Literally the most impactful and conspiratorial political assassination of our lifetime; and not only is this board completely uncurious about all the clear inconsistencies and lies from the FBI, but they openly mock and criticize the only actual journalist investigating the murder.
Oh and the investigation is unearthing several more layers of weirdness and corruption implicating ISR@EL, EGYPT, and France (with receipts) and ignored or mocked here.
I think it's worth acknowledging and unpacking how this site APPEARS to be interested in DS coverups; except when it's possible that any of our favorite heroes might be involved.
I've been here since this site was created, and others like me will acknowledge something has been co-opted and infiltrated here
No one has abandoned Charlie Kirk, we’re still here. Maybe take a 40,000 foot view and read The Art of War. Candace is a distraction to what really happened. WHs in control.
You're obviously not following her investigation if you honestly believe this.
You are calling the only actual alpha a "distraction"
You obviously haven’t stepped back and looked at the bigger picture. Read Sun Tzu. WHs in control.
If WHs are in control then they killed Charlie. Make it make sense
If WHs are in control then they flooded the country with illegals If WHs are in control then Butler was staged
If WHs are in control then they're responsible for every vax jab death.
The White Hats are in control of the federat gov't, red state gov'ts, East Europe + Russia, and the Alternative Media; The Black Hats still own the Blue States, NGOs, West Europe, and Ukraine.
REMEMBER this is a global game of chess
MOVES AND COUNTERMOVES
Pieces will get "captured" as the game progresses
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN
And nothing goes as planned.
Dooming much? "No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD."
How is that dooming? Explain how my past comment isn't true.
If TRUTH = DOOMING then this board has truly lost its way.
Elite Research Board but not researching the most relevant alpha right now?
Used to be
GOAT here. Those were the days. I remember the day we were shut down. So sad. Sorry, but GAW is not at the same level as VOAT and many GOATS have left to other pastures.
Still is to be honest if we compare to the other wins and other forums.
The issue is that you're expecting it to make sense, when Q told us that disinformation is everywhere and necessary, and that there are no coincidences.
Truth is that it doesn't have to make sense right now. We aren't running the operation, we're merely observers at the moment.
“White hats in control” sounds like a cultish mantra meant to turn your brain off when confronted with conflicting data.
White hats in control means that they are in position to counter black hats as much as possible and avoid civil war.
The black hats want a civil war and at that point the white hats would have failed control and avoid that outcome.
I am failing to understand how exhibiting yourself to be compromised (FBI) and upholding the false narrative that Kirk got shot by a .308 bullet is “part of the plan”.
Who claimed that?
Also no plan goes without a hitch. Avoiding civil war is utmost importance of white hats.
Why do you suppose the current administration is still allowing chem trails?
I dunno, man. I have my doubts & there is no clarity coming from the admin.
Foreign bodies would absolutely interfere and we'd be right back to square one circa 1880s-1910s
And that's a problem why?
i've read it twice. should i read it a third time, because i feel like i would still disagree with you afterwards. can you articulate exactly what you have seen from your 40,000ft. view that gives you the reason to believe what you do about candace or is it just all feeling and hunch? because all i hear and see from anyone on this that is against her is feeling and hunch. that's usually a symptom of being a victim to the mockingbird machine. maybe make your 40,000ft. view case here?
"read" what twice? Her investigation is an ongoing video series.
Candace is uncovering joint military operations between the countries I mentioned in my OP; and how they align with Brigitte Macron and the trans agenda with major operations in Wilmington Delaware.
Don't be proud of your ignorance
someone forgot to switch accounts lol oops
obviously the art of war. are you only reading 2 or 3 words before responding emotionally? lol i am on the same side of this issue as you yet you seem to not see that at all.
slow down. breathe. read.
or you're running multiple accounts. which is probably closer to the truth. :)
Smh. Everybody has an opinion you are entitled to yours. Not on you to decide whats important. Tell me. If it all came out today, what in maga changes? We all know the official story doesnt add up and that belief alone should cause some kind of change ifnwhat you say is true. It doesnt. We sir are observers. ALL of us have noted the discrepancies. Gonstsrt a charlie kirk version.of the GAW.
Indeed, and that is exactly what he/she should not do.
This board (or website, as you call it) is here because of Q, no other reason. And if one thing has become clear from Q, it's "DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND DON"T FOLLOW THE STARS"!
Thinking a pretty lady on youtube (who somehow survived all the bans from the last couple of years) will save you is ridiculous. So please, step back and think harder.
Look, if you want to listen to Candace, please do. We all have our weaknesses.
Exactly, candace is pointing fingers at nothingburgers to keep you from looking at where the real leads are. The bullet in question.
The Egyptian planes and French Foreign legion collaboration on "Valhalla" are nothingburgers?
This is exactly what I'm talking about
Uncertainty manifests as hesitation, hesitation breeds indecision, indecision results in inaction. Are you being manipulated? Yes.
That was a fortune cookie response.
Do you really think the WHs wouldn’t stage events to manipulate the populace?
WHs wouldn't end a life to meet their end goal
That’s correct; they could stage an exit though to promote a greater good.
i can only shake my head and laugh. feelers gonna feel
Don’t fall for the Candace is crazy trap man. Do the research. There is endless fuckery around Charlie’s death. Anytime anyone is being called stupid and crazy and attacked it’s usually because they’re on to something. Do the research TPUSA was infiltrated by very bad people.
Not saying that there aren’t quite a few questionable occurrences surrounding Kirk’s death. I am saying that Candace isn’t going about her investigation in the right way. Investigate, collect the data, and then analyze all of the data points in an unbiased way.
I'm super concerned with the French implications in Delaware. And really enjoying Candace's team's work. She's not losing my support.
Candace is controlled opposition. This is how it works:
FBI puts out obvious, complete BS "lone gunman" narrative
Candace points out all the stuff that "makes no sense", then proceeds to do a "limited hangout" disclosure of partially/mostly true details carefully woven into a counter-narrative that leaves out key parts to distract from Mossad activity (straight from CIA COIN playbook)
Public is confused with two competing "conspiracy theories", neither of which are true, but both conveniently leave out Mossad; fighting ensues over "the truth"
Candace "credibility of counter-narrative" distraction is boosted with "threats on her life", yet somehow she is able to NOT get cancelled on Youtube, Twitter/X or anywhere else like the 100k truthers terminated on a single day on 15OCT2020 at the flick of a switch, all at the exact same moment. She operates openly out of a known physical location with no interruptions to power or internet, apparently.
"Mossad did it" narrative gets buried; anons ignore it all because they know its all a psyop, and an exact move-for-move REPLAY of JFK coverup (orchestrated by Mossad)
Mossad operatives infiltrate anon boards and ask: "Why did GAW abandon Charlie Kirk?" In order to counter anons ignoring the obvious psyop to try to "guilt them" into talking about it to keep the disinfo loop operation going and attempt to discredit the anons critical of Mossad/MI-6 shills, and anons pointing out all the above.
Candace is married to a known MI-6 asset. Mossad was created by MI-6. Connect those dots.
She may get there, but keep in mind that both the CIA and Mossad regularly burn parts of their own organizations in order to save the core of the organizations (and keep them from getting shutdown), and in order to blame incidents on "rogue elements" when the heat becomes too much (and in order to protect the "core operators" and keep connections to other globalist actors hidden). Full exposure shows the full map of all the embedded agents that they want to keep obscured.
Not to mention that she's clearly engaging in social engineering and literally lied just recently about Tim Pool and botting. Just full-blown lied.
For me and my opinion only ✡️ did it period
Awesome me either. Though they haven't mentioned yet Biden's ties to Delaware yet...
Do you think the MilOp on Sep 10 was to protect or harm CK?
I'm with you on this.
I'm torn. I don't think Charlie would fake his own death with his kids present.
But Kash's Valhalla comment gives me some hope.
Totally forgot about Biden's connection to Delaware.
Plot twist: Kash is either comped or playing a role similar to Flynn where he will fall on his own sword, allowing for more action against the FBI and other domestic agencies.
Except there is no evidence his kids were present, in fact, Erika Kirk wasn't even there.
The part about his kid running to him was an outright lie, to heighten the emotional toll of it.
I think it was to protect him.
the glowies on this board are working overtime on this lol they want you divided
It didn't used to be this way.
Wrong. Glowies have been in this pond the entire time. They were in the voat pond before that, and the plebbit pond before that. They are a constant.
That being said. I agree with you. There is a clear divide amongst the rank & file frogs here. You either believe a state actor assassinated Kirk, or you believe the official bs narrative, or you believe the whole thing was staged.
Personally, I put my hat in the he was whacked by state actor(s) ring.
when you're really at 40,000ft you can see the glow a mile away or in this case 7.58 miles away
I have noticed that everytime I post a Candace Owens link I get a lot of nasty comments regarding her being a flake.
Even if she was a flake, she is exposing some very odd behavior surrounding Charlie's death and questions we should all want answered.
Frankly, I have never see such a tragic event just abandoned by everyone (including law enforcement) so quickly and left in the dust. That alone is supicious.
It is similar to the J6 pipe bomber. Only after pressure from the Alt media has the FBI starting a real investigation into who the bomber was. That too... is very telling.
Literally the point of this post, to help smoke out glowies
I know what vegas was
What else besides an assassination attempting on the Crown Prince (MBS) arranged by Bin Talal…removing the competition for the crown. The WHs foiled their plan by tipping off MBS. I’ve never been able to figure out if the mass shooting event was planned; I seem to think that it was not. The assassins were pissed that their goal was unsuccessful and they took advantage of the concert. Anything that you can enlighten me about?
I believe the patsy had enough fire power to supply a wet team . Trump sent in an SPU to take out that team and the fire fight spilled over into the crowd below
👆💥 Bottom line The American public is always getting sodomized Always by the news
In light of what happened I find the Operational Silence that TPUSA has engaged in since to be suspect...most of the high priority evidence is now lost or compromised or went uninvestigated...I supported Charlie but the mess left behind in his wake tells me the same rats in corn seem to be on both sides of the fence and working with each other. TPUSA did have audit that we never truly heard the actual results of but some have said there was a misuse of funds was revealed. Charlie was loved by myself...but I got nothing for the organization he left behind as it stands. As for Candice time will tell who was playing who but she maybe right about some things but we will have to wait for the dust to settle.
You'll know it was fake and ghey when they bulldoze the school, ask Alex Jones
I think it's wild you actually believe GAW abandoned Charlie Kirk.
GAW literally believes a tranny shot him with a disappearing 3006 that got stuck in his neck
LOL ok.
Not everyone does. I don’t, haven’t since day 1.
Agreed.
Where is the angst coming from? Candace does bring up some valid points but I do not agree with everything she says. The same with the Tates, Flynn, etc.
Discernment is important too and especially true on this board.
You're getting stuck on a single battle. The war is ongoing.
Bottom line The American public is always getting sodomized Always by the news💥💥💥👆
There is one raging problem with taking it to the FBI.
Dude, are you serious? Israel? Egypt? France??
Everyone here knows that the mod team is comp'd by Iran and Russia.
Успокойся, братан, никто этот сайт не взломал.
و اگر واقعاً اینها رو سرچ کردی، واقعاً تحت تأثیرم، هههه
Nice.
This is the best laugh I had all day.
o7
sips kvass
Anyone willing to have the feds scapegoat a lone NON-SHOOTER and have him sentenced for murder, is so abysmally a shit for brains that there is just nothing else to say. My 40k foot view? I do have one. And I do get the whole gestalt of The Law of War. Yet I feel the way I feel, which is discouraged and depressed right now.
Every bit of research Candace does on behalf of Charlie is useful. I think the picture is getting clearer and clearer. Who else would fight this hard to get at the truth, no matter how painful and discouraging it is? No one. Not Tucker, not Ian Carroll, who then. She is like a foot-soldier in this. If this board hates the revealed truths so much that it basically ignores her podcasts, it is symptomatic. I actually believe that most posts mentioning Candace, are blocked by the mods here? But if I could change one thing about Candace it would simply be for her to refrain from telling the world she is not going to vote until our gov comes clean about being part of a conspiracy to kill Charlie and for having her life threated. Very reckless to lead her followers to allow non maga candidates more possiblity of a win.
I love Trump so much. And he is doing so many awesome things, and I appreciate them. But I loathe the apparent bowing down to Israel, it makes me nauseous, because secrets make me ill. Obviously there is some deep corrupted reason for this situation, that Trump inherited.
Do I think Bibi helped Charlie get assassinated? Yes. Do I think France's big money elite, and Democrats, and Egypt, had a finger in the pie? Yes. If I were to go for the most outlandish theory imaginable, I will not be surprised for it to someday be shown to be true. And it is nasty. Do you recognize that Big Pharma and the Death Cult are addressed in Revelations? What is the worldwide corruption the demons control? Drug trafficking wealth, human trafficking in all it's aspects ( including the facts about past presidents helping it happen through "agreements") Project Blue Beam bullshit (and also the reality part of it) and again the secrets secrets secrets, about human history buried in archives below The Vatican, and their reptilian worship. Oh yes, they do! I believe Trump knows all, and his decisions reflect his awareness. 5D chess does not begin to address the levels that are kept from us. I am at the point where, if two tall beautiful Nordic-looking ET travelers materialize in front of me, I will say, "Thank God".
👆🇺🇸I’m with you 👆and Bottom line The American public is always getting sodomized Always by the news
GAW is not defined by its shills. Smart anons show up, use info, spread info, discuss. Shills try to pave over it all, but the anons know.
CK is a bit different because it's a psyop but clearly a WH one, with goals that are still being worked on. Some anons have a mental speed bump over it, but most are fine observing as it continues to play.
What Are you talking about? Can't you see we're all busy on here defending Candace , against all these shills? We all know it was a multinational government operation.
I mean if you're confused you can literally read this thread's comments. There is an obvious schism on this issue on GAW, and I think it's revealing the glowies and traitors in our midst
The schism is on Israel and many just refuse to see it. IMHO that's why they don't want to talk about it. I do want to talk about it and have a lot.
100 percent
Again, as mentioned before. We know about the glowies. Bad faith AND good FBI followed from TDW and joined the ones already here.
It appears the bad faith are still stirring up trouble, and the good (if any left) are silent observers.
Candace is in the middle of her investigation.
Team Trump/Q+ has a way of timing things according to their schedule/ timeline, and tend to badmouth anyone who interferes with THEIR scheduling. For good or for ill, that is what they do.
Here is my take:
I get the feeling Candace is as impatiant about CK as many of us are. The problem is she's running against other people's timelines for release, investigations, or whatever it is. So a lot of people are running contrary, or directly opposed to her because of this, and this is reflected on the board to some degree, unfortunately.
Keeping up with everything going on has been no small task, and Im sure the FBI in particular has been crazy. Not only are two top shelf dudes trying to manage a broken department, but also actually get something done with the agents.
They are still weeding out bad agents and hidden agents and coordination with other departments. The truly amazing thing is how much they've gotten done considering all of the corruption, bad actors, sleepers, and FBI field offices working against them this entire time.
Despite all the accomplishments yes, i'm upset with the current narrative as well. Going on about all the shills that you should be aware of if you've been here since the beginning, however, is not helping anyone. You're just pissing off all the frogs that are your frens and happened to agree with you.
It's okay to stir the pot, just be aware you really aren't alone in your frustration. It may seem like the frogs here have turned against Candace or charlie, but just remember, it's the noise that you are hearing and seeing.
Take a deep breath, get some rest, step away if you have to, and come back fresh.
God bless.
great comment thanks :)
Sounds like you really mean abandoned Candace. I have thought she was a disinformationalist since the fake black grandma period.
No I mean abandoned Charlie; as this board has completely moved on from investigating his murder in favor of mass smearing of the only investigator.
Or do you believe Kash's defense of a 3006 not piercing CK's neck because he ate salad?
If this helps, the events of that day are all so strange and seemingly suspect that it's been taken for granted that it was a psyop. Idk if Charlie is dead or alive but I do know the official narrative is complete bullshit
tucker carlson was a lefty cnn talking head. you probably abandoned him because of his past too, huh?
operative words "i have thought" so thank you for sharing your opinion even if i disagree with you :)
What are you talking about? I listen to Tucker literally every day and if you were actually following CO's investigation you'd understand Tucker's role
wild that you have responded to me twice defensive when i am on the same side of this issue as you. you sure you aren't running multiple accounts here?
I'm literally posting under the same username
just as you're literally responding to my comments that are directed at someone else and not you. maybe you need to start replying from the thread itself and not the inbox so you get context. my comments are not top level comments. they have been in response to others. just stop and go read your own thread before replying to this comment from your inbox. lol
You are welcome. I was never "with" Tucker. He might be alright but I try not to attach too much to media people. I was never a fan of Charlie Kirk. I assumed he was CIA/Mossad/what have you.
says the guy going out of his way to comment on how he feels about media people lol but go off chief i have popcorn
I thought you brought up Tucker Carlson.
i thought you responded in a thread on your own volition about your opinion of a media member before telling me how disinterested you are in media members lol honkhonk lmao
I said I try not to be attached and you think that's clown shit. What's up?
you glow bro :) have a good one
I'll second the notion that no one here abandoned Charlie... as tragic as that was, this is a Q message board after all... we're all still date-fagging and lining up proofs. I, like many here, am here for the long-haul but understand that the end will not be for everyone.
u/#what
u/#bullshit
literally proud of your ignorance
kek. Glad I could help ya out. User name chek't.
It's ok to see things differently and discuss. That's the only way to get to truth in a corrupted world. This topic is so convoluted with so much misdirection it's hard to have a civilized coherent discussion. And no I haven't read all 68 comments that are here as of now..
We have 10,000 other issues trying to save the country.
I'm sorry the world won't stop,so we have time to dell with it.
I don't think Charlie Kirk is dead at all, and I really don't trust Candace Owens.
Opinions differ I guess.
The problem I have with the "<insert name here>" is not dead, they ackshully faked their death(s) narrative is that the notion is entirely born from low-tier paytriots.
These hypothesis' were roundly rejected on the original bakery boards over the years and there is absolutely zero empirical evidence or proof that anyone has faked their death with the lone exception being Epstein.
If Juan O Savin or Stew Peters or some other charlatan snake oil salesman is the source of a claim as bold as prominent person's death is faked by WH and the bakery/anons majority reject these wild notions, then I fail to see why they are supported by jannies or anyone here.
I totally take your point, but I reached my conclusion not by listening to any of those guys, but by looking at the available evidence around the event such as the impossibility of the 30.06 round story and by looking at the actions of the team around and just after the event.
The official information was entirely opaque too, with obvious lies coming from the team that said they handled the body.
Given all this, I decided that the event was a planned exfiltration using Hollywood style prosthetics, squibs and blood bags. This is why none of the ballistics or apparent wound behaviour make any sense.
Thank Q for the eloquent concise reply. You may have come up with your own personal theory as such, but you know exactly what I meant. There's only one infotainment source(s) that push the fake death theories, and it should be pointed out.
That being said, I must repeat that there is zero empirical evidence to support this:
Now, there is empirical evidence and behavior to suggest there are state actors involved in the assassination. From Naziyahoo being the first person to react publicly, to the occurrence of foriegn government aircraft seemingly tailing Kirk for months, to the search term history location source data....
Those three points alone have been documented and backed up by multiple sources and with data sauce. And, that's just the concrete easy to prove points. Not mentioning the litany or circumstantial events, reactions, and other habbenings that segway into those three data points.
Not trying to argue, just reporting the facts as they are fren o7
o7 good points.
For me, there is no empirical evidence that he was shot. The given gun story is not possible, the wound was incoherent and needed special narratives like a breast plate. The occams razor approach in this case was that he wasn't shot at all.
Other data are things like that nobody tried to apply pressure to his wounds.
That is correct. Without an autopsy and given the crime scene was literally paved over within 48 hrs of the habbening... there won't be.
However, it could be argued that the live video is a form of evidence for a gunshot wound. That being said, it's universally agreed it sure as shit ain't a 30-06 wound.
OK, I don't want to get too boring, but I see it this way.
The scene was set up to look like a sniper shot him with a 30.06, and that gun DID NOT do it, since no other gun or similar device has shown up, we don't have a gun at all.
Since the scene was set up to look like a sniper shot but wasn't, then you'd expect the staged result to look like a gun shot injury (but I contend wasn't, because there was no known gun ).
Because the narrative contains a gunshot ( but we know that actual shot was false ) people continue to assume a gunshot must be present, but there is no reason to. Given the shot was staged, the injury is most likely staged too, especially as it does not conform to the injury you'd expect.
If someone wanted him dead, they'd have really used the rifle and splatter would have been everywhere.
Notice that the wound was in the neck where it was techinically possible to fake it with a prosthesis, instead of in the head where the faking would have been hardly possible at all.
Fren, there's only so much time and there are many happenings. If you have good sauce keep posting it and prove yourself. Many conclusions can't be drawn yet and many anons here are still open to considering ideas and data points and those who publish them. We could start at the 2020 election and spend months unearthing every detail just on that and miss today's events. If CK is your interest do us all a favor and present your best on him. I appriciate the varied contributions from frens like you.
Great points all around. There are a lot of moving pieces and a lot of info to dig through so there is nothing final about what happened with Charlie Kirk or TPUSA.
There is a lot of questions that remain unanswered and far more questions that pop up as a result too. It is easy to quickly shift blame about factions or a divide.
But difference of opinion is what creates discussion which is what is needed for a research board.
Here here...
I second that
You're entitled to think whatever you want, and if that is what you really think, then you think like a shill.
I can think what I want too. And, I think that you are a moron who has simply fallen for nazi shill propaganda. The nazi-shills never miss an opportunity to divide people on conservative boards, and this new bullshit about "our favorite hero's" somehow framing that poor, poor innocent murderer (the actual shooter who stole his grand dads literal nazi gun) is no different.
Click-bait Candice is full of shit: FACT. "Naming a boulevard in Israel" after Charlie is not "evidence" (😆) of a Jewish plot to assassinate Charlie!
If you want to allege a "DS coverup" that people on this board are ignoring, then you need to first prove that a "coverup" even exists. And, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
None of Click-Bait Candice's bullshit amounts to anything more than a popular, young twitter influencer trying to keep her new job as a professional journalist by making attention grabbing headlines, for clicks and attention.
Many people on this board have explored the conspiracy theories surrounding C.K. and have not found anything solid to use to deny the facts of the case. But, you can rest easy knowing that people on this board, and elsewhere, are still paying close attention to the CK case, and will continue to do so.
But, as of now, twitter personalities who claim "naming a boulevard" as proof of an international murder conspiracy and, online "ballistics experts" who have zero factual knowledge of the exact gun, nor bullet used, got nothing of merit.
To be clear; you think a neck stopped a 3006 round.
You have 0 information about what actual 30-06 round was used, and therefore can't make implicit declarations like "Necks can't stop 30-06!"
All we know is that it is FMJ ammo, and nothing else.
Could be a subsonic reload, could be M2 ball which is notorious for low velocity retention at range, could be a faulty round, could have keyholed and lost more energy than would be expected. Given we have a sample size of 1 shot fired, any declarations beyond the basic descriptive are going to be bunk.
Nobody can confirm anything about the ballistics without knowing specific details about the actual round used, like- The powder load, gun barrel dimensions, bullet. core/jacket composition, etc.
Simply saying: "ah, ha! 3006 caliber always does X,Y,Z damage, therefore the FIB must be lying again" ignores factual ballistics details that are not publicly known. I am not one to assume that the punk was using a normal 3006. After all, we do know that the rifle used was a non-standard type. Based on the facts we do know, it is logical to consider that the bullet used may [very likely] also be a non-standard type.
My personal theory about why that 3006 round did not do the kind of damage typically associated with a 3006, is based on the idea that the punk kid who killed him (using grandfathers modified gun) was probably using some kind of modified ammo, in addition to a modified gun and, was likely some type of target practice round.
This is dumb. With about a million things we can focus on. Charlie is not the focal point of MAGA. He is cog. Nobody has stopped a single post about charlie including this one. If you want charlie discussed in here then post away. Impactful is true but not the most impactful. Dont become so focused on one thing and miss the greater context because that will ensure the truth about charlie wont be discovered by the rank and file. I doubt charlie himself would agree with you.
There's so much noise about this, I tuned it out. Will wait to see what happens in the future with the case.
Hi Candace.
Kek
I have not given up on Charlie Kirk but many of the theories are not factually proven to be correct.
I am keeping an open mind.
If that Egyptian plane landed near the campus and left within an hour after the assassination makes for an interesting theory, also the fact that people flying in a corporate jet into a private air strip should stay at a very cheap hotel also makes no sense.
But that does not tell you anything definitive. In fact it could be an attempt to draw your attention towards a false flag instead of the real people responsible.
It is quite possible there is a kill list out there and many people are on it including Candace. I am hopeful things are being difficult to pin down for a reason and all the false accusations flying around draws the attention away from the bullseye so those responsible are caught off guard.
Do not be discouraged, there is an end to this story and we will figure it out. My prayer is the answers come sooner rather than later.
Not abandoned. It de-evolved into too much hate posts against this and that and lets divide and conquer over the subject what, in itself sends up red flag warning to me.
Speaking for myself, from the first day I knew something about the kirk assassination was messed up. What killer leaves those kinds of obvious tracks behind? The quick opinion that he acted alone was in itself a dead giveaway. But the one thing I realized too is that we will know nothing of value, nothing truthful in the early days and weeks. The spin, the twists and turns, the inconsistencies, the obvious desire to bury the case meant to me that there is a lot more to this than anyone could imagine.
I don't think everyone just forgot about his murder but that we weren't going to get fooled by what the media or anyone else was saying or not saying. Just like it seems that people have forgot about the Las Vegas shooting, the Sandy Hook shooting, the Butler, PA shooting of DJT. We haven't nor will we. But we won't waste energy thinking that Candace Owens or anyone else has all the facts. In time the truth will win out. Everyone is awaiting arrests, trials and convictions to hundreds of criminal acts inside and out of the government. The DOJ is being watched by all of us to see if/when the perp walks begin in earnest. Until that happens the Kirk case is just added to the pile of cases that need fully investigated and the guilty brought to justice. Personally, I wish Steve Miller was the AG and Mike Davis in charge of the FBI. I think Bondi and Patel just don't have the horsepower to do these jobs.
Possible disinformation? It's necessary, distractions are too. Some posts stand out more than others imo. Make your own call.
https://qalerts.app/?q=disinformation
Here's what a 30-06 does to a deer btw, go to 7:57.
https://youtu.be/ooyRbj-WAVI?si=F7np0H3DrzVOCqY5
No, I don't believe he was shot by a 30-06 but I do believe his alleged death was used as a bit of a wake up call for a lot of people, It showed some people what their rhetoric can lead to (most didn't care). This is my opinion and yes I meant to say alleged. We may know the truth at some point but possibly not.
There are plenty of videos pointing at inconsistencies with what we were shown and told, I've watched quite a few and have a lot of unanswered questions myself, I don't think anyone has given up on Charlie's death scenario, there is so much happening that is being shared here, it seems like we don't care but that's not true.
A lot of anons here believe things are going according to plan, I am one of them. If you don't, that's ok too, it doesn't hurt to question everything but you shouldn't let it try to cause division amongst us. We're all in this together fren.
I guess by how you think we've abandoned Trump and Butler PA.
Blame the mods
That's easy to do, but it doesn't get you anywhere really.
True
The American tradition is to blame Canada but they have great Canadian bacon.
Because he's not dead. It was fake. Wake up.
You don't wanna know what I think about this...
Psychological operations go both ways. I'm just gonna leave it at that.
And Candace Owens acts like a jilted lover, using assumptive language that is most effective on only the dumbest people.
Life would be a little better with Charlie around, if only I didn't need to hear the childish nonsense coming from Candace and all the dumb people who can't recognize her manipulation of the audience with her assumptive language.
I think it's a case of overload and burnout. Decades of waiting are taking it's toll.
I am going to have to disagree with the divided comment. The difference of opinion generates discussion and fuels research and info digging.
If we were in lock step and dogmatic like a cult that many people on the outside accuse this board of being it would look far more worse in reality.
I believe that Charlie Kirk assassination was a set up by big actors because of its proximity to 9/11 as it happened a day before and in Utah of all places IMVHO.