7
Rocketeer 7 points ago +7 / -0

It must have been something else.

Kari Lake didn't start talking about this incident until the latest CPAC, which was not long after the bribe attempt occurred.

1
Rocketeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not if they looked at the outside of it. Many people got to see it being carried. Touching it or looking inside was deadly.

2
Rocketeer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm still struggling squaring this with him bending the knee to the Zionists

Q said that Israel is being saved for last.

Maybe that means that corruption in every other country has to be dealt with first before the masses are ready to see Israeli corruption revealed. Go after Israeli corruption too soon, and too many people will see it as scapegoating the Jews for everything and think they're witnessing the return of the Third Reich. Until then, playing nice with Israel is necessary for optics.

1
Rocketeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this real?

It appears so.

Why would Tucker do this?

I don't know. This type of weird videos in character as Frank Underwood are something that Kevin Spacey has been doing as Christmastime for years. I don't know why Tucker Carlson got involved, though.

3
Rocketeer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep.

Kevin Spacey has done this sort of thing (weird videos in character as Frank Underwood) in previous years, and always at Christmastime.

14
Rocketeer 14 points ago +14 / -0

Why would Kevin Spacey run for President?

He's not running for president. He was in character as his politician character Frank Underwood from "House of Cards".

Why does his voice sound auto-tuned?

It doesn't if you watch the video on Spacey's YouTube channel instead of a poorly-compressed Twitter version. Here's the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqPePWyduxQ

It should be pretty obvious the the astute and well-trained eye that this is an obvious deepfake, and a very pointed one at that.

I thought that when I watched it on Twitter. But after seeing it in full HD on YouTube, it appears very unlikely to be a deepfake. Also, if it was a deepfake, why would Kevin Spacey post it to his YouTube channel?

8
Rocketeer 8 points ago +8 / -0

I was pleasantly surprised by this news, because not long ago, he was dating a Scientologist.

8
Rocketeer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Didn’t the civil war start because Lincoln was kept off the ballot in southern states?

No. It started because some southern states seceded after he won the election.

2
Rocketeer 2 points ago +4 / -2

The 4,000 B.C. date for creation is based on a flawed understanding of Biblical genealogies. When one understands the ancient process of "telescoping" (skipping over multiple generations when recording genealogies, which has been proven to have been done in at least some portions of the Bible), the Biblical genealogies actually point toward creation likely having taken place anywhere from 10,000 to 60,000 years ago.

Here's a well-researched article explaining this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20161120174551/http://godandscience.org/youngearth/genesis_genealogies.html

1
Rocketeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

By any chance, do you know of any information that has leaked out about what's going on in Antarctica? I find the subject fascinating but never found much info.

2
Rocketeer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oddly enough, I discovered the house I'm currently renting on Facebook Marketplace. That was a miracle, though, and I was careful to do a lot of research to make sure it was legit. Most of the house listings there are scams.

1
Rocketeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then he can go on offense wearing the full armor of God and clean out the Justice Dept. for the good of the country.

Maybe that's what these trials are for: to disqualify him from being able to touch the Justice Department as President due to it being a "conflict of interest".

2
Rocketeer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry. I didn't realize that someone had already posted it.

1
Rocketeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I find it interesting that, based on Kirsch's info, it sounds like only the Pfizer and Moderna shots had SV40 in them. I wonder if that's why President Trump promoted the Johnson & Johnson one?

3
Rocketeer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it your position that the Talmud has nothing about how to treat those who aren't them?

It does have various statements guidelines on how to treat non-Jews, some of which directly contradict one another (the Talmud is made up of the teachings of many Rabbis over many years, some of which disagreed - sometimes vehemently - with one another).

I'm just wondering if you're saying that all the negative things reported about what's in the Talmud are just made up lies.

Most if not all are either fake or taken out of context to twist the meaning.

And sometimes quotes from the Jerusalem Talmud (which is not seen as authoritative within Judaism) are misrepresented as being from the Babylonian Talmud (which is seen as the final, authoritative Talmud within Judaism). When people say "The Talmud", they are referring to the Babylonian Talmud.

For instance, the statement "Kill the best of Gentiles" by Rabbi Simeon ben Ioḥai (who had a grudge against Gentiles due to seeing his teacher flayed to death by Romans and having to hide from the Romans in a cave for 14 years) is genuine, but it's from the Jerusalem Talmud, not the Babylonian Talmud, and thus not considered authoritative within Judaism.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/718279/jewish/The-Two-Talmuds.htm

2
Rocketeer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look to #12 above.

It's a fake quote. It's supposedly from chapter 17 of "Jore Dia" (the real name of which is Yoreh Deah). However the real Yoreh Deah's chapter 17 not only doesn't include that quote but is about an entirely different subject (rules related to slaughtering animals).

Here's the full chapter:

Seif 1 When one slaughters a healthy animal and after slaughtering it does not make convulsive movements, it is permitted. However regarding an animal that is dangerously ill, i.e., one which cannot maintain itself when others cause it to stand it up, even if it eats the food of healthy animals. If such an animal is slaughtered and does not make any convulsive movements at all, it is a nevelah and one is liable for lashes [for partaking] of it. If it makes convulsive movements, it is permitted. The convulsive movements must be made at the end of the slaughter. If they are made at the beginning, they are of no consequence.What is meant by convulsive movements? For a small domesticated animal and for both a small and a large wild beast, the intent is that it extended its foreleg and returned it, extended its hind leg even though it did not return it, or merely bent its hind leg. This is considered a convulsive movement and [the animal] is permitted. If, however, it merely extended its foreleg and did not return it, it is forbidden. This movement is merely a result of the expiration of the soul. If it either extended its foreleg or its hind leg without bending it or bent its foreleg or hind leg without extending it, it is considered as a convulsive movement and it is permitted. If, however, it neither extended or bent its foreleg or its hind leg at all, it is considered as a nevelah.With regard to a fowl, even if it only blinked its eyelid or swatted its tail, it is considered a convulsive movement.

This page covers quotes two similar quotes that are on the meme (#4 and #5):

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/lie.html

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›