For Veterans of this fight we know that this is attempt #5 of stopping the cabal in the US. However, this time (current op) we have the upper hand. Trump becoming POTUS for 4 years is proof of that. That never should have happened with the cabal appearing to control EVERYTHING since 2004. The existence of worldwide allies (setup by Trump) all working together against the cabal makes this time different.
Historical reference to the other 4 Awakenings/Cabal Takedown operations
- 1968-1976 (8 years); Started with Nixon win in 1968, Ended by contrived Watergate and forced resignation, attempted assassination of Ford, and rigged election 1976 by Soviet infiltrators to place Soviet agents Carter/Mondale into White House. See parallels to 1976-1981 here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvUQJhdG/move-and-countermove-19731986-in/; Note a key White Hat "event" with the death of Lyndon Johnson in January 1973 a couple days after Nixon inauguration (it likely was an execution for his role in JFK).
-
1980-1985 (5 years); Started with Reagan election, ended with GW Bush/CIA takeover July 14, 1985 and mass amnesty and importation of illegals/communists to change the demographics ahead of planned end of Soviet Union (too much damage done by Reagan to SU for cabal to recover so they imploded it and pivoted to European Union as successor). Reagan to Bush power transfer: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvGQtCI2/george-hw-bush-was-made-presiden/c/; One could argue that this one went until 1987 when a cabal-engineered market crash (under direction of GHW Bush/CIA) wiped out most of Patriot assets in retaliation for BCCI takedown. Also, some clear White Hat activity with the death of Nelson Rockefeller in 1979.
-Prince was clearly part of this Mini-Awakening on the music/media/entertainment front and 'Purple Rain' was likely a reference to exactly that: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqiGQo5B/purple-rain--a-great-awakening-a/c/
-
1994-2001 (7 years); Started with Republican takeover of the House, attempted takedown of Clinton/CIA crime families, forced implosion of Gore/Green1/Enron carbon trading scheme; ended with 9-11 false flag and national bankruptcy (and re-collateralization of national debt). History of US collateralization: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbSJWq/a-brief-history-of-united-states/
-Some details on what was going on with IBM, AT&T, MSFT, and GOOG as they were all successively deployed as Deep State weapons against Americans: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvL9na6D/finkle-is-einhorn-google-is-micr/
- 2008-2013 (5 years); Started with crashing of cabal financial system, destruction of cabal banks, Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, and Anonymous movements; ended with Obama rigged election, unleashing of propaganda, and Obama purge of military and his mass murder campaign against conservatives using MS-13 operatives. Also note targeting of conservatives, churches, etc. with full weaponization of IRS against Patriots. This one may have started in 2007 as lots of weird stuff started happening publicly in Spring of 2007.
-
2016-now (in year 7); Started with election of President Trump, ending with restoration of our national AND state Sovereignty, control of our money and labor, and a Worldwide Great Awakening to counter the UN/WEF Agenda 2030 Great Reset and Depopulation initiatives.
-The setup for this current operation appears to have started immediately after some triggering event in late 2012 or early 2013. Something happened to the real Joe Biden around this time period. It is possible that Obama got flipped, replaced, or controlled at some point in 2014 or 2015. Something happened to the real Hillary Clinton in late 2016 that prevented her from running again in 2020 as was expected. Several additional markers during the 2013-2016 timeframe look like counter-infiltration bread crumbs and setting up for the Trump victory in 2016.
-Patriots were recording all cabal operative activities (probably through Motorola and Blackberry devices) since 2008. It is unclear if Obama was able to delete all copies of this data prior to 2013. Both companies later broken up/destroyed by the Deep State for their anti-cabal operations.
If you look closely you can see elements of these previous operations in the current operation. Here are 5 examples:
A. 2017-present Crowdsource intelligence analysis and data gathering appears to be built on top of the groundbreaking work of the Anonymous and Wikileaks organizations of the 2008-13 era. In the form of patriots.win and greatawakening.win it has been coupled with a "social media" type interface to allow more efficient and user-friendly interaction while still allowing offline archiving and storage of information. This "cabal intelligence network neutralizer" was the last key piece needed for success, imo.
B. 2021 Music being used as a weapon to help wake up the normies similar to Prince and others 1981-1985. Such as this with 1980s era frequencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s37x2VSZrLw
C. 2022-23 Very public side effects of forced vaccination creating vaccine hesitancy/caution that leads to eventual suspension of weaponized vaccines such as occurred in March 1977 with the Swine Flu vaccine suspension: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219595/
D. 2023 House of Rep. control similar to "Contract with America" that went into effect in 1995 after big engineered Red Wave in 1994 mid-terms (note that it was a hidden Red Wave this time to justify replacement/control of Republican leadership.); Timing of MAGA Senate control might be deciphered by looking at 1994-2000 time period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America
E. 2024 or 2028 Election of MAGA President Trump with a landslide victory such as Reagan in 1980 or Nixon in 1972; 2024 might look like 1924 or 1824 (Andrew Jackson) with Electoral College split 3 or 4 ways. It appears that elections may be legit in at least 27 states by 2024 election, but may take until 2028 to get fixed in 48 states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1824_United_States_presidential_election
God wins, always!
Note that there appear to be other major operations against the cabal, especially during WW1 and WW2, but it appears that JFK setup the Q organization (with help from Eisenhower?) to permanently monitor and counter all cabal activities in the US. So prior to JFK they may not have been called "Q Operations".
'Q' is military intel as in "What's the Q, today?", says a military commander to his scouts in the daily battlefield briefing; with likely origins pre-Revolutionary War military lingo.
Good analasys.
"B. 2021 Music being used as a weapon to help wake up the normies similar to Prince and others 1981-1985. Such as this with 1980s era frequencies:"
Funny, my wife and me were on a little road trip yesterday to gather some furniture she bought online, and we had the radio on with a station playing 8h of 80s music. She, all of a sudden said: "this music sounds so much different than the crap that is played on the popular stations. Some texts are stupid, some aren't, but this music makes me feel good. Why?"
Music and frequencies being used as a weapon for the good and the bad is very obvious.
Also, if you listen to anything 70's and earlier, there are numerous "one hit" wonders. So many songs you know well were written and performed by someone you more or less never heard from again. That's because music was organic and not mass produced through some marketed icon, I assume. If a record was good it got played.
Single Cell- Tainted Love !
Soft cell
Thanks, I was wondering if I had it right.
Close enough!
Agree! The 40s channel always puts me in a good mood too.
Listening to Motown, rockabilly or garage rock has that effect on me. Whereas most music from 67 - 77 is a downer.
There's a different energy
Lisa Marie Presley "Dirty Laundry" vid. Calling out the media. I thought it was interesting.
https://youtu.be/3QEuaRALdV4
She know!
Love that song. Don Henley is one of the best songwriters of our time.
He also killed a teenager in his hotel room in 1980.
Dirty laundry was released just after that incident.
She's not calling out, she was deeply involved. She just confirms the status quo.
Interesting note about the music we listen to. There is definitely something to be looked into about music, frequencies and harmony. While in traffic, I used to get very irritated and annoyed until I started listening to classical music. This calmed me down incredibly and made the trips less irritating. I also started listening to lss hard rock and more 60-80's rock in the softer, more positive types and find myself calmer and more at ease. Maybe I am just getting older, but I noticed a very rapid shift in my moods and mitigation of some of my more extreme emotions. There was a study about the effects of music on plants and another on the formation of ice crystals. Quite interesting and definitely a point to consider.
we're all vibrations and these affect our cells on molecular levels so absolutely
"Yacht" rock! {Seriously this soothes me on long drives}
Also for some reason 60s garage rock has a way higher energy {positive} than the rock that followed, late 60s to late 70s.
Memes are pinned but analysis isn't. Of course.
You just have to lobby for it. I think this one is a good candidate for a sticky when the mods get around to switching up, but they usually won't sticky with self promotion, so I will have to rely on other anons to lobby for it if they think it is worthy.
I'm already sent a pin request via deport
Good call, thanks to you and OP for the best post I've seen in awhile.
What is your view on why Nixon went along with getting US off of the Gold standard fully? Did he truly believe he was just saving US from the inevitable default? Why did he allow the transition to Petro-Dollars?
I also strongly believe Nixon was a good guy (especially due to his connections to Trump and how savagely he was attacked by the establishment), but these questions remains unanswered.
Nixon was, imo, during his entire presidency, absolutely controlled opposition. I don't think people appreciate how much power the Cabal has. Their control is, or at least was (hopefully), total. Was Nixon always compromised? I don't know, possibly, possibly not. Some of his pre-president moves seem pretty anti-Cabal. I assert he was absolutely controlled opposition even then, I'm just not sure if he knew he was controlled opposition, though his concession to JFK in 1960 after obvious cheating suggests to me he may have known.
With controlled opposition it is difficult to tell. Once you appreciate how much controlled opposition there is however, you allow yourself to see the obvious compromises. There must be those who push agenda's against the Cabal. Since there must be those that do so, it makes sense to control them. The only obvious truth, when looking into history, is that The House Always Wins.
By the time Nixon became President however, I am (from what I've seen so far) convinced he was controlled opposition and knew it. All of his moves post-appointment were perfectly aligned with the Cabal agenda, even if they appeared to be "against."
Nixon's move to the petro-dollar was undeniably a victory for the Cabal plan. It wasn't a huge victory, it was really more like "the final nail in the coffin." Many of Nixon's moves were such. His moves in the Cold War, Vietnam, China, etc. were all Cabal victories, all completely in line with David Rockefeller's foreign agenda.
Gerald Ford, Nixon's VP, was 100% a Rockefeller crony from the get-go. He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral commission, who made it into office with nary a vote, then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as VP, again, with nary a vote. I don't think Nelson Rockefeller ever wanted to be Pres. however. I think he was there to clean up shop in the messy C_A disclosures happening at the time, and neuter the Church Commission, both of which he accomplished. He was there to help transition out of the war with Vietnam, direct cold war efforts, and close the book on the JFK fiasco, all of which were causing so many issues with the public. He did what it took to put in the structures that would keep the C_A out of the limelight for future endeavors. He also helped finish solidifying most of the structure of government we have today with respect to social engineering (schools, health care, welfare, etc.) all of which had been started by him in the 1940s (he created the HEW e.g.). He was there to set up the necessary framework for the Carter era that followed who was also a Rockefeller (Trilateral commission) agent.
This whole analysis misses what controlled opposition is. Many of the issues can be shown to be such actions, intentioned to make it look like they are "against the Cabal," when in fact they are the opposite. So many of the actions that appear to be against, can be shown, through who is doing it, and where they are getting their funding, to be a fiction to placate the opposition, and create a false enemy.
I understand cabal threatened to murder his daughter. Plus Nixon’s wife may have been placed as “handler” as I suspect Jackie was for JFK and Betty was for Ford.
JFK was a member of the Cabal, through and through (by birth, and what he did in his life prior to being President). However, he also did things that were more against the Cabal agenda than any other President. Why he did that I don't know. I personally think he actually was acting against the Cabal, though some of his actions were both for and against them, so it's hard to tell. Some of his actions were decidedly against however. Rather than the Cabal winning through those actions (as so many other actions I've found in history that appear to be "against" but are actually for), they needed to be shut down and memory holed. This is the only thing that makes me think there was more to JFK than just controlled opposition.
For example, his speech against "secret societies" was actually, when you read the whole thing, in support of the media keeping the government's secrets. It was in support of the C_A doing things without public oversight. But that wasn't stated until the end, and the entire first part seemed to be so completely against it. The speech taken in total just didn't have the required rhetoric to support the conclusion. It's as if it were two different speeches, where the first part was a cut and paste for a completely different speech. The speech he actually gave created a very long sound bite that made it sound like the opposite of the conclusion. I think that was an intentional Fuck You to the Cabal, both pushing their overall agenda in his speech, while at the same time revealing their efforts in the shadows.
Whether or not his wife was his handler, that's a definite maybe for me, but he was absolutely a member of the Cabal (controlled elite aristocracy) from birth. I think he just may have rebelled. I don't think he would have done so on his own though. There is just too much entrenchment. This suggests to me that there may have been a larger effort to help him do so. It could very well be that JFK's win over Nixon was itself a Q-type effort, and that is why Nixon conceded. Who knows.
As for Ford, his entire resume screams Rockefeller agent. You don't get to be a member of the CFR, and especially not the Trilateral Commission and a Bohemian Grove regular unless you are completely compromised, as in, a blood sucking pedovore. He didn't need a handler.
The important point most people forget when they talk about someone being a member of the Cabal is that the Cabal is not one singular entity. Even going back to the founding of America, it was done by the "Cabal" which had both humanist and anti-humanist factions in it, and in the end I would argue that the constitution contained text that really set back the anti-humanists, but also omitted some text (specifically about forbidding central banks) that left the door open for the anti-humanists.
Even during Kennedy's time, its conceivable that the humanist faction was active. Only after killing Kennedy did the anti-humanists start believing that they had won (hence the Q mark on his grave. Q stands for victory, and the anti-humanists were sending a message that the had won this victory by killing JFK. However, this pushed the humanist faction underground, and lead to reclaiming the Q - aka victory)
This is not correct, even though a cursory glance at the speech makes you think so.
His actual point was a much harder message. He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal. However, he also did not want stop this through censorship or to be expanded to censor everything.
So the entire point of the speech was to talk about the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy he was fighting, and how important it is to consider this like any real war and show self restraint in reporting our plans to the enemy, but at the same time not go to the extent of censorship or suppressing truths.
Handy link to the full transcript
Opening paragraph is actually referring to the idea of secrecy being repugnant because thats how the Cabal operates.
In second paragraph he expresses his worry that the increased need for security will be used as an excuse for extensive censorship.
In the third paragraph, he asks the publishers to refrain from revealing information helpful for the enemy because this is a time of war.
In the 4th paragraph, he explains how even though a "war" has not been declared our very way of life is under threat.
In the 5th, he asks the press not to wait for a war declaration before self imposing restriction on not exposing secrets that will help the enemy.
And finally he explains who the enemy really is - the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that attacks us covertly.
He then talks about atleast one specific case where national security secrets were leaked to the advantage of the Cabal.
And finally ends by appealing to the media to do the right thing, but he would never impost any restrictions on them officially.
Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:
He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts. This appreciation we should have as to why "Freedom of the press" should be reduced was sold under the guise of "National Security" which is the selling point of all such fuckery.
He even says all these things explicity:
The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.
I suggest you read it again. I assert that none of what you are saying is in there is actually in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).
Once you realise that beyond the Cold War being a "theatre" for the normies, the real Cold War was with the Cabal (KGB infiltrating US government was literally Cabal puppets taking over the US and steering it towards communism), you will realise that JFK's reference to Cold War refers not to USSR but to the Cabal. The key is in the "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy".
if he were referring to the optical theatre of the Cold War, he didnt have to call it that, he could have simply said USSR.
I suggest you are missing a larger picture here. The KGB didn't "infiltrate" the US government. The KGB was controlled by the CIA. They were the same organization. In fact they were both just Nazi intelligence, split apart to the two Rockefeller controlled governments to create the Cold War narrative to initiate the plan to change the beliefs of all nations. The design seems to have been to speed up peoples release of their Freedoms, to begin the path to the final enslavement of the world.
The C_A was designed, from day one, to lead America into communism. In fact, as far as I can tell, America was designed from day one to lead America into communism. The whole plan, starting with the foundation of America and the French Revolution was to lead the whole world into communism. By the time we get to the C_A and the KGB, none of these agencies was ever independent. They were all designed to work together. They were always the Cabal.
Maybe, maybe not. I can't possibly say, and I suggest you can't either, or at least there is no evidence within the rhetoric itself (after the first part, which you quoted above, but otherwise seem to be ignoring my protest that there are two separate speeches). But more importantly, not one single person of the intended audience (the American public) at the time would have taken it that way. At the time people trusted the government. At the time people were clueless about the Cabal. There were no "conspiracy theorists" at the time. It wasn't until after JFK was killed that the world started to mistrust the US government.
The entire world believed in the Cold War and "the enemy" they had created in the USSR. American's believed, and were being trained to believe in giving up their freedom's for "National Security." That was one of the main purposes of the Cold War (the other was, I think, the introduction of new technologies to create a better Matrix).
Regardless of how you are taking this speech, from the perspective of anyone in 1960 listening to this speech, they would have heard nothing but what I am saying. I think you aren't appreciating the larger context of this speech.
Correct. Both Kennedy and Ford families (as well as Lincoln btw) were cabal families. Individuals from cabal families are selected to be “double-agents” intentionally, imo. This is using cabal tactics against them as cabal loves to infiltrate organizations working against cabal and then redeploy to do cabal bidding.
The main reason for this is to confuse people so we cannot figure out who is on which sides based on what they say. But actions give it away.
One interesting counterpoint is that Gerald Ford was adopted and not actually part of the Ford family bloodline. In fact, I still don't know who he really was.
I appreciate what you are saying, and I agree that actions give it away, however, I think you may not appreciate that many actions that appear to be against the Cabal are actually for them, which is very difficult to appreciate except by what happens after, or perhaps by understanding what is left out, i.e. what remains hidden during "disclosure."
For example, all of Ford's actions were pro-Cabal. Every single one. You seem to be suggesting the opposite, both in your OP and in your responses. The same can be said for Reagan. GHWB didn't take over in the second term, he took over with the assassination attempt. All of Reagan's actions were pro-Cabal. There were no "Q" actions going on there. I think it's possible that Reagan didn't start his Presidency compromised (at least not completely compromised), but he was assassinated two months in. He was compromised at least since that moment. No Q-type event went on with Reagan, as there were no actions that went against the Cabal, nor could there have been. I really don't think you appreciate how much control they have.
The "Republican takeover of the House" during Clinton was not a Q effort, that was controlled opposition. They needed to air the dirt, and it needed to be done in a controlled fashion. That is what that was. This is not about "Republican v. Democrat." BOTH are completely compromised and always have been. The Republican's that led the Charge against Clinton were doing exactly what they were told to do by the Cabal.
I believe Ford was placed as a White Hat controlled safety to prevent the Nixon admin personnel from getting gutted. Note that Deep Stater Spiro Agnew taken out as Watergate collateral damage.
It was just damage control for the Nixon admin after Nixon resigned. Ford may have done some things to appear to benefit cabal, but then why try to take him out? Not necessary if he was fully controlled by cabal. And the Reagan sabotage at the 1976 convention possibly intentional to shift Reagan to 1980 after plans to rig 1976 election became known.
Your overall point works both ways. White Hats allow cabal actions that they can build on and weaponize later and vice versa. And I do not underestimate either the cabal’s power or their lethality as they would probably like to murder me for this post.
Not a chance. Ford was placed specifically to put in Nelson Rockefeller as VP. I strongly suggest you read my report. When I get to the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, as well as all the other government agencies (in an upcoming section of my report), everything I am saying will have sufficient evidential support.
I think you really don't appreciate the evidence of the level of controlled opposition that exists. I don't blame you. I had no idea either until I did my investigation. A few thousand hours later, I am now releasing my report. It's taking a while to get each section out, but I think it's going to be quite mind blowing.
You always have a way of making my mind blow Slyver haha! Very well put on your info and points! ;)
This is likely partially true. We know how the cabal likes to bring some dirt out publicly to coverup even WORSE crimes. However, it appears cabal did not step in until very late to keep Clinton from being removed after impeachment, and this points to some countermove military action of some sort taken against him prior to Jan 20, 2001, imo.
Whatever that was forced a green light on the 9-11 false flag, imo. That date had been marked for a long time (since at least 1931), but they pulled out all the stops on that one and went BIG.
They didn't go bigger than planned with 911. There is evidence that suggests the twin towers were put in place by the Rockefellers specifically to be destroyed on that date. As for Clinton, I really don't think so. I am fairly convinced it was all theatre. My investigations suggest at least 80% of the legislature is compromised in one way or another, to one extent or another, at any one moment since at least post Civil War (and possibly the entire time). I suggest it is all theatre, and I will be making that case in an upcoming part of my report. However, I am not up to taking the time to make a sufficient argument for the Clinton fiasco atm, so I will leave it at that for now.
I admit this is a possibility. However, I am leaning toward the real Reagan or a White Hat body double serving 1-20-1981 thru 7-14-85, and then Bush taking over. The active war and damage done to the Soviet Union and the lack of a nuclear exchange seems to indicate that cabal was not in FULL control during this period (this was third attempt at nuclear WW3 by cabal and they got thwarted again). The Amnesty that happened after 7-14-1985 has CIA fingerprints all over it.
I admit it is at least 50/50 that whoever got shot in 1981 did not survive, but I believe the real Reagan knew it was coming and had a body double in place. Unlikely a man of Reagan’s age survived what was reported, imo.
Lots of other events post 7-14-85 demonstrate a “change in fundamental character” of the Reagan administration.
The Soviet Union is a United States agent and always have been. Both have been run by the same people for the entire time (since 1917). The Cold War was designed specifically to create The Machine. It was run on both sides by the Nazis, who are themselves just Rockefeller/Rothschild agents from the beginning.. Anyone who "does great things against the Soviet Union" is nothing but an actor in one of the greatest Theatre plays of all time.
The entire scare of "nuclear war" was always a farce. That was never going to happen to the world they already owned (see my report linked in another response to you). That particular brand of fear porn was created specifically to encourage us to give up our freedoms for "National Security."
Everyone, especially in any position of power, is a part of the cabal until they're not.
I think we put too much stock in are they or aren't theyit's not an either-or. Some turn on the cabal, some stay. Some work both sides and never really decide who they're working for.
The point is, JFK certainly was cabal to reach the presidential perch. However, it's clear in his actions he was making moves against the cabal. It's easy to see why they did what they did.
Nixon too. Nixon started pushing against but was put in line. A lot of his "secret" recordings reveal this.
The Fact that the ONLY reason that he did not become President in 1960, was that the Kennedy's bought off and Cheated in Illinois...Always has made me Suspect of him??
Nixon could have challenged and likely won challenge, but he did not. Cabal may have been trying to start a Civil War (as they were doing 1968-69) by getting the two sides to fight each other.
It more likely was an exposure operation on Chicago organized crime in 1960, not dissimilar to 2020 election. Note the Kennedy admin could then crack down on organized crime and it might appear to cabal to be “covering tracks”. Unclear if JFK knew that “organized crime” = CIA; this may have contributed to CIA desire to target the Kennedys.
I used to think of Nixon as an ok politician with a Napoleon complex that got him into trouble. But there's too many (little and not so little) things that make me think he was compromised at best, DS at worst.
Establishing relations with China seems good on the surface, but knowing more now, it seems more like establishing the channels of infiltration. There's no reason to be at odds with China or any other country, but that doesn't mean you invite them in and show them where you keep the gold and silver.
He was partially controlled, but once he attempted to go “off the chain” with actions against the CIA and FedRes, they nuked him with Watergate. CIA was already gunning for him because Nixon helped shutdown their massive drug running operation in Vietnam.
Note GHW Bush Sr assisted CIA with Watergate setup and then conveniently left the country for China until Nixon was gone, then magically reappeared to be appointed CIA head under Ford.
Wow. I'm really not familiar with many of the details from that time frame, and most of that is MSM info, so quite suspect. Was pretty young when it all went down, and had no interesting in studying it. Lots of good info in this post.
Note that both Nixon AND JFK were Patriot-controlled in 1960 election. I believe Eisenhower had somehow arranged for both sides to be controlled by White Hats, effectively using a known cabal play against them. Eisenhower possibly partially controlled, but clearly was up to some SECRET stuff that had the cabal worried.
Origins of this sort of operation may go back to Truman (“Truman Show”) who was placed as VP at an opportune time, and survived a Deep State election rigging attempt in 1948 (NYT was so sure their rigging op worked that they printed the headline ‘Dewey defeats Truman’, and NYT was big cabal mouthpiece from at least 1933).
It looks to me like he was trying to implode the Fed Reserve by switching to a “new system”, but got outmaneuvered for control of the new system by the cabal. I think he got manipulated heavily and/or threatened as well. Lots of snakes like Kissinger in his inner circle.
Great writeup, now I'm wondering about previous events to 1968 as well. Hard to know where/when to attribute cause and effect
Eisenhower warned of the industrial military complex. The MSM made that to be one thing (like swords into plowshares), but it was was probably intended to get people to start looking into DS operations. Remember how much money the CIA spent on military equipment and operations? To provoke other countries and give them reasons to build up their arsenals?
I could be wrong, and the DS has had many years to scrub the books of anything incriminating.
Most people remember that part of his final address, but there was more to it that I think we need to remember in our present situation.
From an article published almost 12 years ago that interviewed his grandson:
"Eisenhower's farewell address, in the final analysis, is about internal threats posed by vested interests to the democratic process," he says. "But above all, it is addressed to citizens -- and about citizenship."
"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals," Eisenhower said in his address.
https://www.npr.org/2011/01/16/132935716/eisenhowers-warning-still-challenges-the-nation
Eisenhower was also likely threatened. He knew a lot of the cabal players personally. Note that he was involved in some of the cabal dirty work before he was aware (forcibly removing protesting WW1 Veterans from DC in early 30s when US went bankrupt 1931 and no money for pensions.)
That's why I think he was careful about the words he chose and what he said. How do you get the message out to the people and call attention to the DS without the DS having a reason to squash it directly?
But I could be wrong, having spent very little studying Eisenhower. I wasn't all that impressed with him as a general in WWII.
Something big happened in 1947. I don’t know if it was a single event or series of events. Something forced cabal to go all out rigging 1948 US election (failed) and note creation of CIA (and importation of Nazis), creation of Israel, and CCP takeover in China all within a 2-year period 1947-49.
I now suspect that WW2 ended “early” and forced cabal to accelerate actions without the complete cover of war.
Makes sense to me. I've been reading more WWII history recently, and it's uncanny how the allies made every mistake possible to give Hitler time to consolidate territory and build his war machine while squashing every voice of reason saying attack him now while he has no forces in the west, and uphold our treaties with Poland and the Czech republic. WWII was staged.
Not just staged, but planned down to its start year (and possibly Month/Day) from at least 1931. Note 3-6-1933 US National Emergency with 3-9-1933 Banking Act that collateralized all sovereign state property to pay national debt. From 1933-1938 all state Constitutions modified to place Municipal Service Corporations (MSC) on top of sovereign states. Note US bankrupt in 1931.
All State Bar Corporations created 1871-1932 so they could create STATE OF XX CORPs in 1933 for the 48 states. All state court jurisdiction changed from Const/common law to roman civil law/corporate/UCC.
All unconstitutional in violation of Article IV, Section 4 guarantee of “Republican Form of Gov’t”. Corporate Gov’t is NOT Republican Gov’t.
I have divided my “real history” studies into post JFK/pre JFK for the modern era. Here are some good dividing lines:
I believe Truman started the CIA...and within Weeks was very sorry that he did...Eisenhower warned us...Kennedy verbalized it. Kennedy also had Eisenhower over to Camp David for talks. IF anything I think Truman, by giving them an actual AGENCY "legitimacy"...kicked off our Modern day troubles!!??
Thus, the current “Truman Show” whether his hand was forced or he just lost control.
Rockefeller died of a heart attack while having sex with his young mistress. It's a common way for men to die.
Sudden cardiovascular death associated with sexual activity : A forensic autopsy study (1972-2004)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25868589/
Love Death-A Retrospective and Prospective Follow-Up Mortality Study Over 45 Years
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28916405/
Of course, it's possible that's the story the Rockefellers allowed to be publicized, as it would be less embarrassing than execution for treason, but I personally will continue to chalk this death up to divine intervention.
I also attribute Gerald Ford surviving the "killer" swine flu shot that would have put Rockefeller in the White House as President as yet another instance of divine intervention.
Also, please don't let this comment be seen as a detraction of your work putting this post together. Very enjoyable read over all.
Nelson Rockefeller would have been chief beneficiary of multiple attempts on Ford. And note that assassination attempts on Ford didn’t start until Nelson was VP. So Nelson likely executed for treason, imo; Also note that Tom Hanks is Michael Rockefeller (aka Mike from NYC), Nelson’s son, and he ramped up his evil in part for retribution over this apparent “execution” of his father (despite faking his own death in S. Pacific; ‘Castaway’ is an autobiographical documentary btw.)
Rockefeller Foundation as one head of cabal snake in US is well known at this point.
Nice, thank you.
Anons need a boost right now, and this historical context should do it.
Great reminder of history! Future proves Past!!
Thank you u/MemeToDeath2021
Where does Russell-Jay: Gould come into play he? He apparently captured our flag back from the crown in 1999 at the Postmaster General. They've ignored him, and just went on with their plans.
Excellent question, I would also like to know. I was studying his information after I was waking up. He is obviously a very intelligent man. His theories seem to be rooted in truth. There's so much information out there to dig through it is hard verifying everyone's legitimacy, especially working a full-time job. Some anons here seem to be professional analysts and I need to use their resourced information to learn. I really appreciate the work they do.
I need to watch war castles again! Thanks for the reminder about Russell-Jay: Gould
https://rumble.com/vwnouh-sgt-robert-horton-war-castles-born-of-the-water-banking-system.html
Agreed...never get tired of the Horton Video!
Unknown. The context of 1999-2001 was that the US was coming up on the 3rd 70 year period for repayment of debt to international bankers (1861, 1931, 2001) that started in 1791.
Maybe we declared bankruptcy early and dissolved the 1871 Trust II in 1998-99? This might explain some of the weird worldwide financial stuff of 1998. Apparently a big behind the scenes battle was being waged for control of the country 1998-2001, but I have been unable to find significant details.
Eh! Maybe to that. The last part for sure. The rest if those were attempts sure sucked.
Cabal does not stop. And pretty easy for them to get people back in line with unlimited money and a group of professional killers at their disposal.
Agreed. Perhaps those where all like operations by the good guys to find the weak spot. Probing the enemy amd after 5 attempts the find the chick. Almost a Trojan horse with trump being a Democrat all those years.
Very interesting!
This is excellent information that expands my understanding of the good vs. evil battle that's been ongoing all of my life (unbeknownst to me until a couple of years ago). I do have a question about "example B" in your post. The you tube link takes you to "The Weeknd & Ariana Grande – Save Your Tears (Live on The 2021 iHeart Radio Music Awards)". The music is absolutely beautiful, but the performers appear to be connected to the DS Cabal agenda with their other apparently immoral and satanic performances. Can you help me better understand, is this somehow just part of the movie we are watching? I would like to think they are the good guys, but I really don't know.
Arianna Grande was likely trafficked. Weeknd is/was unabashed satantic cabal stooge. It appears Arianna has been freed and Weeknd has been replaced (likely some time in late May 2021-see his last video from around that time where he is trying to invoke a “protection spell” with the cars/trucks).
6-1-21 is mirror of 1-6-21; original video of Save your tears was 1-5-21 ahead of false flag. Frequencies and lyrics changed for 6-1-21 and cabal weapon redeployed against them.
Thank you. I will need time to digest this. I am so glad to be part of this awakening process.
Excellent post and information! I think it is all the same war. Still ongoing...
edit: deported for sticky request!!!
thanks op
4 previous failures? Let me tell you. If this one fails, I’ll finish it myself. I won’t see a sixth attempt.
Talk to your sheriff about how to setup your local, legal militia. It might be needed to arrest corrupt county and school board officials that have taken money from China.
Great post
Thank you for your analysis. Perhaps it's your writing style, but you seem to be talking on this subject as some kind of authority. I've been around long enough to know a lot of you have been studying the cabal for decades and your knowledge is amalgamated from many traditional and untraditional forms of study, but if some uninitiated normie stumbled upon what was presented here, and I had to help convince them it was credible, how would I differentiate your excellent analysis from the writings of a paranoid schizophrenic? What are some good primary sources if someone wanted to follow up on learning more about this information? Thanks again.
rofl...i would say use your own discernment to verify. I dropped as much sauce as I could in links. I understand that any link on sources gets targetted for removal/deletion so that people dropping truths can be called “paranoid schizophrenic”, favorite label of Deep State intended to destroy people. More severe than “conspiracy theorists” just intended to dismiss people who are then targeted for a psyop.
The full story is being compiled with fully sourced in depth data to be released through a third party at some point in the future when the cabal is too handicapped to effectively squash it.
Thanks for your reply. I understand the concern with web links, but books can also be a great resource so I was wondering if you had any of those. I'm currently reading through Bill Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse" myself.
I try to read everything I can from non-cabal authors to try to put the pieces together so that they make sense about what really happened. Bill Cooper is a good starting point to start pulling the thread on a particular rabbit hole to then go down.
There are many rabbit holes where data has been completely scrubbed from the internet, making it impossible to put the puzzle back together, but this then reveals that topic as a particular sensitive "black hole" of the cabal, confirming that almost all speculation about that topic is likely worst than can be imagined.
Timeline analysis is the most useful and most attacked by the cabal because they know it is so effective in revealing the truth of their manipulations. It is the same method used by detectives to solve crimes. List all the interesting events on a timeline and then see 1. who was doing what when, and 2. who benefits from the events that occurred.
There are not coincidences, but lots of actual conspiracies of coordinated action by individuals that end of benefiting from that same action. By design. The cabal loves it when a plan comes together.
Does anyone remember the "Drake" thing back in 2012? When I first found Q, I thought it was related because there were so many similarities. Maybe #4 included the Drake information dispersal?
https://divinecosmos.com/davids-blog/1043-massarrests/
Worthy of the read.
Thanks, OP.
Really good birds-eye view. Thanks for taking the time. This is the approach we need to take, not get caught up in The Current Thing.
-The setup for this current operation appears to have started immediately after some triggering event in late 2012 or early 2013.
Romney (R) vs Obama (D) meant the cabal owned the election and the presidency. I was involved in that election cycle in support of Dr. Ron Paul. They did everything possible to keep a third candidate off of the ballot. John Boehner at the RNC proved it for me.
I think the D.S. -AFTER Ross Perot, of course a Billionaire, with the $ to get an actual Third Party to the "PARTY" Made sure that IT would Never happen AGAIN...Bush and Clinton actually had to have a substantive debate! My Favorite Ross Perot line...I will save American Tax payers $$ I have my own Jet...we don't need to Spend $ on Air Force 1...LOL!
I truly do not know the deal with Ross Perot or 1992 election. All I know is that he and his family got threatened, but it looked to me like a 3rd party "setup" to transfer power to Clinton. However, I recently revisited George HW Bush Sr's "vomit incident" in Japan in early 1992 (just prior to the election), and he very well might have been murdered and replaced at that point. (unknown whether it was good guys or bad guys). [SPECULATION]
So the Ross Perot thing is interesting depending on whether Bush Sr. at that point was White Hat or Black Hat operative. A lot of what happened in 1992 is very confusing including the whole election run. I thought Bush Sr. sabotaged is own race by using the media to attack himself, but it is possible he got flipped or replaced by White Hat operative in Japan so CIA/Black Hats sabotaged him. Jury still out on this one for me.
Interdasting...I forgot ALL about that...Maybe a COMM to others...Which ever side..
You can tell IF a president is on our side...ONLY if an Attempt is made on their Life...Think About it ;) Trumps just has not been publicized...
Correct. Supposedly, 25 attempts on Trump’s life 2017-2020. I have seen sauce on five:
JFK-murdered 1963; LBJ forced not to run in 1968.
Nixon-threatened, forced out 1974; left prior to 1-20-75 to term limit Ford.
Ford-partially controlled, used to stifle Reagan 1976 primary rigging; attempts in 1975, 1976 likely with knowledge of VP Rockefeller
Reagan-Hinkley attempt 1981; orchestrated by VP Bush Sr.
Trump-25 attempts? At least one orchestrated with knowledge of Pence; plus Pence attempt to use 25th against Trump at least twice
For Pelosi, are you referring to the handshake he denied at the SOTU where she ripped the speech?
Yes, that may have been the one. The video was the one where she put out her hand and Trump refused to shake it, and I think people thought she was pissed about that so she lost her cool and ripped up the speech. I think she went a little "batshit crazy" there for a moment and it got caught on video.
He also was fighting an embedded Administrative State (Deep State) and cabal threatened to murder his daughter if he did not do certain things they needed him to do.
Pulling out of Vietnam or setting up that war end infuriated CIA as they were using it as a trafficking, drug-running, money laundering base much as Ukraine is being used now.
Unknown actual threat, but it must have been severe. Media was setting the narrative and they appeared to have the votes in the Senate to remove Nixon sometime after 1-20-1975, giving Ford a shot at 10 years as POTUS. So he likely cut some “legacy deal” or “family safety deal” and agreed to resign “early”. My speculation based on how it played out as “damage control”.
Note that Nixon admin initiatives picked up immediately by Reagan admin with many of the same people. Most notably, breakup of AT&T (completed 1-1-84) which was being used as a surveillance tool against Americans.
I like the analysis... I love it in fact.
But isn't this just speculation? There isn't exactly a historical record of these events being what you're saying they are.
And I'm all for speculating, comparisons and the analysis... But debate is just as important.
To title something a brief history of the 5 Q operations... Says who?
The historical record has been wiped clean by the cabal; and the rest has been classified until recently (big declass on Jan 9, 2021). Much of this was info was declassified, but still being blocked by MSM and the Deep State. So it will come out in pieces- as they get put back together. You have to "re-assemble the puzzle" based on events, people, what happened when, and 'qui bono' (who benefits). This is the purpose of this site and the crowdsource analysts that reside here.
If you are waiting for an "expert" to tell you the truth you will be waiting a very long time, indeed. Experts are not there to "tell the truth", they are there to cover it up.
My expert is facts.
And true, facts have been hidden. But in either case, you nor I know the truth.
That's my point. I actually do think this has been going on over and over throughout history... But there's no telling it isn't just bad actors fighting eachother for control or white hats vs cabal or overarching chaos.
Good point. Pieces of the truth will have to suffice for now, and hopefully we can build on that. It may take 50 years or more to reconstruct all the details of our true history if it has not been destroyed permanently.
Honestly, at this point (after what I've seen) I'm not sure I could handle the FULL truth, and there are some rabbit holes I will NOT go down or talk about because I don't want to be contaminated with overwhelmingly negative crap.
Crypto is a huge aspect of all this. Look at what happened to the price of bitcoin: 1) when Q op started 2) 2020 election and 3) when Elon bought 1.5b and then shortly thereafter sold it. These are markers.
Blockchain clearly developed by White Hats in partnership with Japan, imo starting as early as the late 70s. I believe it was intended to end the Federal Reserve and all Central Banks worldwide through decentralized gold-backed crypto (see what Russia just did 1-13-23 with world’s first gold-backed blockchain). Sa-Toshi Naka-Moto was a four company consortium behind Bitcoin: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvPn5IUa/pepperidge-farm-remembers-the-di/
Bitcoin likely was partially co-opted by cabal (at least control of blockchain patents) and intended to be the elites’ currency while the slaves forced into centalized CBDC “fake” Bitcoin. Clearly elites are currently using Bitcoin to transfer/launder trafficking proceeds, etc, but the blockchain recordings of amounts/dates may come back to bite them in the ass.
That year is very special to me. Thank you Lord.
You can add this. Ted Kennedy was working with the Russians to try and beat President Reagan. Probably most of you were not alive at this time. But boy, do I recall it. Also, if I recall, Ted Kennedy needed money for his failing campaign for President in 1988. He asked the Russians for cash. The Russian rebuffed him again. I do not know where this fits in. But it does. https://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedy-soviet-union-ronald-reagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html?sh=6fc84aaf359a
Interesting. I used to really dislike Ted Kennedy, but now I wonder if he was being put up as a counter to GHW Bush in 1988. I still can’t figure out why it was not Bush vs Mondale in 1988 as expected. Those were the two cabal guys, one of which needed to be in place by 1989, imo. Was Kennedy a cabal backup or WH counter?
Stop whitewashing Reagan.
He had Deep State working against him and sabotaging him, largely in the form of former CIA head GHW Bush Sr, his VP, that was “placed” on his ticket, much like Pence “placed” on Trump ticker as a “safety” by cabal.
Ok, so how are we so sure of that VS any of the other presidents? Why does Saint Ronnie get a pass but everyone else was 100% Deep State. I can understand Bush 41, and maybe BILL Clinton.
Note cabal controls both sides. Two people were setup to be “implementers of NWO” in the US, one on the Left and one on the right. GHW Bush Sr was the one on the right. Walter Mondale (Soviet-trained “communist”) was the one on the Left. They were the other’s alternate in case one side taken down.
In addition there are backup “players” one on left, one on right to these 2 individuals. Unclear at this point who these individuals were.
Short answer is 100% Deep State may only apply to Puppet Masters. Everyone except those with unshakable integrity are for sale. Those that refuse to be compromised are targeted or murdered. Those that have their families threatened will take the money, but resent being controlled.
LBJ-cabal stooge, cabal family
Carter/Mondale-MI-6/Mossad/SU Agents
GHW Bush Sr-CIA, Cabal family
Clinton-Creation of Bush Sr/CIA
GW Bush-cabal family; FL rigged by Jeb
Obama-Creation of Bush Sr/CIA
As noted George HW Bush Sr (and his puppet master) were defacto POTUS from July 14, 1985 until January 18, 2017 when he was “arrested”
Wednesday 18 January 2017 08:29: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/george-hw-bush-senior-us-president-former-admitted-hospital-houston-illness-condition-latest-a7532606.html
If Q had actually been in operation since the 60s, maybe they'll start changing the "2 more weeks" to "2 more decades", that'll make everyone feel better right?
It's not "raw uncut hopium" to attribute Q operations back to the 1960s. It's a FUD tactic.
Unless you think "Q" fighting, but failing, against the cabal for over half a century is good news. I don't.
Were they good guys, or struggles between warring factions that craved power?
So many talking points tossed at us like they're bonafide 100% fact that are simply unknowable from the public's perspective.
Like this:
Based on what? Even Q said Obama would say he's from Kenya to escape. That Q post was made in 2018. Why bother making that post if Obama had actually flipped?
Russia Russia Russia? Are you kidding me? Yes, Carter was a bad guy. Where's the sauce it was Russia's bad guy, as opposed to the wordwide cabal that has been operating things for the last few centuries?
It's just a massive "trust me bro" wall of text that I'm surprised no one is pushing back against in any way after a day of being stickied.
It would NOT be good news if Q has been failing and losing at fighting the cabal for over half a century. No sauce given that these power struggles above are on behalf of anything that resembles military intelligence.
Consider it a few partial victories, but overall failure due to assets being wiped out temporarily by the cabal now and then. Then a regroup is necessary to try again. Note that the structure of a half century plus battle against a cabal that plans in 3 generations (son, father, grandson) over a 100 year planning cycles is not too far off the mark. The cabal uses 25 year operational and 100 year planning cycles. Here is my attempt at a planning/operational cycle decode which apparently was a bit too close to the mark judging by the attacks I received over that post: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Ir27hJv4/repost-the-q-year-on-the-89s-891/
In fact, you may be seeing that exact thing (3 generation counter) play out in favor of the Patriots with JFK (setup?), JFK Jr (1995 George), and JFK grandchildren (2 identified in Trump admin) participating in 'Q operations'. Note 1995 launch of George magazine by JFK Jr. and recent relaunch: https://myrtlebeachsc.com/george-magazine-re-launches-with-myrtle-beach-editor/; Note that "George" is not George Washington as thought, but another "George".
It is very likely this operation runs through 2028 or 2030, possibly 2032, so you may be closer than you realize on the "2 more decades", despite you being cheeky there.
No source on anything.
Nearly everything you posted has no credible information sourced, and is based entirely on guesswork. Guesswork that is contrary to Q in some instances, like Obama having flipped in 2014/2015, when in 2018 Q states that when they're done Obama would claim he is Kenyan to escape.
You have access to no information that has Q operating in 1960s, 70s, 80s, 90s or 2000s. Zero. Zilch. There's nothing to indicate military intelligence was behind any of those power shifts, or if they were, that they were acting benevolently.
Nixon certainly wasn't a Q operative ... Q said gold would destroy the fed and Nixon took us off the gold standard.
Your leaps of logic too huge for the non-existent source provided on any of the statements of fact you claim to be true.
Stated as irrefutable matter-of-fact, but actually contrary to Q posts. Q 3387 says "Note next (6) years." Not "Note next 2 decades." You're acting like you're in-the-know.
You're not.
Yup