“Yeah it’s as everybody knows Kevin McCarthy and the gang released [41,000] hours from January 6th to exclusively Fox News. Well, we’re not going to sit back and let that happen. This is our first amendment provision,” he said.
The January 6th defendants have petitioned Kevin McCarthy to release the footage to them and their lawyers. I havent heard of resistance to that petition, in fact I havent heard anything about it since that day, but I believe this is a warning that he better give these political prisoners equal access, and the stick is the threat of lawsuits. Other MSM has also been squawking for the tapes. If its not a warning it could just be providing political cover for McCarthy to release it.
Honestly, I think that even if they did have to force McCarthy to bow to the pressure (or if his intent all along was a broader release), that this was the best way to get the info to the people in a form that is digestible. If one team is releasing small amounts that the public wrap their heads around, and a couple weeks later there is a D5 of government culpability wash over them, the risk of loosing momentum through overwhelming less focused minds and sending it to the memory hole is lessened. It keeps this story in the news much longer while being more easily understood by our low IQ normies. It lets the truthful narrative build to a climax.
Tucker may not be the best person to be sole keeper of the flame, but he has shown a willingness to give people more honest coverage than the bulk of MSM.
As our favorite President likes to say "let's see what happens".
Many believe that the steal was allowed to go through to put the Potatus at the helm of the ship as it's about to careen over the waterfall. Not only did this allow all the minor minions to feel emboldened that they're safe to let their evil be on full display (thinking they'd never be held accountable), but arrests and resignations, etc done while Potatus is in charge wouldn't be scrutinized as they would if POTUS was the public leader. Also they get to put the Potatus and his band of astoundingly ridiculous fellow puppets on full display for the history books.
.
Do you notice any glaring omissions when Q laid out the DNC-corrupted FNM?
Great point! There are 242 mentions - most of them actual links to Fox News articles and a couple of those were referring to Kim Foxx. It’s surprising to see since all MSM is suspect that they wouldn’t be in the diagram.
Twitter Files being released to selected journalists? Jan 6 files being released to Carlson? Coincidence? I don't think so.
Anons need to apply 40,000ft view thinking here.
What are the tangible strategic imperatives here? Wake the people. Without waking the people, NO justice will be done. It won't.
That's why the twitter files were released to a small number of non-aligned journalists. Because, otherwise, normies would ignore most of it, if not everything, and it's normies on Twitter, on the Left and on the Right, that need most to hear about this so that it can lead to congressional hearings that are meaningful to the general, wider population.
If only anons saw the twitter files, while they were abused, distorted, etc, by the Lamestream propaganda machine, the wider population would have no real sense of their significance, and then the followup congressional hearings would not have enough general context to be MEANINGFUL to the wider population.
There's a strategy behind the release of information. Didn't Q tell us that big time? Why should we think that the operation to release the information came to a screeching halt when Q stopped posting? What if Q was merely phase 1 on a multi-phase operation?
Likewise, Jan 6 footage.
One, if it was released openly to the general public, you can be certain that the corporate propaganda machine would distort it, bury it, and use what they could access to poison the public awareness.
Two, scarcity generates demand. If these files cannot be seen (yet) anywhere, it generates a focus. In this case, how is the target audience? It's MAGA normies and conservatives etc, who follow Tucker, and the pundits, and MSM who follow Tucker because they know he's a threat. It's NOT us.
Does it make sense that the entire footage would ONLY be released to the Carlson show? Then, that's it? Obviously not. So, what's the strategy here? Successful warfare requires strategy, not just shoot from the hip reactionary action.
In my opinion (opinion only, pedes), this is part of a larger strategy that folds in very neatly with the Musk Twitter takeover, release of "Twitter Files", the House being reclaimed, congressional hearings, McCarthy being put in place by DJT team and then controlled release of this footage NOW.
If it is part of a larger strategy, then it doesn't stop here. There is more to come. And a soldier who doesn't understand the strategy could easily end up going against it if he's simply reacting without thinking.
Demanding the wider release of the footage is appropriate on one level, but it isn't strategic in my view. It's a reactionary response, understandable because people are tired of being deceived, not being included and they don't trust anyone (sadly). But it's also a reactionary response rooted in fear, doubt, distrust.
I think there is a much bigger game being played here, and we ALWAYS need to remember what the military objectives are: Waking up the People, all the people in the Middle Ground.
I think it was misdirection to make the mainstream media have to look.
Think about it: the full video will exonerate the protesters. The media does not want to show it. Releasing it to Tucker creates outrage from the left to force them to look into it (we can't just have the right wingers only looking at it).
When Lindell sued it was the nail in the coffin and they had to follow and request it.
Eh his argument is to obtain the footage for his media network. I say release all footage to the public without media in the middle. The only reason I can think of why they won't, is crowd control. Too much footage of the truth would enrage the public after viewing.
A minuscule fraction of people read Wikileaks, and it’s the people who are already awake. The Great Awakening is about waking up the average, apathetic people, not us.
Election fraud evidence was available, I watched the hearings, but the masses never bothered to look at it.
Pfizer clinical trial report that was submitted to FDA was available in early ‘21. I read a report on it and saw that I should avoid the shots, but the average person didn’t bother.
Hunter’s laptop data has been out there. Again, a small group of anons look into it, the widespread public doesn’t.
My two cents is let’s see what Carlson’s team does, give them a limited exclusive for a couple weeks, since THATS HOW YOU EXPOSE THE NORMIES TO IT, and then publish it all online.
I think I remember something about Tucker wanting to work in the Intelligence community before he got into broadcasting, but his IQ was too high so he was rejected. Something like that.
McCarthy says the footage belongs to the People... so he hands it directly to his narrative-spinning, globalist cronies at Fox. The People are then forced to accept a cherry-picked version from a pundit and globalist network, considered by anyone left of us to be "conspiracy theorists. McCarthy says he'll later hand it over to the rest of the fake news, who will then cherry pick to "debunk" the "Fox News conspiracy theorists". All the while, just like the GOP following the big steal, McCarthy is using this limited hangout to collect donations. 100% Swamp stuff.
Yea, Hannity's casual relationship with his far left "colleagues" is unsettling. He treats people like Don Lemon with more respect than people like Ron Paul.
I wish I had chosen a less divisive username for the .wins back when I deleted my old account. There are bigger problems than Fox News celebrities. At the time, I thought it was important to help put a wedge between the globalist Murdoch family and our patriots.
From article:
“Yeah it’s as everybody knows Kevin McCarthy and the gang released [41,000] hours from January 6th to exclusively Fox News. Well, we’re not going to sit back and let that happen. This is our first amendment provision,” he said.
The January 6th defendants have petitioned Kevin McCarthy to release the footage to them and their lawyers. I havent heard of resistance to that petition, in fact I havent heard anything about it since that day, but I believe this is a warning that he better give these political prisoners equal access, and the stick is the threat of lawsuits. Other MSM has also been squawking for the tapes. If its not a warning it could just be providing political cover for McCarthy to release it.
Honestly, I think that even if they did have to force McCarthy to bow to the pressure (or if his intent all along was a broader release), that this was the best way to get the info to the people in a form that is digestible. If one team is releasing small amounts that the public wrap their heads around, and a couple weeks later there is a D5 of government culpability wash over them, the risk of loosing momentum through overwhelming less focused minds and sending it to the memory hole is lessened. It keeps this story in the news much longer while being more easily understood by our low IQ normies. It lets the truthful narrative build to a climax.
Tucker may not be the best person to be sole keeper of the flame, but he has shown a willingness to give people more honest coverage than the bulk of MSM.
As our favorite President likes to say "let's see what happens".
MTG said they were making it available to the J6 POW's
About time the POWs get something (hopefully) to help. 🙏🇺🇸
Yeah, those poor guys
Probably accessed through a single terminal, in black and white, on a 10” screen and only a ‘play’ button, no rw stop or ff.
5D chess.
Bravo! 👍
Question: What is the significance of this?
Releasing it just to Fox makes them the gatekeeper. It should be released to all citizen journalists to review collectively.
Simple.
J6footage.com or some shit like that
Make it all available to everybody.
Anons will sort it out
Release it to everyone.
But citizen journalists don't much of a platform though..............not that they shouldn't have it
Mark dice is just some guy on his laptop and has more views than cnn.
Good point
The Anons can break this shit apart in a week !! Dam Skippy they can
First of all, recall what Tucker Carlson did when he was sent a copy of the Hunter Biden laptop.
No clue I dont get it either unless they think Tucker wont show important parts.
Yeah I don't trust Tucker "good friend of Hunter Biden" Carlson much tbh.
I think this may be reasonable...
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/08/01/01/60921129-11067081-Presidential_hopefuls_Donald_Trump_and_Tucker_Carlson_were_seen_-a-28_1659315322711.jpg
.
.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%231515
Great point! There are 242 mentions - most of them actual links to Fox News articles and a couple of those were referring to Kim Foxx. It’s surprising to see since all MSM is suspect that they wouldn’t be in the diagram.
Twitter Files being released to selected journalists? Jan 6 files being released to Carlson? Coincidence? I don't think so.
Anons need to apply 40,000ft view thinking here.
What are the tangible strategic imperatives here? Wake the people. Without waking the people, NO justice will be done. It won't.
That's why the twitter files were released to a small number of non-aligned journalists. Because, otherwise, normies would ignore most of it, if not everything, and it's normies on Twitter, on the Left and on the Right, that need most to hear about this so that it can lead to congressional hearings that are meaningful to the general, wider population.
If only anons saw the twitter files, while they were abused, distorted, etc, by the Lamestream propaganda machine, the wider population would have no real sense of their significance, and then the followup congressional hearings would not have enough general context to be MEANINGFUL to the wider population.
There's a strategy behind the release of information. Didn't Q tell us that big time? Why should we think that the operation to release the information came to a screeching halt when Q stopped posting? What if Q was merely phase 1 on a multi-phase operation?
Likewise, Jan 6 footage.
One, if it was released openly to the general public, you can be certain that the corporate propaganda machine would distort it, bury it, and use what they could access to poison the public awareness.
Two, scarcity generates demand. If these files cannot be seen (yet) anywhere, it generates a focus. In this case, how is the target audience? It's MAGA normies and conservatives etc, who follow Tucker, and the pundits, and MSM who follow Tucker because they know he's a threat. It's NOT us.
Does it make sense that the entire footage would ONLY be released to the Carlson show? Then, that's it? Obviously not. So, what's the strategy here? Successful warfare requires strategy, not just shoot from the hip reactionary action.
In my opinion (opinion only, pedes), this is part of a larger strategy that folds in very neatly with the Musk Twitter takeover, release of "Twitter Files", the House being reclaimed, congressional hearings, McCarthy being put in place by DJT team and then controlled release of this footage NOW.
If it is part of a larger strategy, then it doesn't stop here. There is more to come. And a soldier who doesn't understand the strategy could easily end up going against it if he's simply reacting without thinking.
Demanding the wider release of the footage is appropriate on one level, but it isn't strategic in my view. It's a reactionary response, understandable because people are tired of being deceived, not being included and they don't trust anyone (sadly). But it's also a reactionary response rooted in fear, doubt, distrust.
I think there is a much bigger game being played here, and we ALWAYS need to remember what the military objectives are: Waking up the People, all the people in the Middle Ground.
This is logical thinking. Excellent analysis on this situation.
Thank you!
I was not happy with the release only to Tucker Carlson.
I think it was misdirection to make the mainstream media have to look.
Think about it: the full video will exonerate the protesters. The media does not want to show it. Releasing it to Tucker creates outrage from the left to force them to look into it (we can't just have the right wingers only looking at it).
When Lindell sued it was the nail in the coffin and they had to follow and request it.
O'Keefe should have gotten it
I hope Mike gets access to it too. We ALL should have access to them.
Mike is suing Kevin and that brings it out into the open so everyone else can see or I'm dreaming?
Lololol now this is clever! The average sheep will not understand why is was planned like this.
Eh his argument is to obtain the footage for his media network. I say release all footage to the public without media in the middle. The only reason I can think of why they won't, is crowd control. Too much footage of the truth would enrage the public after viewing.
I dont get it. If it didnt go to Tucker then it would end up buried if it went anywhere else. Where was it supposed to go?
To everyone!
To we People, Julian Assange style
A minuscule fraction of people read Wikileaks, and it’s the people who are already awake. The Great Awakening is about waking up the average, apathetic people, not us.
Election fraud evidence was available, I watched the hearings, but the masses never bothered to look at it.
Pfizer clinical trial report that was submitted to FDA was available in early ‘21. I read a report on it and saw that I should avoid the shots, but the average person didn’t bother.
Hunter’s laptop data has been out there. Again, a small group of anons look into it, the widespread public doesn’t.
My two cents is let’s see what Carlson’s team does, give them a limited exclusive for a couple weeks, since THATS HOW YOU EXPOSE THE NORMIES TO IT, and then publish it all online.
This is why we need to show mercy to the jabbed, like you say, the average person didn't bother to look at the Pfizer clinical trial report.
Okeefe
From the article
.
McCarthy added that he plans on making the footage more widely available at a later date. It’s not clear when that may happen.
I think I remember something about Tucker wanting to work in the Intelligence community before he got into broadcasting, but his IQ was too high so he was rejected. Something like that.
No. ?
it was a joke on the intelligence community.
McCarthy says the footage belongs to the People... so he hands it directly to his narrative-spinning, globalist cronies at Fox. The People are then forced to accept a cherry-picked version from a pundit and globalist network, considered by anyone left of us to be "conspiracy theorists. McCarthy says he'll later hand it over to the rest of the fake news, who will then cherry pick to "debunk" the "Fox News conspiracy theorists". All the while, just like the GOP following the big steal, McCarthy is using this limited hangout to collect donations. 100% Swamp stuff.
Yea, Hannity's casual relationship with his far left "colleagues" is unsettling. He treats people like Don Lemon with more respect than people like Ron Paul.
I wish I had chosen a less divisive username for the .wins back when I deleted my old account. There are bigger problems than Fox News celebrities. At the time, I thought it was important to help put a wedge between the globalist Murdoch family and our patriots.