I wonder if it's not AI writing these articles. I mean who thinks or even talks like this? Most of the article is a private circle jerk. Couldn't even get through a couple of paragraphs.
I don't have any reason to think a human author (EDIT: didn't write) this, and it fits right in with much of the liberal writing on this and other sites I've sampled. Importantly, it includes more than enough TRUTH, despite the obvious slant, to make the case for the movie's premise: that child sex trafficking is REAL, that it is an epidemic, and that the public as well as those In Power have been ignoring it or worse for a long, long time.
Not only is the film a direct and powerful red-pill for all who see it, but the popularity of the film is causing those who support sex-trafficking or hide the problem to expose themselves in ways that are ALSO red-pilling the public.
Take notes everyone. They are being exposed. I would believe most people would demand a thorough fair and in depth worldwide investigation of what the movie portrays. To even attack, make fun of, diminish or even dismiss is suspect. The list WILL BE LONG.
In April we (U.S.) had a government employee present testimony to congress about how we (U.S.) were trafficking children across the border for sex, slave labor, and organ harvesting. 85,000 children have crossed into America and we don't know where they are!
Bollywood has even done a movie about child sex trafficking.
There have been books written about it, one using the tsunami in 2004 of the coast of India as a backdrop.
Human Trafficking (Donald Sutherland), Taken, and several other movies created centered in El Paso and other border towns have covered Human sex trafficking.
Where the heck has she been? She comes across as if this is being made up.
My advice to her is to get her head out of her master's arse and start looking around in the real world.
That’s not, strictly speaking, accurate – Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny had already been out for five days, the first three of which out-earned Sound of Freedom’s opening-day take, when the new independent thriller came to theaters on Tuesday. But for a fleeting moment this past Fourth of July, while the intended audience of Indy’s latest outing was presumably spending time with their families and friends at barbecues or in other social situations, an unoccupied fandom rallied by the star Jim Caviezel claimed the day with a $14.2m gross versus Dial of Destiny’s $11.7m. No matter that these figures require selective, almost willfully misleading framing to allow for the David-and-Goliath narrative trumpeted by supporters;
Is this true?
So Sound of Freedom has not actually out-earned Indiana?
If so, that's really lame of those on our side to manipulate the numbers like that.
Indiana Jones cost $300 million to create plus it is estimated almost $300 million in marketing. Sound of Freedom is all in for $15 million cost. It is estimated that Indiana Jones needs to hit $900 million to break even. Sound of Freedom has already broken even with no big money marketing at all.
Sound of Freedom is already $850 million ahead of Indiana Jones in net profit.
Very low effort article - reads as though it was written by ChatGPT. Also, The Guardian is pathetic - they shill at the bottom of the page, saying how they’re “different” and want a donation. Smacks of the PBS playbook - claim you’re supported by readers/viewers, but accept massive fistfuls of subsidies behind the scenes..
Lmfao so want the decriminalization of killing pedos, how do I sign up to help Ballard, heard he has a problem retaining people bc of the difficult nature, sign me up
Oh, I did! And he himself made a crack about having a mustache and horn-rimmed glasses like it's funny to look like a pedo. I can't remember which sock puppet I used, but I told him he was vile to even make that joke, that right now some child was suffering. Piece of shit. We don't even need to shame them, they're shaming themselves. And people are noticing. All the people they thought would jump on their "conspiracy" bandwagon are actually looking cock-eyed at them and wondering why THEY think it's a joking matter. They're not the cool kids anymore.
They’re ratting themselves out. Why don’t they just say something bland like “lackluster performance” but instead they actually portray themselves as pro-child trafficking. Very strange.
Watching leftists come out against Sound of Freedom because conservatives like it, really makes me wish that Trump had said "Air is great, I recommend that everyone breathe lots of it" so that we could have been rid of these moronic scumbags by their own hand.
This legit made me so fucking angry to read. Holy fucking shit I can't believe my fucking eyes. My brain is doing loops trying to understand where this demonic woman is coming from. Cannot compute. I'm sick to my stomach from this.
Me: Thinks feeding Pedos feet first into Wood Chippers is Good.
Reading the article gives me the feeling the author is one.
The pedos are giving themselves away. "These people are stupid."
https://res.cloudinary.com/pippa/image/fetch/h_750,w_750,f_auto/https://assets.pippa.io/shows/609a54c479051b6d3d6e79ca/1675762454212-0927e80b2488024e3d899e4b290f5060.jpeg
Need I comment?
You can spot them a mile away.
The more they lash out as anti trump the more I wonder. Specifically teachers and anyone explicitly working with kids
Pedo face
Must be.
Got the same vibe, actually read whole article. It’s more concise than a Kamala Harris speech but just as deep.
Wood chipper may too good of an out.
No one said the wood chipper had to be running full speed. I am sure you can make them run slower but with higher torque
Inhuman crimes don’t necessarily mean humane termination
That says all I need to know about this "writer."
I wonder if it's not AI writing these articles. I mean who thinks or even talks like this? Most of the article is a private circle jerk. Couldn't even get through a couple of paragraphs.
I don't have any reason to think a human author (EDIT: didn't write) this, and it fits right in with much of the liberal writing on this and other sites I've sampled. Importantly, it includes more than enough TRUTH, despite the obvious slant, to make the case for the movie's premise: that child sex trafficking is REAL, that it is an epidemic, and that the public as well as those In Power have been ignoring it or worse for a long, long time.
Not only is the film a direct and powerful red-pill for all who see it, but the popularity of the film is causing those who support sex-trafficking or hide the problem to expose themselves in ways that are ALSO red-pilling the public.
I need a lobotomy after reading that. I can't imagine the amount of mental gymnastics required to support child sex trafficking.
Well duh,
It is very bad; It's morally wrong, and a crime against humanity as a whole
And just what kind of threat is that, The Guardian?
Take notes everyone. They are being exposed. I would believe most people would demand a thorough fair and in depth worldwide investigation of what the movie portrays. To even attack, make fun of, diminish or even dismiss is suspect. The list WILL BE LONG.
Right? Who cares if the actor was x CIA or whatever they are saying, or if you don't like the charity. The point is the TOPIC!
Guardian(s) of the Pedophiles
https://twitter.com/intothecrevasse/status/777653666933243904?lang=en
Charles Bramesco · @intothecrevasse. I'm a white, Jewish heterosexual man and I hate myself,
I am pretty sure that the guy that wrote this had a thesaurus in his hands.
They are probably using AI right now to write majority of their articles
Looks like a lady wrote it. A lady with curiously thinned out eyebrows and insufferable expression.
The photo at the bottom is of the editor and not the author.
A-ha! Thanks for clarifying. Yep - he looks creepy: Pasty complexion, horn-rimmed glasses, sketchy moustache in some photos..
Her ignorance is astounding.
In April we (U.S.) had a government employee present testimony to congress about how we (U.S.) were trafficking children across the border for sex, slave labor, and organ harvesting. 85,000 children have crossed into America and we don't know where they are!
Bollywood has even done a movie about child sex trafficking.
There have been books written about it, one using the tsunami in 2004 of the coast of India as a backdrop.
Human Trafficking (Donald Sutherland), Taken, and several other movies created centered in El Paso and other border towns have covered Human sex trafficking.
Where the heck has she been? She comes across as if this is being made up.
My advice to her is to get her head out of her master's arse and start looking around in the real world.
From the article
"(decent people who wish to live good, happy lives should under no circumstances actually do this)"
Seriously? Learning about the atrocities happening in our country and around the world makes one a bad person? Get a rope!
Is this true?
So Sound of Freedom has not actually out-earned Indiana?
If so, that's really lame of those on our side to manipulate the numbers like that.
Very pathetic and damaging to us.
ETA:
Well this is a big bummer:
According to this site: https://www.boxofficemojo.com/date/2023-07-06/weekly/
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
Gross on Fri Jun 30 = $23,682,998
Sound of Freedom Tues. 7/4 = $14,242,063
Wed. 7/5 = $4,047,558
It's really lame that some on our side tried to make it sound like SOF was way out-earning another major film...... 🤬🤬🤬🤦♂️🤦♂️
Indiana Jones cost $300 million to create plus it is estimated almost $300 million in marketing. Sound of Freedom is all in for $15 million cost. It is estimated that Indiana Jones needs to hit $900 million to break even. Sound of Freedom has already broken even with no big money marketing at all.
Sound of Freedom is already $850 million ahead of Indiana Jones in net profit.
Well damn......Thanks for the perspective!!!
In other words, yes, it is out-earning another major film.
Love it, happy to be wrong!! :-)
Very low effort article - reads as though it was written by ChatGPT. Also, The Guardian is pathetic - they shill at the bottom of the page, saying how they’re “different” and want a donation. Smacks of the PBS playbook - claim you’re supported by readers/viewers, but accept massive fistfuls of subsidies behind the scenes..
Lmfao so want the decriminalization of killing pedos, how do I sign up to help Ballard, heard he has a problem retaining people bc of the difficult nature, sign me up
What a vile man
Scroll to the bottom of the article and get a load of the writer...
Oh, I did! And he himself made a crack about having a mustache and horn-rimmed glasses like it's funny to look like a pedo. I can't remember which sock puppet I used, but I told him he was vile to even make that joke, that right now some child was suffering. Piece of shit. We don't even need to shame them, they're shaming themselves. And people are noticing. All the people they thought would jump on their "conspiracy" bandwagon are actually looking cock-eyed at them and wondering why THEY think it's a joking matter. They're not the cool kids anymore.
That is the editor in the photo at the bottom.
They’re ratting themselves out. Why don’t they just say something bland like “lackluster performance” but instead they actually portray themselves as pro-child trafficking. Very strange.
Watching leftists come out against Sound of Freedom because conservatives like it, really makes me wish that Trump had said "Air is great, I recommend that everyone breathe lots of it" so that we could have been rid of these moronic scumbags by their own hand.
This legit made me so fucking angry to read. Holy fucking shit I can't believe my fucking eyes. My brain is doing loops trying to understand where this demonic woman is coming from. Cannot compute. I'm sick to my stomach from this.
What kind of drivel was that?