He promoted it early on. My belief is they (Q / White Hats) recruited him to be part of the rollout to a wider audience, but then had him pull back the reigns so as not to have the whole movement associated with “Alex Jones.”
I get that Q says this - but I really have a hard time seeing the Alex Jones that so jubilantly celebrated Trumps election night with champagne and party hats, is actually someone working against the interest of America. His heart seems to much into hating these globalist pieces of shit.
My main question to Alex Jones supporters is this: what change has he actually caused? James O'Keefe and Julian Assange both sacrificed their jobs and also got people fired from their positions of power. What has Alex Jones, who's been in his role for twice as long, actually accomplished or sacrificed?
And before you say the sandyhook lawsuit, has he actually paid yet?
What Alex Jones accomplished is he made everyone associate truth seeking with being a total lunatic. He turned so many people off to reality because of how insane and stupid he always acts
My theory on him acting a bit nutty is that it’s a security measure.
If he was too accurate and provided too much sauce openly, they’d have probably offed him. Anyway, he’s disclosure. Litigation isn’t his arena. O’Keefe is fighting a different front. Assange was a whistleblower inlet. That’s also a different front.
Or maybe he’s a double agent. Who knows? He woke me up to a ton of things, though.
My thoughts exactly! People do change. People can be "flipped". People can repent. A really smart person can see what's coming and out of a sense of self-preservation get on board the winning side!
I think Tuck is a white hat. He denied election fraud in the beginning but was told to in purpose as to maintain his position at Fox , until time came to move on after Elon did his role in purchasing X.
I'm betting Musk puts Alex back on X and all hell breaks loose because nobody is saying he's a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist now. They talk about it at 32m.
It was a great interview. I think the most important thing I learned is that Alex gets a bunch of his ideas from openly available documents. They don't try to hide this stuff.
Tucker Carlson is (or at least was) a Cabal agent, working for the C_A as a media voice for the "Conservatives," part of the Controlled Opposition scheme.
Alex Jones is (or at least was) a Cabal agent, working for the C_A as a media voice for the "Truthers," part of the Controlled Opposition scheme.
My thoughts exactly! People do change. People can be "flipped". People can repent. A really smart person can see what's coming and out of a sense of self-preservation get on board the winning side! And sometimes people are blackmailed into doing things they wouldn't naturally do.
If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA. They both have family members in the CIA and freely admit it. And they claim their families are very patriotic and go back to the founding.
If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA.
First, there's probably not a whole lot of "white hats" in the C_A. The C_A is an agency designed by the Cabal specifically to be their black hat "social control agency." It was created by marrying the Rockefeller created OSS with the Rockefeller funded Nazi intelligence agency (Gehlen Organization).
Second, what evidence makes you think that Tucker and AJ were "undercover white hats" in an organization that only recruits black hats, or people who are clueless who they work for?
Let's look at AJ. First, Q specifically calls him out as a Cabal agent (Mossad controlled opposition agent), so there's that. But far more importantly, what does he do? He gives some really good evidence of fuckery. But he also acts like a lunatic. What does that do? It associates the good evidence he shows with his lunacy. If you try to show the evidence through one of AJ's reports, a person will look at it and say, "OMG, it's Alex Jones. You are a crazy conspiracy theorist, just like him! Look at him, he think's he's an alien abductee. He thinks lizard people are eating brains and Rich people are murdering babies and drinking their blood. Where is the evidence for that?"
And that's the thing. The really crazy stuff, even if it's true, he provides zero, or really poor evidence for. ALL of his actions discredit the good information he provides. The good information and evidence is associated with "crazy," thus it remains hidden. That is exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
The Truth needs an outlet. AJ is that outlet, and he makes the truth look false to anyone who is skeptical by association with his lunacy.
Now lets look at Carlson. His father has Cabal written all over him. He himself has decades of work presenting the "Conservative view." What is the "Conservative view?" It is the OPPOSITE SIDE of the "Liberal View." He gives the truth (but only part of the truth) and says constantly that "The other side is lying." What does that do? That drives division. What is the primary purpose of Controlled Opposition agents? To create social division. It isn't about what is true or false. BOTH SIDES present the truth, but only part of the truth. That makes people believe them. Then, on each side, the agents say "the other side is lying." And it's true. It's ALWAYS true. The other side IS lying by omission. And both sides are getting part of the truth (but not the whole truth). The Left and The Right have both been controlled by the Cabal since their beginning.
Don't believe me? Ask yourself, why are there "two sides?" You put 100 people in a room and ask them their ideas on something and you will get 100 different responses. You put 100 people in a room and force them to put on a blue shirt or a red shirt and you will get 2 responses. When people are forced to pick a side, they will choose whichever one they align with best, and then, to ensure "their side" wins, they will concede whatever they have to, give up whatever they are forced to, to ensure "victory." So if you want to control the narrative, make two boxes, force everyone to join one or the other, and feed them both the truth in scope, then say "the other side is lying." Tucker has fulfilled that role perfectly for decades.
Exactly as he was self-admittedly trained at the C_A to do.
“Alex is a lunatic” is a subjective statement. Not an argument to hang your hat on. You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
It's not my opinion. I don't think it's true. That is what the world see's (that link is just one of a thousand hit pieces on AJ’s particular brand of crazy). Any article on him talks about how crazy he is. He talks about truly whacked out shit all the time and he is quoted on it all the time. Suggesting that statement is controversial in the broader public view is just being willfully blind.
You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
I am looking at what actually happens as a result of his actions. It isn't about what I want. I don’t think AJ is a lunatic at all. I think he is a really smart and gifted actor. What I am talking about is the actual effect he has.
Yes, after people start to question their reality, they get a lot of good evidence from Alex Jones. Then they go around trying to red pill their friends. Then they show their friends Alex Jones’ work, or they quote AJ, or they talk about some of the things he says that don’t have any evidential support (as supplied by him, or in general). Then their friends think that Alex Jones is a lunatic, because he acts like a lunatic, and sounds like a lunatic, and says things attributed to lunacy (the human body is just an alien antenna e.g.). Then all the good evidence he shows gets discredited by association with his crazy talk. The most important thing to appreciate here is that by "crazy talk" I specifically mean those statements he makes that are not believable (even if they are true) for which he shows no supporting evidence. Such statements make a person look crazy. Even if they are making statements of the most profound truth, it doesn't appear that way. I suggest that is intentional.
What actually happens is that Alex Jones “wakes up” very few people. The millions that find him, find him because they are already questioning their reality and he is the largest voice speaking the truth. When they find him, they can’t use him as a source, because he has no credibility. His lack of credibility is due not to the really good reports he puts out, but to the other things he says that act to discredit him, and thus the truth.
The truth needs an outlet. If that outlet is not believable by someone who already doesn’t believe, then the truth remains hidden. If, on the other hand, you do already believe something, and AJ is giving further good information on it, you will be a fan of AJ, thus separating you from the other people you wish to show “the truth” to by your association to AJ, either by quoting him, showing his work, or just sounding like him. What actually happens is that he creates division between the truth, those that want to talk about the truth (Truthers) and the rest of society. He helps to create boxes for people to sort themselves in to, thus the division. Whether that is intentional or not, that is what actually happens. That is the AJ effect.
He is not alone. All Truther leaders do the same thing. They all talk about whacked out shit (which may or may not be true) and provide no evidence for it. They also all have provable or stated direct ties to the C_A.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Alex Jones explicitly stated that his father (and other members of his family) was on the C_A payroll. True or not, it is a stated direct connection to the Agency. Q explicitly stated that AJ was a Mossad agent as shown in the link above. Mossad and the C_A are the same agency.
Tucker Carlson spoke at a rally on his campus about the C_A recruiters there, defending them. He then later is explicitly stated as having gone through the application process for the C_A. He is then stated as having been rejected.
Immediately afterwards, his father, who is easily proven to be a member of the Cabal, is appointed the head of the Voice of America by George H. W. Bush and the Carlson family moves from California to D.C.. VoA is the C_A’s media front and Tucker Carlson's father became the head of a major arm of the C_A right after Tucker applied to the C_A. George H. W. Bush, who personally appointed Mr. Carlson to head an important C_A organization right after his son applies to the C_A, is the former head of the C_A. GHWB was the head of the C_A during the Church Committee hearings and ran interference for the C_A there when the Senate investigation outed the C_A as having hundreds of American media talking heads as their agents.
When his father took over the VoA, Tucker then immediately began working as a “editor and fact checker” for the Heritage Foundation, which is itself just a front organization for the C_A. “Fact checkers” are one of the C_A’s primary tools for controlling information. Tucker then became a media star, basically instantly. In his early career he ran interference for the C_A regarding Iran-Contra, one of the most blatant C_A corruption scandals ever (that made it to the public), that no one ever talks about or knows the details of.
You find patterns like this everywhere. Numerous threads leading directly to the C_A/Cabal in the biggest names in media, on all sides, going back to their origin stories. This has always been the case. What are the odds that that pattern exists in all the big names purely by chance? I suggest somewhere in the range of zero, especially given the explicit statements made by numerous people (including the Church Committee) that all big media people work for the C_A in some fashion. It isn’t that the C_A subverts top level media stars, it’s that you can’t make it big unless you are already working for them. All evidence suggests that the media is completely controlled.
Now those may not be enough pieces of evidence to convince you, and that's fair, but it's just a start, and it is supporting evidence for the assertions, so not "no evidence."
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
Citing the "some disinfo is necessary" statement to cover every thing you don't want to be true is not using reason, but justifying belief. Look at the actual facts contained within the Q statements. Look at all the evidence of connections between AJ and Mossad/C_A. Look. Don’t be a True Believer. That will not help you uncover the scope of the deception.
The same argument can be made about Trump: “He makes us look crazy!”
And he also creates division. That division is intentional. It is the first part of "divide and conquer," only in this case it is a war of attrition. One side only gets bigger over time. Thus, in this particular case, the creation of the different boxes actually serves to unify. This division into different sides is a necessary operation of any war however.
The same argument can be made about Q: “It makes us look crazy!”
Q itself doesn't make anyone look crazy. Q doesn't say anything crazy. The media makes "Qanon" look crazy. I suggest that also is intentional, but justifying that would take too much effort, and you don't appear to be listening (since you aren't actually addressing anything I am saying).
Not a good foundation to build your argument on
Actually it is an excellent foundation to build an argument on. The point is showing intent to divide. The point is showing these operations are not organic. If they aren't organic, then who is controlling them. I have shown substantial evidence for the "who," though you haven't actually addressed any of it (and probably haven't actually looked at it).
Robert David Steele was actually in the CIA, but he became a whistleblower who exposed them. There are a few like him.
Yup, and they all talk about crazy whacked out shit (true or not, they say "out there" things for which they provide no supporting evidence) which serves to discredit themselves, and thus their testimonies. Just look at the crazy things they say, and how that might serve to discredit the other things they say. And they all are part of the C_A. Thinking there is such a thing as an "ex-C_A whistleblower" does not understand how the C_A works.
Association is not the same as guilt.
Who said anything about guilt? I don't care about culpability, I care about patterns. If you are trying to investigate a secret organization that has infiltrated everything at the highest level, patterns are the only path.
You know damning things about some people who are provably agents of the Cabal. You know there are numerous such agents within the larger structure. You see the exact same associations, connections, and actions in other people as the people you know are agents. That is evidence that they are also agents of the same organization. "Solid evidence," "connections," and "patterns" are not proof, but they are really good evidence. Dismissing that evidence and saying "it isn't proof" is nothing more than sticking your head in the sand to justify your currently held beliefs.
I don't know what happened. I don't know who is really in charge of what or who is working for whom. I don't know that there are "two sides" to "flip" to, now or ever.
I do think it is entirely possible that is the case. Indeed, if the Q narrative is true, it would have to be the case that there are insiders at every level (except maybe the top) that have flipped sides. I even think it is likely that at least AJ has flipped.
Carlson maybe. There is just so much Cabal in his blood. He was born to it, but maybe.
I really enjoy reading comments over articles. That said, I did not read “FIRST” the comments. I go back twenty years with AJ on Art Bell show, coast to coast am. Bohemian Grove woke my eyes open, prior that was Chuck Harder for the people in Florida.
My opinion of AJ I’m envious of him. He has bigger cojones than me. I had at one time read his web site all the time. (Not anymore, just like Drudge Report)
THE CARTEL / Cabal had him (AJ) in their sights and I to fell into it. My reason “AJ is his worst enemy” I would post on his site that “man” needs a LIFE COACH that AJ himself had respect for. Someone who would tone his ass down. A BULL IN A CHINA STORE. He reminds me of a drunk in a party that farts out loud and thinks he’s funny. AJ is / was out of control. How do I know? Because I’m 70 and I have the same fucking evil demons chewing on my soul. For AJ he has so much money he doesn’t care.
Tucker Carlson, “ what the fuck” there are so many men and woman out in the radio waves, internet waves that blows circles around him. Just a vanilla boy, he’s not one that I would run up machine gun hill for or with. Not sure if his wife feels safe around him or she protects “HIM”
Both of them are not my John Wayne’s that I respect. I tolerate the two.
So, so many others that are BAD ASS and we have these two clowns.
Just saying!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove
Anyone have a link that will auto-embed on Discord? I want to show my server this video. The server has seen far worse stuff on there, I just hate that twitter won't auto-embed anymore.
You don’t have to. What is this “trust” schtick so many here are always going on about? The truth stands on its own. When they speak it, agree. When they don’t, then disagree. Are we all just THAT eager for a prophet to do all our thinking for us? Isn’t that what got the world into this mess in the first place?
Amen. I can figure out what to trust and believe damn well on my own. Watch the damn interview and tell me what he's saying is wrong when you can see if with your own two eyes what these people are doing to us.
I agree well put. You have to look past the messenger. I pray that's what millions will do with trump. You don't have to love him but he knows how to fix America
Note the book on the table, "The Great Awakening" :)
No mention of Bill Cooper? The 'father' of the "great awakening"?
That's a touchy subject for AJ
In short, it's theorized that AJ/MOS plagiarized Bill Cooper
Wow, that was written by Alex? Last I checked all he did was slander Q, and made jokes about the movement.
He promoted it early on. My belief is they (Q / White Hats) recruited him to be part of the rollout to a wider audience, but then had him pull back the reigns so as not to have the whole movement associated with “Alex Jones.”
Q literally calls him a Mossad owned agent.
That's right.
I get that Q says this - but I really have a hard time seeing the Alex Jones that so jubilantly celebrated Trumps election night with champagne and party hats, is actually someone working against the interest of America. His heart seems to much into hating these globalist pieces of shit.
I actually disagree. I wrote a post in how Alex Jones is a Mossad controlled Honeypot.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16amrS0oHk/alex-jones-is-a-honeypot-plant-a/
My main question to Alex Jones supporters is this: what change has he actually caused? James O'Keefe and Julian Assange both sacrificed their jobs and also got people fired from their positions of power. What has Alex Jones, who's been in his role for twice as long, actually accomplished or sacrificed? And before you say the sandyhook lawsuit, has he actually paid yet?
He got himself some nice watches for sure
What Alex Jones accomplished is he made everyone associate truth seeking with being a total lunatic. He turned so many people off to reality because of how insane and stupid he always acts
He only put off normies but he carried autists all the way to Q
My theory on him acting a bit nutty is that it’s a security measure.
If he was too accurate and provided too much sauce openly, they’d have probably offed him. Anyway, he’s disclosure. Litigation isn’t his arena. O’Keefe is fighting a different front. Assange was a whistleblower inlet. That’s also a different front.
Or maybe he’s a double agent. Who knows? He woke me up to a ton of things, though.
Some people are just really good actors.
What if he turned and joined the white hats
My thoughts exactly! People do change. People can be "flipped". People can repent. A really smart person can see what's coming and out of a sense of self-preservation get on board the winning side!
What if disinformation was necessary?
I do like that one
So where does Tucker stand?
I think Tuck is a white hat. He denied election fraud in the beginning but was told to in purpose as to maintain his position at Fox , until time came to move on after Elon did his role in purchasing X.
Alex Jones red-pilled millions. So he is responsible for waking up a lot of people regardless if he is a Mossad asset.
My assumption was he dropped the Q thing at least partly because he didn't control or own it.
IIRC he tried to make his own Q type entity.
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
AJ is Q lol
I'm betting Musk puts Alex back on X and all hell breaks loose because nobody is saying he's a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist now. They talk about it at 32m.
What about the rest of us?
Just make a new one bro. If you’re worried about followers then ask an old fren to boost your account to get followers.
This is what we need
This is a good interview, he’s definitely plugged into the global elites WEF agenda for humanity.
Wow! I don't know why, but I just never listened to AJ. He's like a force of nature.
He's got that rizz
sticky by popular request.
u/#ridetofreedom
ThanQ for posting this! I didn't even know Tucker interviewed AJ. Worth a watch!
Why is Tucker Carlsons studio in Canada?
What? Is that true? I didn't know that. Is he originally from Canada?
Aww shit. I’ve got my morning coffee time figured out!
me tooooooo
It was a great interview. I think the most important thing I learned is that Alex gets a bunch of his ideas from openly available documents. They don't try to hide this stuff.
Tucker Carlson is (or at least was) a Cabal agent, working for the C_A as a media voice for the "Conservatives," part of the Controlled Opposition scheme.
Alex Jones is (or at least was) a Cabal agent, working for the C_A as a media voice for the "Truthers," part of the Controlled Opposition scheme.
Who are they working for now?
That is a really good question.
what message are they sending? i care less and less about the messengers.
That’s a big mouthful of TRUTH !
My thoughts exactly! People do change. People can be "flipped". People can repent. A really smart person can see what's coming and out of a sense of self-preservation get on board the winning side! And sometimes people are blackmailed into doing things they wouldn't naturally do.
If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA. They both have family members in the CIA and freely admit it. And they claim their families are very patriotic and go back to the founding.
First, there's probably not a whole lot of "white hats" in the C_A. The C_A is an agency designed by the Cabal specifically to be their black hat "social control agency." It was created by marrying the Rockefeller created OSS with the Rockefeller funded Nazi intelligence agency (Gehlen Organization).
Second, what evidence makes you think that Tucker and AJ were "undercover white hats" in an organization that only recruits black hats, or people who are clueless who they work for?
Let's look at AJ. First, Q specifically calls him out as a Cabal agent (Mossad controlled opposition agent), so there's that. But far more importantly, what does he do? He gives some really good evidence of fuckery. But he also acts like a lunatic. What does that do? It associates the good evidence he shows with his lunacy. If you try to show the evidence through one of AJ's reports, a person will look at it and say, "OMG, it's Alex Jones. You are a crazy conspiracy theorist, just like him! Look at him, he think's he's an alien abductee. He thinks lizard people are eating brains and Rich people are murdering babies and drinking their blood. Where is the evidence for that?"
And that's the thing. The really crazy stuff, even if it's true, he provides zero, or really poor evidence for. ALL of his actions discredit the good information he provides. The good information and evidence is associated with "crazy," thus it remains hidden. That is exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
The Truth needs an outlet. AJ is that outlet, and he makes the truth look false to anyone who is skeptical by association with his lunacy.
Now lets look at Carlson. His father has Cabal written all over him. He himself has decades of work presenting the "Conservative view." What is the "Conservative view?" It is the OPPOSITE SIDE of the "Liberal View." He gives the truth (but only part of the truth) and says constantly that "The other side is lying." What does that do? That drives division. What is the primary purpose of Controlled Opposition agents? To create social division. It isn't about what is true or false. BOTH SIDES present the truth, but only part of the truth. That makes people believe them. Then, on each side, the agents say "the other side is lying." And it's true. It's ALWAYS true. The other side IS lying by omission. And both sides are getting part of the truth (but not the whole truth). The Left and The Right have both been controlled by the Cabal since their beginning.
Don't believe me? Ask yourself, why are there "two sides?" You put 100 people in a room and ask them their ideas on something and you will get 100 different responses. You put 100 people in a room and force them to put on a blue shirt or a red shirt and you will get 2 responses. When people are forced to pick a side, they will choose whichever one they align with best, and then, to ensure "their side" wins, they will concede whatever they have to, give up whatever they are forced to, to ensure "victory." So if you want to control the narrative, make two boxes, force everyone to join one or the other, and feed them both the truth in scope, then say "the other side is lying." Tucker has fulfilled that role perfectly for decades.
Exactly as he was self-admittedly trained at the C_A to do.
“Alex is a lunatic” is a subjective statement. Not an argument to hang your hat on. You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
It's not my opinion. I don't think it's true. That is what the world see's (that link is just one of a thousand hit pieces on AJ’s particular brand of crazy). Any article on him talks about how crazy he is. He talks about truly whacked out shit all the time and he is quoted on it all the time. Suggesting that statement is controversial in the broader public view is just being willfully blind.
I am looking at what actually happens as a result of his actions. It isn't about what I want. I don’t think AJ is a lunatic at all. I think he is a really smart and gifted actor. What I am talking about is the actual effect he has.
Yes, after people start to question their reality, they get a lot of good evidence from Alex Jones. Then they go around trying to red pill their friends. Then they show their friends Alex Jones’ work, or they quote AJ, or they talk about some of the things he says that don’t have any evidential support (as supplied by him, or in general). Then their friends think that Alex Jones is a lunatic, because he acts like a lunatic, and sounds like a lunatic, and says things attributed to lunacy (the human body is just an alien antenna e.g.). Then all the good evidence he shows gets discredited by association with his crazy talk. The most important thing to appreciate here is that by "crazy talk" I specifically mean those statements he makes that are not believable (even if they are true) for which he shows no supporting evidence. Such statements make a person look crazy. Even if they are making statements of the most profound truth, it doesn't appear that way. I suggest that is intentional.
What actually happens is that Alex Jones “wakes up” very few people. The millions that find him, find him because they are already questioning their reality and he is the largest voice speaking the truth. When they find him, they can’t use him as a source, because he has no credibility. His lack of credibility is due not to the really good reports he puts out, but to the other things he says that act to discredit him, and thus the truth.
The truth needs an outlet. If that outlet is not believable by someone who already doesn’t believe, then the truth remains hidden. If, on the other hand, you do already believe something, and AJ is giving further good information on it, you will be a fan of AJ, thus separating you from the other people you wish to show “the truth” to by your association to AJ, either by quoting him, showing his work, or just sounding like him. What actually happens is that he creates division between the truth, those that want to talk about the truth (Truthers) and the rest of society. He helps to create boxes for people to sort themselves in to, thus the division. Whether that is intentional or not, that is what actually happens. That is the AJ effect.
It also happens to be how the C_A is noted to control information in their takeover of other countries (see the details of Operation PBSUCCESS e.g.).
He is not alone. All Truther leaders do the same thing. They all talk about whacked out shit (which may or may not be true) and provide no evidence for it. They also all have provable or stated direct ties to the C_A.
Alex Jones explicitly stated that his father (and other members of his family) was on the C_A payroll. True or not, it is a stated direct connection to the Agency. Q explicitly stated that AJ was a Mossad agent as shown in the link above. Mossad and the C_A are the same agency.
Tucker Carlson spoke at a rally on his campus about the C_A recruiters there, defending them. He then later is explicitly stated as having gone through the application process for the C_A. He is then stated as having been rejected.
Immediately afterwards, his father, who is easily proven to be a member of the Cabal, is appointed the head of the Voice of America by George H. W. Bush and the Carlson family moves from California to D.C.. VoA is the C_A’s media front and Tucker Carlson's father became the head of a major arm of the C_A right after Tucker applied to the C_A. George H. W. Bush, who personally appointed Mr. Carlson to head an important C_A organization right after his son applies to the C_A, is the former head of the C_A. GHWB was the head of the C_A during the Church Committee hearings and ran interference for the C_A there when the Senate investigation outed the C_A as having hundreds of American media talking heads as their agents.
When his father took over the VoA, Tucker then immediately began working as a “editor and fact checker” for the Heritage Foundation, which is itself just a front organization for the C_A. “Fact checkers” are one of the C_A’s primary tools for controlling information. Tucker then became a media star, basically instantly. In his early career he ran interference for the C_A regarding Iran-Contra, one of the most blatant C_A corruption scandals ever (that made it to the public), that no one ever talks about or knows the details of.
You find patterns like this everywhere. Numerous threads leading directly to the C_A/Cabal in the biggest names in media, on all sides, going back to their origin stories. This has always been the case. What are the odds that that pattern exists in all the big names purely by chance? I suggest somewhere in the range of zero, especially given the explicit statements made by numerous people (including the Church Committee) that all big media people work for the C_A in some fashion. It isn’t that the C_A subverts top level media stars, it’s that you can’t make it big unless you are already working for them. All evidence suggests that the media is completely controlled.
Now those may not be enough pieces of evidence to convince you, and that's fair, but it's just a start, and it is supporting evidence for the assertions, so not "no evidence."
Citing the "some disinfo is necessary" statement to cover every thing you don't want to be true is not using reason, but justifying belief. Look at the actual facts contained within the Q statements. Look at all the evidence of connections between AJ and Mossad/C_A. Look. Don’t be a True Believer. That will not help you uncover the scope of the deception.
The same argument can be made about Trump: “He makes us look crazy!”
The same argument can be made about Q: “It makes us look crazy!”
Not a good foundation to build your argument on.
Robert David Steele was actually in the CIA, but he became a whistleblower who exposed them. There are a few like him.
Association is not the same as guilt.
And he also creates division. That division is intentional. It is the first part of "divide and conquer," only in this case it is a war of attrition. One side only gets bigger over time. Thus, in this particular case, the creation of the different boxes actually serves to unify. This division into different sides is a necessary operation of any war however.
Q itself doesn't make anyone look crazy. Q doesn't say anything crazy. The media makes "Qanon" look crazy. I suggest that also is intentional, but justifying that would take too much effort, and you don't appear to be listening (since you aren't actually addressing anything I am saying).
Actually it is an excellent foundation to build an argument on. The point is showing intent to divide. The point is showing these operations are not organic. If they aren't organic, then who is controlling them. I have shown substantial evidence for the "who," though you haven't actually addressed any of it (and probably haven't actually looked at it).
Yup, and they all talk about crazy whacked out shit (true or not, they say "out there" things for which they provide no supporting evidence) which serves to discredit themselves, and thus their testimonies. Just look at the crazy things they say, and how that might serve to discredit the other things they say. And they all are part of the C_A. Thinking there is such a thing as an "ex-C_A whistleblower" does not understand how the C_A works.
Who said anything about guilt? I don't care about culpability, I care about patterns. If you are trying to investigate a secret organization that has infiltrated everything at the highest level, patterns are the only path.
You know damning things about some people who are provably agents of the Cabal. You know there are numerous such agents within the larger structure. You see the exact same associations, connections, and actions in other people as the people you know are agents. That is evidence that they are also agents of the same organization. "Solid evidence," "connections," and "patterns" are not proof, but they are really good evidence. Dismissing that evidence and saying "it isn't proof" is nothing more than sticking your head in the sand to justify your currently held beliefs.
It’s evidence, not proof.
Excellent points! Can you address the possibility that both Tucker and AJ have been flipped?
I don't know what happened. I don't know who is really in charge of what or who is working for whom. I don't know that there are "two sides" to "flip" to, now or ever.
I do think it is entirely possible that is the case. Indeed, if the Q narrative is true, it would have to be the case that there are insiders at every level (except maybe the top) that have flipped sides. I even think it is likely that at least AJ has flipped.
Carlson maybe. There is just so much Cabal in his blood. He was born to it, but maybe.
GAYEST COMMENT
Amazing. More people need to wake up!
I really enjoy reading comments over articles. That said, I did not read “FIRST” the comments. I go back twenty years with AJ on Art Bell show, coast to coast am. Bohemian Grove woke my eyes open, prior that was Chuck Harder for the people in Florida. My opinion of AJ I’m envious of him. He has bigger cojones than me. I had at one time read his web site all the time. (Not anymore, just like Drudge Report) THE CARTEL / Cabal had him (AJ) in their sights and I to fell into it. My reason “AJ is his worst enemy” I would post on his site that “man” needs a LIFE COACH that AJ himself had respect for. Someone who would tone his ass down. A BULL IN A CHINA STORE. He reminds me of a drunk in a party that farts out loud and thinks he’s funny. AJ is / was out of control. How do I know? Because I’m 70 and I have the same fucking evil demons chewing on my soul. For AJ he has so much money he doesn’t care. Tucker Carlson, “ what the fuck” there are so many men and woman out in the radio waves, internet waves that blows circles around him. Just a vanilla boy, he’s not one that I would run up machine gun hill for or with. Not sure if his wife feels safe around him or she protects “HIM” Both of them are not my John Wayne’s that I respect. I tolerate the two. So, so many others that are BAD ASS and we have these two clowns. Just saying! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove
Anyone have a link that will auto-embed on Discord? I want to show my server this video. The server has seen far worse stuff on there, I just hate that twitter won't auto-embed anymore.
Wow. He looks horrible.
I dont trust either one of them.
You don’t have to. What is this “trust” schtick so many here are always going on about? The truth stands on its own. When they speak it, agree. When they don’t, then disagree. Are we all just THAT eager for a prophet to do all our thinking for us? Isn’t that what got the world into this mess in the first place?
Amen. I can figure out what to trust and believe damn well on my own. Watch the damn interview and tell me what he's saying is wrong when you can see if with your own two eyes what these people are doing to us.
I agree well put. You have to look past the messenger. I pray that's what millions will do with trump. You don't have to love him but he knows how to fix America
This movement is reaching it's final form...
Is anyone legit?