All true no doubt, but I want to see the results of people that have successfully won out with their claims of being a Sovereign entity unbound by equity contracts. I want to learn of the fate of anyone that quit paying their income tax because of the evidence that it only applies to federal workers.
Kent Hovind was one of those guys who went around preaching you dont have to pay taxes, legally. probably everything he said was true but he still went to jail for tax evasion. the IRS doesnt care about the law
He bound himself in the court when he verified the legal name to them. Trying to have his cake and eat it.
The courts are legal name Guardians. Once you accept the legal name on the birth certificate that is the person (per sound) in court, you are thereby bounty to their jurisdiction.
The D.C. corporation needs the man/woman to accept in being a legal strawman/name that they are not. So when they verbally agree with the court at the beginning on being said dead paper-fuction, they have them in their jurisdiction through commerce code.
i think quibbling over whether you are the person named in a legal document is a bad premise. everybody would just refuse to agree that they are that person and escape all court jurisdiction if that were the case
At this point, everybody would be right. The entire government is fake. It's a RICO organization. The oaths of office are all incomplete, wrong or missing. They're just there to fleece us and pose as a government. It's a Puerto Rico corporation.
Lots of court room videos of sovereign citizens trying this on YouTube. Since they deny that is who they are the courts just order a warrant for them since they “didn’t show up” to court.
Pete at losthorizons.com has been teaching and doing this for a very long time. He has had issues, yes, but last I saw remains a free man. I'm not saying to follow him. I'm way too chicken myself.
I'll tell you the secret. Or at least what has worked for me and others.
There is nothing in the law that says you have to report anything to the IRS. They are technically a foreign entity (District of Columbia).
Most people prepay their taxes by having it withheld from their paycheck. There is nothing in the law that says it has to be done this way. You can tell your HR department that you wish to handle your taxes on your own and to not withhold from your check. They might look at you sideways but it's your right.
Where people get into hot water is when they continue to report their income and decide not to pay what they "owe".
The moment you submit that filing is the moment you become liable. If you lie about how much you made in order to pay less taxes, you are liable, because you contracted with them and did so dishonestly. If you try to argue with what they calculated based on what you reported, then you are being belligerent and a court may hold you in contempt.
I've never heard of a case where someone got their door busted down for not reporting their income.
I really wish people would understand this because if we all just demanded an end to tax withholding, the government's funds would immediately dry up. They wouldn't make it to next week, let alone next year.
Right. A concerted effort based on something as simple as protesting everything being sent to places like Ukraine and Isreal would be all it would take.
How do you not report? As 1099 everyone that writes me a check surely reports it. And all the IRS has to do is ask a bank to see my account. If I file once, have I forever waived my 5th amendment?
I was talking about tax withholding as a W-2 employee. It's different for 1099.
As 1099 there is no tax withholding, but you are expected to report according to what type of entity the payment is going to. I'm not sure if it's different for LLCs vs sole proprietors, but if you pay employees, there is a payroll tax, which is a liability for the employer. My understanding is that the payroll tax is what gets split between the employee and employer and withheld as "income tax". It's not a law, it's just employers spreading out the loss by making employees share the burden.
The only reason that is done (in my opinion) is so that when people go to file their tax report, they are asking for their money back because they overpaid. So instead of the "tax bill" being a literal bill that you have to pay, you are incentivized to file in order to get a refund. If you prepay through withholdings all year and then don't file, no problem, the government is happy to keep your money.
But why give the government an interest-free loan?
How do you not report? As 1099 everyone that writes me a check surely reports it.
I'm not a CPA so I don't want to say anything inaccurate, but what does it matter if your checks get reported? The liability doesn't exist until you file and report your full accounting to determine profits and losses. As an LLC I don't know if there are reporting requirements, there might be. I only know as a W-2 employee you can exercise your right to collect your entire check with no withholding. Whether you report it is up to you.
If I file once, have I forever waived my 5th amendment?
But if one works a full time job for an employer, doesn't that employer report your earnings to the IRS? And then when you get you W2, are you not bound to report earnings via that W2?
But if one works a full time job for an employer, doesn't that employer report your earnings to the IRS?
Yes, but so what? They report what they paid you, but that doesn't make you liable for anything. You can go ahead and file a report, but what I'm trying to say is that you can exercise your right to not have your taxes withheld upfront. The only reason that is done (in my opinion) is so that when people go to file their tax report, they are asking for their money back because they overpaid. So instead of the "tax bill" being a literal bill that comes out of your pocket, you are incentivized to file in order to get a refund. If you prepay through withholdings all year and then don't file, no problem, the government is happy to keep your money.
And then when you get you W2, are you not bound to report earnings via that W2?
Without getting too deep in the weeds, I'll just say it all stems from the use of the SSN, claiming to be a "US Citizen" which is a fiction that "lives in" DC, and claiming to be a US Citizen legally puts you in the District of Columbia and makes you a subject. So that's part of it, and to correct your status involves several steps like converting your passport to a state national so that you are officially on record as NOT being a US Citizen (as defined in case law) and not residing in the District of Columbia. Then you can correct your contracts with your employer to reflect that you are non-citizen national and being paid as a foreign entity (foreign to DC).
That's the jist of it but I know it's a lot to wrap your head around. They don't make it easy, for sure, but I have done everything above so I can confirm it is a real thing.
Yes, this is all very complicated. I am learning that much of our system is illegal, and that complexity is designed such that people cannot easily fight the system.
But all that being said, I still want to see someone who armed with this knowledge, has prevailed over that system.
The law is what the guy with the power says it is.
The law is what the guy with the power says it is.
I understand the tendency to think that way. Honestly, it was a major hurdle to get over, but it was learning about the very foundations of law and how the institution itself comes directly from the Bible, starting with the Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, etc, and then learning about how exactly it got corrupted along the way, that I realized there is an order to the madness.
I was learning all this at the same time Trump was in office, and that's when I started to pay attention to his actions and could see what he was doing, i.e. doing everything by the book, because at the end of the day, the power is with the People, and he knows something and I think he is demonstrating how to fight corruption by exposing it publicly.
It is not the institution of law itself that is corrupt, it's the people within the institution that sell out and fail to honor their oath.
Sad. Most people do not know this but prior to 1913 (IRS/FEDEDERAL RESERVE) Americans didn't pay an income tax. They brought home what they were paid. Our government (state/Fed) functioned on import/export tariffs paid by foreign corporations/countries trading with the U.S.and vice-versa.
1913 was a terrible year for the U.S. and even though Potatobrain Biden is trying to earn the title of Worst in Whitehouse, Woodrow Wilson still holds that title.
Yes. Also one would need to look at congressional records on ratifications of amendments for 1912-13 timeline. -Also too, a research of the State legislation records that held votes to recognize the 16th amendment would be the final authority. If I recall correctly, 2/3s of the States are required by law to proclaim an amendment bill to be added to the Constitution.
-Extra points for those who dig into Jekyl Island, Georgia in 1913 (ironically as the 16th Amendment was being pushed) and understand the inner workings of who, how, why and when(s) the Articles of the Federal Reserve Act were drawn up and presented to Wilson to sign 20 months after the Tatanic sank (who was lost onboard that opposed a central banking system?). Yes, there was serious fuckery afoot!
yeah, my uncle was told by a couple people that income taxes were not legal, so he quit paying them. then the IRS came a knocking and they ended up with so many fines, court costs and of course having to pay back the taxes that weren't paid, that they had to sell my grand fathers farm to pay for all of it. my grand father left his farm to my aunt. it was sad.
Yes and most likely if he had tried to resist the tyrants with arms, instead of the uncle losing the farm, he would have "bought the farm" so to speak.
1st off: I never reccomend anyone stop paying taxes no matter what the internet tells you. It’s not worth your families livelihood and really doesn’t prove any point in moving the needle for patriots at this point in time. We know it’s a scam and fraud but if Donald Trump with billions still can’t beat it please don’t try as an average American making 80-150k a year.
2nd off: avoid taxes legally if you feel the need to. There are plenty of ways to save money on taxes that’s literally all rich people do. But don’t get fancy with it and pay expensive CPAs till you are earning big time. If you make an extra 50k and owe 15k in taxes it ain’t worth complicated tax law shit most of the time just pay it.
3rd off: this is the real secret.
Example: Buy a rental property for 200k, break even in rent or make 300/mo it doesn’t matter the point is you barely make anything but you now own an appreciating asset that is paying its self off and providing you legal tax deductions like depreciation so your net worth is passively increasing.
Once you have enough value you do a 1031 exchange which allows you to roll the profits into another similar investment so you can upgrade to a duplex or quadplex for free and continue accumulating equity and cash flow. You ever met a poor person that owns 10 or 20 houses? I haven’t.
Also if you come on hard times you can always sell and pull cash out and pay taxes but your net worth will still be way higher than it was.
You don’t pay taxes till you sell. That’s the secret. Wealthy people don’t have a billion in cash they have an assload in stocks and property that just keeps going up in value.
They also take out loans against the stock/assets. Pay that loan off with the next one. On and on. No taxes paid because nothing or very little is ever sold.
But reading it, it may seem off. And the reason is the tax code doesn't define what an individual is, other giving different tax rates for different marital statuses.
But what is an individual?
What about age? What if they are in utero? what about location? What about if the person is dead? what if they are permanently disabled? What about Puerto Ricans? what about visitors to the US for a week? A month? Six months? A Year? What about people who don't live in the US? What about a solider KIA? MIA? A POW? what about his widow? What about their children? what about someone in Guam? What about servicemen out at sea? What about subject to another country's income tax? What about foreign diplomats? The aides of foreign diplomats? The wife, the children of foreign diplomats? What about federal employees? Federal judges? What is an individual?
Rather, the regulations define what "individuals" are subject to the "Tax Imposed" by Title 26.
So technically Peel is correct. There is no individual income tax law. There are individual income tax regulations. And they are terrifying.
Our overbearing and tyrannical tax regulations could not survive an honest West Virginia v EPA analysis. No one voted for what we got. But boy did we get it.
I think Mike Johnson has the answer to that. Cut back the IRS funds, and send the money to Israel. I don't agree with sending the money, but if it comes from our of the IRS budget, and weakens them, I'm for it.
Coincidentally I was just thinking about this woman yesterday, whom I saw on a video probably more than 10 years ago. If she is the same one (an IRS employee who found out there is no law requiring income tax), I had also heard that they put her in jail on trumped up charges. Obviously for being a whistle blower.
Title is a little ambiguous. Seems to imply the government has no right to collect any kind of tax. My quick search pointed to Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. Am I missing something?
All true no doubt, but I want to see the results of people that have successfully won out with their claims of being a Sovereign entity unbound by equity contracts. I want to learn of the fate of anyone that quit paying their income tax because of the evidence that it only applies to federal workers.
Kent Hovind was one of those guys who went around preaching you dont have to pay taxes, legally. probably everything he said was true but he still went to jail for tax evasion. the IRS doesnt care about the law
Exactly. The laws of what the judges and courts say it is.
Remember the drivers education poster that read:
He was right, as he sped along,
But he's just as dead as if he were wrong.
He bound himself in the court when he verified the legal name to them. Trying to have his cake and eat it.
The courts are legal name Guardians. Once you accept the legal name on the birth certificate that is the person (per sound) in court, you are thereby bounty to their jurisdiction.
i dont know how well that actually works in practice
The courts need to establish jurisdiction.
The D.C. corporation needs the man/woman to accept in being a legal strawman/name that they are not. So when they verbally agree with the court at the beginning on being said dead paper-fuction, they have them in their jurisdiction through commerce code.
No name, no game.
In theory...
i think quibbling over whether you are the person named in a legal document is a bad premise. everybody would just refuse to agree that they are that person and escape all court jurisdiction if that were the case
At this point, everybody would be right. The entire government is fake. It's a RICO organization. The oaths of office are all incomplete, wrong or missing. They're just there to fleece us and pose as a government. It's a Puerto Rico corporation.
Lots of court room videos of sovereign citizens trying this on YouTube. Since they deny that is who they are the courts just order a warrant for them since they “didn’t show up” to court.
By voting you are agreeing you are a citizen of the District of Columbia. Same with a drivers license.
Exactly.
And a licence is permission to break the law.
Legal vs lawful.
Pete at losthorizons.com has been teaching and doing this for a very long time. He has had issues, yes, but last I saw remains a free man. I'm not saying to follow him. I'm way too chicken myself.
I'll tell you the secret. Or at least what has worked for me and others.
There is nothing in the law that says you have to report anything to the IRS. They are technically a foreign entity (District of Columbia).
Most people prepay their taxes by having it withheld from their paycheck. There is nothing in the law that says it has to be done this way. You can tell your HR department that you wish to handle your taxes on your own and to not withhold from your check. They might look at you sideways but it's your right.
Where people get into hot water is when they continue to report their income and decide not to pay what they "owe".
The moment you submit that filing is the moment you become liable. If you lie about how much you made in order to pay less taxes, you are liable, because you contracted with them and did so dishonestly. If you try to argue with what they calculated based on what you reported, then you are being belligerent and a court may hold you in contempt.
I've never heard of a case where someone got their door busted down for not reporting their income.
I really wish people would understand this because if we all just demanded an end to tax withholding, the government's funds would immediately dry up. They wouldn't make it to next week, let alone next year.
Disclaimer: Not a lawyer, not tax advice, YMMV.
I would expect you to get into trouble if you don't pay.
I have always wondered what would happen if you pled the fifth on your tax forms. What would happen if we all did?
The only reason they need these documents is so that they can be used against you in court.
Right. A concerted effort based on something as simple as protesting everything being sent to places like Ukraine and Isreal would be all it would take.
How do you not report? As 1099 everyone that writes me a check surely reports it. And all the IRS has to do is ask a bank to see my account. If I file once, have I forever waived my 5th amendment?
I was talking about tax withholding as a W-2 employee. It's different for 1099.
As 1099 there is no tax withholding, but you are expected to report according to what type of entity the payment is going to. I'm not sure if it's different for LLCs vs sole proprietors, but if you pay employees, there is a payroll tax, which is a liability for the employer. My understanding is that the payroll tax is what gets split between the employee and employer and withheld as "income tax". It's not a law, it's just employers spreading out the loss by making employees share the burden.
The only reason that is done (in my opinion) is so that when people go to file their tax report, they are asking for their money back because they overpaid. So instead of the "tax bill" being a literal bill that you have to pay, you are incentivized to file in order to get a refund. If you prepay through withholdings all year and then don't file, no problem, the government is happy to keep your money.
But why give the government an interest-free loan?
I'm not a CPA so I don't want to say anything inaccurate, but what does it matter if your checks get reported? The liability doesn't exist until you file and report your full accounting to determine profits and losses. As an LLC I don't know if there are reporting requirements, there might be. I only know as a W-2 employee you can exercise your right to collect your entire check with no withholding. Whether you report it is up to you.
It's by year, so no, every year is a new leaf.
But if one works a full time job for an employer, doesn't that employer report your earnings to the IRS? And then when you get you W2, are you not bound to report earnings via that W2?
Yes, but so what? They report what they paid you, but that doesn't make you liable for anything. You can go ahead and file a report, but what I'm trying to say is that you can exercise your right to not have your taxes withheld upfront. The only reason that is done (in my opinion) is so that when people go to file their tax report, they are asking for their money back because they overpaid. So instead of the "tax bill" being a literal bill that comes out of your pocket, you are incentivized to file in order to get a refund. If you prepay through withholdings all year and then don't file, no problem, the government is happy to keep your money.
Without getting too deep in the weeds, I'll just say it all stems from the use of the SSN, claiming to be a "US Citizen" which is a fiction that "lives in" DC, and claiming to be a US Citizen legally puts you in the District of Columbia and makes you a subject. So that's part of it, and to correct your status involves several steps like converting your passport to a state national so that you are officially on record as NOT being a US Citizen (as defined in case law) and not residing in the District of Columbia. Then you can correct your contracts with your employer to reflect that you are non-citizen national and being paid as a foreign entity (foreign to DC).
That's the jist of it but I know it's a lot to wrap your head around. They don't make it easy, for sure, but I have done everything above so I can confirm it is a real thing.
Yes, this is all very complicated. I am learning that much of our system is illegal, and that complexity is designed such that people cannot easily fight the system.
But all that being said, I still want to see someone who armed with this knowledge, has prevailed over that system.
The law is what the guy with the power says it is.
I understand the tendency to think that way. Honestly, it was a major hurdle to get over, but it was learning about the very foundations of law and how the institution itself comes directly from the Bible, starting with the Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, etc, and then learning about how exactly it got corrupted along the way, that I realized there is an order to the madness.
I was learning all this at the same time Trump was in office, and that's when I started to pay attention to his actions and could see what he was doing, i.e. doing everything by the book, because at the end of the day, the power is with the People, and he knows something and I think he is demonstrating how to fight corruption by exposing it publicly.
It is not the institution of law itself that is corrupt, it's the people within the institution that sell out and fail to honor their oath.
Use legal name, play the legal game.
And you are either doing it, or not doing it. No half pregnant.
Bill Cooper is dead off this BS
He pissed off the Anti Defamation League ‘Jewish cabal’, and they sent their henchmen after him. Interesting they call themselves a “league”.
a few years ago my uncle quit paying his income tax and he got sued by the IRS. aunt and uncle lost their farm, literally.
Sad. Most people do not know this but prior to 1913 (IRS/FEDEDERAL RESERVE) Americans didn't pay an income tax. They brought home what they were paid. Our government (state/Fed) functioned on import/export tariffs paid by foreign corporations/countries trading with the U.S.and vice-versa. 1913 was a terrible year for the U.S. and even though Potatobrain Biden is trying to earn the title of Worst in Whitehouse, Woodrow Wilson still holds that title.
I wonder if his presidential library holds records that could be useful. Is there a way to find out?
Yes. Also one would need to look at congressional records on ratifications of amendments for 1912-13 timeline. -Also too, a research of the State legislation records that held votes to recognize the 16th amendment would be the final authority. If I recall correctly, 2/3s of the States are required by law to proclaim an amendment bill to be added to the Constitution. -Extra points for those who dig into Jekyl Island, Georgia in 1913 (ironically as the 16th Amendment was being pushed) and understand the inner workings of who, how, why and when(s) the Articles of the Federal Reserve Act were drawn up and presented to Wilson to sign 20 months after the Tatanic sank (who was lost onboard that opposed a central banking system?). Yes, there was serious fuckery afoot!
Here’s a link to the library https://www.woodrowwilson.org/archivesandresearchcenter
This is why we have the second amendment
yeah, my uncle was told by a couple people that income taxes were not legal, so he quit paying them. then the IRS came a knocking and they ended up with so many fines, court costs and of course having to pay back the taxes that weren't paid, that they had to sell my grand fathers farm to pay for all of it. my grand father left his farm to my aunt. it was sad.
We need to come together armed and ready to defend one another against these tyrants.
I've yet to hear of a case where someone won the argument in court, and I've personally known 2
Yes and most likely if he had tried to resist the tyrants with arms, instead of the uncle losing the farm, he would have "bought the farm" so to speak.
Be like a Chinese restaurant, 1 register is for cards the other for cash. On the books you are barely making it by.
Baffling.
1st off: I never reccomend anyone stop paying taxes no matter what the internet tells you. It’s not worth your families livelihood and really doesn’t prove any point in moving the needle for patriots at this point in time. We know it’s a scam and fraud but if Donald Trump with billions still can’t beat it please don’t try as an average American making 80-150k a year.
2nd off: avoid taxes legally if you feel the need to. There are plenty of ways to save money on taxes that’s literally all rich people do. But don’t get fancy with it and pay expensive CPAs till you are earning big time. If you make an extra 50k and owe 15k in taxes it ain’t worth complicated tax law shit most of the time just pay it.
3rd off: this is the real secret. Example: Buy a rental property for 200k, break even in rent or make 300/mo it doesn’t matter the point is you barely make anything but you now own an appreciating asset that is paying its self off and providing you legal tax deductions like depreciation so your net worth is passively increasing. Once you have enough value you do a 1031 exchange which allows you to roll the profits into another similar investment so you can upgrade to a duplex or quadplex for free and continue accumulating equity and cash flow. You ever met a poor person that owns 10 or 20 houses? I haven’t.
Also if you come on hard times you can always sell and pull cash out and pay taxes but your net worth will still be way higher than it was.
You don’t pay taxes till you sell. That’s the secret. Wealthy people don’t have a billion in cash they have an assload in stocks and property that just keeps going up in value.
They also take out loans against the stock/assets. Pay that loan off with the next one. On and on. No taxes paid because nothing or very little is ever sold.
I'm very glad she no longer works their.
She will red pill the heck out of the black community.
She’s good!! Everyone needs to hear this!!!
Peel may not be dealing with a full deck. She is inadvertently correct, however.
Title 26 of the US Code is what claims to be the income tax. It starts right here.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1
But reading it, it may seem off. And the reason is the tax code doesn't define what an individual is, other giving different tax rates for different marital statuses.
But what is an individual?
What about age? What if they are in utero? what about location? What about if the person is dead? what if they are permanently disabled? What about Puerto Ricans? what about visitors to the US for a week? A month? Six months? A Year? What about people who don't live in the US? What about a solider KIA? MIA? A POW? what about his widow? What about their children? what about someone in Guam? What about servicemen out at sea? What about subject to another country's income tax? What about foreign diplomats? The aides of foreign diplomats? The wife, the children of foreign diplomats? What about federal employees? Federal judges? What is an individual?
Rather, the regulations define what "individuals" are subject to the "Tax Imposed" by Title 26.
So technically Peel is correct. There is no individual income tax law. There are individual income tax regulations. And they are terrifying.
Our overbearing and tyrannical tax regulations could not survive an honest West Virginia v EPA analysis. No one voted for what we got. But boy did we get it.
The Creature from Jekyl Isle
Also look up former IRS Agent Joe Bannister
Looks like that was the first of multiple IRS & Fed videos posted today.
The Fed
Aaron Russo
Joe Banister (former IRS Enforcement)
John Turner (former IRS Enforcement)
Sherry is very convincing and speaks succinctly that it is all bs. Love this gal and glad she is on our side of truth.
and Freedom to Fascism
The IRS can't audit every blade of grass
87,000 new agents beg to differ.
I think Mike Johnson has the answer to that. Cut back the IRS funds, and send the money to Israel. I don't agree with sending the money, but if it comes from our of the IRS budget, and weakens them, I'm for it.
I'd rather you incinerate the money than give it to irs. I guess the same could be said of most government spending.
Let them try it. Especially now they will be defunded $14 billion
87,000 pussies have never accomplished anything aside from populating the planet.
26 USC 7701(a)(1) & (14)
26 CFR 1.441-1(8)
26 USC 7343
It is important to know these with the application of 'ejusdem generis' in mind.
Coincidentally I was just thinking about this woman yesterday, whom I saw on a video probably more than 10 years ago. If she is the same one (an IRS employee who found out there is no law requiring income tax), I had also heard that they put her in jail on trumped up charges. Obviously for being a whistle blower.
Title is a little ambiguous. Seems to imply the government has no right to collect any kind of tax. My quick search pointed to Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. Am I missing something?