Just like the mug shot.... Trump MUST take advantage of this moment!!! He should hire a Trump impersonator... And stand right next to him silently while the person says whatever it is that Trump wants to tell the public. IT WILL GO VIRAL... AND MAKE THE COURTS A LAUGHING STOCK!
You might think it's bogus. I might even think it's bogus. I'm sure President Trump thinks it's bogus.
But the judge sure as hell won't and will be the one to deal with it.
Again, if he thinks it's bogus, he can respond with the appropriate LEGAL methods. And that bit of nonsense above will not only get President Trump in further hot water, but the person(s) doing it on his behalf will certainly be in legal trouble over it as well.
People need to start being able to differentiate between opinions we hold personally and the facts of the legal system.
It doesn't matter if you or anyone else on this board thinks it's bogus or not. The judges involved in these cases are those whose opinions matter here.
Don't like that? Arguing with me won't change anything. Find some ways to make a difference. And sitting on a board, talking to a group where around 95% of the members agree with you won't make a difference.
I'm sure Trump's lawyers have already figured out how they want to respond, legally.
So, if you care about it, go find a way to make a difference. How you do that is up to you.
Become a well-known media personality.
Become a best-selling author and write something that will sway the opinions of others.
Become a lawyer and fight against the laws you think are unconstitutional.
Become a judge and help others out in similar situations.
I volunteer my time to several things I think makes a difference. Helping illiterate homeless and poor people learn how to read is one. That way they can read the Constitution themselves and learn how laws are made and which politician is saying and doing what.
Reading is extraordinarily important in learning things such as what a peraon's civil rights are.
Suggesting ways people can help make a difference if they really care about the issue isn't really "telling everyone else what to do".
Is it specific to his person? Does it include his representatives and agents? Is it explicit to his directives to said agents? It has to be specific or otherwise could be over burdensome
Who can look at this and say honestly: making fun of the lead prosecutor from the DOJ currently is grounds for a gag order?
Why don't you just, sue? Or go after him for false statements? Oh wait, that would require an investigation right and evidence what Trump said was invalid, and allow evidence that proves Trump is right.
So. Judge Tanya wants to play. She'll just trade one Maga truthsayer, Trump, with 1000's of other Magas talking the same language.
WE can go to a Trump Rally, event and have signs stating various disparaging signs relative to the DC proceedings. Place on the back of our Trump signs and facing the fake media gaggle of cameras behind us. As long time Magas, we all speak and think alike with Trump's Maga Agenda.
Exactly, we can send the message as you described. But they will appeal and expose this as more DS BS and election interference, which they all know they are guilty of.
At one point, Chutkan asked prosecutor Molly Gaston to define which of Trump’s statements about the case would qualify as “disparaging,” and therefore be barred under the gag order. She also asked how such an order could be enforced against a former president.
Chutkan clashed repeatedly with Trump defense lawyer John Lauro, who argued that the effort to limit his client’s out-of-court statements would violate Trump’s First Amendment rights.
Same tactic as ambushes, funnel the people into KZ. Military version of KZ, just applied in the information aspect using fact checkers that are full of crap.
You SLY Devil you...I was thinking the same thing...President Trump is TWEAKING THEIR NOSES to see what happens...GUESS we will sooooooon find out!!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😍😍😍😍😍😍
Unlikely. Most likely this will be quickly overturned.
More likely this will go to further prove his point of the weaponization of the judicial for election interference.
Makes me concerned though, a frivolous gag order is one of the few options they had left, kinetic war on US soil, and/or assassination are not that far off.
Eh, kind of? That would be pretty sketchy and easy to call him out on. Better to wait the week or so before it is overturned, and suffer in front of the TV for the optics. Make them look even more evil, if that is possible.
Their derangement will go through the roof when it is overturned.
Anyone who places a gag order on an American should be barred from any governmental position or appointment for the rest of their lives, and honestly a step further: their entire family should be as well.
Gag orders are absolutely NOT unconstitutional and the Supreme Court has considered them. First Amendment considerations are part of the equation.
Another part of the equation is something like the right to have a fair trial. We want to have the trial only happens in court and the jury doesn't hear a bunch of rumors or evidence that will not be presented in court.
I was on a civil suit once and we had to determine if the owner of property was negligent. He was sued after a pretty severe accident occurred.
The judge strictly controlled what the attorney suing him could say....in terms of prior incidents of negligence. I found out afterwards, he had multiple cases of negligence on his property. Every time the attorney got close to a question that would plant that in the jury's mind the judge shut him down hard. The idea being we should decide the case in front of us. (dunno if that is an actual gag order.)
Also defendants in criminal trials routinely have restrictions on their rights.
Gag orders are used all the time, legitimately and nefariously. Often on product recall cases, often on defamation cases, criminal cases, all over the place.
While I agree with you in theory, I wonder that in practice this may not pan out. Though, I don't know the differences in precident for DC courts in relation to the rest of the US. If, in the past, rulings in DC were held up in the US, then the precident is that he cannot get away with it. If legally DC has been established to have limited powers as you claim, AND US courts can show evidence where this is the case, then I would agree with you in practice.
Here is what is really going on. DOJ and FBI leaks to the press to contaminate a future jury. this is ok and no gag orders. But if President trump counters and they give him a gag order. And this is election fraud because it is hoping to take away votes by holding court by public opinion. They will not win their cases but their objective is to get Trump removed or lose by votes.
Just like the mug shot.... Trump MUST take advantage of this moment!!! He should hire a Trump impersonator... And stand right next to him silently while the person says whatever it is that Trump wants to tell the public. IT WILL GO VIRAL... AND MAKE THE COURTS A LAUGHING STOCK!
^^^ this this this ^^^
god damn thats genius
that is genius. Nothing the court can do legally to stop this.
I suspect they will appeal and expose it as more DS BS.
That is a great idea. Q Team, did you read this?
You don't actually think that would actually circumvent a gag order, do you?
I can't tell if you're serious or joking here.
A bogus gag order that should be ignored by large?
You might think it's bogus. I might even think it's bogus. I'm sure President Trump thinks it's bogus.
But the judge sure as hell won't and will be the one to deal with it.
Again, if he thinks it's bogus, he can respond with the appropriate LEGAL methods. And that bit of nonsense above will not only get President Trump in further hot water, but the person(s) doing it on his behalf will certainly be in legal trouble over it as well.
People need to start being able to differentiate between opinions we hold personally and the facts of the legal system.
It doesn't matter if you or anyone else on this board thinks it's bogus or not. The judges involved in these cases are those whose opinions matter here.
Don't like that? Arguing with me won't change anything. Find some ways to make a difference. And sitting on a board, talking to a group where around 95% of the members agree with you won't make a difference.
I'm sure Trump's lawyers have already figured out how they want to respond, legally.
So, if you care about it, go find a way to make a difference. How you do that is up to you.
Become a well-known media personality. Become a best-selling author and write something that will sway the opinions of others. Become a lawyer and fight against the laws you think are unconstitutional. Become a judge and help others out in similar situations.
There are plenty of ways to make a difference.
I'm just curious, what way are YOU making a difference? Seems like your sitting here on this board telling everyone else what to do.
I volunteer my time to several things I think makes a difference. Helping illiterate homeless and poor people learn how to read is one. That way they can read the Constitution themselves and learn how laws are made and which politician is saying and doing what.
Reading is extraordinarily important in learning things such as what a peraon's civil rights are.
Suggesting ways people can help make a difference if they really care about the issue isn't really "telling everyone else what to do".
A bogus judge? Lol
I'm pretty sure the judge is real.
So you're a lawyer then?
Nope. Is everyone else here giving their opinions lawyers?
But I am forming my opinions based on what lawyers have said.
You said it - with such authority - I assumed you knew definitively.
Look around. I'm not the only one saying what they're saying with "such authority".
Depends on the wording of the order.
Is it specific to his person? Does it include his representatives and agents? Is it explicit to his directives to said agents? It has to be specific or otherwise could be over burdensome
Were you the kid who would always say "I'm not touching you!!" with your index finger an inch away from someone's face? ;)
Do'h! I've been spotted! It was their shoulder, actually.
You can't see me! (ducks behind a potted twig).
This is going to be reversed and yet again bafoons like Chutkan will be shown for what they are, partisan hacks that should be removed from the bench.
This.
Who can look at this and say honestly: making fun of the lead prosecutor from the DOJ currently is grounds for a gag order?
Why don't you just, sue? Or go after him for false statements? Oh wait, that would require an investigation right and evidence what Trump said was invalid, and allow evidence that proves Trump is right.
I agree and President Trumps rating will keep climbing.
lol by whom?
Appeals court, duh. This could easily and swiftly go up, all the way to SC if it has to. Very likely they would take it up too.
I guess we will have to meme the shit outta them for Trump!
meme them until they cry, then make memes of them crying
Then make memes of them being orphans so you can meme about drinking their orphan tears.
That is our main job now isnt it. Carpet bomb those bitches!
Outstanding idea. Joke them if they they can't take a fork.
So. Judge Tanya wants to play. She'll just trade one Maga truthsayer, Trump, with 1000's of other Magas talking the same language. WE can go to a Trump Rally, event and have signs stating various disparaging signs relative to the DC proceedings. Place on the back of our Trump signs and facing the fake media gaggle of cameras behind us. As long time Magas, we all speak and think alike with Trump's Maga Agenda.
Exactly, we can send the message as you described. But they will appeal and expose this as more DS BS and election interference, which they all know they are guilty of.
Not really. Learn to understand context, "faggot" handshake.
Spreading information in his stead is a major part of this battle, "faggot" handshake.
Go back to Reddit "faggot" handshake.
At one point, Chutkan asked prosecutor Molly Gaston to define which of Trump’s statements about the case would qualify as “disparaging,” and therefore be barred under the gag order. She also asked how such an order could be enforced against a former president.
Chutkan clashed repeatedly with Trump defense lawyer John Lauro, who argued that the effort to limit his client’s out-of-court statements would violate Trump’s First Amendment rights.
Links provide more articles to read
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/wow-laawless-far-left-dc-judge-tanya-chutkan/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/more-lawless-trump-hating-judge-chutkan-is-angry/
Yeah, it is all smoke and mirrors to get him quiet for even a few days.
To them, the millions this will end up costing will be worth every penny, yet they till won't realize the damage to themselves that was done.
They keep ensuring his rating will keep getting hire.
Exactly, almost like they're being manipulated into doing so.
Same tactic as ambushes, funnel the people into KZ. Military version of KZ, just applied in the information aspect using fact checkers that are full of crap.
I'm wondering if Trump wants this, so he can "violate" it and they'll arrest and jail him for "contempt", triggering The Storm. Hmmm...
You SLY Devil you...I was thinking the same thing...President Trump is TWEAKING THEIR NOSES to see what happens...GUESS we will sooooooon find out!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😍😍😍😍😍😍
Kind of like, "please don't throw me in that briar patch"??? Interesting.
Unlikely. Most likely this will be quickly overturned.
More likely this will go to further prove his point of the weaponization of the judicial for election interference.
Makes me concerned though, a frivolous gag order is one of the few options they had left, kinetic war on US soil, and/or assassination are not that far off.
His ratings will keep climbing thanks to them. Suspect they will appeal and expose it for the DS BS it is.
You think Trump wants to spend even a day in jail?
Also why would this trigger the storm?
in the mean time enter il donoldo trumpo...lol
YES!
Exactly. LOL
This.
Thugs - political hit jobs
just when you think they can not get any lower they rise to the occasion.
That will be overturned by the end of the week, I suspect.
That is my suspicion also and his popularity will grow even more.
He can give them made-up names like doapy, sleepy, goofy, and sniffie and talk about them all he wants.
Eh, kind of? That would be pretty sketchy and easy to call him out on. Better to wait the week or so before it is overturned, and suffer in front of the TV for the optics. Make them look even more evil, if that is possible.
Their derangement will go through the roof when it is overturned.
Or Winken, Blinken and Bald.
Anyone who places a gag order on an American should be barred from any governmental position or appointment for the rest of their lives, and honestly a step further: their entire family should be as well.
???
Gag orders are routine in criminal cases.
Here's one in a famous a case a decade ago
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-judge-in-clemens-case-issues-gag-order-2010aug23-story.html
And where was the benefit in that case?
Gagging someone is unconstitutional. You cannot stop someone's right to free speech. It is the FIRST amendment for a reason.
Gag orders are absolutely NOT unconstitutional and the Supreme Court has considered them. First Amendment considerations are part of the equation.
Another part of the equation is something like the right to have a fair trial. We want to have the trial only happens in court and the jury doesn't hear a bunch of rumors or evidence that will not be presented in court.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/gag_order
I was on a civil suit once and we had to determine if the owner of property was negligent. He was sued after a pretty severe accident occurred.
The judge strictly controlled what the attorney suing him could say....in terms of prior incidents of negligence. I found out afterwards, he had multiple cases of negligence on his property. Every time the attorney got close to a question that would plant that in the jury's mind the judge shut him down hard. The idea being we should decide the case in front of us. (dunno if that is an actual gag order.)
Also defendants in criminal trials routinely have restrictions on their rights.
Gag orders are used all the time, legitimately and nefariously. Often on product recall cases, often on defamation cases, criminal cases, all over the place.
What is funny is a GAG Order in DC where everything leaks.
Why?
Because treading upon first amendment rights is unconstitutional.
The gag order can only be enforced in DC everywhere else he can say what he wants. A judge does not have the power to go US wide.
While I agree with you in theory, I wonder that in practice this may not pan out. Though, I don't know the differences in precident for DC courts in relation to the rest of the US. If, in the past, rulings in DC were held up in the US, then the precident is that he cannot get away with it. If legally DC has been established to have limited powers as you claim, AND US courts can show evidence where this is the case, then I would agree with you in practice.
I suspect they will appeal and expose it for the DS BS it is.
This is not true
It only applies to the DC case, but the location doesn't affect what would be a violation.
Where in the world did you get that idea?
Then we will do it for him. Just carpet bomb on that subject until we achieve success.
Amen, exactly. Hit then with truth and God and prayers as that is all we need.
WHERE IS THE OPPRESSION HUSSEIN CRYING ABOUT?
Fuck her
They are appealing this DS BS.
Jack smith is a crybaby
Jack Smith has a destiny with a Military Tribunal.
These two bit shysters!
No shame in their game.
I don't think Trump will listen he will challenge them to throw him in jail.
I read they would appeal. They may run it up to SCOTUS to expose this DS BS.
WHAT DO WE THINK HER FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR A NEW COURT ASSIGNMENT IN 2025 ARE? YEAH ME NEITHER
I think she will do great. The other douchebag Judges will be facing their own Military Tribunals.
These GAG orders seem to me to be unconstitutional just based on the First Amendment. So are these gag orders really lawful?
Here is what is really going on. DOJ and FBI leaks to the press to contaminate a future jury. this is ok and no gag orders. But if President trump counters and they give him a gag order. And this is election fraud because it is hoping to take away votes by holding court by public opinion. They will not win their cases but their objective is to get Trump removed or lose by votes.
It is election interference and rigging for sure. But how can a foreign born judge be allowed to do this?
Exactly. and we see the problem and these problems need to be addressed leagaly so it never happens again.
Another Womynperson of Colour?
I always wonder what leverage they have. With these serpents it is nd always has been about leverage.
Just leak everything out like that demonrat schiff for brains does.
DOJ, FBI and Schitty Schiff leak and no gag orders.