Hell hath officially frozen over...ππ
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I didn't read the article, but I suspect Adam really means that Donald Trump deserves the ILLUSION of a fair trial.
Is what they're saying, "Fair Trial, then we we hang him."
All that means is recusing whenever there is conflict of interest. This is common sense, even leftists exist who understand some level of equity in the legal system is necessary.
Its worth reading
Not gonna read it.
He does... But leftists' definition of "Fair Trial" , especially when it comes to conservatives, likely has little to nothing to do with fairness or justice. It "sounds good" for the sheeple to swallow their twisted, corrupt narratives.
This. Exactly. Trojan horses have worked for centuries.
Maybe these vermin are worried about their own trials in the future
We need that lady from Austin Powers yelling "Unseal the Indictments".
What he deserves is to not have to defend himself over stupid, made up shit.
Link: https://archive.is/Sga3h
I just posted this elsewhere, but it fits here too.
These people need to rot in hell.
Even that may be too good for them.
ππ
Why should it be in question in the first place? It's right there in the US Constitution.
Theyβre trying to normalize the idea that he deserves to be on trial.
If they can do this to President, they can do WORSE to the rest of us!
oh.... i thought the Vikings won a superb-owl! .. nevermind.
Perhaps this is a warning to their renfields that the lawfare campaign to remove PDJT is backfiring bigly?
A message to their renfields:
figure out how to abort your mission before you're hoist on your own petards which could take us ie your masters out too?
As long as he's found guilty. Otherwise, they won't think it was fair.
Trial for what exactly?
They would only say something like that if they planned to railroad him. Then they will say "the trial was fair, we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing."
Kim Clement did say that these places would be forced to write what God wanted them to and not the other way around.
And why exactly does he deserve a trial?
He should never have been indicted in the first place.
This is not hell freezing over. This is the Lord of Lies trying to convince everyone that Trump deserves to be on trial.
Typo?
You seeeee! We are fair and objective! --The Atlantic
6 ways from Sunday fair?
Holy hell!
Two failed impeachments (zero proof of a single crime). The criminal-mueller 'investigation' (zero proof of a single crime). The criminal-circus called the Jan. 6 'committee' (zero proof of a single crime). and now two or three criminal-lies from criminal=liberal State DAs with.....ZERO Proof of a single crime by Trump. This is obviously a hundred criminal violations on the Rights of Trump by the liberal/communist COUP.
Probably just an opinion piece. They throw those in for an illusion of fairness.