Edit: Looked at the twit linked article. Yes same hack wrote both. Both published at 08:30. Either major error or something is up that msm is putting this mainstream.
But again, YAHOO Lied:: ""it claims that lawmakers violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate""....
The truth is that the Brunson case is about the Worth of taking the Oath of Office, is it just a Joke or is it a Serious thing which is Violable or Inviolable....
Some MSM folks just can't stop missing the tree branches as they fall....
They Keep making it about reinstating Trump, when the case is about the Oath of Office, and whether it can or cannot be Violated, and what the Punishment for that should be....
The MSM is not to be trusted with any of this info because they'll just spin it into something it never was....
Likely stems from this. Major fudged article by yayhoo from yesterday. They failed to check their own source/link to SC showing that it was denied.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/supreme-court-hear-case-reinstate-143017080.html
Edit: Looked at the twit linked article. Yes same hack wrote both. Both published at 08:30. Either major error or something is up that msm is putting this mainstream.
Ahh, I see thank you.
Further confirmation:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
"Rehearing DENIED"
But again, YAHOO Lied:: ""it claims that lawmakers violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate""....
The truth is that the Brunson case is about the Worth of taking the Oath of Office, is it just a Joke or is it a Serious thing which is Violable or Inviolable....
Some MSM folks just can't stop missing the tree branches as they fall....
Need more info on this, huge if true.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/supreme-court-to-hear-case-to-reinstate-donald-trump-over-rigged-election/ss-AA17Xkrc#image=3
Thanks , your fast.
-grammar kitty is peaking around the corner.... kek
Grammar kitty needs to beat up those union teachers that were paid to dumb us down.
u/#correct
It could be fake news/bad reporting. Last I heard the case was denied. We will see.
Not sure if it’s good.
Can Biden be tried twice for the same crime?
If not: What happens if the corrupt judges decide: “no evidence of fraud”?
Would it be better if multiple smaller cases are proven in the court first? e.g. like the one in Arizona, and then: the big guy.
A legal attack (if too weak) becomes a defence (provides protection from future cases). Can also be fake and intentional.
I don't think Joe Biden orchestrated anything....he'd go down but not as a part of this trial.
And again, this is Bullshit from the MSM....
They Keep making it about reinstating Trump, when the case is about the Oath of Office, and whether it can or cannot be Violated, and what the Punishment for that should be....
The MSM is not to be trusted with any of this info because they'll just spin it into something it never was....
...Brunson case....
Is it possible something Hugh is in the works and they are trying to distract or get in front of it?
Hefner, if true.
Heh, heh!
One thing to note:
Brunson v. Alma S. Adams was filed under rule 11 (emergency) supreme court can execute even if they deny the hearing.
Could this be it?
That’s quite interesting Anon.
It's Hugh Jarce and they're trying to get in front of it alright.
That would bring forth Hugh G. Rection.
Urge to make Borg joke...rising...
I'd prefer enforcing the oath of office, but this would be entertaining.
If for no other reason than to read Keith Olbermann squirm 😅😂
Old news. Feb 21 2023 Rehearing DENIED.
This was posted on the 26th (yesterday).. So either bad reporting or something has changed.
I looked on the supreme court website, and nothing has changed. So methinks it is bad reporting.
I agree, we will see. I find it odd.
This gonna be yuge. Me hopes
I thought the Brunson case got axed last week. What am I missing?
It could be fake news/bad reporting. Last I heard the case was denied. We will see.
We are so tire of crumbs. Make this happen so we can get our country back on the right track
last I heard the case was denied AGAIN. Did something change or is this just fake news/bad reporting? Why would the mainstream media report on this?
My approach with the news nowadays is what Mike Pompeo (the real one) outlined for dealing with CCP:
If it's MSM - distrust and verify
If it's Trump / Anons - trust but verify
ORDER OF OPERATIONS
See
Believe
1.5 Verify
Yeah, should be
See
Verify
Believe
Is this the Brunson case?
I don't think that's exactly what the suit is, but it'll be fun to watch the meltdowns ensue...
LOL Molars had to be cracking for someone tweeting this.
Sounds like a new version of two more weeks …
Well that was wishful thinking. For about 10 seconds.
My spidy senses tell me this is BS.