I have figured this out but glad to hear.

I don't like what he says about AI and climate change. I don't trust AI and there is no such thing as climate change.

I trust God.

5 letters come to mind... T R U M P

They are, imo, scared shitless

Been subbed to this channel. Literally just finished watching it. On point.

Very good summary.

It’s a distraction for something big. There is A PSYOP INCOMING.

Financial collapse?

WW3?

Another pandemic?

Those involved in Diddy or Epstein is about to be exposed?

❗️Recommended viewing.

https://youtu.be/nTpQq1a9zhI?si=m-uZkJnvyZx-uo55

Deception is something like 90 percent truth and 10 percent a lie. Essentially the USA government is deceiving the population as a whole and therefore the government is against God.

That simple. Yet nothing I can about it. I have believed the USA has been gone for a long time and the train is about to wreck finally.

The government is seeding all the deadly sins to its citizens and such high volume.

I don’t panic nor do I stock up on anything. I pray. I hope. When people panic at huge volumes I will hopefully be at home or close to home and I will sit and wait for the next logical move.

The level of pysops going on right only leads to a huge hysteria event. When the dust settles and storm goes out. We will have more people resolved in consequences….

Yet I understand they know this and this is starting to spell out a nuclear disaster at heights never seen before. They have no choice. They have went down the path so far that they are never going to repent.

People as a day to day people is not what i am saying. It is those who the people have given to keys to.

diddy / epstein list and arrests...OMGERHD UFOS!!11

The drones are looking for a nuclear warhead smuggled out of Ukraine.

The only mixed message I'm getting is his referencing AI for analysis but at 16:20 says trust your gut. I trust my gut 1st then verify however possible. Not comfortable with AI enough yet (I'm old). But good information for those addicted to television.

Very good video to share. I’ll sticky this for a few days.

Drones could be integral in psychological operations (psyops) through:

Information Dissemination: Broadcasting propaganda or psychological messaging. Intimidation: Visible presence to instill fear or deterrence. Disinformation: Use in staged events to manipulate public perception.

Always the grainy videos.

The U.S. government has engaged in psychological operations (psyops) at various points in its history, both domestically and internationally. These operations often aim to influence perceptions, behaviors, or decision-making to achieve political, military, or economic objectives. Below are some examples and aspects of U.S. government psyops:

1. Cold War Era Psyops

• Propaganda Against Communism:

  • During the Cold War, the U.S. conducted extensive propaganda campaigns to counter Soviet influence. These included spreading pro-democracy narratives and discrediting communism through media, education, and covert operations.
  • Agencies like the United States Information Agency (USIA) and CIA funded cultural programs, news outlets, and films to promote American values abroad.
  • Example: Radio Free Europe broadcasted Western propaganda into Eastern Bloc countries to undermine Soviet control.

• Operation Mockingbird:

  • Allegedly, the CIA worked with journalists and media outlets to influence public opinion and promote narratives aligned with U.S. foreign policy interests.

2. Military Psyops

• Operation Desert Storm (1991):

  • The U.S. used psychological warfare during the Gulf War to weaken Iraqi morale. Leaflets were dropped on Iraqi troops, urging them to surrender, accompanied by radio broadcasts that emphasized the futility of resisting the coalition forces.

• Guantanamo and the War on Terror:

  • Detainee treatment and manipulation of information were used to extract intelligence and control narratives surrounding the War on Terror. Reports of psychological tactics to break prisoners' resistance emerged, including the use of fear and misinformation.

• Afghanistan and Iraq (Post-9/11):

  • Psyops teams worked to win "hearts and minds" by promoting pro-American messaging to local populations while undermining insurgent propaganda.

3. Domestic Psyops

• The War on Drugs:

  • The U.S. government used mass media campaigns in the 1980s and 1990s, like the "Just Say No" program, to shape public opinion about drugs and justify stricter drug enforcement policies. Critics argue that some campaigns exaggerated threats to build public support for policies that disproportionately affected certain communities.

• Post-9/11 Patriotism and Fear:

  • Following the September 11 attacks, the government heavily leaned on patriotic messaging and fear of terrorism to justify policies like the USA PATRIOT Act and interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Critics argue that some of the threats were exaggerated to consolidate support for these measures.

4. Social Media Psyops

• Influencing Public Opinion Online:

  • In recent years, the U.S. military and intelligence agencies have acknowledged using social media platforms for psyops. These efforts aim to counter extremist narratives, disrupt adversaries, and sometimes influence foreign and domestic audiences.

• Astroturfing:

  • The creation of fake grassroots movements or accounts to influence online discourse and amplify certain narratives.

5. Historical Controversies

• Operation Northwoods (1962):

  • This declassified proposal from the U.S. Department of Defense suggested staging false-flag attacks (blaming Cuba for acts of terrorism) to justify military action against Fidel Castro’s regime. Though never implemented, it highlights how psyops were seriously considered.

• COINTELPRO (1956–1971):

  • The FBI's Counter Intelligence Program targeted civil rights activists, anti-war protesters, and other groups deemed subversive. Tactics included spreading false information, infiltrating movements, and sowing discord to discredit or dismantle opposition.

• MKUltra (1950s–1970s):

  • A covert CIA program that experimented with mind control and behavior manipulation through drugs, psychological techniques, and other methods. Though it was not strictly a psyop in the traditional sense, its aim to control and influence individuals aligns with psychological warfare goals.

6. Modern-Day Psyops

• Social Media Influence Campaigns:

  • With the rise of digital platforms, the U.S. government has shifted its psyops focus to countering misinformation and influencing narratives online. For example:
    • Using AI-driven tools to monitor and counteract adversarial propaganda.
    • Creating and distributing narratives in regions of strategic interest, like the Middle East or Eastern Europe.

• "Strategic Narratives":

  • Agencies like the State Department and Department of Defense emphasize "strategic communications" to frame events in ways that support U.S. interests. While these narratives are presented as truthful, their selective focus can be seen as a form of psyop.

Why Psyops Are Controversial

1. Ethical Concerns: The deliberate manipulation of information can erode trust in institutions and create long-term damage if exposed.
2. Unintended Consequences: Psyops can backfire, leading to mistrust or strengthening opposition forces.
3. Lack of Transparency: Psyops are often conducted in secrecy, making oversight and accountability difficult.
4. Domestic Impact: Though psyops are typically aimed at foreign audiences, their spillover into domestic populations raises questions about government manipulation of its own citizens.

How to Recognize Psyops

• Monitor for:
  • Consistent narratives repeated across media.
  • Simplistic "good vs. evil" framing.
  • Emotional appeals that bypass logic or evidence.
  • Suppression of alternative viewpoints.

The U.S. government’s use of psyops underscores the complex interplay between national security, public perception, and ethical boundaries. While some operations are aimed at legitimate security goals, others raise serious concerns about manipulation and trust in democratic institutions.

Unfortunately this expert can't see that the man made climate crisis we are being fed with a solution that ushers in government control in every aspect of our lives justified to fight this threat, discredits his expertise. It's almost comical - he gives good advice, but he can't apply it to his own perception of reality!

1. Consistent Messaging Across Media

Look for uniformity: If a single narrative is being promoted across major media outlets and alternative voices are systematically suppressed or ignored, it could indicate a coordinated effort. Echo effect: Repetition of the same phrases or terminology, especially ones that evoke strong emotional reactions.

2. Emotional Manipulation

Check for fear or outrage triggers: Psyops often rely on fear, anger, or empathy to sway public opinion. Examine emotional appeals: If the message prioritizes emotional reaction over evidence, it might be a deliberate attempt to manipulate.

3. Lack of Transparency

Anonymous sources: Be wary of information based on unnamed or vague sources. Missing evidence: If claims lack tangible proof but demand trust, that could be a red flag.

4. Polarization

"Us vs. Them" narratives: Psyops often aim to divide groups or amplify conflict. Demonization of dissent: If questioning the narrative is met with hostility or accusations, critical thinking may be discouraged intentionally.

5. Overuse of Authority Figures

Experts on repeat: An overreliance on select "experts" or authority figures can indicate an effort to legitimize a narrative without room for debate. Instant expert opinions: Watch out for newly minted "specialists" who appear immediately after an event.

6. Timing and Context

Suspicious timing: If a story coincides with political events, new policies, or efforts to distract from other issues, question the intent. Pattern recognition: Look for a history of similar events being used to justify specific actions.

7. Suppression of Counter-Narratives

Censorship: Attempts to silence, de-platform, or discredit dissenting voices could suggest the presence of a coordinated effort. Algorithmic manipulation: Be mindful of how information is filtered on social media and search engines.

8. Follow the Money

Beneficiaries: Consider who stands to gain from the narrative—financially, politically, or socially. Funding sources: Research the organizations or individuals pushing a narrative for potential conflicts of interest.

9. Patterns of Disinformation

Shifting narratives: If key details in a story change frequently, it may be a sign of deliberate confusion. False flags: Events framed to appear as though another group or entity is responsible can be part of a psyop.

10. Be Objective and Fact-Check

Independent research: Consult diverse sources, including those outside mainstream narratives. Logical consistency: Test whether the claims hold up to scrutiny and align with known facts.

This video is excellent.

I love the point: If aliens are here, wouldn't you expect them to know how incompetent governments are, so the information would not be flowing through the government.

In other words, if all the information about aliens is coming from the government, it's probably is a psyop.

He missed the part where COVID and Sandy Hook were also psyops, as nearly all other lone shooter narratives. This video is good for normies, but I feel like he could have updated his examples. He felt more comfy with largely accepted ones. When you dive in the matter, you understand the modus operandi and common elements in all of these. Anyway, it's really useful, still.

Wait a minute i know this guy, he's from the behavior panel and one(or 2 i don't remember) of them has a huge TDS.

The thing that tells me it's all staged is the fact the drones have lights. If it was China sending agents to use consumer drones to spy, they could just fly at night without lights and probably no one would notice.

So...If you see a big ass MOTHERSHIP over a city...

KNOW it's bs.

They could be filming independence day 3...

BUT - even IF it's a physical ship - If they try wanting to take MORE Rights away for ANY reason - Here's your sign.

Carolyn Rosin - see what Werner von Braun told her if you don't already know... It's "Wild"

Read his epitaph while you're at it...

Look it's a bird, ITS a Plane.....no.... no it's just the war mongers trying to pull us into ww3.

I smell C.I.A

What Happened in the Gulf of Tonkin?

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident refers to two alleged encounters between U.S. Navy ships and North Vietnamese forces in August 1964, during the early stages of the Vietnam War:

August 2, 1964: The USS Maddox was reportedly engaged by North Vietnamese torpedo boats while conducting intelligence-gathering operations. The Maddox fired warning shots, and the North Vietnamese boats allegedly fired back, prompting a skirmish.

August 4, 1964: A second alleged attack occurred, involving both the Maddox and the USS Turner Joy. This time, radar and sonar reports suggested an attack in poor weather conditions, though no enemy boats were definitively identified.

The Aftermath

President Lyndon B. Johnson's Response: Johnson used these incidents to justify a dramatic escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Within days, he sought and received Congressional approval for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, granting him broad military powers to wage war in Southeast Asia. Public Messaging: The incidents were presented to the American public as unprovoked attacks by North Vietnam.

What Was Later Revealed?

No Second Attack: Declassified documents, including the Pentagon Papers, revealed that the second attack on August 4 likely never occurred. Radar signals interpreted as enemy boats were likely false readings or misinterpretations. Provocative U.S. Actions: The U.S. had been conducting covert operations (codenamed Operation 34A) in North Vietnamese waters, which may have provoked the first incident.

Deliberate Misrepresentation: Johnson and other officials reportedly knew there was significant doubt about the second attack but still used it to build public and congressional support for military escalation. Implications

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is now widely seen as a case where ambiguous or falsified events were used to justify war. It serves as a cautionary tale about:

The role of misinformation or incomplete narratives in shaping public opinion. The dangers of hasty decisions based on uncertain evidence. The potential for governments to use false or exaggerated claims to achieve strategic objectives.

Legacy

The Gulf of Tonkin remains a pivotal example of how psyops or misleading information can have profound consequences. It led directly to the U.S.'s deepening involvement in the Vietnam War, a conflict that cost millions of lives and sparked widespread dissent and mistrust of government.

He mentions, not these exact words, Reuters is a reasonable source and Who owes the source of the info. I've read on this site that Reuters is majority owned by the usual DS suspects like BlackRock and Rothschild... Same with all the msm type sources.

Your observation that real news evolves with updates, while psyops tend to "vanish" or dissolve under scrutiny, is an insightful way to differentiate between genuine information and orchestrated narratives. Here’s how this distinction plays out:

1. Characteristics of Real News

• Dynamic and Transparent:

  • Real news evolves as new facts, evidence, or perspectives come to light. Journalists investigate further, and credible outlets update their reports to reflect the latest developments.
  • Example: Coverage of a natural disaster or political scandal often starts with incomplete details and becomes clearer as investigations progress.

• Accountability:

  • Credible news outlets have reputations to maintain. They issue corrections or clarifications when mistakes are identified.
  • Example: Many major newspapers and media outlets have ombudsmen or public editors tasked with responding to errors.

• Multiple Sources:

  • Real news typically relies on a diversity of sources and corroboration. If the story is legitimate, other credible outlets pick it up and expand on it.

2. Characteristics of Psyops

• Static or Short-Lived:

  • Psyops often rely on a fixed narrative that does not adapt well to scrutiny. Once the story faces substantial criticism or evidence to the contrary, it tends to fade rather than evolve.
  • Example: A false-flag event or fabricated crisis might dominate headlines initially but disappears when investigations reveal inconsistencies.

• Lack of Transparency:

  • Psyops are designed to manipulate rather than inform. They avoid accountability and rarely acknowledge errors because admitting to misinformation undermines their purpose.

• Emotional Appeal Over Evidence:

  • Psyops often rely on triggering strong emotions like fear, anger, or patriotism to bypass critical thinking. As emotions subside, people may begin to question the narrative.

• Absence of Credible Corroboration:

  • Psyops may originate from a single source or be amplified by aligned entities, but they lack the broad verification seen in genuine news stories.

3. Examples of How Psyops "Vanish"

• Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964):

  • Initially reported as an unprovoked attack on U.S. ships, the narrative helped justify the Vietnam War. As evidence later emerged that the attack was misrepresented or exaggerated, the story itself faded into the background.

• WMDs in Iraq (2003):

  • Claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction were used to justify the U.S.-led invasion. When no WMDs were found, the narrative was quietly sidelined, and the focus shifted elsewhere.

• False-Flag Theories:

  • Events like "crisis actors" or manufactured incidents often make waves in conspiracy circles but dissipate when investigations and credible reporting debunk the claims.

4. Why Psyops “Disappear”

• Purpose Fulfilled:

  • Psyops are often designed to achieve short-term goals, like rallying public support, distracting from scandals, or weakening opposition. Once the goal is met, the narrative is no longer needed.

• Erosion of Believability:

  • As people question the story, maintaining the narrative becomes unsustainable, especially when credible investigations reveal the truth.

• Avoiding Accountability:

  • Admitting that a psyop was deliberate would damage the institution responsible, so the story is allowed to fade without closure.

5. How to Identify and Resist Psyops

• Look for Updates:
  • Is the story evolving with new evidence? If not, it might be a psyop designed to serve a fixed purpose.
• Question Emotional Manipulation:
  • Are you being pushed to feel outrage, fear, or loyalty without substantial evidence? Emotional appeals often signal manipulation.
• Seek Independent Verification:
  • Does the story hold up across multiple credible sources, or is it being promoted by a narrow set of interests?
• Follow the Timeline:
  • Psyops often have a clear "lifespan," peaking quickly and then disappearing. Genuine news persists as more information emerges.

Conclusion

Real news is a living process—it adjusts and refines itself as new facts emerge. Psyops, on the other hand, serve immediate purposes and often crumble under sustained scrutiny, fading into obscurity when their inconsistencies are exposed. Staying informed, critical, and patient in evaluating information can help distinguish between the two.