Cal just banned toddler autopsies 😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Multiple "benefits":
hides "post-birth abortions",
hides Satanic ritual sacrifices
and
4.Other forms of abuse.
This one.
REDUCES RACISM! (really)
Whites are vastly underrepresented in toddler murders by far!
Therefore autopsies previously mandated by age WERE RACIST INVESTIGATIONS
side note : The coroners (medical examiners) of California in the past were caught selling entire eyeballs OF EVERY DROWNED TODDLER for years, for huge profits!
Where can I get one? Asking for my friend, one eyed Willy. 🤣
its the cornea they use, but the ENTIRE eye is taken , despite myth of "cornea transplant" extraction.
then later the cornea by itself is mechanically cut out and immersed in oxy solution and nutrients for 7 days
You sound very knowledgeable about it. Not a bad thing, if this all goes sideways and I’m losing an eye. I’ll be looking for u 😊
You sound very knowledgeable about it. Not a bad thing, if this all goes sideways and I’m losing an eye. I’ll be looking for u 😊
It's a nothingburger. Read the fking text, all it's doing is ending a requirement for autopsy following fetal death. Which like, idk, could save money. But also I do think it is very important to know why babies are dying en utero.
FYI, the purpose of this bill is to decriminalize use of addictive drugs while pregnant. A different form of this bill was created after two women were criminally prosecuted because their babies were born drug addicted and died of withdraw shortly thereafter. The politicians behind it -- and the state attorney general -- said it was horrible that women were being persecuted for the death of the babies. That original bill was HORRIFYING. That bill was shot down and was resurrected as this one.
*edit to add: I wanted to explain where the hyperbolic title came from. The original bill did ban all autopsies and investigations on babies under 30 days old (maybe it was 20 days, I don't remember all the details now). It was basically a giveaway to the satanists to mutilate newborns with no fear of any consequences. That language seems to have been removed from this bill; investigations and autopsies can be launched, but now that they are not mandatory, it will be a lot easier for the satanists to be more open with their activities now that they can evade an autopsy/investigation. Here is an article about the original bill: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/infanticide-or-pregnancy-loss-abortion-bill-passes-assembly-judiciary-committee/
Oh, I understand the consequences of this becoming law would be gigantic, just nowhere near the earth-shattering level that would have occured in the circumstances declared in the title.
SIDS was invented to cover-up the fact that vaccines kill babies.
Progressives are doing the work of Satan.
And they will pay the ultimate price for it.
you are so right that i feel the need to make this comment about how right you are.
I am going to post the highlighted text because the tweet is misleading. If you read what the highlighted text says compared to what the tweet claims I think you'll see what I mean. Highlighted text:
"This bill would delete the requirement that a coroner hold inquests for deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion, and would delete the requirement that an unattended fetal death be handled as a death without medical attendance. The bill would prohibit using the coroner’s statements on the certificate of fetal death to establish, bring, or support a criminal prosecution or civil cause of damages against a person who is immune from liability based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, or who aids a pregnant person in exercising their rights under the Reproductive Privacy Act, as specified."
I am curious, what part of this bans somebody from investigating the death of a baby? As far as I can tell the quoted section gets rid of a requirement that coroner's "hold inquests for deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion", changes the way an "unattended fetal death" is handled, and prohibits using a coroner's findings to bring a complaint against the party that provided you the abortion. None of that suggests you can no longer investigate the cause of your babies death does it?
I feel like it's bare minimum effort to make sure something quoted or highlighted says what you claim it does.
Thanks for that. After squinting at the screencapped text I was going to find the original. Yes it is funny that "fetus" became "child" became "toddler". Now the podcast that mentions this post will talk about how autopsies for teenagers are banned lol
The text, without the title, is appalling.
Yes ban is not what it is, but the ramifications surely can be imagined to be horrific.
See the top rated post.
I can explain where the hyperbolic title came from. A different form of this bill was created after two women were criminally prosecuted because their babies were born drug addicted and died of withdraw shortly thereafter. The politicians behind it -- and the state attorney general -- said it was horrible that women were being persecuted for the death of the babies.
That original bill was HORRIFYING. It did ban all autopsies and investigations on babies under 30 days old (maybe it was 20 days, I don't remember all the details now). It was basically a giveaway to the satanists to mutilate newborns with no fear of any consequences. That language seems to have been removed from this bill; investigations and autopsies can be launched, but now that they are not mandatory, it will be a lot easier for the satanists to be more open with their activities now that they can evade an autopsy/investigation. Here is an article about the original bill: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/infanticide-or-pregnancy-loss-abortion-bill-passes-assembly-judiciary-committee/
Gotta hide all those satanic rituals 👁
Toddlers in the title is definitely misleading, unless you're referring to two year old fetuses.
Maybe they are. Evil knows no bounds.
Wouldn't want to mess up the inventory.
Burn the state too the ground. Reset. They’re done for no going back.
Give me some time to get out of here first.
Be careful over in California. The "Big One" has been prophesied.
I have family in California so I hope the “big one” isn’t as terrible as they’ve already said it could be. The next “big one” is actually supposed to be further North than where my family is - the Pacific Northwest - Northern California, Oregon, Washington, and BC coast in Canada. Lots of liberal leftist politics in that region, but also some really good people . . . my people.
https://strangesounds.org/2022/01/preparedness-a-monstrous-earthquake-in-the-pacific-northwest-is-a-certainty-we-just-dont-know-when.html
Retarded fucking title. "Toddlers"....? Nah this is all fetal-related. Embarrassed that I read this to my non-Q SO before diving into it and now I have to correct myself
Land mines everywhere here
Yeah fking irritating, and the shills, and the paytriots.
You learned an important lesson.
Think with your brain and not with your u/penisse.
And yet... nobody's stopping them
It's illegal in the USA to do an autopsy of a person who got the covid vaccine. Is our government trying to hide the massive rubbery blood clots that embalmers are finding?
Did you know 1% of Americans have been killed by covid vaccines already?
I'm making a documentary and plan on releasing it next month. It's going to have enough evidence to even convince the most pro-vaxxers that covid vaccines are the deadliest weapon in history.
Well #RipadeeDip
Wait - How does a law like his even pass???
Where the fuck are the victims advocates? Where the fuck is the outrage!?!?
Women's favorite hobby, huh? If that were the case, don't you think there'd be a lot less humans in the world?
Well when you make sweeping generalizations like women's favorite pass time is killing their own children, it's reasonable to assume you might draw some flak.
Why is it out of the question that some or most SIDs can be caused by a heavy vaccination load? I implore you to check out the CDC recommended vaccination schedules for 1-2 month, 3-4 month, 5-6 month olds and compare that to the average SIDs death age distribution. (19 vaccines by 6 months, 5 more by 12 months)
Here's an interesting fact, the risk of SIDs appears higher in baby boys. Did you know that autism affects far more boys than girls? As the vaccination load has increased over the years, the rate of autism has skyrockted as well. Around 1 in 30 kids have autism.
What sounds more likely: women have an deep-seeded psychopathy that should have caused the demise of the human race ages ago or the bombardment of a heavy metal, formaldehyde, fetal tissue cocktail injected into an infant's veins may be harmful for them?
You are correct, it is not jab related. It's to protect drug addicts. A different form of this bill was created after two women were criminally prosecuted because their babies were born drug addicted and died of withdraw shortly thereafter. The politicians behind it -- and the state attorney general -- said it was horrible that women were being persecuted for the death of the babies. That bill died, and was resurrected as this one. *edit to add an article about the original bill: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/infanticide-or-pregnancy-loss-abortion-bill-passes-assembly-judiciary-committee/