I don't know that anyone here follows Joe, we watch suspiciously of everyone. We aren't normies here, just so you know. The news is reported here regardless of who is doing what. We cannot censor news because we don't follow or listen to them regularly, news is news.
Well said. I think most of us know JR is a gate keeping faggot. Most likely the same as AJ: COINTELPRO.
Yet, as you say, news is news. Even MSM throws bits of truth out there. Plus, it's good to be constantly aware of how and who they are targeting with their illicit bullshit.
Another similar example is how Frank of Quiet Frankly has the same symbolic esoteric tattoos on his forearm and hand and edit blurs them in his videos.
I listened and the dude was straight government IA propaganda peddler, for sure. However, I’m glad the spooks are on these types of shows. Especially a lengthy one like Rogan’s. It useful to listen to more than the 2 minute hits they do on MSM…bullet point propaganda, in essence, because we learn the establishment spin on a more diverse group of topics. Know thy enemy.
Agreed, I listened and it was so blatantly obvious that he is still a spook spewing propaganda that there will be more people finally seeing the bullshit that buying it. This is proven in the youtube comments on every clip of his. Literally nobody believed a word he said.
His entire platform's purpose is to spew propaganda and programming for the masses, occasionally sprinkling some alternative voices here and there just enough to fool the normies. Even the icon for his podcast is screaming his agenda (the third eye).
Top comment: Its actually impressive how this guy manages to speak for hours without saying anything.
Even more amazing that even among as big and varied of an audience as JRE, no one likes this guy. Congrats, everyone comes together in feelings of boredom and distrust for you. Clown.
Edit: it's worth mentioning that Baker gets literally every part of this that he isn't "talking in circles" (his words not mine) completely wrong as well. Even just quickly reading the comments:
The affidavit WAS OUT at the time this aired
Glenn Beck had JUST held up the paperwork showing Trump signed off to declassify the documents, so your "protocols" were followed
confirmed by someone who worked as a Doc Custodian, Yes the president can declassify anything just on his order alone no papers needed
"I don't know anyone senior at FBI or DOJ or how politicized they are" ::immediately touches his face::
Everything this guy says is either NOTHING or LYING. Who the fuck are these repeated episodes with him even for. (I know the answer)
Just hosting and listening to his takes isn't cause for outrage, who are we? The left? It's good when we hear the other side in less curated formats like this
Are.... um, are we talking about the same person?
This message would be correct if you were talking about Bret Weinstein or Malcolm Gladwell or a similar person.
Mike Baker is straight up Permanent Washington, National Security State, Uniparty, [DS], Intel Agency spokesperson. He isn't left or right. He's both/neither. He's whatever party likes the Agency the most currently.
I mean, if you are saying you can listen to him as like, opposition research, I guess you can... Strictly speaking I don't know his actual politics. Dude is on Fox News and Gutfeld. You can tell he doesn't fuck with Trump at all. Never heard him say much that was pro-Democrat. Or pro anything. He says A LOT of nothing and avoids answering questions, its frequently pointed out in EVERY COMMENT under JRE.
It's not that I'm looking to listen to only a conservative opinion. This guy isn't a voice or an opinion, he is a MOUTHPIECE. He speaks the language of ESTABLISHMENT. Pro-agency, Intel, Neo-anything. He isn't real and you can't take him seriously. You would find it impossible. The comments are flooded with others who are saying this.
So yeah. This isn't intended to be hostile or disagreeable. But I have to FERVENTLY disagree. It is possible you mixed him up with someone else. Or, you might mean it's good to get the [DS] message so we can learn their evil ways and counter. Either way this guy isn't a leftist.
He isn't anything. I guess that's another way to say SPOOK. 😱👻😆
It's more likely they slip up during candid conversation than curated media, and that has been interesting when it happens. We have gotten a lot of sneak previews through candid conversation
Okay, NOW I see your point. Totally germane and logical - some of the most telling things we've learned about "them" certainly have come from those candid moments, and the longform style absolutely cuts that way and encourages that.
In fact, I think I prove you right in my other comment where I detailed Baker's reaction to the Tucker clip. The first thing he goes to is something that didn't even occur to 98% of us who watched it - WHO is the source? He gives his motives away by repeating it about eight more times in a minute of talking, and also seems to be almost chiding Carlson and that source by saying they have potential to be a "conspiracy theorist" (immediate red flag in that term) and saying if they have proof that they have almost a duty to come forward.
What the fuck is that? Only Feds think and talk like this - the majority of us do not immediately become dubious WHATSOEVER so its VERY TELLING when he doesn't skip past that to the actual substance.
In general, Tucker has a proven track record of credibility - he hasn't directly lied to the public before on his show and he maintains viewpoints that our crowd agrees with and regards mostly as common sense. Unlike, you know, the fucking agencies, who lie all the time and then double down by justifying it when they're caught.
If anything it was a lack of confronting certain topics that disturbed and angered people. He is literally the standard bearer of credibility and the only remaining in-road to the silent Trump majority that Fox still has left currently. Tucker is like Atlas holding up the entire fucking thing; and they are well aware the numbers will go to Newsmax levels with one wrong move.
So I was entertaining the possibility that Rogan showed him that to fuck with him, but I'm doubting it now. Baker is a guy who GOES ON Fox, for Christ sake.
Very elucidating, almost naked in its purpose, that Mike Baker, former CIA and still in the "Intel biz" would go on JRE and act dubious toward the validity of this statement. Baker comes on as a Contributor and even sits for shows in-studio - if you have doubts or questions why not send a text?? What is your relationship if YOU CAN'T get an answer to that question? Is there no one who will answer you? Have you already tried? (Yes!)
What does it say about you, Mike Baker, if someone was reticent to tell you WHO the source Tucker claimed was? That you, a Fox guest, doubt the sincerity of Tucker & his source MORE than the audience? Are you just asking who the source is because you legitimately question CIA involvement in JFK's death? Are YOU BEING SINCERE?
No no no. None of this is good. It bodes VERY poorly for all involved. Either Baker knows that Tucker is as full of shit as the next man up at Fox and legitimately doubts the information he transmits nightly ... or Baker is not just a "retired guy" running an innocent little Intel store down the street.
Baker comes on JRE, acts like this is all new to him (even if it is, he NEVER EVEN mentions being able to contact anyone at Fox to find out) and goes right to questioning the sources. We know Tucker is highly insulated and does NOT do his show from the main studio these days. Bongino once mentioned before that his writers and Tuck's are next door to one another in the cubicles, though - I mean, isn't there someone Baker could ask?
Here's the finality of this. Baker is one of however many 🤡 reps and plants they STICK into the MSM places and thus it's likely he isn't exactly Prom King over there. He tried already to finagle the identity of this source person and didn't catch the fish.
So we'll put him back on JRE to stage this reaction and have Mike poke the bear, see if we can jar it loose. The #1 podcast for the #1 TV show - maybe someone will get a bruised ego and respond DIRECTLY!
Why else? If you're really buddies with the Fox fam, why deride Tucker with the "conspiracy" tag and say the source "owes it to America" to come out from the dark? Why give up the usual nothing speak and sound frustrated and adversarial for a moment there?
There is some dark shit that goes on right in front of us. Underneath what it claims to be is what it REALLY is - when you catch it in moments like these it can be pretty profound.
Sorry for the long response, thanks for explaining and I hope the example works to your point.
He used to be a guest on Gutfeld's show, and the running joke was Baker could never get to the point. It did make me wonder how this guy could even be with the CIA.
It does make me wonder why he was a guest on Gutfeld so much. Even guest-hosted the show once. I wonder if he was Gutfeld's handler. It might explain why Gutfeld lost his appetite for questioning things during the pandemic.
You have to take into consideration how big Joe's power and influence is with his platform. He probably doesn't have a choice in letting this goofball on because Joe has gotten "too big". Might have to play along and let the clown talk to avoid problems. If you go back when this clown first started coming on the show, look at Joe's body language and temperament. He is visibly upset and its super obvious he wants nothing to do with the guy. Next episode, Joe's back to normal. A few months later this clown comes back and Joe is pissed off again. Body language says a lot. Never take anything at face value. Critical thinking goes a long way.
Wow, my 3rd comment...
What can I say except, I really hate this guy. No really. Mike Baker is SUCH a cocksucker and it's amazing how literally EVERYONE seems to think so.
Anyway, you kind of spun me up a bit and I checked on this. Didn't go back and watch his first appearance but from catching some clips on YT (the best part is reading all the comments, where everyone shares different reasons why he's AWFUL) I noticed something.
You were right! A few times Joe and him both have odd body language and at one point (around 10:20 in the Trump FBI raid clip) you can CLEARLY see Rogan look down and away, mumbling something like
"For someone like me WHO'S ON THE OUTSIDE just trying to pay attention to as little as I can AND STILL TALK ABOUT IT" then he kind of looks up, blurry stoned expression at Baker.
Baker immediately gets a shy kind of body language and just says "Uh yeah, it's odd odd" smiling weirdly.
The whole thing looked and felt like two people who just met on Tinder and trying to act natural before they find a way to make out.Awful awkwardness.
Baker is definitely a handler he may have been assigned to Joe. Rogan is REQUIRED to do these it's not his choice at all, that made it so obvious to me. Probably goes down to collect all the JRE data for his buddies in the biz and does these podcasts while he's there to help spread "the message"
Either way this is not something Joe wants to do. There are other moments of both of them having awkward or confused body language too, I noticed quite a bit once I was looking for it. These guys do NOT like each other. It makes sense too: Joe is kind of a dumb bro leftist type, I like to say he has the attitude of me when I was 19 - I smoked a lot of pot and hated the government back then.... I still do. Well, one of those things anyway.
He probably has a natural revulsion to Feds and cops, most weed smokers and psychedelic enthusiasts do. So he must HATE having to be such a DICK GOBBLING NARC FED deep down inside. He can make himself play along and try to get beyond it, forget about it for short periods, tell himself its all about the money, I'm rich and I'm the shit.
But we all know its fucking lame. He used to hate the man and now he is the man. Actually it's much worse, he's the man's towel boy and they treat him like a dirty jockstrap. They steal his analytics and other data (I am sure they called it "sharing" and told him he's helping the country!) and use this smiley gladhand dirtbag that no one likes to come on his podcast and deliver Gov't approved talking points whenever they want.
Think about it: are YOU gonna say No to an ex-Spook when he asks to come on your pod and get some shine? He AIN'T some good ol' boy and Baker is the type of asshole who WOULD retaliate and make life hard for crossing him.
Hah! Have you ever seen a FEDBOY who ISN'T like I just described? Probably few and far between. By the way he carries himself it's easy to tell, he ain't it.
So when Joe prods him about Tucker Carlson and JFK, what does Baker say? "Ehhh you never know." THIS MOTHERFUCKER SOUNDS LIKE BILL GATES TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN. OBVIOUSLY NOT "RETIRED," FUCK OFF WITH THAT. These stooges don't retire until they croak - they don't have the morals or the character to GIVE UP the power and the wicked fun of it all. Once a fedboy always one.
I could go on forever so I'll have to stop myself here. Last thing:
Did ROGAN decide to bring that Tucker shit up? Does he have enough autonomy left to pull some shit like that?
Or (more likely) was THE WHOLE POINT OF BAKER COMING ON (and when he had just been recently) TO "DISCUSS" THE 🤡 & JFK TOPIC?
I would hope for #1 but expect #2. Especially considering after the ha-ha response Baker says: "I would want to know who the source was..." and then talks about "the source" like EIGHT MORE fucking times, the source "probably is into conspiracy stuff," without knowing who the source is "maybe the guy should step forward" LMAO ROFLCOPTER.
Mike Baker: "Hey Tucker and whoever your source is, IF YOU GUYS AREN'T PINKO UNAMERICAN PUSSIES, COME OUT OF THE DARK SO WE CAN BLOW YOUR BRAI- UH, I MEAN THIS IS VITAL TO AMERICA & INCUMBENT ON YOU TO COME FORWARD WITH YOUR INFO."
What a bunch of horseshit. Whether its benign or cancerous, Baker is never anything below a spokesperson for Intel. He never comes across like a normal human being... because he's not.
Sitting there staring at that goon and realizing that he IS NOW THE SAME THING must really hurt Rogan in his soul a tad bit. Like I said, I might be fooling myself but I kind of see it coming out of him a bit. He looks just slightly disgusted at this guy, a type of person he's likely always had an aversion towards, and having to be in the room with him and talk about shit he doesn't want to in a way that isn't natural is probably very depressing.
Ever hear them talk about doing anything off-air together? Any mutual friends between them?? Or stuff they've done together? How many serial guests does Joe Rogan have that have almost ZERO common hobbies or friends or interests with him?
No elk hunting bro, the only possibility is that Mike could take Rogan fishing one day. 🤣
Congrats Joe, you are a FUCKBOY FEDBOY NARC now. How's that Spotify money helping?
I pretty much stopped listening entirely when the Spotify deal happened. I liked the show and all however requiring an account to listen to a podcast was a deal breaker. I noticed a lot of people who listen to Rogan too much parroting his opinions no different than if it were the mainstream news. That is a problem.
I just watched this fuckstick blame the seee ayeee ayyyy expose on Kennedy that Tuck did as "Russian disinfo".
Me and the wife literally busted up laughing. I love that she went from total normie to being able to smell the stench of propaganda within 4 years.
God bless your wife frend!! Your a lucky one!
How many direct, CIA motherfuckers can this faggot stuff into one month?? TEN?
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1oNPaY3g4zWIdHgFfqCPWx?si=iMJwLZ5TTgWI4tiQiv2uGA&utm_source=copy-link
Lmfaoo
He's always been a faggot, congrats on finally noticing. That is what you get for following the stars, you were warned.
This got my noggin jogging and basically summed up a kinda rule of thumb I have had for a while now - anyone who gets major positive media coverage is comped in some way… https://miriaf.co.uk/off-the-beaten-track-the-most-unpopular-conspiracy-theory/
AJ
BH
Good read. Thanks
I don't know that anyone here follows Joe, we watch suspiciously of everyone. We aren't normies here, just so you know. The news is reported here regardless of who is doing what. We cannot censor news because we don't follow or listen to them regularly, news is news.
Well said. I think most of us know JR is a gate keeping faggot. Most likely the same as AJ: COINTELPRO.
Yet, as you say, news is news. Even MSM throws bits of truth out there. Plus, it's good to be constantly aware of how and who they are targeting with their illicit bullshit.
Look at his third eye icon when the show starts, he is literally telling everyone who he is....
Yeah, good catch!
Another similar example is how Frank of Quiet Frankly has the same symbolic esoteric tattoos on his forearm and hand and edit blurs them in his videos.
Are those 2 cia also?
I listened and the dude was straight government IA propaganda peddler, for sure. However, I’m glad the spooks are on these types of shows. Especially a lengthy one like Rogan’s. It useful to listen to more than the 2 minute hits they do on MSM…bullet point propaganda, in essence, because we learn the establishment spin on a more diverse group of topics. Know thy enemy.
Agreed, I listened and it was so blatantly obvious that he is still a spook spewing propaganda that there will be more people finally seeing the bullshit that buying it. This is proven in the youtube comments on every clip of his. Literally nobody believed a word he said.
His entire platform's purpose is to spew propaganda and programming for the masses, occasionally sprinkling some alternative voices here and there just enough to fool the normies. Even the icon for his podcast is screaming his agenda (the third eye).
Ty. Been pointing out his sis logo for years.
Curious why he had mccullough and other doctors like Mallone on though.. Maybe they want the Covid narrative to be chaotic.. keeps us distracted?
Or they’re Judas Goats too. It’s not just a big club, it’s a really big club, and we’re not in it.
He invites a few from the other side to lure you in and then flood the show with the set programming. Typical controlled opposition move.
It's interesting how that works for most people.. must be that autistic thing everyone keeps mentioning.. doesn't work for me
This POS was saying Trump was in the wrong for the document raid by the FBI. Fuck him.
https://youtu.be/uPwlmwNQq8Y
Top comment: Its actually impressive how this guy manages to speak for hours without saying anything.
Even more amazing that even among as big and varied of an audience as JRE, no one likes this guy. Congrats, everyone comes together in feelings of boredom and distrust for you. Clown.
Edit: it's worth mentioning that Baker gets literally every part of this that he isn't "talking in circles" (his words not mine) completely wrong as well. Even just quickly reading the comments:
Everything this guy says is either NOTHING or LYING. Who the fuck are these repeated episodes with him even for. (I know the answer)
Just hosting and listening to his takes isn't cause for outrage, who are we? The left?
It's good when we hear the other side in less curated formats like this.
If I wanted to only see/head conservatives, I'd go to a conservative broadcast aimed exclusively at conservatives.
Are.... um, are we talking about the same person?
This message would be correct if you were talking about Bret Weinstein or Malcolm Gladwell or a similar person.
Mike Baker is straight up Permanent Washington, National Security State, Uniparty, [DS], Intel Agency spokesperson. He isn't left or right. He's both/neither. He's whatever party likes the Agency the most currently.
I mean, if you are saying you can listen to him as like, opposition research, I guess you can... Strictly speaking I don't know his actual politics. Dude is on Fox News and Gutfeld. You can tell he doesn't fuck with Trump at all. Never heard him say much that was pro-Democrat. Or pro anything. He says A LOT of nothing and avoids answering questions, its frequently pointed out in EVERY COMMENT under JRE.
It's not that I'm looking to listen to only a conservative opinion. This guy isn't a voice or an opinion, he is a MOUTHPIECE. He speaks the language of ESTABLISHMENT. Pro-agency, Intel, Neo-anything. He isn't real and you can't take him seriously. You would find it impossible. The comments are flooded with others who are saying this.
So yeah. This isn't intended to be hostile or disagreeable. But I have to FERVENTLY disagree. It is possible you mixed him up with someone else. Or, you might mean it's good to get the [DS] message so we can learn their evil ways and counter. Either way this guy isn't a leftist.
He isn't anything. I guess that's another way to say SPOOK. 😱👻😆
It's more likely they slip up during candid conversation than curated media, and that has been interesting when it happens. We have gotten a lot of sneak previews through candid conversation
Okay, NOW I see your point. Totally germane and logical - some of the most telling things we've learned about "them" certainly have come from those candid moments, and the longform style absolutely cuts that way and encourages that.
In fact, I think I prove you right in my other comment where I detailed Baker's reaction to the Tucker clip. The first thing he goes to is something that didn't even occur to 98% of us who watched it - WHO is the source? He gives his motives away by repeating it about eight more times in a minute of talking, and also seems to be almost chiding Carlson and that source by saying they have potential to be a "conspiracy theorist" (immediate red flag in that term) and saying if they have proof that they have almost a duty to come forward.
What the fuck is that? Only Feds think and talk like this - the majority of us do not immediately become dubious WHATSOEVER so its VERY TELLING when he doesn't skip past that to the actual substance.
In general, Tucker has a proven track record of credibility - he hasn't directly lied to the public before on his show and he maintains viewpoints that our crowd agrees with and regards mostly as common sense. Unlike, you know, the fucking agencies, who lie all the time and then double down by justifying it when they're caught.
If anything it was a lack of confronting certain topics that disturbed and angered people. He is literally the standard bearer of credibility and the only remaining in-road to the silent Trump majority that Fox still has left currently. Tucker is like Atlas holding up the entire fucking thing; and they are well aware the numbers will go to Newsmax levels with one wrong move.
So I was entertaining the possibility that Rogan showed him that to fuck with him, but I'm doubting it now. Baker is a guy who GOES ON Fox, for Christ sake.
Very elucidating, almost naked in its purpose, that Mike Baker, former CIA and still in the "Intel biz" would go on JRE and act dubious toward the validity of this statement. Baker comes on as a Contributor and even sits for shows in-studio - if you have doubts or questions why not send a text?? What is your relationship if YOU CAN'T get an answer to that question? Is there no one who will answer you? Have you already tried? (Yes!)
What does it say about you, Mike Baker, if someone was reticent to tell you WHO the source Tucker claimed was? That you, a Fox guest, doubt the sincerity of Tucker & his source MORE than the audience? Are you just asking who the source is because you legitimately question CIA involvement in JFK's death? Are YOU BEING SINCERE?
No no no. None of this is good. It bodes VERY poorly for all involved. Either Baker knows that Tucker is as full of shit as the next man up at Fox and legitimately doubts the information he transmits nightly ... or Baker is not just a "retired guy" running an innocent little Intel store down the street.
Baker comes on JRE, acts like this is all new to him (even if it is, he NEVER EVEN mentions being able to contact anyone at Fox to find out) and goes right to questioning the sources. We know Tucker is highly insulated and does NOT do his show from the main studio these days. Bongino once mentioned before that his writers and Tuck's are next door to one another in the cubicles, though - I mean, isn't there someone Baker could ask?
Here's the finality of this. Baker is one of however many 🤡 reps and plants they STICK into the MSM places and thus it's likely he isn't exactly Prom King over there. He tried already to finagle the identity of this source person and didn't catch the fish.
So we'll put him back on JRE to stage this reaction and have Mike poke the bear, see if we can jar it loose. The #1 podcast for the #1 TV show - maybe someone will get a bruised ego and respond DIRECTLY! Why else? If you're really buddies with the Fox fam, why deride Tucker with the "conspiracy" tag and say the source "owes it to America" to come out from the dark? Why give up the usual nothing speak and sound frustrated and adversarial for a moment there?
There is some dark shit that goes on right in front of us. Underneath what it claims to be is what it REALLY is - when you catch it in moments like these it can be pretty profound.
Sorry for the long response, thanks for explaining and I hope the example works to your point.
He used to be a guest on Gutfeld's show, and the running joke was Baker could never get to the point. It did make me wonder how this guy could even be with the CIA.
HAHAHA OMG! He just talks in circles.
It's possible he was TOO BORING to become a politician. Jeeeeeez
It does make me wonder why he was a guest on Gutfeld so much. Even guest-hosted the show once. I wonder if he was Gutfeld's handler. It might explain why Gutfeld lost his appetite for questioning things during the pandemic.
Hey Joe, where you going with that disinfo in yo hand?
I'm going down to Frisco to join a faggotty band.
You have to take into consideration how big Joe's power and influence is with his platform. He probably doesn't have a choice in letting this goofball on because Joe has gotten "too big". Might have to play along and let the clown talk to avoid problems. If you go back when this clown first started coming on the show, look at Joe's body language and temperament. He is visibly upset and its super obvious he wants nothing to do with the guy. Next episode, Joe's back to normal. A few months later this clown comes back and Joe is pissed off again. Body language says a lot. Never take anything at face value. Critical thinking goes a long way.
Wow, my 3rd comment... What can I say except, I really hate this guy. No really. Mike Baker is SUCH a cocksucker and it's amazing how literally EVERYONE seems to think so.
Anyway, you kind of spun me up a bit and I checked on this. Didn't go back and watch his first appearance but from catching some clips on YT (the best part is reading all the comments, where everyone shares different reasons why he's AWFUL) I noticed something.
You were right! A few times Joe and him both have odd body language and at one point (around 10:20 in the Trump FBI raid clip) you can CLEARLY see Rogan look down and away, mumbling something like
"For someone like me WHO'S ON THE OUTSIDE just trying to pay attention to as little as I can AND STILL TALK ABOUT IT" then he kind of looks up, blurry stoned expression at Baker.
Baker immediately gets a shy kind of body language and just says "Uh yeah, it's odd odd" smiling weirdly.
The whole thing looked and felt like two people who just met on Tinder and trying to act natural before they find a way to make out. Awful awkwardness.
Baker is definitely a handler he may have been assigned to Joe. Rogan is REQUIRED to do these it's not his choice at all, that made it so obvious to me. Probably goes down to collect all the JRE data for his buddies in the biz and does these podcasts while he's there to help spread "the message"
Either way this is not something Joe wants to do. There are other moments of both of them having awkward or confused body language too, I noticed quite a bit once I was looking for it. These guys do NOT like each other. It makes sense too: Joe is kind of a dumb bro leftist type, I like to say he has the attitude of me when I was 19 - I smoked a lot of pot and hated the government back then.... I still do. Well, one of those things anyway.
He probably has a natural revulsion to Feds and cops, most weed smokers and psychedelic enthusiasts do. So he must HATE having to be such a DICK GOBBLING NARC FED deep down inside. He can make himself play along and try to get beyond it, forget about it for short periods, tell himself its all about the money, I'm rich and I'm the shit.
But we all know its fucking lame. He used to hate the man and now he is the man. Actually it's much worse, he's the man's towel boy and they treat him like a dirty jockstrap. They steal his analytics and other data (I am sure they called it "sharing" and told him he's helping the country!) and use this smiley gladhand dirtbag that no one likes to come on his podcast and deliver Gov't approved talking points whenever they want.
Think about it: are YOU gonna say No to an ex-Spook when he asks to come on your pod and get some shine? He AIN'T some good ol' boy and Baker is the type of asshole who WOULD retaliate and make life hard for crossing him.
Hah! Have you ever seen a FEDBOY who ISN'T like I just described? Probably few and far between. By the way he carries himself it's easy to tell, he ain't it.
So when Joe prods him about Tucker Carlson and JFK, what does Baker say? "Ehhh you never know." THIS MOTHERFUCKER SOUNDS LIKE BILL GATES TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN. OBVIOUSLY NOT "RETIRED," FUCK OFF WITH THAT. These stooges don't retire until they croak - they don't have the morals or the character to GIVE UP the power and the wicked fun of it all. Once a fedboy always one.
I could go on forever so I'll have to stop myself here. Last thing:
Did ROGAN decide to bring that Tucker shit up? Does he have enough autonomy left to pull some shit like that?
Or (more likely) was THE WHOLE POINT OF BAKER COMING ON (and when he had just been recently) TO "DISCUSS" THE 🤡 & JFK TOPIC?
I would hope for #1 but expect #2. Especially considering after the ha-ha response Baker says: "I would want to know who the source was..." and then talks about "the source" like EIGHT MORE fucking times, the source "probably is into conspiracy stuff," without knowing who the source is "maybe the guy should step forward" LMAO ROFLCOPTER.
Mike Baker: "Hey Tucker and whoever your source is, IF YOU GUYS AREN'T PINKO UNAMERICAN PUSSIES, COME OUT OF THE DARK SO WE CAN BLOW YOUR BRAI- UH, I MEAN THIS IS VITAL TO AMERICA & INCUMBENT ON YOU TO COME FORWARD WITH YOUR INFO."
What a bunch of horseshit. Whether its benign or cancerous, Baker is never anything below a spokesperson for Intel. He never comes across like a normal human being... because he's not.
Sitting there staring at that goon and realizing that he IS NOW THE SAME THING must really hurt Rogan in his soul a tad bit. Like I said, I might be fooling myself but I kind of see it coming out of him a bit. He looks just slightly disgusted at this guy, a type of person he's likely always had an aversion towards, and having to be in the room with him and talk about shit he doesn't want to in a way that isn't natural is probably very depressing.
Ever hear them talk about doing anything off-air together? Any mutual friends between them?? Or stuff they've done together? How many serial guests does Joe Rogan have that have almost ZERO common hobbies or friends or interests with him?
No elk hunting bro, the only possibility is that Mike could take Rogan fishing one day. 🤣
Congrats Joe, you are a FUCKBOY FEDBOY NARC now. How's that Spotify money helping?
guy can get in touch with Snowden. all you need to know.
Joe's friend Joey outed him as a Company Man and that's why you won't see him on the show again.
Joe says get over your Fear Factor: Eat ze bugs and win a prize.
sorry for youtube link, but if you haven't seen this, you're missing out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVGXgjAUG14
oh... and while we're at it... also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urglg3WimHA
enjoy!
I pretty much stopped listening entirely when the Spotify deal happened. I liked the show and all however requiring an account to listen to a podcast was a deal breaker. I noticed a lot of people who listen to Rogan too much parroting his opinions no different than if it were the mainstream news. That is a problem.
Yeah. Disheartening but not surprising. I knew what time it was when he signed on for all that
$$$$$CASHMONEY$$$$$
$$$$DOLLARBILLS,YA’LL$$$$
MAMMON
IS THEIR
GOD
Joe Rogan likes to play the logical centrist seeking truth but he is nothing but a deep state shill. Fuck Joe Rogan.
Diet Woke Joe Rogan
You mean the same guy that says 'check that on snopes'?
Lol
This feels oddly personal while easily ignoring folks on like Randall Carlson or Jordan Peterson.
Can’t risk getting cancelled when his standup and cage fighting aren’t good enough to make him any moneys.
He has enough fuck you money now.
That’s shortsighted and an easy way out