewable look bad.
–bcfromfl 22 days ago +4 / -0
I did extensive research about all this, because what I REALLY wanted was a "solar generator" -- a backup battery for our home. I did all the calculations (the biggest power draw is our 40-amp circuit for our well pump), and figured, if we were miserly, and didn't operate any major appliances, we would need a 12kW battery to operate two days. (We have a 1700 square-foot home.) I wanted the option to add on solar panels later, in case of a multi-day event. What I wanted to do is have the panels mobile, and just place in the yard when needed, tracking the sun manually. Putting them on the roof would void our new roof warranty.
What I found out is the residential solar industry is mostly a scam. No one would install just the battery backup without solar panels on the roof. This is where they make their big bucks. They'll tell you they can make it so the price offset in your electric bills will pay for the panel 30-year loan. Holy cow.
If you're on the west coast, using battery backup systems for time-of-use is fairly common, and you may be able to find contractors willing to install the battery alone. Time-of-use means you set up the billing with your electric provider for variable billing...you charge the battery during cheaper rates, and use the battery during higher rates. Here in Florida there is not enough of a difference between the rates to make this cost-effective.
I have examined carefully the handful of providers who offer solar generators. Generac's PWRCell is the beefiest, and offers the highest-quality switching components. One to watch is Bluetti -- they offer smaller systems which do precisely what I want (complete with solar panels), but don't quite have 40-amp capability.
Hope this helps. (Something else someone posted is that a small layer of dust on the panels will significantly reduce efficiency )
He entertained the idea of deciphering the comms and even went as far as correcting the incorrect interpretation, providing a more literal and open analysis of the terms. Q even made a note to suggest THIS is how they communicate with White Hats in the field.
That Q just decided to talk about the cryptic post just because?
Q never said they were comms in themselves.
Again...
Message not for Anons.
If the message wasn't for Anons, then who was it for?
For White Hats?
Communications in broad daylight using an Acroamatic Cipher strucure?
Sounds like comms to me...
You're talking about a "lot." Auction comms?
Those who refuse to read through all the Q posts often don't catch on that Q created a training platform for Secret Society cipher systems and double-speak.
The machinery is 26 years out of date, and the director of the factory admitted recently that some of the machines were 50 years old ... A recent visitor saw no evidence of electric furnaces at the steel plant ... Close to the factory is a plant club, which is extremely clean, containing a good theater, recreation rooms, library, canteens, and billiard rooms. The general standard was far in advance of similar clubs [redacted] ... Those workers who have a good record for production have their photographs prominently displayed in various parts of the factory ... All the cranes, except the 50-ton crane used for handling liquid metal, are operated by women.
Why is STEEL important?
Because under Cold War era Steel Plants are Secret Society sex dens just like on Epstein island is why. Why was the Azovstal iron and steel works in the headlines for a month straight?
What is STEEL? What is the definition of STEEL?
Comms has an answer.
So yeah, when I say "you lot" at this point I mean it. My acceptance of comms has allowed me to correctly decode Q's post. More than just reading between the lines.
Steel plants take iron (military) and carbon (blackmail) to make Steel, which are blackmailed military members. More aptly, STEEL are weapons. Soldiers. Enforcers. It's where you train the next Gestapo who not only allow themselves to be blackmailed into serving Satan, but they relish in the idea so long as they get some sex slaves and all the amphetamines (steel needles) you can provide.
Just like in Ukraine with the NAZI Azov battalion, using the same playbook the NAZI's used by making "super-soldiers" tweaking on a meth/painkiller cocktail. Define: "Stimpak"
By the way, you have a LOT of deleted posts.
What deleted posts?
If they were deleted, it was not me. The only time I typically delete posts is when I make a typo in the title. Count for me how many posts have been deleted, because I frankly just don't believe you're looking at the correct user at this point. Personally, I count less than 20 deleted posts/comments.
Quit trying to make this about my character and not the content of my Comms discussion. It's petty and working against declas.
Open Comms discussion is one major component of [DECLAS]. The more people resist, the longer this will take...
Cost.
EROI.
EOL cleanup.
Subsidies.
Parasitic lending.
Government interference.
Low voltage end point to high voltage carrier conversion.
40s to 90s home conversions to carry weight of roof panels.
It will depend on the panels, usually the Pmax is around 40C and drops by about 1% efficiency per degree C above that and a different % per degree colder.
seems like you'd be better off slapping them on a pressure chamber filled with water/coolant and using that to run a steam turbine rather than just putting huge fields of them out...
Course, I don't know what the hell I'm talking about, so take me with a grain of salt, lol.
That's essentially the solar collector systems, where, instead of panels they reflect all the solar energy into a single point to super-heat a tank of some type of salt, the molten salt then flows to boil water.
You may not 'know what you're talking about,' but this is a pretty good example of intuitive/creative thinking.
There aren't many of them that I'm aware at least, California has one I believe. It was in the ballpark of 700F hitting the convergence point, so, you might as well put something in it that can hold the heat.
As an add-on to existing solar stations, it's one of those where there's extra heat you could soak up, but not quite what you could use to spin a turbine with, not without taking that creativity an extra level.
40C oh boy. That is not a high temperature at all for electronics, and would be a normal temperature in most places where solar would have its best effect, especially when you consider the thermal radiation hitting it all day.
Especially when you factor in that roofs are the most common install area which will be sitting 10-20 degrees hotter than the ground level. Or if in a field, the color of the panels is that dark material which will absorb heat to a similar extent.
I've seen systems like those water cooled heat sinks for PCs tied to the panels to keep them at a good temperature while pre-heating water going to hot water tanks.
But yes, the constraints on solar are far more than is brought up in the sales pitch.... sorry, got me thinking of Cernovich once pushing solar panel installations as a good career and got mad at me for bringing up that, in most cases, is a losing proposition that is akin to 'pre-paying' for electricity and that personal integrity should get in the way of that choice as a career path.
I feel like if you have to water cool a solar panel you are expending a lot of electricity on pumps and a lot of money on maintaining those pumps at scale.
Didn't even consider darker colors and the heat rising angle either.
At grid scale, there's not really a feasible way to cool the panels without impacting the bottom line of the production.
When I was in school, the average panel would convert about 40% of solar energy into electrical energy, the math I did suggested that panels would need to hit about 80-85% efficient before they would be truly viable anything north of the northern Texas border, and those areas tend to get too hot.
It was around that time that Germany put 400B into solar panels, and so I ran the same numbers and it appeared that the projects stood to return approximately 125B over the 20 years (average output for optimal time). That meant they were going to be the cautionary tale.
The rush for green energy is not unlike the desired outcome of Operation Warp Speed with the vaccine initiative. The end result of these agendas is showing the public how utterly incompetent the Pharmaceutical and Energy industries are when they chase woke agendas.
I have no doubt in my mind that once we achieve full Awakening status across the globe, countless patents will be released from the locked achieves that will dwarf our present energy output with oil and coal. I am a firm believer in the work of Tesla, and how his many energy related inventions were not only ignored, but placed under lock and key for over a hundred years.
Before we can achieve Tesla's vision, we must first indulge the communists in their green energy utopia long enough for the general public to come to an understanding that the entire premise is a fraud and a scam on the people of the world.
Tesla's patents will never be released under his name, they may see the light of day masquerading around as someone else's invention, who claims intellectual property rights.
Or intentionally destroyed, as scornful retribution when we hunt down and exterminate the cabal traitor murderous scum.
If tesla's patents/inventions are destroyed, the physics that enables them are forever. If they were discovered hundred+ years ago, they can be rediscovered today.
We shouldnt treat tesla's inventions as the "holy text", he found and learned of fantastic machinery, thats all.
I hear you my brother, and having studied overunity in it's many forms, I understand that science servers the natural laws it obeys alone, and I agree, Tesla but worked within the bounds of Maxwell's laws.
And yet to this day, we struggle to understand and replicate his work. Will his equal eventually come, probably, would it be a lost to loose all he has discovered, absolutely...
The wheel need not be reinvented, every time we need a wheel.
Yes
Exactly, and even Tesla talked about the disconnect between theoretical physics and actual experimentation.
A problem today comes down to the level of funding someone would need to create comparable labs to perform the experimentation, even starting with what we know of his inventions and expanding from there...
If you've ever heard of the 'antigravity lifters' (just the search term in youtube, the scientific term is something like asymmetric capacitance. Anyway, those ones use very high frequency DC to create 2 magnetic fields such that the stronger one is repulsing from the bottom and attracting at the top, so the weight 'lifts' the object.
???
The main one I remembered ramped up the supply to ~10kVDC and was switching at 1000hz on/off.
While I was looking to find examples to respond, I came across others that would go to 35kvAC with a high resistance in the circuit with a filter.
Looks like the important part is a high voltage with low current...
I am a Tesla fan and have read about his works way before (decades) the internet.
I have recreated some of his works.
He is not perfect. He has a few impossible machines (flying stove etc).
Don't get me wrong, Tesla was a goddamn genius.
I believe that, in time, he will be viewed as more significant than Einstein.
Even though I haven't repeated personally, the experiments I've seen documented by so many disparate people that all reference his work as inspiration is more than enough to know that it would be society changing if not suppressed.
IMO He already is --- by people that have done any research.
Green Energy ----- is anti-plant
Dreaming of the future is nice, but you don't even live in reality now.
Solar like other green technology is for complimentary purposes and never should be considered a main way of generating power.
Elon doesn't even like solar for space use it sounded like from Rogan's more recent podcast episode with him.
Definitely not supposed to be a main use. Elon likes solar, but also believes it can't be more efficient than it is now.
So that presents an interesting problem if he's correct. Investment into solar was always based around a future promise of better efficiency, to get the infrastructure in place and improve on it over time.
But when we are talking about scaling it to millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, billions of people, there's just not enough surface area and probably not enough material on the planet to sustain it.
It's worse if it can't operate at high temperatures either -- which is kind of important since the best places for solar tend to be places with higher temperatures.
Solar's best use case, after it comes down more in cost, is for supplementary power on an individual's home basis, and for preppers / off the grid living.
Powering an electrical grid? We need something far more efficient. Nuclear is clearly the future technology of the past that needs to be further developed, as it has near limitless energy potential. We just need to figure out how to get rid of the waste, as right now we store it in expensive containers permanently to the best of my knowledge.
Solar is neat but inefficient. Hydro is expensive and requires heavy construction and maintenance. Aero is clearly the worst, as it is even more conditional than solar and way more destructive to the environment than hydro, and requires a lot of land.
I believe they've actually developed nuclear plants that actually run off of nuclear waste, but the really useful innovation will never happen until the laws banning the building of home fission reactors...
I get the safety arguments, etc, but My thought is smaller reactors would produce less waste and call less fallout if they failed.
actually, I've been playing with the idea of making a small solar/nuclear hybrid, base on a video I saw a long time ago, think it was kipkay. He took a small bit of nuclear material from an old smoke detector and fastened over the end o of a webcam so you could see the radioactive decay. He had this idea you could use it as an actual random number generator, based on the data from the webcam.
I'm wondering if you could do something similar with a solar panel and the same material. Obviously you couldn't power a house or anything like that, but a portable phone charger that always had juice would be pretty cool. (dunno if it would be feasible, of course, just an idea...)
nuclear waste issue has been mostly solved. just the narrative and lack of political & investment interest holding it back.
i'm just going by memory, but do look into it for yourself:
thorium reactors, molten salt reactors, small modular reactors... all that technology is largely ready to go. very safe, meltdown safeguards built-in. thorium & some uranium can be recycled back into more energy-generation up to a point where the resultant waste is miniscule & can be disposed of as bricks. radioactive sludge waste products not so relevant anymore.
This. Any serious energy engineer will tell you that the only current clean energy technology available to serve our massive power needs is nuclear. The safety issues have been drastically improved and are very manageable. Wind and solar have a horrible ROI, but are largely driven by $cience. Ramp up our domestic oil and gas industry to serve our needs in parallel with a massive 10 year deployment of nuclear. Global warming, I mean Climate change is a hoax, but that doesn’t mean we should not have a responsible, non-political long term energy strategy.
LFTRs. Much MUCH SAFER than current nuke plants. And we have 300 + years of fuel for them in coal tailings.
Solar in space is of little good once you get further out than Mars. There's a reason the probes that went further used RTGs.
Yeah, but solar was also treated as a space exploration technology due to the lack of atmosphere inhibiting direct rays. Fact we can't even really use it that way definitely detracts from the promise of a solar array.
I used to defend solar based on future potential, but the only one pushing for space exploration doesn't believe in it getting more efficient than it is.
And of course while Elon isn't an expert in every field personally, I would definitely say he has some of the world's brightest minds employed.
TL;DR: Solar really kinda sucks for 9/10 use cases. Can't even charge an electric vehicle to any substantial degree under optimal conditions. Green New Deal fetishists should go back to the drawing board and stop wasting our time and money.
P.S. RTGs are neat
Absolutely, and when I was in school, all the data and spec sheets for solar and wind made it absolutely clear that, outside of a few geographically specific locations, that no renewable project at grid scale should be implemented.
Since then, I've seen job postings for 'BESS' systems, where they take solar arrays to charge massive lithium battery banks that power up a 16kV 'mini' grid to power things like bases outside of grid range, research stations, etc. (I actually wanted that job, in spite that it was effectively a 'grid' with a 'bomb' as a key component to its operation).
Main problem I have with solar is that after 15 to 20 years no longer efficient maybe less.
I asked a solar guy salesman how are you going to get rid of these in 15 years when they dont work anymore. He said we hope we will figure it out but then lol.
Geothermal is better investment imho. Underground will always be cold.
I Put in systems 25-30. Years ago. That still work
My folks system put in 05. Still hits over ratings. ( Sunpower )
In areas where the water table isn't high geothermal is the better option. But in areas where the water table is high geothermal is not a viable option (eg Florida).
My parents tried to get solar panels for their house for this reason.
I had to talk them out of it, because it would've locked them into a contract for 10+ years and stuck them with the bill.
Thank God they listened to me.
the propaganda behind it is pretty effective...
honestly, a steam engine run off of solar power would probably work better, especially during hot weather, though there's a risk of explosion if the pressure gets too high...
A giant solyndra all the way round - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for politicians and crooked companies
windmills need oil
electric cars can't tow shit for more than a few miles
The damned cars can't travel that far anyway. Electric car owners are carrying portable gasoline powered generators, just in case.
The car batteries are far worse for the environment than coal/oil. What powers all the equipment that mines that extract the lithium? Oh yeah, oil
Solar panels are turning to crap if it gets too hot.
What a load of crap. I'm on a stand alone solar system. Not connected to the grid at all. Consistently get temps over 40c in summer and my system hasn't failed once in 5 years/summers.Got the system checked by a technician last year just as routine maintenance and he said it was all in excellent condition.
They didn't say the panels failed. They said their efficiency was reduced.
I haven't looked it into too much regarding to personal home solar systems but I do know that in Florida they do hold up despite the high heat temps we experience. Basically if you are using the power to heat your water, appliances or basics electronics you should be fine IMO.
I'm in Aus. In summer I find my batteries are fully charged by about 9 am ,in winter by about 11 am. I use gas for hot water but run 2 water pumps,a household of the normal appliances like washing machine ,fridges ,dryer ,TV ,modem ,charge my appliances etc .Plus we have a man shed/ granny flat out back and it runs that as well. Even a day like today where we have a severe weather warning for intense winds, thunderstorms and a lot of rain and it's very dull/ overcast I'm still getting a 1.3 kw charge.
I am not for the nonsensical green deals and rush to renewable energy. However i am a fan of the technology. Obviously fields full of used windmill blades is a bad idea.
But solar panels are legit in allot of ways, we should be investing in the technology but it’s foolish to blame the oil industry. We could and should mine our own fossil fuels for 300 years right here in America. But the commies don’t want us to do that.
I think I’m 100 years we could really get some good renewable energy producers but it doesn’t need to be rushed. We need allot of batteries and allot of materials it’s not going to happen by 2030 this isn’t the 2020 movie we aren’t going to burn up on a summer day it’s all a crock of shit that makes solar and renewable look bad.
–bcfromfl 22 days ago +4 / -0 I did extensive research about all this, because what I REALLY wanted was a "solar generator" -- a backup battery for our home. I did all the calculations (the biggest power draw is our 40-amp circuit for our well pump), and figured, if we were miserly, and didn't operate any major appliances, we would need a 12kW battery to operate two days. (We have a 1700 square-foot home.) I wanted the option to add on solar panels later, in case of a multi-day event. What I wanted to do is have the panels mobile, and just place in the yard when needed, tracking the sun manually. Putting them on the roof would void our new roof warranty.
What I found out is the residential solar industry is mostly a scam. No one would install just the battery backup without solar panels on the roof. This is where they make their big bucks. They'll tell you they can make it so the price offset in your electric bills will pay for the panel 30-year loan. Holy cow.
If you're on the west coast, using battery backup systems for time-of-use is fairly common, and you may be able to find contractors willing to install the battery alone. Time-of-use means you set up the billing with your electric provider for variable billing...you charge the battery during cheaper rates, and use the battery during higher rates. Here in Florida there is not enough of a difference between the rates to make this cost-effective.
I have examined carefully the handful of providers who offer solar generators. Generac's PWRCell is the beefiest, and offers the highest-quality switching components. One to watch is Bluetti -- they offer smaller systems which do precisely what I want (complete with solar panels), but don't quite have 40-amp capability.
Hope this helps. (Something else someone posted is that a small layer of dust on the panels will significantly reduce efficiency )
I looked into that myself but found that gasoline/propane generators are way more cost effective plus I need 240V power for well pump and A/C.
Comms Translation:
Solar = Star Power
Solar Panel = Celebrity's social media account. (Panel, as in TV and/or smart phone).
Green Energy = Propaganda and Indoctrination
https://greatawakening.win/p/141YIjZIIN/3--thinking-in-symbols-climate-c/
Wake up.
Or solar panels suck.
Occam's Razor.
Why would they admit that solar panels suck?
This is a MSM article. WHY would they attack their own baby?
Occam's Razor.
Because not everything is fucking comms.
You're overcomplicating shit.
Shohei Ohtani wears jersey number 17.
Clearly Q comms.
Clearly.
Or it's just a fucking number given to him by the team.
Occam's Razor.
Trying to find comms in fucking everything that Q didn't specify (such as dog comms) is a waste of effort.
https://qalerts.app/?n=1547
u/#q1547
Q did specify the comms...
You lot really need to watch the movie instead of pecking away at your phones. You're missing the plot, yo.
Q never said the guy was correct.
Q said these were examples that Q could give at some point in the future.
Q never said they were comms in themselves.
You're talking about a "lot." Auction comms?
Occam's Razor.
By the way, you have a LOT of deleted posts. Why? Something to hide? Own your words, yo.
He entertained the idea of deciphering the comms and even went as far as correcting the incorrect interpretation, providing a more literal and open analysis of the terms. Q even made a note to suggest THIS is how they communicate with White Hats in the field.
https://qalerts.app/?n=1545
...
https://qalerts.app/?n=1547
What do you think this line means?
That Q just decided to talk about the cryptic post just because?
Again...
If the message wasn't for Anons, then who was it for?
For White Hats?
Communications in broad daylight using an Acroamatic Cipher strucure?
Sounds like comms to me...
Those who refuse to read through all the Q posts often don't catch on that Q created a training platform for Secret Society cipher systems and double-speak.
https://qalerts.app/?n=645
Simple inverse mirror approaches apply like 645, but are typically empty threats.
https://qalerts.app/?n=850
u/#q850
Now, look at the document. Google censors it, so you gotta enter it in the Google homepage sometimes to not get a redirect.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A004000690005-7.pdf
Why is STEEL important?
Because under Cold War era Steel Plants are Secret Society sex dens just like on Epstein island is why. Why was the Azovstal iron and steel works in the headlines for a month straight?
What is STEEL? What is the definition of STEEL?
Comms has an answer.
So yeah, when I say "you lot" at this point I mean it. My acceptance of comms has allowed me to correctly decode Q's post. More than just reading between the lines.
Steel plants take iron (military) and carbon (blackmail) to make Steel, which are blackmailed military members. More aptly, STEEL are weapons. Soldiers. Enforcers. It's where you train the next Gestapo who not only allow themselves to be blackmailed into serving Satan, but they relish in the idea so long as they get some sex slaves and all the amphetamines (steel needles) you can provide.
Just like in Ukraine with the NAZI Azov battalion, using the same playbook the NAZI's used by making "super-soldiers" tweaking on a meth/painkiller cocktail. Define: "Stimpak"
What deleted posts?
If they were deleted, it was not me. The only time I typically delete posts is when I make a typo in the title. Count for me how many posts have been deleted, because I frankly just don't believe you're looking at the correct user at this point. Personally, I count less than 20 deleted posts/comments.
Quit trying to make this about my character and not the content of my Comms discussion. It's petty and working against declas.
Open Comms discussion is one major component of [DECLAS]. The more people resist, the longer this will take...
Makes no sense when solar panels have powered satellites closer to the sun at much higher temperatures.
If that’s the case then all those panels outside of Vegas must be never used 6 months out of the year.
Did it say how hot was “too hot”?
How can it be to hot? I would think that would be ideal.
Options for decentralized energy are good for freedom.
What kind of a shitty solar panel can’t absorb sunlight effectively when the sun is shining?! Everything the left touches turns to shit.
@junkScience....just saying.....
How is that even possible?
How hot does it get because at 115 degrees in vegas mine worked fine. The problem is they are priced 3 times more than they should be
Total Bs. Engineer for 30 years in commercial PV
VOLtage drops. By max like 10%
Watts per square meter. NOT TEMP. is only factor in PV production
There is simply NO ARGUMENT against PV. UNLIKE wind 💨
There are many arguments against PV.
Cost. EROI. EOL cleanup. Subsidies. Parasitic lending. Government interference. Low voltage end point to high voltage carrier conversion. 40s to 90s home conversions to carry weight of roof panels.
We have solar and it does fine in the desert heat.
So the sun was to sunny for the sun collectors to collect the sun?
Depends. Are we talking about the stated purpose, or the actual purpose?
So the only tools to fight climate change, wind and solar, are rendered ineffective due to climate change. In their own words, of course.
Too hot for the hot tub
What part “green” is not a fail? The money part.
No part is not a total fail, ergo: It's all shite!! (I like this reformation of an uglier word. Thanks, Brits!!)
It will depend on the panels, usually the Pmax is around 40C and drops by about 1% efficiency per degree C above that and a different % per degree colder.
seems like you'd be better off slapping them on a pressure chamber filled with water/coolant and using that to run a steam turbine rather than just putting huge fields of them out...
Course, I don't know what the hell I'm talking about, so take me with a grain of salt, lol.
Honestly, that's not in the worst thinking.
That's essentially the solar collector systems, where, instead of panels they reflect all the solar energy into a single point to super-heat a tank of some type of salt, the molten salt then flows to boil water.
You may not 'know what you're talking about,' but this is a pretty good example of intuitive/creative thinking.
honestly, i was just thinking you'd use the waste heat from the panels, getting the best of both worlds
I do know they use boilers for some solar setups, I just didn't know molten salt was involved, lol
There aren't many of them that I'm aware at least, California has one I believe. It was in the ballpark of 700F hitting the convergence point, so, you might as well put something in it that can hold the heat.
As an add-on to existing solar stations, it's one of those where there's extra heat you could soak up, but not quite what you could use to spin a turbine with, not without taking that creativity an extra level.
ah, so you need something that can hold that heat until it reaches the necessary temp then?
40C oh boy. That is not a high temperature at all for electronics, and would be a normal temperature in most places where solar would have its best effect, especially when you consider the thermal radiation hitting it all day.
Especially when you factor in that roofs are the most common install area which will be sitting 10-20 degrees hotter than the ground level. Or if in a field, the color of the panels is that dark material which will absorb heat to a similar extent.
I've seen systems like those water cooled heat sinks for PCs tied to the panels to keep them at a good temperature while pre-heating water going to hot water tanks.
But yes, the constraints on solar are far more than is brought up in the sales pitch.... sorry, got me thinking of Cernovich once pushing solar panel installations as a good career and got mad at me for bringing up that, in most cases, is a losing proposition that is akin to 'pre-paying' for electricity and that personal integrity should get in the way of that choice as a career path.
I feel like if you have to water cool a solar panel you are expending a lot of electricity on pumps and a lot of money on maintaining those pumps at scale.
Didn't even consider darker colors and the heat rising angle either.
Yikes.
At grid scale, there's not really a feasible way to cool the panels without impacting the bottom line of the production.
When I was in school, the average panel would convert about 40% of solar energy into electrical energy, the math I did suggested that panels would need to hit about 80-85% efficient before they would be truly viable anything north of the northern Texas border, and those areas tend to get too hot.
It was around that time that Germany put 400B into solar panels, and so I ran the same numbers and it appeared that the projects stood to return approximately 125B over the 20 years (average output for optimal time). That meant they were going to be the cautionary tale.