As I understand matters, on Friday (October 7), an injunction preventing Dennis Montgomery from speaking publicly was lifted. This brings Mr. Montgomery back to center stage. His story is unclear, and I thought I’d do what I could for the GAW community to describe his story as I understand it.
Mr. Montgomery is a software developer. He developed Hammer – which is one component of the infamous “Hammer and Scorecard” system, which you no doubt heard so much about.
Hammer is a generic tool for conducting man-in-the-middle (MITM) exploits. It can be pointed at any “secure” online communication session in order to eavesdrop on it. Mr. Montgomery licensed Hammer to the U.S. government, with a fee arrangement that obligated the government to pay him a royalty on a per-use basis.
The government has been using Hammer to eavesdrop on all sorts of communications: to spy on judges, politicians, political campaigns; to conduct insider trading; and so on. Evidently, this goes all the way up to Obama and Hillary.
The government also uses Hammer in connection with elections. If the government wants to alter an election, it uses Hammer together with Scorecard. Hammer intercepts the original data stream from election systems; Scorecard alters it; Hammer reintroduces the altered voting data into the data stream. So Hammer and Scorecard are designed to interoperate in order to alter elections. But Hammer can be used as a stand-alone tool to eavesdrop on secure communication, and that is how it is generally used.
Mr. Montgomery did not trust the government to actually pay him each time they used Hammer. So he designed the system to send all of the information it collected in the course of its use to his private servers – so he’d be able to prove that it was being used. That way he’d be able to enforce his royalty provisions. This means that when the government used Hammer and Scorecard to alter the 2020 election, all of the original voting data ended up on Mr. Montgomery’s private servers. This is the source of Mike Lindell’s PCAP data. It came from Mr. Montgomery’s private servers.
This is congruous with what Dr. Frank told me about the PCAP data more than a year ago. I attended an event that Dr. Frank (and others: Patrick Byrne, Jovan Pulitzer, General Flynn, etc.). was speaking at. At one point in the evening, I left the auditorium to hit the restroom and I saw Dr. Frank in the lobby, so I approached him. He was friendly as could be. Very open. Great man. He’s everything you hear about him and more. Anyhow, I asked him about the PCAPs. He told me that they are real. He further said that Mike Lindell was approached by insiders from three different agencies – including the NSA – and was given software to run. They told him the software would reach out through the Internet and retrieve the original election data. We now know that it reached out to Mr. Montgomery’s private servers to obtain the data.
One further thing. Dr. Frank told me that the real reason they couldn’t reveal the PCAP data was that the packets would reveal the method by which they were intercepted, and that would jeopardize national security. Well, they’d have the IP address of Mr. Montgomery’s private servers, and that would mean Hammer was used. So that’s correct.
Here’s a picture of me and Dr. Frank from the event, BTW: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYrQlIP/
The hilarious part of all of this is that the entire thing is going to collapse on the evildoers because Mr. Montgomery didn’t trust the government not to cheat on royalty payments!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask away.
Has this been confirmed via court docket?
This post pointed out that nothing on the docket actually reflects this. I wont deny that the injunction being lifted is yet to hit the docket, but is there a first hand confirmation. So far its been Lindel telling Finchem and Finchem telling others.
Regardless of the injunction being lifted or not, the rest of your post is very informative, keep up your great work!
I haven't seen the order lifting the injunction - yet. When I do, that will clarify matters relating to the realm of topics to which Mr. Montgomery is free to speak, and will further clarify whether he is at liberty to share the underlying data.
As for whether the order is "real," I believe the source of this information is one of Mr. Montgomery's attorneys.
Oh, this would make a huge difference. So far all my searches are only yielding either Pete Santillini (who says he hasnt confirmed on the docket yet) or people saying Lindell said it.
I understand that news of the court order lifting the injunction came from one of Mr. Montgomery's attorneys.
I haven't seen the order for myself, yet. The order will clarify the realm of topics Mr. Montgomery is free to speak to, and whether he may reveal underlying evidence, i.e., PCAPs.
Also important, is that when Lindell moved to intervene to have the protective order lifted, the Trump appointee "We The People" volunteer judge magistrate recused herself, and an Obama appointee took over. We shall see how she rules.
this offers perspective that all of the good work that was done to oppose the steal wasn't defeated. it was just put on hold.
Indeed. It kinda feels like we let the shills win on this one the last couple of years.
But the work these people have done here is still huge, and will play a huge role in fixing our elections. Eventually.
We just need to get ourselves out of instant gratification mode. Give war a chance.
I remember Lindell, Powell, and company relying on the Montgomery information especially right after the 2020 election. It seemed like that information just evaporated. Now it is making the rounds again. The possibility arose then that Montgomery was disinformation planted at the heart of the Patriot election theft movement and that Lindell and the others were led astray. I cannot make any claims one way or the other.
Those of us that have been on this ride for a number of years remember the stories about Montgomery, Hammer, and Scorecard. So, for some pedes that are more recent passengers, I leave some samplings of information on Montgomery and his background coming into the Patriot movement. You can make up your own minds. Some of the links provided may be considered from mainstream sources, but the research on the information is good - regardless of their conclusions about what it means.
Montgomery has a long history of being in the middle of controversy and has been associated with the intelligence apparatus of the US government at some of the highest levels long before Trump was even on the radar.
Playboy undercover with Dennis Montgomery, who 'fooled CIA over Al-Jazeera codes'
Where have Mary Fanning and Alan Jones gone? They made the alt media circuits quite heavily leading up to and shortly after the 2020 election. Their work can be found on the American Report. They were primarily the ones that introduced Montgomery to the Patriot world.
Did Mary Fanning and Dennis Montgomery set up Mike Lindell for a Hard Fall?
Montgomery v. Risen
Then there are the ties to Hammer, Scorecard, Gen McInerney, and Adm Lyons. I first heard about most of this on Dave Janda's broadcast that first dropped the supposed bomb about Hammer on his show. Not sure if the original broadcast can still be found since YouTube took down Janda's channel.
THE REAL WHISTLEBLOWER STORY: DENNIS MONTGOMERY, THE HAMMER, THE HARD DRIVES, THE WIRETAPPING OF TRUMP, AND THE PROSECUTION OF GENERAL FLYNN.
Cyber-warfare, Team Trump, and the Unlawful Raid on Dennis Montgomery
Montgomery has a long history in the software development field and is no stranger to litigation and controversy. Some label him as a con man. Hard to know where the truth lies.
Ghost of eTreppid: Tech ‘con man’ in the middle of Trump’s voter fraud
2012-12-13 | dennis montgomery declaration re edra blixseth docs
John Solomon and Sara Carter also interviewed Montgomery and did some research on his claims. These two are not easily taken in by con men - but anything is possible.
Former NSA and CIA Contractor Dennis Montgomery a Topic on Hannity
Then there was Lindell's first big exposure, the Cyber Symposium in August of 2021 that seemed not to deliver the goods promised. The rumor was that Montgomery was placed within the Patriot movement to discredit any legitimate election tampering claims that Trump and other may have. Trump never gave any validity to any of Montgomery's allegations. I ran across this article linked to a headline posted on Citizen Free Press
EXCLUSIVE: Cyber expert says his team can’t prove Mike Lindell’s claims that China hacked election
The Hammer, Montgomery, The Man in the Middle "ALL WITH NO EVIDENCE"
So, I can honestly say that I am not sure where the truth lies regarding Montgomery and his claims. Some very credible people in our movement have supported him and his statements. But, several that were backing him up to 2020 have also quietly distanced themselves from Montgomery and his claims. It seems that some within the election steal movement with expertise have been trying to resurrect Montgomery again. Those that have knowledge about these processes seem to give validity to Montgomery's story and are hard to ignore. Can that many people be bamboozled by one man? I don't know. You be the judge.
We don't have to trust Mr. Montgomery or anyone else.
The PCAP data will definitively speak for themselves with cryptographic certainty.
This evidence validates itself - or refutes itself.
There is plenty more evidence that suggests what you say is true.
Most of it isn't this obvious.
Thank you for the very informative cliff notes on all this!
Happy to help.
And that's exactly what I wanted this to be: cliff notes.
My BIG question is this: Although most of us here have suspected election fraud a long time now, nothing seems to be happening to counter it or punish those involved in the 2020 election fraud. Our DOJ/FBI seems to be "otherwise occupied" to do anything, the Biden cabal is in on the scheme, and the media refuses to cover such things.... so....
What persons or agency has this information and what is going to be done about it?
I surmise that much of what is to be done needs to be perceived to have been done by private citizens. When an agency or department does finally act, they will be responding to private citizens - i.e., they'd be "just doing their job"... not undermining their superiors.
While you may be right, that is disheartening at the same time. Agencies are legendary for ignoring citizens, and courts have this loophole to doing anything by claiming citizens "have no standing" to bring a lawsuit. Well, perhaps Q was right, "the military IS the only way."
I think the States Secret Privilege is the keystone to all of this. NOTHING can be declassified that involves Hammer until the courts say that yes, documents can be declassified that talk to techniques.
Durham has got to be pushing against this somehow with his cases. Hammer was used for the spying. Evidence he needs was obtained via Hammer.
What if Montgomery is his first witness? Durham asked for the witness list to be sealed last week and his request was granted.
I have another theory, involving the millions of DoD reserved IPv4 addresses, Robert Durham, who held a patent to create an undetectable classified network, (and who Trump referenced in a statement), and military tribunals.
I think the white hats grabbed the data themselves, but it is classified and thus we can’t know. But that data could be used to prove the election fraud and used in military tribunals and to punish countries, thanks to the EO.
Meanwhile the white hats knew that Montgomery was capturing the data (did they give him those servers? How did he afford them when he was supposedly not working from a major health problem?) and pointed Lindell to the data.
Everything done “by the book.”
Hmmmmm..... hmmmm.... yeah, I LIKE that theory. Fully plausible.
but you DO know about the Konnech revelation this week, right?
UPDATE: Thanks for the tip, I have spent the last 20 minutes educating myself on the Konnech material. Thanks again.
Sorry, no, this past week has had me out of pocket much of the time, running to and fro, performing music in public (old time and blues, my specialty), and so on. What did Konnech reveal exactly, please?
glad you found some info - sorry I had to get a mid-term exam done today. 10 essay questions - ugh! Also just want to make sure you saw this great sauce enter text
When I read about this program this week https://www.omega4america.com/. It got me thinking that there is very likely so much more going on behind the scenes that we are unaware of. Mike Lindell and so many others are playing a public part and keeping attention focused on certain things so that 'other' things can be built in the background and will be slipped into place when the timing is right.
I have met and spoken with Dr. Frank in person as well and completely concur with your assessment of his character. The man is candid to a fault. Ask him a sincere question and you will get a thoughtful and well considered reply. At the event I was at someone asked him if the PCAPs were real, if all of that was true? Without hesitation he answered Yes! Also upon being questioned he gave his honest and personal assessment of Jovan, Patrick Byrne and General Flynn.
I'd be interested in "hearing" you relay Dr. Frank's assessment of Jovan, Byrne and Flynn...?
I'm positive I'm not alone on that.
If I may I'd like to provide some context unlike our current crop of so-called journalists. First, I love Dr. Frank to death. If you've ever been privileged to be at an event where he brings his down syndrome daughter your heart will melt. I have followed him since the beginning of the covid hoax. As everyone was searching for answers to make things make sense he was among those in our state who stepped forward to analyze the numbers the governor was using to justify their stupid moves, and he clearly showed us it didn't add up. My personal assessment of Dr. Frank himself is that he is brilliant and deeply kind. But, like most people who have spent their lives studying one or two fields, there is some naivete or blind spots. You constantly hear him say that he is learning along the way, learning about how government actually operates and learning about people. He knows Covid is a hoax and is against the vaccine mandates yet in the talk he gave he spoke of prior work he'd done promoting the polio vaccine internationally and he is very proud of that. I don't think I was the only one in the room who cringed.
So, on the topic of Jovan. He said he cannot work with him. That is a huge statement from someone of Dr. Frank's temperament. He watched Jovan embed himself in the AZ investigation early on and says the Jovan gave up the only two pieces that would have provided the needed proof. Canvassing which has already been successfully started and I think the other thing had to do with looking inside the machines. Both of these were vital and Jovan tossed them both aside. We can all see that the AZ investigation got derailed and ended up going nowhere. He did mention Jovan is in it for profit.
General Flynn. Some of you won't like his phrasing but I happen to agree with this. He said as a Catholic General Flynn is a "baby Christian". That he found a prayer to read that he thought sounded good without any exploration of the meaning. He thinks Flynn is a patriot and a solid guy who has sacrificed a great deal.
Patrick Byrne. Dr. Frank says he is a good guy too even though he is "out there" with some of the things he says and does.
So take it for what it's worth. Dr. Frank has met and worked with these people. Dr. Frank is very much a "what you see you get" kind of person, honest and forthcoming. For me personally these comments confirmed how I feel about each of the four men from my own assessments.
A million thanks.
Great write-up. That explains a lot. I read / heard some of the Montgomery information at the last summit Lindell put on. Before that, I had bought into the narrative that Montgomery was a nut job. Mike Lindell talks about the ruling on Friday's Lindell report: https://rumble.com/v1n1iou-the-lindell-report-10-7-22.html
Thank you Simon This is one of Good news that we are waiting for too.God bless you for that. You are a good citizen.
I dont understand the part about NSA and 2 other agencies.... Were these whistleblowers trying to help Montgomery by giving him capture software? Wouldn't anyone be suspicious of a govt agency saying 'here, its free, use this (inject this)'.
You are asking a good question. During my discussion with Dr. Frank, I was focused on trying to understand the underlying technical details about what actually occurred. I asked whether the packets were cryptographically signed, for example (Dr. Frank said they were, for the record). So I was focused on getting as much detail as I could about where things stood from an informational point of view.
Unfortunately, I neglected the "human" side of the affair. How did the encounter occur? Under what circumstances? Was there a backdrop for all of this? Etc.
I have considered trying to track Dr. Frank down at another speaking event to follow up with these sorts of questions. If he becomes aware of this, there is a reasonable likelihood that he will be reluctant to elaborate further.
Lindell was in direct contact with Trump at the time. If OP's story is true (which I think it is) then Trump could have personally assured Lindell that the software was legit.
You know, if you read Mike's autobiography, it almost seems as if he is pointing to the Q team. I've wondered since reading it if he was part of the Q team or at the least, a big part of the plan from the beginning. There are so many hints in his autobiography. Just a few examples> chapter 12, Storm Warning, chapter 27, Countdown, Chapter 32, Death Spiral, there are only 3 Q posts with that exact term, 4539, 4537, 4152 and the book was published before those Q posts. 🤔 Chapter 40, Awakening. Chapter 17, Good and Evil. The book title says it all, WHAT ARE THE ODDS? Just my thoughts on Mike.
Do you think the data or servers is still safe, as Lindell’s iphone was picked up by the FBI and Lindell said he had kept “everything” about his business on the phone? I’m sure the FBI is looking for a way to access the data that was given to Lindell. But then I wouldn’t put it by Lindell to have put a “trap” in the phone to catch them trying to destroy, access data.
We are talking about HUGE amounts of data, too much for any phone to store. We are talking servers. The people involved would be smart enough to store those in a vault.
I agree. I was thinking some kind of text etc. I feel assured that Lindell would not put any info pertaining to the servers on his phone but what the government could infer from texts email and other form of communication might be helpful to their investigation.
When might this situation change?
It is conceivable that the court order just changed all of this. I haven't seen the order yet, so I am unsure.
One further thing that likely complicates things is that redirecting the captured data to your own personal servers was likely "not entirely legal." So the data is genuine, but obtained illegally.
Do you think the NSA has copies of the data intercepted en-route to Mr Mongomery? The white hats boast that they have it all.
Perhaps this intercepted data may not be illegal in the same way because it was collected by an agency.
I think that's highly likely. I suspect a source inside the NSA directed Lindell to Montgomery's servers so that the source of the PCAP information was a private citizen - not the NSA.
or Space Force, right?
100% SPACE FORCE
I say when arrests occur at the top.
Wow, smart man with brilliant insight!
All I know is that Lindel has earned my trust and he is a patriot! Go… USA 🇺🇸
Pete Santili and “The Big Mig” who ever that is covered this yesterday. There’s a clip on Rumble.
On Fridays Lindell Report Mike said hes now majority owner of Dennis Montgomery's company. And assumingly with that comes the data.
From the other side if this debate wikipedia "The man who conned the Pentagon", saying he won millions in federal contracts for his supposed terrorist-exposing intelligence software.[2] The software was later reported to have been an elaborate hoax and Montgomery's former lawyer called him a "con artist" and "habitual liar engaged in fraud"
https://www.theregister.com/2009/12/24/cia_montgomery/
Some claim Montgomery is a fraud he may be or not, do your research. I tend to think he is a con artist.
A lookup using the above "www.theregister.com" gives the following:
Name CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS, INC. Whois Server whois.corporatedomains.com Referral URL www.cscprotectsbrands.com
Registrant Contact Information: Name Drew Cullen Organization Situation Publishing Ltd Address First Floor, The Lightwell City London State / Province London Postal Code EC1R 4PF Country GB Phone +44.8448544970 Fax +44.2036996571 Email
Administrative Contact Information: Name Drew Cullen Organization Situation Publishing Ltd Address First Floor, The Lightwell City London State / Province London Postal Code EC1R 4PF Country GB Phone +44.8448544970 Fax +44.2036996571 Email
Technical Contact Information: Name Drew Cullen Organization Situation Publishing Ltd Address First Floor, The Lightwell City London State / Province London Postal Code EC1R 4PF Country GB Phone +44.8448544970 Fax +44.2036996571 Email
This is FOREIGN OWNED COMPANY REGISTERED IN LONDON, ENGLAND!!!!
WHY would anyone believe ANYTHING from a FOREIGN OWNED COMPANY? Esp. since the NSA/CIA could have reached out and have that story published to DISCREDIT!!!!!!!
Fyi the register has also been compromised for the last few years.
Watch the presentation about Montgomery by Lindell at his last summit. All sourced or presented to a court. I found him to be totally believable after watching that.
Or was it? Maybe his software was so good that it exposed the true terrorist - - maybe some who even worked inside the Pentagon. So they try and slander him by saying he’s a con man and his software didn’t exist.
I’d trust outside information before I’d believe anything our government or Wikipedia says.
I'm just trying to help the community understand a somewhat involved and complicated story. I can't imagine the mods would have a problem with that?
No, great topic, the shills will come running unabated because of it.