It's not just cars. The faulty MCAS software in the 737 MAX killed 346 people in two crashes, by overriding the pilots' desperate attempts to pull the nose up.
Ann Heshe (spelling?) was murdered when her car was remote controlled ito a home, before her documentary films about child trafficking and another about chemtrails were released.
They said she was dead, burned alive, seconds before she tried to climb out of the body bag on a gurney on live TV
Anybody see those movies?
I heard that the Indian programmers were hired after Boeing laid off a bunch of senior software engineers. The ones who had the historical knowledge who might have prevented the bad software.
I will say that I have seen the AH-64D/E Apache Ada software written by Boeing and dang, that was some well-written code. Someone at Mesa knows Ada and software design.
Mostly correct. The supposed sales objective was that the 737 MAX was supposed to be identical in handling with the 737 New Generation (NG), so as to preclude the necessity for special training. Just move over from one plane to the other. Why would MCAS training be needed, if they have the same handling? This is a case where the customers believed the vendor.
The engine mounting moved the C.G. slightly forward, but the real problem was when the plane started to mount an angle of attack, the sidewise area of the engine nacelles acted like forward aerodynamic surfaces, wanting to push the nose up. If left uncontrolled, this would result in a stall and loss of lift. The idea behind MCAS was that it would insert a nose-down pitch moment via the horizontal stabilizer. What they didn't reckon was that the application would occur again...and again...and again...cumulatively. Overriding the pilots' control inputs.
Bad Boeing oversight (as in...no oversight?) was the main culprit. Coders do exactly what you tell them to. They are not aerodynamicists and they have no insight into the correctness of the algorithms. I am not happy with programming outsourcing, but I think it is not fair to blame the coders. The problem was above their pay grade.
I get your point, but losing control at high speed on a super speedway is a roll of the dice, especially in convertible without a roll cage. Leno was going twice the speed of Walker.
The recent Leno 'accidents' made me more suspicious of his GT wreck.
Used to know people who work on cars and restore old vehicles. They said it's always better to do that than getting those new ones. Wondered why they said that now.
My husband, a Design Engineer contractor, who designed 100s of parts on so many brilliant cars, the Aston Martin 4 door Rapide being his favourite, for the team he worked with, always said don't buy electric cars, one little electric failure and the whole car won't work! So true!
He was a petrol head through and through, F1, rallys etc.,
That's right. You can pull one small electronic part out and it's completely dead. Old car doesn't work that way. I know (even though I don't much about cars. I hang out with many who worked on them).
I remember that story some years ago and we knew back then that the CIA/DS was involved. No quesstion that was an assassination by software hacking. Any new car/truck can be hacked. Police have your vehicle identification via your license plate and with that information linked to the car manufacturer database, they can disable your brand new vehicle at will through satellite link, its that easy, no freedom for you in the NWO.
Wish they would build more reliable vehicles like they used to without all the unecessary gadgets that cost a fortune to fix. Give me a vehicle with AC/Heat, radio that brings me safely from one place to another and back home without all the fuss keep it simple.
Its like the runawaway Toyotas, the manufacturer lied and actually successfully blamed the floor mats getting caught in the accellerator pedal. All along these runaway Toyotas were triggered by an electronic RF signal that caused the engine management computer to crash and disable the braking system, the electronic shifter along with locked on full accelleration with no means of disabling the engine where a reliable hard wired pilot keylock system could have saved lives. Toyota quietly made a software revision to remedy the problem after almost 300 deaths. I remember when a police officer and his family brought their Toyota to the dealer for servicing and he was given a loaner Toyota Lexus that once on the highway suddenly accellerated to 120 MPH. We heard the 911 call in frantic desperation he was unable to shut off the engine, disengage the transmission or use the brakes as they were all disabled. He and his family crashed on a road bend and he his wife and two kids died. No we don't need all these unreliable electronic gadgets especially if an enemy provoked by the Deep State decides to unleash an EMP upon us, then all the vehicles will be disabled useless junk which will cause chaos across the country. My two cents.
Faraday cages for all car control electronics(as a bonus this would also make them much more emp resistant...).
metal mesh and alu-foil wrapping may sound very tin-foil hatty but as far as preventing outside em interference it will actually work(imperfectly if its an in-situ wrap but still provides a lot of shielding from anything weak/directional and short of a strong blanket signal)
You can actually fabricate this into the fire wall and hood of the vehicle and add a layer of sound dampener (cork material, or rubberized black matting) and it could be a fairly clean looking install and upgrade.
Same thing for building hardened enclosures (boxes) around some of the control electronic components (it might seem daunting, especially with modern cars, but there really aren't that many).
Also for EMP protection you can get an aluminum cable that reaches the actual ground and aluminum spike and ground the chassis to the ground itself. Functional cheap EMP protection. When the vehicle is not moving.
Problem with that solution is that you still have a satellite antenna on top of the vehicle which directly links to the engine managment control and other electronic conponents that an EMP could destroy. Unless you keep your vehicle deep underground or as you say in a Faraday Cage which people don't, the damage is unavoidable. Also remember that your battery or batteries are grounded to the vehicle which also introduces a direct link to the power supply of the electronic systems which an EMP can easily disrupt.
More emp resistant, emp-proofing anything with electronic control of a function-system(like fuel-injection) is a bit of a lost cause, if you want an absolutely EMP-proofable vehicle then mechanical fuel injection/diesel-pump and ignition being the most electric thing in the vehicle related to running it is the only real option.
Agreed, better is better than not at all. I have a mechanical fuel injection turbo diesel Sierra on standby for just the time when things get bad. Even tractors these days have electronic fuel injection control which would disable agriculture real fast. Its good to keep some older John Deeres or IH tractors and store as much fuel as possible just in case.
There is a way to EMP proof an electronic vehicle and you will laugh about it, but going back to really old technology like the use of Electron Tubes can easily harden the control systems against an EMP. Thats how some critical components are hardened on our modern Navy ships. Problem with electron tubes is heat dissipation but its just a thought.
The selective use of vacuum tubes was a feature of Soviet avionics design. We sneered and snickered at it...until some brainy folks pointed out that they were designing-in EMP hardness (e.g., MiG-25 radar set).
Hastings was likely a bomb though. They said the engine block was 50 feet away if I remember correctly. Even if steering was involved that thing BLEW UP not just crashed.
Its true, that was quite the fierry crash and maybe a bomb, although its not impossible that the fuel kept leaking out of the fuel tank and could have been the cause of the explosion. Either way, its an assassination by the DS.
Just a little fun fact some might not be aware of is that the Mercedes Benz Princess Diana was killed in had been stolen just a few months before. Now instead of getting rid of it, MB replaced ALL the electronics in it shortly before the errrr 'accident".
When I bought my truck over 15 years ago I got a base work truck with automatic and air. All I heard from people was why didn’t you get this and that on your truck? Mine was based on affordability. New truck for 15K. I’m happy my wallet could not afford more.
Based Alex Jones had spoken about this with several industry insiders! Do not buy a car with wifi, they are listening and training ai to manipulate you! One even said they're tracking eye movement save fingerprints. Very evil!!!
Ever think about this ? You know those cables we run over from time to time for a " car count" ? Well if you were to put a small charge in the cable would it shutdown your electric car/ any car with electronic ignition ??
I think it is the electronics that can be used remotely. I heard years ago that the clintons had the patent to the device that can override the pilot on a plane, probably the cars too since there have been some weird crashes .
It was on a video after that strange video of Trumps cavalcade coming along a dual carriageway and a car came from no where up the grass bank or it was the one where a car went out of control and a policeman on a motorbike came off, and Trump stopped and got out of the car to check him.
Never copied the videos never thought they would be taken off at the time.
The notion of anything in a car being online/wifi updateable at the very least guarantees that a car can be bricked, at speed....
I will pay new car money for a used car before I drive any vehicle that has any wireless updateable anything..
Currently driving basic jap pickup(there's a reason those things are such great sellers in all those dusty countries...), if a buy a new car in a few years time it will be the same or a diesel van with 4wd(genuine 4wd, not that electronic awd(potential 1wd) crap) and some ground clearance...
They're illegal thanks to crash testing and emissions.
Anything since keyfob remotes were added is suspect. How many of these already have a killswitch built in? If it receives data it might be hackable. The special message just needs to be long enough that noise and interference will not trigger it in any practical time window (decades * millions of vehicles). While cars have had a stereo for a long time, the radio, until recently, had a completely analog audio path and there was no signal path from the radio to control anything in the car.
No. Everything goes thru the radio. I know it sounds weird but just look at everything the "Radio" controls in your vehicle these days: it isn't just a radio. Remove it and your vehicle no longer runs, as everything ties into it as a central hub.
So, if you have one of these computers on wheels, and it flips out and tries to kill you. Perhaps putting a round through the radio, may be the only way to stop it.
Agreed, these days they all look the same and costs of production could be greatly reduced since 40% of the cost of a vehicle these days is the electronic gadgets. Manufacturers would no longer have to rely on chip suppliers from foreign countries as has happened many times with electronic chip shortages. Analog is the way to keep it simple.
A few years ago I checked into this. I wanted to buy a vehicle without all the computers and electronics. I was told they were made mandatory through laws and rules. Only the government was able to buy vehicles without the electronics. I started to look at classic vehicles of the 1960s, except there isn't enough of them and the ones available require traveling long distances. To me, this was too much of an act to pursue.
There was a federal court ruling back in the early 1900s
At the time, tugboats did not come standard with radios
Something happened, and a bunch of people died on tugboats that did not have radios. They could've lived had they had radios.
The court ruled that if you don't include all available safety features, or features that could be related to safety, you will be held liable should anything go wrong.
In other words, if I sold a car with no "safety features", and that car crashed, I would be held liable for it.
We must realize that the federal government is a foreign occupation.
It's not just cars. The faulty MCAS software in the 737 MAX killed 346 people in two crashes, by overriding the pilots' desperate attempts to pull the nose up.
Uninterruptible autopilot … shuuush! We’re not supposed to know about these things.
Anyone of note die in those crashes?
Ann Heshe (spelling?) was murdered when her car was remote controlled ito a home, before her documentary films about child trafficking and another about chemtrails were released.
They said she was dead, burned alive, seconds before she tried to climb out of the body bag on a gurney on live TV Anybody see those movies?
Of course not
Thanks for that info.
I heard that the Indian programmers were hired after Boeing laid off a bunch of senior software engineers. The ones who had the historical knowledge who might have prevented the bad software.
I will say that I have seen the AH-64D/E Apache Ada software written by Boeing and dang, that was some well-written code. Someone at Mesa knows Ada and software design.
Mostly correct. The supposed sales objective was that the 737 MAX was supposed to be identical in handling with the 737 New Generation (NG), so as to preclude the necessity for special training. Just move over from one plane to the other. Why would MCAS training be needed, if they have the same handling? This is a case where the customers believed the vendor.
The engine mounting moved the C.G. slightly forward, but the real problem was when the plane started to mount an angle of attack, the sidewise area of the engine nacelles acted like forward aerodynamic surfaces, wanting to push the nose up. If left uncontrolled, this would result in a stall and loss of lift. The idea behind MCAS was that it would insert a nose-down pitch moment via the horizontal stabilizer. What they didn't reckon was that the application would occur again...and again...and again...cumulatively. Overriding the pilots' control inputs.
Bad Boeing oversight (as in...no oversight?) was the main culprit. Coders do exactly what you tell them to. They are not aerodynamicists and they have no insight into the correctness of the algorithms. I am not happy with programming outsourcing, but I think it is not fair to blame the coders. The problem was above their pay grade.
They are worth blaming. But the new mantra of "we'll get it right THIS time" does not wash well with me.
Yes. 346 of them. Each and every one with a headstone.
Each and everyone with someone who loved them.
Kinda makes you wonder...
https://www.golfdigest.com/story/tiger-woods-car-accident-los-angeles
Jay Leno almost died in a Carrera GT, too.
tell Dale Earnhardt that...
I get your point, but losing control at high speed on a super speedway is a roll of the dice, especially in convertible without a roll cage. Leno was going twice the speed of Walker.
The recent Leno 'accidents' made me more suspicious of his GT wreck.
"That Mercedes drove me crazy I was speedin'." - Mac Miller.
Spent the night at David Spades house, nearly dies in a crash the following morning.
Spades brother was married to Kate Spade, who traveled to Haiti with Hillary. She hung herself from a doorknob with a red scarf.
Don't forget Chris Farley, either.
I heard Tiger Woods car “malfunctioned”. Hmmmm
You want to buy an old car that works.
Obama's Cash for Clunkers made that much more difficult, unfortunately.
probably the real reason for the program
There are still junkyards out there with complete cars that can be restored. Watch Roadkill on motor trend or vice grip garage on yt.
Shit. That one deserve a firing squad.
Yes. I remember that. We did not sell our T100.
Agreed. People ought to demand manual and mechanical linkage for brakes, emergency brake, and door locks.
Used to know people who work on cars and restore old vehicles. They said it's always better to do that than getting those new ones. Wondered why they said that now.
My husband, a Design Engineer contractor, who designed 100s of parts on so many brilliant cars, the Aston Martin 4 door Rapide being his favourite, for the team he worked with, always said don't buy electric cars, one little electric failure and the whole car won't work! So true!
He was a petrol head through and through, F1, rallys etc.,
That's right. You can pull one small electronic part out and it's completely dead. Old car doesn't work that way. I know (even though I don't much about cars. I hang out with many who worked on them).
and manual windows for egress
I have a diesel truck that can run without any electricity at all.
That's the right type of vehicle you want. Good one.
Exactly!! They're not gonna be hacking my new '71 GMC C1500.
I wish I know how to do all that.
I remember that story some years ago and we knew back then that the CIA/DS was involved. No quesstion that was an assassination by software hacking. Any new car/truck can be hacked. Police have your vehicle identification via your license plate and with that information linked to the car manufacturer database, they can disable your brand new vehicle at will through satellite link, its that easy, no freedom for you in the NWO.
Wish they would build more reliable vehicles like they used to without all the unecessary gadgets that cost a fortune to fix. Give me a vehicle with AC/Heat, radio that brings me safely from one place to another and back home without all the fuss keep it simple.
Its like the runawaway Toyotas, the manufacturer lied and actually successfully blamed the floor mats getting caught in the accellerator pedal. All along these runaway Toyotas were triggered by an electronic RF signal that caused the engine management computer to crash and disable the braking system, the electronic shifter along with locked on full accelleration with no means of disabling the engine where a reliable hard wired pilot keylock system could have saved lives. Toyota quietly made a software revision to remedy the problem after almost 300 deaths. I remember when a police officer and his family brought their Toyota to the dealer for servicing and he was given a loaner Toyota Lexus that once on the highway suddenly accellerated to 120 MPH. We heard the 911 call in frantic desperation he was unable to shut off the engine, disengage the transmission or use the brakes as they were all disabled. He and his family crashed on a road bend and he his wife and two kids died. No we don't need all these unreliable electronic gadgets especially if an enemy provoked by the Deep State decides to unleash an EMP upon us, then all the vehicles will be disabled useless junk which will cause chaos across the country. My two cents.
Faraday cages for all car control electronics(as a bonus this would also make them much more emp resistant...).
metal mesh and alu-foil wrapping may sound very tin-foil hatty but as far as preventing outside em interference it will actually work(imperfectly if its an in-situ wrap but still provides a lot of shielding from anything weak/directional and short of a strong blanket signal)
You can actually fabricate this into the fire wall and hood of the vehicle and add a layer of sound dampener (cork material, or rubberized black matting) and it could be a fairly clean looking install and upgrade.
Same thing for building hardened enclosures (boxes) around some of the control electronic components (it might seem daunting, especially with modern cars, but there really aren't that many).
Also for EMP protection you can get an aluminum cable that reaches the actual ground and aluminum spike and ground the chassis to the ground itself. Functional cheap EMP protection. When the vehicle is not moving.
Works for generators too.
Problem with that solution is that you still have a satellite antenna on top of the vehicle which directly links to the engine managment control and other electronic conponents that an EMP could destroy. Unless you keep your vehicle deep underground or as you say in a Faraday Cage which people don't, the damage is unavoidable. Also remember that your battery or batteries are grounded to the vehicle which also introduces a direct link to the power supply of the electronic systems which an EMP can easily disrupt.
More emp resistant, emp-proofing anything with electronic control of a function-system(like fuel-injection) is a bit of a lost cause, if you want an absolutely EMP-proofable vehicle then mechanical fuel injection/diesel-pump and ignition being the most electric thing in the vehicle related to running it is the only real option.
But better is better than not at all......
Agreed, better is better than not at all. I have a mechanical fuel injection turbo diesel Sierra on standby for just the time when things get bad. Even tractors these days have electronic fuel injection control which would disable agriculture real fast. Its good to keep some older John Deeres or IH tractors and store as much fuel as possible just in case.
There is a way to EMP proof an electronic vehicle and you will laugh about it, but going back to really old technology like the use of Electron Tubes can easily harden the control systems against an EMP. Thats how some critical components are hardened on our modern Navy ships. Problem with electron tubes is heat dissipation but its just a thought.
The selective use of vacuum tubes was a feature of Soviet avionics design. We sneered and snickered at it...until some brainy folks pointed out that they were designing-in EMP hardness (e.g., MiG-25 radar set).
Interesting about the Mig25.
Do they have something like that? I know of Faraday cage for phone and meter.
There is a device for this. Not sure how they test it though.
https://www.empshield.com/vehicle-protection/
Hey thanks. This is important. I know I sound like I am wearing tin foil hat all day long, but hey, whatever works.
Hastings was likely a bomb though. They said the engine block was 50 feet away if I remember correctly. Even if steering was involved that thing BLEW UP not just crashed.
Its true, that was quite the fierry crash and maybe a bomb, although its not impossible that the fuel kept leaking out of the fuel tank and could have been the cause of the explosion. Either way, its an assassination by the DS.
I remember that....
If I was going to drive a classic car I would choose a 1968 Shelby GT500KR.
Just a little fun fact some might not be aware of is that the Mercedes Benz Princess Diana was killed in had been stolen just a few months before. Now instead of getting rid of it, MB replaced ALL the electronics in it shortly before the errrr 'accident".
When I bought my truck over 15 years ago I got a base work truck with automatic and air. All I heard from people was why didn’t you get this and that on your truck? Mine was based on affordability. New truck for 15K. I’m happy my wallet could not afford more.
Who was the kid they exploded to control the Georgia governor?
Wasn't it the governor's daughter's boyfriend??
Yes
The burned Ann Heich that be way before killing her in the ambulance.
Based Alex Jones had spoken about this with several industry insiders! Do not buy a car with wifi, they are listening and training ai to manipulate you! One even said they're tracking eye movement save fingerprints. Very evil!!!
Main reason why 'they' want you in/on electric everything so they can shut you down when worried.
Anyone have experience in de-automizing the treat of these vehicle features?
My '81 F150 doesnt have this problem lol
There currently is no technology to remotely lock the zipper windows on my wrangler. The 4wd is a lever and the gears are stick.
You need to upgrade to the slider window 1/2 door upper. I went through 2 or 3 driver door skins before I fingered that one out. And they lock
Double-check that. Does it use a carburetor or does it have fuel-injection?
If fuel-injected, it is controlled by a computer.
electronic ignition?? 72 jeep only thing electronic
'05 for me or older
Ever think about this ? You know those cables we run over from time to time for a " car count" ? Well if you were to put a small charge in the cable would it shutdown your electric car/ any car with electronic ignition ??
No, it would have to be a very strong electromagnetic pulse.
I've always wondered about that..
Yes, putting it into drive is simply a matter of energising a solenoid valve.
I would fit a battery disconnect switch. In fact not just battery but alternator too.
And buy a vehicle with manual gearbox.
Watch idiots in cars youtube
I think it is the electronics that can be used remotely. I heard years ago that the clintons had the patent to the device that can override the pilot on a plane, probably the cars too since there have been some weird crashes .
It was on a video after that strange video of Trumps cavalcade coming along a dual carriageway and a car came from no where up the grass bank or it was the one where a car went out of control and a policeman on a motorbike came off, and Trump stopped and got out of the car to check him.
Never copied the videos never thought they would be taken off at the time.
The car came out of a car park and up the embankment. Luckily, it couldn't make it and stalled.
The notion of anything in a car being online/wifi updateable at the very least guarantees that a car can be bricked, at speed....
I will pay new car money for a used car before I drive any vehicle that has any wireless updateable anything..
Currently driving basic jap pickup(there's a reason those things are such great sellers in all those dusty countries...), if a buy a new car in a few years time it will be the same or a diesel van with 4wd(genuine 4wd, not that electronic awd(potential 1wd) crap) and some ground clearance...
The engine flew out of that car and landed like 50 yards away. That's normal
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/reporter-michael-hastings-sent-panicky-email-hours-before-sudden-car-crash-death/news-story/d8a07712abbcb79451b928c722931df6
With computer panels all things are possible. If you are driving on the freeway at 70, your car can be turned off and you are dead in a major pileup.
https://youtu.be/3LSY3wVuASg NSFW
They're illegal thanks to crash testing and emissions.
Anything since keyfob remotes were added is suspect. How many of these already have a killswitch built in? If it receives data it might be hackable. The special message just needs to be long enough that noise and interference will not trigger it in any practical time window (decades * millions of vehicles). While cars have had a stereo for a long time, the radio, until recently, had a completely analog audio path and there was no signal path from the radio to control anything in the car.
I have an old car, but if you have a newer one. Would removing the radio system help remedy thia situation?
No. Everything goes thru the radio. I know it sounds weird but just look at everything the "Radio" controls in your vehicle these days: it isn't just a radio. Remove it and your vehicle no longer runs, as everything ties into it as a central hub.
Good point!
So, if you have one of these computers on wheels, and it flips out and tries to kill you. Perhaps putting a round through the radio, may be the only way to stop it.
Agreed, these days they all look the same and costs of production could be greatly reduced since 40% of the cost of a vehicle these days is the electronic gadgets. Manufacturers would no longer have to rely on chip suppliers from foreign countries as has happened many times with electronic chip shortages. Analog is the way to keep it simple.
A few years ago I checked into this. I wanted to buy a vehicle without all the computers and electronics. I was told they were made mandatory through laws and rules. Only the government was able to buy vehicles without the electronics. I started to look at classic vehicles of the 1960s, except there isn't enough of them and the ones available require traveling long distances. To me, this was too much of an act to pursue.
Wait, does this mean that used cop cars and the like are free of those devices?
They are called hotrods.
There was a federal court ruling back in the early 1900s
At the time, tugboats did not come standard with radios
Something happened, and a bunch of people died on tugboats that did not have radios. They could've lived had they had radios.
The court ruled that if you don't include all available safety features, or features that could be related to safety, you will be held liable should anything go wrong.
In other words, if I sold a car with no "safety features", and that car crashed, I would be held liable for it.
We must realize that the federal government is a foreign occupation.