Barack “the Kenyan” Obama ediition; “Political leader(s) [+family (follow)] w: possible ties to sex trafficking?”, “THOSE WHO YOU TRUST THE MOST ARE THE MOST EVIL”Q. 👁👀🥺see comments
I read your comment several hours ago and at first I was going to just disregard it because you clearly didn't understand what I was trying to say but I also wasn't sure how to explain it. But, I keep thinking about this comment and I didn't want to just not reply so i'm just gonna freefall (RIP Tom Petty ) lol and hopefully I can convey it in a way that you'll understand in a better way
I'm not saying bad things dont happen and im not saying we arent up against an immensely massive army of the eviliest things you can imagine. When I say righteous....I mean if its a war between good and evil well we aint the evil ones and "if it will be biblical" means "good" translates easy into RIGHTEOUS.
i've played enough video games to know sometimes you feel like there's no way I can win this....but, you can either shut off or have faith that whatever they send to defeat you can be defeated. I'm not going to blackpill because once I do whats left?
Alright, after all that you'll get it or you wont. but, i'm still glad I wrote it because even if you don't I know other people that come across this conversation will get it and o7 to those that do. No matter how high the water gets, just keep your head above it. <3
did you consider that Trump & Pence baited them in to passing law that definitively prevents the VP from doing stuff like rejecting electors? Because in 2025, they are going to try anything and everything to prevent DJT from taking office again, and because of that law that THEY passed, the VP option is completely off the table.
Did DJT want Pence to reject electors? Just because he made all that noise doesn't necessarily mean so. 5D chess.
In the cosmos, there is a creator who is sovereign. The enemy who doesn't play by the rules will necessarily eventually get caught and destroyed because one cannot violate the rules forever.
But as soon as you compromise yourself by playing dirty like the enemy, you yourself then become liable, and stand on the exact same foundation as that enemy.
Did you consider that DJT baited them into all of this crazy warfare stuff/ Does he look worried? Clarifying that a president has immunity with regards to official acts but NOT with regards to unofficial acts is going to be critical to holding previous presidents to account, if ever.
DJT is in zero danger. It is they who are exposed, more and more and more. (FYI, they've been going to 'get trump' for oh, 7 years now. Do you really think they are going to do it in 2024? What has changed? Nothing.)
I'm talking about self defense. If I walk up to a man and punch him in the face, that's a crime. If he's telling me he's going to kill my wife and I punch him in the face, that's self defense.
We have got to get over this naive and juvenile idea that we have to let predators run will and hopefully circumstances stances will save us after decades have passed, we are not protecting the innocent and that's evil and cowardess. It's not noble and it isn't righteous.
Who taught you to think like you do? The predators. I guarantee it. We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man. But that's after school special conditioning.
The good guys have no more right to sacrifice us to their plans than the bad guys.
Thanks for the reply. You're making way too many assumptions about how I think, what i think, and also for including me in
"We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man".
Something I think is utter nonsense, no offense. By which I mean, both that "we all have" (that's not true) and also that "being passive in the face of aggression makes one a better man". I never have, and never will think that way. I cannot speak for others.
Myself, I was talking merely about what to do when your opponent does not play by the rules.
Appropriate and applicable self defense is exactly playing by the rules, so i really don't know what your thinking is.
Moreover, taking responsibility to self-defense is not only playing by the rules, it's called being responsible. But being underhanded, going out and taking someone out because you are scared, or being dishonest because its you vs them, this is not playing by the rules, imo.
I think we're probably in agreement, but I don't agree with your characterization of my thinking OR for including me in those people you think have been conditioned to the way of thinking you describe.
The idea that being passive in the face of agression is noble is all over the place. It's deep in our culture. It's cooked in.
What happens to a kid in school that defends himself from a bully? Is he a hero? Nope. Is he praised and supported? Nope. Why? Because passivity is valued.
We regularly see self defense criminalized.
That's why they've killed millions of us over the last century, and gotten away with it. We won't oppose then in a way they respect. That's part of why they hate us and see us as sheep and cattle. We act like it. And we've let THEM train us how to think and act.
When I point this out, people object, even though it's right in front of them daily.
This is so commonly misquoted around here. You are mashing together a few qposts into a statement that was not made
That being said, my interpretation of this is that white hats are talking about their first arrest, which very well could be Obama. Many anons think it's Trump, but it's also possible that double meanings exist, and Trump was [[their]] first arrest, while Obama will be ours
I figure, Trump's arrest 'shocked' no one. White hats and blacks hats both knew it was coming. And the general public isn't going to be shocked when they've been told "Trump should be arrested / in prison" repeatedly by the MSM.
No, for shock and awe, it's gotta be HUGE. Someone portrayed as squeegee-squeaky clean and beyond reproach. I have my theories on who that might be, but I'm probably wrong.
he was the first pres to be arrested, so it would confirm that the direction is towards arresting other former presidents. if that is what it is alluding to
I think that, what you said, and also..if they’ll arrest him, think about what they’ll do to us. I feel the direction is, let the games begin. After Trumps arrest. Persecution. And that goes both ways. Predators become the prey.
Can't leave Obummer's Fast and Furious "Wing Man" off that list!
Eric Holder.
{ There is no statute of limitations on murder...or treason. }
Posted too early or late?
Barack “the Kenyan” Obama ediition; “Political leader(s) [+family (follow)] w: possible ties to sex trafficking?”, “THOSE WHO YOU TRUST THE MOST ARE THE MOST EVIL”Q. 👁👀🥺see comments
https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5ADLgR/barack-the-kenyan-obama-ediition/c/
Obama killing seal team 6
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/05/09/obama-put-a-target-on-their-backs-seal-team-6-family-members-say
Their plan is to take immunity away from Trump, but then put it back after they get Trump. So, no danger for them.
Just like they said Pense couldn't do anything about the fraudulent election but then made a law to stop him from doing what they said he couldn't do.
If your opponent doesn't play by the rules, but you do, what outcome do you expect?
a righteous one
Really? I'm sure you're a nice guy, but you're very naive.
WWI, WWII, Korea. Viet Nam, WTC, Feminism, Population control, homosexualality, abortion, transitioning children, human trafficking, pedophiles running schools and churches, COVID, the jabs, sudden death, sudden cancers.
The innocent thrown under the bus in the name of what? Your alleged righteous outcome. Disgusting and shameful.
No one said it would be easy, or fair. However, this life on Earth is only temporary.
Amen to that
I read your comment several hours ago and at first I was going to just disregard it because you clearly didn't understand what I was trying to say but I also wasn't sure how to explain it. But, I keep thinking about this comment and I didn't want to just not reply so i'm just gonna freefall (RIP Tom Petty ) lol and hopefully I can convey it in a way that you'll understand in a better way
I'm not saying bad things dont happen and im not saying we arent up against an immensely massive army of the eviliest things you can imagine. When I say righteous....I mean if its a war between good and evil well we aint the evil ones and "if it will be biblical" means "good" translates easy into RIGHTEOUS.
i've played enough video games to know sometimes you feel like there's no way I can win this....but, you can either shut off or have faith that whatever they send to defeat you can be defeated. I'm not going to blackpill because once I do whats left?
Alright, after all that you'll get it or you wont. but, i'm still glad I wrote it because even if you don't I know other people that come across this conversation will get it and o7 to those that do. No matter how high the water gets, just keep your head above it. <3
re: Pence
did you consider that Trump & Pence baited them in to passing law that definitively prevents the VP from doing stuff like rejecting electors? Because in 2025, they are going to try anything and everything to prevent DJT from taking office again, and because of that law that THEY passed, the VP option is completely off the table.
Did DJT want Pence to reject electors? Just because he made all that noise doesn't necessarily mean so. 5D chess.
In the cosmos, there is a creator who is sovereign. The enemy who doesn't play by the rules will necessarily eventually get caught and destroyed because one cannot violate the rules forever.
But as soon as you compromise yourself by playing dirty like the enemy, you yourself then become liable, and stand on the exact same foundation as that enemy.
Did you consider that DJT baited them into all of this crazy warfare stuff/ Does he look worried? Clarifying that a president has immunity with regards to official acts but NOT with regards to unofficial acts is going to be critical to holding previous presidents to account, if ever.
DJT is in zero danger. It is they who are exposed, more and more and more. (FYI, they've been going to 'get trump' for oh, 7 years now. Do you really think they are going to do it in 2024? What has changed? Nothing.)
I'm talking about self defense. If I walk up to a man and punch him in the face, that's a crime. If he's telling me he's going to kill my wife and I punch him in the face, that's self defense.
We have got to get over this naive and juvenile idea that we have to let predators run will and hopefully circumstances stances will save us after decades have passed, we are not protecting the innocent and that's evil and cowardess. It's not noble and it isn't righteous.
Who taught you to think like you do? The predators. I guarantee it. We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man. But that's after school special conditioning.
The good guys have no more right to sacrifice us to their plans than the bad guys.
Thanks for the reply. You're making way too many assumptions about how I think, what i think, and also for including me in
Something I think is utter nonsense, no offense. By which I mean, both that "we all have" (that's not true) and also that "being passive in the face of aggression makes one a better man". I never have, and never will think that way. I cannot speak for others.
Myself, I was talking merely about what to do when your opponent does not play by the rules.
Appropriate and applicable self defense is exactly playing by the rules, so i really don't know what your thinking is.
Moreover, taking responsibility to self-defense is not only playing by the rules, it's called being responsible. But being underhanded, going out and taking someone out because you are scared, or being dishonest because its you vs them, this is not playing by the rules, imo.
I think we're probably in agreement, but I don't agree with your characterization of my thinking OR for including me in those people you think have been conditioned to the way of thinking you describe.
The idea that being passive in the face of agression is noble is all over the place. It's deep in our culture. It's cooked in.
What happens to a kid in school that defends himself from a bully? Is he a hero? Nope. Is he praised and supported? Nope. Why? Because passivity is valued.
We regularly see self defense criminalized.
That's why they've killed millions of us over the last century, and gotten away with it. We won't oppose then in a way they respect. That's part of why they hate us and see us as sheep and cattle. We act like it. And we've let THEM train us how to think and act.
When I point this out, people object, even though it's right in front of them daily.
Anons knew...
OBAMA being the first arrest would shock the world.
Not anons. Probably wouldn't phase most of us at all. Somewhere between "about damn time" and "always has been" meme.
This is so commonly misquoted around here. You are mashing together a few qposts into a statement that was not made
That being said, my interpretation of this is that white hats are talking about their first arrest, which very well could be Obama. Many anons think it's Trump, but it's also possible that double meanings exist, and Trump was [[their]] first arrest, while Obama will be ours
u/#q3717
Q already explained what the first arrest was. It's been done a LONG time back.
I figure, Trump's arrest 'shocked' no one. White hats and blacks hats both knew it was coming. And the general public isn't going to be shocked when they've been told "Trump should be arrested / in prison" repeatedly by the MSM.
No, for shock and awe, it's gotta be HUGE. Someone portrayed as squeegee-squeaky clean and beyond reproach. I have my theories on who that might be, but I'm probably wrong.
Let them eat cake while we play it again, Sam. ;)
Wasn’t Trump the first arrest? We got an awesome mug shot out of it. And Trump gained momentum afterwards, even more so.
If it was, how does it indicate future direction?
he was the first pres to be arrested, so it would confirm that the direction is towards arresting other former presidents. if that is what it is alluding to
I think that, what you said, and also..if they’ll arrest him, think about what they’ll do to us. I feel the direction is, let the games begin. After Trumps arrest. Persecution. And that goes both ways. Predators become the prey.
Ghislaine Maxwell enters the chat.
https://truthsocial.com/@mrddmia/posts/112062510680113861
Benghazi
He'll be tried for worse crimes.
Oh, and “spraying” the red, white and blue.
Day one, President Trump signs a Presidential immunity law that starts with his first term.
Justice MUST be served
And FJB for treasonously sowing an invasion of illegal aliens ignoring all immigration laws.
Can? More like will! Barrys goin to the big house
Bury him under the big house after they hang him from the roof top of the big house
Statue of Limitations or Shit Outta Luck. . .SOL LOL!
this was my first thought....payback is a bitch
About time.