Is it too much to hope he plows over top of Hillary while landing the sleigh and after he gets out and realizes its her proceeds to mercilessly beat her over the head with a yule log to finish the job?
That is what I was getting at. Everyone seems to be rushing to this Qstar being what created or is being referenced in the painting. It looks like Q, something, A something. Cant tell if its 1 or i. But it looks to me like there is definately something between the Q and A.
"QA" and "QAnon" are wrapped in apostrophes; most (all?) references to "QAnon" are wrapped in either quotation marks or apostrophes, and most references to straight Q are not.
Perhaps it's saying that narratively, they went from calling Q "QA" to "QAnon"? Hammer not being wrapped in apostrophes definitely means something there too, but this has probably been talked about.
I get the “disinformation is necessary” part, but in this instance, Q actually CONTRADICTS what Q said in another post (that there is no “QAnon”). It didn’t pop into my head till this ‘hammer Santa’ post was brought back up.
I didn’t downvote it. My comment was that the Q post with the hammer-holding Santa using the word “QAnon” and the painting being signed “QA” (abbreviation for “QAnon”) contradicts Q’s other post that clarified “There is no QAnon - there is Q and there are Anons - no “QAnon.”
That’s all I was saying. Q contradicted themselves re: those 2 posts. In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing. Simple fact - not a theory or interpretation. It is what it is.
Just search the Q board for the term “QAnon” and you can see the contradicting Q posts. One of the 2 (the hammer-holding Santa) is already posted in this thread.
You’re repeating yourself. You said that a q post with the word qanon contradicts previous posts but I’m asking you how does it contradict the previous post.
I’ll tell you how it doesn’t by correcting your understanding:
In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing.
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
He tells you 1) yes it is a thing and 2) this is what that thing is.
Please link the post number that contradicts what I said.
E: to use a different subject:
unicorns don’t exist.
a unicorn looks like a horse with a spiraled horn on his forehead.
Both statements are true.
If you hear someone say they saw a unicorn, you know they’re full of shit.
If the media is talking about qanon, you know they’re full of shit.
We’re seeing different things from the same 2 Q posts. What I’m seeing in Q post #2598 is that Q is validating “QAnon” as being a legit thing because Q is replying to an Anon who pointed out the artist signed the painting “QA” (abbreviation for QAnon). Q replies to the Anon that the ‘Santa with the hammer’ painting is signed by “QA > ‘QAnon’ > Hammer” (quote from Q in that post).
In Q post #4881, Q is declaring that “QAnon” is NOT a legitimate thing. In #4881, Q says: “There is no ‘QAnon.’ 3”
I’m baffled re: why you’re not seeing how these 2 Q posts directly contradict each other.
I just think this is next year. This year feels too soon. Even when the “list” is published, it will take months for people to wake up. Based on my office, we have a long way to go.
I agree. I also think the Trump trials have to occur. The people still asleep are not going to believe election fraud or a coup d’état that was captured in classified documents unless it is proven in a court of law.
I have a little Messenger group of friends and family that want to discuss current events and liked what I used to throw up on Facebook. We’ve all recognized that the trickle has become a flood in recent months. There are some days that I can’t keep up with what is in the Hot section here or that is flashing across with my X notifications.
We are getting there, but I will be surprised if the military were to rip the bandaid off before the next election.
That is one item that puzzles me. Trump doesn’t lie to us and he has said that he will be back “soon”. He has said it many different ways at his rallies. So when is “soon”?
Is it too much to hope he plows over top of Hillary while landing the sleigh and after he gets out and realizes its her proceeds to mercilessly beat her over the head with a yule log to finish the job?
"Kankles got run over by a reindeer...."
Walking home from Epstiens Christmas Eve!
You can say there's no such thing as karma...
But as for Q and MAGA we believe
IS that a reference to Hammer and Scorecard?
And what is that bird/plane badge on Santa's hat?
Its a holly leaf on the hat and the painting isnt signed AI or A1
Yes it looks like "QAi" to me.
That image did have a 'painted by ai' feel to it. Wonder if santa has 6 fingers inside that glove.
What if it means....... Quantum AI
Happy thanksgiving brother
I think it was actually signed QiAi if I recall correctly.
That is what I was getting at. Everyone seems to be rushing to this Qstar being what created or is being referenced in the painting. It looks like Q, something, A something. Cant tell if its 1 or i. But it looks to me like there is definately something between the Q and A.
It is literally QAi and very easy to see when zooming in.
Holly leaves/berries
Is it an "x"???
I know right?
Pelosi's husband would like a word...
Odd that Q later said, “There is no QAnon” (only “Q” and “Anons”), yet Q uses that reference “QAnon” by name here in this post.
Perhaps there is a misinterpretation here.
"QA" and "QAnon" are wrapped in apostrophes; most (all?) references to "QAnon" are wrapped in either quotation marks or apostrophes, and most references to straight Q are not.
Perhaps it's saying that narratively, they went from calling Q "QA" to "QAnon"? Hammer not being wrapped in apostrophes definitely means something there too, but this has probably been talked about.
Good points - thanks for your input on that. Wishing you a blessed Thanksgiving with your loved ones!
You as well! Also I'm not saying I'm right by any means, just that it may not be a "disinformation is necessary" thing nor a contradiction haha
Disinformation is necessary. Don’t ever take Q completely at its word. Let it make you hypothesize and research.
I get the “disinformation is necessary” part, but in this instance, Q actually CONTRADICTS what Q said in another post (that there is no “QAnon”). It didn’t pop into my head till this ‘hammer Santa’ post was brought back up.
I hate when questions get downvoted but let’s play with the Socratic method.
How did Q contradict himself.
When did he say there is a QAnon, and is that what they said or is that your interpretation of what was said.
I didn’t downvote it. My comment was that the Q post with the hammer-holding Santa using the word “QAnon” and the painting being signed “QA” (abbreviation for “QAnon”) contradicts Q’s other post that clarified “There is no QAnon - there is Q and there are Anons - no “QAnon.”
That’s all I was saying. Q contradicted themselves re: those 2 posts. In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing. Simple fact - not a theory or interpretation. It is what it is.
Just search the Q board for the term “QAnon” and you can see the contradicting Q posts. One of the 2 (the hammer-holding Santa) is already posted in this thread.
You’re repeating yourself. You said that a q post with the word qanon contradicts previous posts but I’m asking you how does it contradict the previous post.
I’ll tell you how it doesn’t by correcting your understanding:
That’s false. Q specifically says in u/#q4881
He tells you 1) yes it is a thing and 2) this is what that thing is.
Please link the post number that contradicts what I said.
E: to use a different subject:
Both statements are true. If you hear someone say they saw a unicorn, you know they’re full of shit. If the media is talking about qanon, you know they’re full of shit.
We’re seeing different things from the same 2 Q posts. What I’m seeing in Q post #2598 is that Q is validating “QAnon” as being a legit thing because Q is replying to an Anon who pointed out the artist signed the painting “QA” (abbreviation for QAnon). Q replies to the Anon that the ‘Santa with the hammer’ painting is signed by “QA > ‘QAnon’ > Hammer” (quote from Q in that post).
In Q post #4881, Q is declaring that “QAnon” is NOT a legitimate thing. In #4881, Q says: “There is no ‘QAnon.’ 3”
I’m baffled re: why you’re not seeing how these 2 Q posts directly contradict each other.
They contradict each other because you want it to. You quote 4881 but then stop right where you wanted to.
I just think this is next year. This year feels too soon. Even when the “list” is published, it will take months for people to wake up. Based on my office, we have a long way to go.
I agree. I also think the Trump trials have to occur. The people still asleep are not going to believe election fraud or a coup d’état that was captured in classified documents unless it is proven in a court of law.
I have a little Messenger group of friends and family that want to discuss current events and liked what I used to throw up on Facebook. We’ve all recognized that the trickle has become a flood in recent months. There are some days that I can’t keep up with what is in the Hot section here or that is flashing across with my X notifications.
We are getting there, but I will be surprised if the military were to rip the bandaid off before the next election.
That is one item that puzzles me. Trump doesn’t lie to us and he has said that he will be back “soon”. He has said it many different ways at his rallies. So when is “soon”?
Exactly my thoughts. The trials, then time for people to come to grips with it.
QAi can hear you when you breathe.
u/#q150