-
Where did the ladder come from? How did he move it to location? Was it an extension ladder, or step ladder?
-
Where exactly was his car parked? What kind of car is it? Who's name is it registered under, and in what state? When was it acquired?
-
It is said that explosives were found in his car- what kinds, and how much?
-
Where exactly did his shirt come from? We know it is associated with a popular YouTube channel, Demolition Ranch. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-shooter-reportedly-wearing-demolition-ranch-merchandise-t-shirt-1924914
Did Crooks order that shirt himself, online, or was it gifted to him? Where is the receipt showing that he purchased the shirt for himself? When did he buy/acquire that shirt? Did he purchase any other items from Demolition Ranch?
-
He worked at a nursing home- How long? Are there any scandals associated with that nursing home that Crooks may have been involved with? How about nursing home voting irregularities?
-
Why has his family not yet publicly denounced the actions of their little monster? The father reportedly told CNN that he had to wait to talk to law enforcement before commenting...BS...But whatever. I'm sure the family has spoken to law enforcement by now, so where is their statement; why the long delay for comment? What about his siblings (reportedly has at least one sister)? What are they up to? Are they dangerous monsters too?
-
Explosives were reportedly found at the family home. What kinds; how much? Were the explosives well hidden, or did the family know about it?
-
Where is the security footage from the business where Crooks was perched on one of their buildings? Are we to assume that the business has no security cameras?
-
Where is the security camera, or traffic camera footage from the area surrounding Crooks' car? It seems to be strangely absent as well.
...10+...Please add your own thought's and questions, and let's see what GAW can piece together.
Here is the most relevant fact. We will only learn what they want us to know. We are in an information war. Name one assassination attempt where we were told the truth. We can ask all the question we want...
The only way the truth can ever come out is an inside whistleblower. Anything less will just be a sold narrative. All answers will be suspect. Just the nature of the beast in an information war. Sad but true.
We only know there was an attemp on Trumps life because we SAW IT LIVE. And the shitstream media is STILL trying to obscure the fact that an attempt was made on his life!
And inside whistleblower WITH RECEIPTS. Anyone can claim to be involved but I need to see their merit and acredation before I trust that what they say is anything more than misinfo bullshit.
To me, the kid fits the stereotype of who the FBI targets to entrap in their fake terror schemes. I have a hard time believing a 20 year-old with his background had the balls to come up with this and pull it off on his own. I just don't see it. Maybe his family isn't commenting because they don't believe it either.
My question is how did Charlie's Angels get hired for Trump's security detail? The one agent couldn't even get her gun holstered. They were floundering around like like amateurs - not serious, not well trained. When I went to a Trump rally, Trump's security was hard core - nothing like these clowns.
I watch most of these rallies. This is the first time I’ve seen women (agents)
I hope it's the last. Not that female agents shouldn't have opportunities in the SS. They're fine for protecting the littles and even teens while in school and that sort of thing, but not the President in a highly public, high risk situation. Women are not cut out for everything. We just aren't. I have no problem admitting it. That DEI dingbat currently running the SS needs to get the boot ASAP. She's a joke. Absolutely, not a serious person.
Billiards. If there was ever a 'sport' where women can compete with men, this should be it. But the men are much better. I believe it is because they lack 'killers instinct'. Meaning their ruthlessness is emotional. Their courage is toward the ones they love. Their own children.
If I was to need life and death protection, the only woman on the team would be the one gobbling my hog each night.
I've been to seven rallies, I've seen female agents at all of them, they are almost always near the front gates.
Read a post from here last night, no I dont know how to put a link to it here, the only regular at the rally was the agent in charge. The rest of the team was replacements from Pittsburgh. Post stated that dr jill was in Pittsburg and trump's team was pulled and put on her detail. 72 hour rule for me on this.
If true (that dr. Jill was in Pittsburg at the same time) that could be part of the plan to give them a reason, or plausible deniability, to replace all but 1 of the team.
Was it this article? https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/07/15/secret_service_in_crisis_inflexible_protocols_security_lapses_in_spotlight_151265.html
No. It was a thread on this forum.
The truth is that we are NOT being told the truth.
Yep
All great questions and I am sorry that I cannot help.
However, I do note that in all these strange events e.g. Charlottesville, Sandyhook, Las Vegas etc, a similar list of questions always exists and goes unanswered.
Our "journalists" seem happy to report the event but completely fail with any follow-up.
I know, really. It's almost like we could make an Ai bot that would ask proper news reporting questions better than reporter's!
I wish the media had journalists.
I totally get what you are saying, but those journalists aren't magicians. If the family isn't talking and the shooter doesn't have everything just written in full view on his social, it's hard to get in the guys head and get any motives.
Look at Vegas, WSJ and WP did crazy investigations where they talked to every single person the guy knew and they didn't get shit.
OK, but that is all part of the plan. Imagine if they wrote the complete life history of Lee Harvey Oswald after he was killed. They would find very little of interest because he did not shoot anyone!
All those people who spoke out after Las Vegas who died in "accidents", isn't there a story there? What about the man who managed to stop smiling long enough to tell us how sad he was to lose his children at Sandyhook? What is he doing these days? Are the stories about the mortgages on the homes near to Sandyhook?
What about the actors that allegedly appear in many of these situations. Who has ever investigated the idea of crisis actors? Do all these people go back into witness protection after making an appearance?
I dunno man, I have a hard time with the whole crisis actor thing. My kids all went to Marjory Stoneman Douglas in Parkland, FL. Two of them were in the school during the shooting there and one was interviewed by the news afterwards and she sounded pretty dumb, she stammered through how the guy was a loner and it sounded crazy scripted, but I know who my daughter is.
I went to the funerals because a lot of those kids were my kids friends. My wife is friends with the social worker who went to the shooter's house to talk to him before the shooting.
There are too many real world events to make that all faked. I totally understand the whole false flag being someone sent in a shooter and covered it up, but I don't buy into the whole thing about the entire town around Sandy Hook being fake and full of actors. They said the same about our whole neighborhood.
Hell, Alex Jones called out two of my neighbors as crisis actors and I've known them for 30 years and I know one of their kids died because I drove the wife to the police station to ID the body.
But now you'll just call me a shill or whatever and write this off.
I am not in the habit of calling people shills, so you are quite safe there.
These events fall into different categories. Some end up with more really dead people than others but there are companies hiring out crisis actors. They are used for training purposes.
Then we have lots of suspicious photographs of similar looking people at different events. Click on the arrow on the right to scroll.
What makes events suspicious is the cover-up. Was anyone allowed to see the dead bodies at Sandyhook? My (failing!) memory tells me that the police pronounced all the children dead and placed them in body bags then stopped anyone else from seeing them. That is not standard procedure because police do not have the final word on who is dead and who is not because medical expertise is required.
One of the tell-tale signs of a false flag event is whether there was a training exercise or drill carried out in the preceding few days. I remember when Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, went to see the aftermath of the Manchester Arena event after the Ariana Grande concert. She was asking the people in the hospital how they coped and they said they had just held an exercise to train for such an event. HM said: "That was lucky!"
Then we had the Westminster Bridge attack in the UK. They had a drill a few days beforehand. Also, some of the dead bodies we saw on camera and people being resuscitated looked like shop window dummies. Interestingly, the most revealing images are now nowhere to be found on the Internet. Funny how that happens.
And we have the most amazing images sometimes. Remember that iconic one from Charlottesville? Imagine you are a photographer, how would you take that. First you need to have your long focus lens fitted. No time to change it. Now look at the wheels on the vehicle on the right. The camera must have been around the same height as the centre of the wheels.
So, photographer got lucky with the lens, he dived into the middle of the road, head down, just as the car was crashing and managed to snap some photos before the people landed. He or she probably landed flat on their faces. Oh, and someone managed to get the crowd to turn all the signs round to make a good picture. I find that hard to believe.
It is also strange that three corners of that intersection were all covered by cameras high up and one corner had a drone filming which could not quite see the corner it was over. Then you find out that the witness, who saw the young lad in the car reverse up the entire length of the street at speed, was US intel.
Those photos are ridiculous, they're taking women with brown hair and similar features and saying they are all the same. Look closely at those pictures on the first image, all four of those women have different shaped faces and heads. It's using far off blurry photos to make them seem similar.
The next photo just circles a super blurry blonde woman wearing glasses and swears it's another girl.
Also for Charlottesville, you can't imagine that? My wife was a photographer for 25 years with different papers and did weddings. She carried two cameras at all times, a short lens and a long one - especially back when she was still shooting film. But with that photo, the car passes and she bends down and takes the picture, well takes like 150 pictures and chooses the best one.
I agree about the pictures. Only some are similar. How about these for instance.
As for Charlottesville, why would your wife bend down? Would she automatically know that would be the best vantage point for what was about to happen? Could she get so low that she was level with the middle of the car wheels in the time available? Would the second camera be seriously damaged as a result? Did the placard holders instinctively know which way to face so as to minimise the gaps in the background?
If you ever try to photograph people talking you see that they usually stand in a circle but when they do it in the films it is always more of a line so they can see everybody. Posing becomes more obvious if you know what to look for. Elements of that picture look poses including the ones in mid-air.
Plan B: Ask your wife if it looks completely natural.
I wonder how the car stopped without the brakes on?
Dude, people were in line because it was a parade and they were all standing there. These photos and the whole thing is so silly. Have you ever been in any major tragedy? People run around like idiots and some just stand there in shock and don't move.
I would take a hard look at the photos you're linking of the kids. Actually look at the faces and the photos. They are not the same people.
The shooter was not Crooks though.
Glowfags fail again, intentional or not.
IDF and Feds showing their ass without calling us goyim, christcucks, incels and chuds cause that shit doesn't work here, lol. It was as much Crooks as it was Paddock. 5 (maybe 6) years this board has been here and we still haven't learned the basics.
Oh, ok. Go tell his family that, and explain it to CNN, and all the other media that is slandering Crooks family.
Yes, CNN has never lied before.
Could Crooks have been invited to participate without knowing he was actually being set up to be a sacrificed decoy for the real shooter?
I say yes !
This is a very solid possibility and exactly what happened with Oswald. However, the photos available of the deceased has been facial rec. matched to conviction photos of Maxwell Yearick.
"Crooks" - well played operators... well played. It's kinda like trying to do a deep dig on Rachel Chandler, but only getting a shit ton of results for Friends the TV show.
I can see the 40k ft view. Real eyes, realize real lies.
Sitting back watching the emotional be emotional. Comfy as F 🍿🍿🍿
Yup.
Yep, shooter doesn't matter, that's always the first play on a Fed op, find the one to blame.
Why isn't anybody talking about Maxwell Yearick here? Why has Maxwell Yearick's internet presence been scrubbed? Roger Stone put him up as the shooter on X, then deleted that post, and has now reinstated it saying that he deleted it in error and his sources are saying it was Yearick. Do a search on X for Maxwell Yearick. I go with the autists on the chans who named him before I go with anything MSM has to say about it.
Yes. And there is a video I saw yesterday of the current shooter saying “I hate the republicans, I hate Trump, you have the wrong guy.”
Why is no one talking about the video that was posted of him saying they got the wrong guy? https://files.catbox.moe/hnkric.mp4
Because that guy is just a troll. Kinda looks like shooter, but not the real shooter. Internet stunt.
What is that all about? First time I've seen it.
We will only be told what we are told to be told by the MSM. The narrative right now seems to be to muddy the waters so obscurely that nobody can figure out what happened. Give talking points that are irrelevant to obscure the true points of interest. The entire thing was a lapse in security by the SS. I want to know why Trumps detail was replaced with temps and why Jill Biden was in PA. at that time.
I think you answered your own question.
Explosives in his car and at home.
4th of July was not that long ago. Are we talking C4 or are we talking the awesome destructive power of 1.25 inch Black Cat firecrackers and some bottle rockets
The press has a tendency to exaggerate. Ammo at home? Most shooters I know are not only law abiding; but have THOUSANDS of rounds at home. Storing ammo at home is not a crime
Storing ammo at home absolutely not a crime.
But everything he did has to be looked through a certain lens because of what he did with that ammo.
If he had bought 1 box, or 4 pallets; what difference would it make? Other than the financials, it has no impact on the crime.
The natural result of focusing on his amount of ammo; will be to regulate how much anyone can else may have on hand. That’s what the Democrats want. Limit the amount you may have, and then reduce it. Let’s not go there
Who had the authority to pull Trump off the stage and chose to leave him for dead?
Why are anons falling for blaming local law enforcement instead of the decision makers who set them up for failure?
Possibly because the Secret Service is blaming them for not securing the outlying area of the venue. Not a good reason. Secret Service doesn't get to foist the blame. They are ultimately responsible for making sure local law enforcement is up to the task. Especially, in small towns, where they may not have the training and experience to do the job without a lot of guidance. https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/us-news/secret-service-blames-local-police-says-it-was-tasked-with-securing-properties-surrounding-trumps-pa-rally/
To me, it seems like the fake news wants the general public to accept that some loser of a cops is responsible for all of it and to stop asking any further questions.
Who chose that location for a rally? Was it chosen due to it's proximity to being able to stage a shooter near where the stage would be?
Was he under psychological care for a "Mental disorder" and if so who was his "therapist" and did they prescribe him psychiatric drugs?
Rumor is both of the shooters’ parents were registered therapists.
I did see fren mention that yesterday. There definitely seems to be a pattern here and will be interested in seeing how that pans out. MK style mind manipulation much?
Need information on the parents. Obviously this kid was a basement dweller. Probably on SSRIs, parents and maybe a gov shrink made him nuts with the help of Gov tech like voice-to-skull.
I think it's worth digging on this and as a reminder I included this drop under my JFK assassination repost yesterday.
u/#q1630
And just plain old mkultra programming.
His dad is some sort of salesman for PNC
Per article both are therapists: https://time.com/6998557/thomas-matthew-crooks-trump-rally-shooter-fbi-motive/
It says Counselors, not therapists. One of my daughters is a counselor at a hospital, she counsels people on quitting smoking. My brother's son is a counselor, he helps CEOs manage investments - pretty sure that is what his dad does according to his linkedin.
What do you think this means: "counselors through the Pennsylvania social work board."?
Do you think they are helping social service recipients with their portfolios?
Oh, I didn't see the social work board part, I've only seen all the screenshots of his linkedIN that were all over the place yesterday.
Do you have a source? I’m just seeing rumors.
Yeah, people were posting his linkedIN which was still up. He is some sort of financial counselor/advisor at PNC for the sales team. Before that he ran sales at Heinz.
One goes from head of sales at Heinz to being a licensed clinical social worker of 20 years? Not buying it.
His father works in the mental behavior institution per X22 Report.
And a pattern begins to emerge. What a coincidence indeed.
That above picture turned out to be fake
No drones up?
Allegedly there was some type of aerial surveillance. I am not sure if it was drone or satellite however. But, that is where the picture of the shooter on the roof supposedly came from- the pic that shows his back, and the DemoRanch logo on his shirt.
Just came to offer an unproductive comment.
Cheatle 'n Crooks is a meme that writes itself.
His father works in the mental behavior institution per X22 Report.
Yes. I heard (unconfirmed) that his mom does too.
Were the explosives in the car dusted for fingerprints?
Reported the gun on scene was registered to his father & purchased legally 6 months ago. So how did the gun get outside the family home? Did the shooter “steal” it while his parents were away? Was the father letting the shooter ‘borrow’ it for target shooting? How much culpability might there be?
Gun bought by dad, who has yet to make a statement denouncing the actions of his little monster, or offering condolences to the dead and injured. How much culpability indeed?.
I can't see this being a White or Black hat operation, everything is so neatly wrapped up in a bow. Everyone is having the prescribed reactions. Left... false flag to make Trump a hero. Right.. failed assanition attempt. It has to be one or the other though, no one could have gained that position to shoot without being allowed to gain that position. Is it all an attempt to get people to think? Think about how you're having a guided scripted reaction? I have no answers, only more questions.
Pepe farms knows how this works, the motive and the overall plan moving forward. The details are irrelevant. Has seen this game a hundred times, now it's time for normals and recently awakened to figure this out.. in the end, you may find its much simpler than you think
Excellent questions!
Do we have confirmation on an actual ladder?Some videos show smaller buildings next to the one Crooks was on. He could have climbed up to the roof.
I have not seen any hard confirmation on a ladder, but it has been reported that he used a ladder.
Could be. And, if so, is even more damning for the negligent security that failed to cover a building with a friggin ladder built onto it.
Oh, they're trying to catch up Demo Ranch with this?
That's totally sure to go well for them.
Yup. Mighty convenient that the Demolition Ranch logo was made visible on one of the only photos of the shooter, on day 1. DemoRanch should seriously comb their sales records and get the facts about how, and why their shirt ended up tied to an assassin.
Also when.
Especially when.
Is no one really talking about the fact that his last name is “Crooks”?
Crooks is a fairly common name. It is derived from ancient shepherds who used crooks as tools.
I was at a Reagan speech as a kid, the Secret Service protection was insane, off the chart. It was at Cal State Fullerton, multiple snipers on every roof, Secret Service in the crowd, helicopters with snipers, Secret Service on the perimeter, police on the roads and in the crowd, complete 360deg protection with multiple layers. This looked staged or set up, a clown show in comparison.
I'm not even dwelling on it anymore. We see what we see and people no doubt have eyes on it. I'm moving forward.