By "eye" do you mean his iris? It is round in both cases. There is not enough resolution in these photos to determine eye color, which in any case depends on lighting, as it is not an issue of pigment but of light reflection.
Maybe, per the post, the picture on the right was taken with a wide-angle (fisheye) lens, which has the effect of magnifying the face and showing the ears at an angle to the line of sight.
I get the strong conviction that the "anons" commenting on this don't know anything about photography.
Smiling won't cause his chin to extend.
His ears are completely different.
He is missing a mole in the 2nd image.
The shape of his eyes are completely different.
The bridge of his nose is drastically different, even accounting for the angle of his head.
Imagine being such a faggot sperg that you can't literally apply any basic form of deduction despite the obvious facts right there in your fucking face. THAT AIN'T HIM CHIEF!
Also what is up with the brow ridge being different? Anyhow thing is the photo on the right being passed off as new is from a video from 2022 which makes this even stranger.
Fetterman never left that hospital but the dems will never let the truth be known. Fetterman and Finestein are both no longer functioning in the senate. Uniparty is protecting the status quo
His chin didn't "extend." His beard grew out. That happens with men. His ears are not different; you are just looking at them from a different angle---as per being shot with a different lens focal length. His eyes are round; his eyelids can move. The shape of his nose is being confused with a light reflection.
Mr. Sather is spewing 100% bullshit. Focal length only affects facial features if you have a wide angle lens and you are super close to the subject. What will happen is the face will curve to the lens curvature ; it won't make the face longer, but wider.
24mm isn't 'wide angle' anyway.
And it doesn't change the shape of your head, eyes, ears, jawline, nor does it make you nose longer.
Not bullshit. The closer you get to a subject, the more the face will block out the ears. Why would you think it was far away? Hard to believe you are a veteran photographer. A wide-angle lens works in the vertical direction as well as the horizontal. And it does change the shape (fish-eye effect), which is due to perspective. Stand 1 foot away from your car and view it in one look. Weird shape. The farther features are from the centerline, the smaller they appear. A telephoto lens will minimize this effect.
This confusion will do much to eliminate any credibility in "he's dead" or "it's a clone" arguments, when ignorant people claim identification precision that is impossible to substantiate.
Can't we just take in info and theories and then wait. Why the idiot comment? I am sure I don't 100% know, and I also know that Sather does not "know" Both theories are possible. If you don't insist on knowing something you can't possibly know, it is easier to get to the truth.
Yeah, I’m openminded to the two people possibly being the same person, with some kind of explanation for the ear differences, like surgery. I’m also openminded to the imposter hypothesis. Like you said, we don’t know for sure yet so it’s not worth insulting people who are brainstorming.
Idiocy because it's obvious to anyone who isn't kowtowing to their confirmation bias. I spotted this con within two minutes of seeing the photos. If I can see through it, you have to be an idiot not to.
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard to explain away a prominent brow structure changing to almost no brow at all. Skull shape is different, chin shape is different, ears are different.
It doesn't need to be explained. It's a totally different expression at a different time. On the right is how he naturally ought to look. The left is the pain-wracked Fetterman we are familiar with.
Everyone assumes the pic on the right is a new, recent pic but it's not, it's from, 3 years ago. There is NO new, recent pic period. THAT is what needs explanation.
It is Fetterman IMO. The nose, ears and forehead wrinkles match. He has been on a continuous decline since then, hence the contorted confused, slightly different looking Fetterman we're more used to seeing.
People can become unrecognizable in a very short time when they are not healthy, using drugs etc.
I have a theory that both Biden and Fetterman are being heavily drugged, like Ozzy was when he was on that stupid MTV show.
I'm somewhat reminded right now about how those before/after photos in fitness ads are often reversed, the after is before and the before is after the athlete gained some weight.
I already have. Different angle, different expression, relaxed and in better health. You keep saying "nose and eye set." What do you mean? The nose has the same crooked shape. It's just a different angle. This is annoying.
Im not swallowing Jordan ?.camera focas bs hes calling people who dont agree with him conspiracy theorists,. the pictures are of 2 different people,.they werent taken a long time, apart they were both taken in May 2022,.when he suffered his stroke,..
What Sather is saying is completely wrong. A wider lens (24mm) would make Fetterman’s head appear wider. A longer lens (80-100mm) would make it appear much closer to its real proportions. 125mm lens is considered a “portrait lens”. Also unusual would be using a camera w a 80-200mm (normal zoom range) indoor. Possible, but unusual. I think Sather is misinformed.
If they were both taken in May 2022, then how is it that we're claiming them as proof that he was replaced by a clone during his recent hospitalization?
This is what this site is about,we dont all have to agree with Jordan sather who i believe is a shill,.we can say,& think what we want,.we still have freedom of speech,.(just)...
right,.!
Maybe fetterman’s stroke changed his ears
and his nose
And the shape of his head
And the mole on his forehead
And his new ability to smile whereas he could not before....
and his eye shape and color.
By "eye" do you mean his iris? It is round in both cases. There is not enough resolution in these photos to determine eye color, which in any case depends on lighting, as it is not an issue of pigment but of light reflection.
the whole shebang
What mole? You are seeing things.
maybe it even changed him in to his double,..
Maybe, per the post, the picture on the right was taken with a wide-angle (fisheye) lens, which has the effect of magnifying the face and showing the ears at an angle to the line of sight.
I get the strong conviction that the "anons" commenting on this don't know anything about photography.
maybe
Smiling won't cause his chin to extend. His ears are completely different. He is missing a mole in the 2nd image. The shape of his eyes are completely different. The bridge of his nose is drastically different, even accounting for the angle of his head.
Imagine being such a faggot sperg that you can't literally apply any basic form of deduction despite the obvious facts right there in your fucking face. THAT AIN'T HIM CHIEF!
Also what is up with the brow ridge being different? Anyhow thing is the photo on the right being passed off as new is from a video from 2022 which makes this even stranger.
https://www.wesa.fm/politics-government/2022-05-22/john-fetterman-leaves-lancaster-hospital-for-braddock-to-recover-from-stroke
https://twitter.com/giselefetterman/status/1528403948880658432
Fetterman never left that hospital but the dems will never let the truth be known. Fetterman and Finestein are both no longer functioning in the senate. Uniparty is protecting the status quo
Yet people in the comments are justifying it.
The skull shape is completely different. Short and round compared to high and oval....
His chin didn't "extend." His beard grew out. That happens with men. His ears are not different; you are just looking at them from a different angle---as per being shot with a different lens focal length. His eyes are round; his eyelids can move. The shape of his nose is being confused with a light reflection.
Imagine being a faggot...
I read your comment, so I didn’t have to imagine. Sounds like you’re cycling for a brain dead retard, so… congratulations? 🎊🎉🍾 🎈
I know I wrote this before but come on.
Are you freaking serious?
First off I live in PA. That ain't him.
Second the nose and eye set are totally different.
Third the shape of his head is different.
I was thinking the same thing. Nose, eyes and head shape.
I'm a photographer for over 20 years.
Mr. Sather is spewing 100% bullshit. Focal length only affects facial features if you have a wide angle lens and you are super close to the subject. What will happen is the face will curve to the lens curvature ; it won't make the face longer, but wider.
24mm isn't 'wide angle' anyway.
And it doesn't change the shape of your head, eyes, ears, jawline, nor does it make you nose longer.
The picture in question is years old. Read the thread.
I think the more likely explanation is that the image was stretched to make the woman in the sundress look slimmer.
You mean his wife? Lmao
Sure
Not bullshit. The closer you get to a subject, the more the face will block out the ears. Why would you think it was far away? Hard to believe you are a veteran photographer. A wide-angle lens works in the vertical direction as well as the horizontal. And it does change the shape (fish-eye effect), which is due to perspective. Stand 1 foot away from your car and view it in one look. Weird shape. The farther features are from the centerline, the smaller they appear. A telephoto lens will minimize this effect.
This confusion will do much to eliminate any credibility in "he's dead" or "it's a clone" arguments, when ignorant people claim identification precision that is impossible to substantiate.
Can't we just take in info and theories and then wait. Why the idiot comment? I am sure I don't 100% know, and I also know that Sather does not "know" Both theories are possible. If you don't insist on knowing something you can't possibly know, it is easier to get to the truth.
Yeah, I’m openminded to the two people possibly being the same person, with some kind of explanation for the ear differences, like surgery. I’m also openminded to the imposter hypothesis. Like you said, we don’t know for sure yet so it’s not worth insulting people who are brainstorming.
The nose and eye set are totally different.
Third the shape of his head are different.
Here's what gets even stranger, they're trying to pass off a photo from 2022 as the current Fetterman "look he's alive"!
https://www.wesa.fm/politics-government/2022-05-22/john-fetterman-leaves-lancaster-hospital-for-braddock-to-recover-from-stroke
https://twitter.com/giselefetterman/status/1528403948880658432
Who's trying to pass it off as that? I've only seen it in the context of questioning the differences.
Unbelievable .
Idiocy because it's obvious to anyone who isn't kowtowing to their confirmation bias. I spotted this con within two minutes of seeing the photos. If I can see through it, you have to be an idiot not to.
If Fetterman can be replaced, what's to stop anyone replacing Biden?
I think that already happened
Like 5 times probably
It's Ok, I noticed
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard to explain away a prominent brow structure changing to almost no brow at all. Skull shape is different, chin shape is different, ears are different.
That doesn't mean all is well in Fetterman land...
Lovely straw man you have there!
It doesn't need to be explained. It's a totally different expression at a different time. On the right is how he naturally ought to look. The left is the pain-wracked Fetterman we are familiar with.
Everyone assumes the pic on the right is a new, recent pic but it's not, it's from, 3 years ago. There is NO new, recent pic period. THAT is what needs explanation.
It was taken right after he was released post-stroke. May 2022. Less than 1 year ago.
https://www.msnbc.com/yasmin-vossoughian/watch/pennsylvania-lt-governor-fetterman-released-from-hospital-after-suffering-stroke-140587077511
It is Fetterman IMO. The nose, ears and forehead wrinkles match. He has been on a continuous decline since then, hence the contorted confused, slightly different looking Fetterman we're more used to seeing.
People can become unrecognizable in a very short time when they are not healthy, using drugs etc.
I have a theory that both Biden and Fetterman are being heavily drugged, like Ozzy was when he was on that stupid MTV show.
I read it was from 2020.
Here's the video from 2022: https://twitter.com/giselefetterman/status/1528403948880658432
I'm somewhat reminded right now about how those before/after photos in fitness ads are often reversed, the after is before and the before is after the athlete gained some weight.
Explain the different head shape, nose snd eye set.
I already have. Different angle, different expression, relaxed and in better health. You keep saying "nose and eye set." What do you mean? The nose has the same crooked shape. It's just a different angle. This is annoying.
Still no explanation for how Biden's left eye is significantly lower than his right in the last few years. A facelift doesn't alter your skull shape.
prove it
Here's a Getty Image showing Biden's wearing a mask...
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/president-joe-biden-attends-the-ceremony-at-the-national-9-news-photo/1235181248
relevance?
oh, well, hey, Jordan ...? who? says it's him, so it must be him, GUISE!
pic from 2022
https://twitter.com/giselefetterman/status/1528403948880658432?s=46&t=6aLe-Z8uzP7kSAiqQ3l2Rw
It's not the same man.
Im not swallowing Jordan ?.camera focas bs hes calling people who dont agree with him conspiracy theorists,. the pictures are of 2 different people,.they werent taken a long time, apart they were both taken in May 2022,.when he suffered his stroke,..
What Sather is saying is completely wrong. A wider lens (24mm) would make Fetterman’s head appear wider. A longer lens (80-100mm) would make it appear much closer to its real proportions. 125mm lens is considered a “portrait lens”. Also unusual would be using a camera w a 80-200mm (normal zoom range) indoor. Possible, but unusual. I think Sather is misinformed.
But then why is the picture on the right show his wife looking very normal? (If the photo was not cropped)
while the picture on the left is how he really looks on video?
and who is jordan sather,the picture on the right even allowing for camera,angle,focus.and everything else theyre 2 different people,...
If they were both taken in May 2022, then how is it that we're claiming them as proof that he was replaced by a clone during his recent hospitalization?
This is what this site is about,we dont all have to agree with Jordan sather who i believe is a shill,.we can say,& think what we want,.we still have freedom of speech,.(just)... right,.!
well its nearly a year ago,.oh thats right were conspiracy theorists ,.i forgot that
Well now that's just dumb.
Jordan Sather. SMH .
There's nobody in this arena more reliable and level-headed than Jordan Sather.
Yucky is in the eye of the beholder... 😁