16
TSearch 16 points ago +16 / -0

Part of the plan.

If she charges people, they stand trial in the corrupted civilian court system. A system where activist judges and liberal juries regularly absolve DS operatives of their crimes.

Activist judges need to be removed and way more lefties need to wake up, or these people will never truly face justice. Or, their crimes have to be clearly linked to the grand conspiracy to subvert our government so they can be charged in a military tribunal.

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’ve been thinking for a while the Dems are an organized crime syndicate. Look at how blue states and cities enable, then protect criminals. They do this because they are likely getting a piece of the action.

Same goes for illegal immigration. Yes, one big factor is to steal elections, but they’re also supplying human beings to groups who want to exploit them for financial gain. Why? Because they are likely getting a piece of the action for enabling mass human trafficking.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think this is part of the recurring theme in Q posts that “you have more than you know.”

And, we know enemy combatants should not be charged in a civilian court. Their destination must be military tribunals, preferably at Guantanamo. Bondi won’t charge the people because she shouldn’t.

9
TSearch 9 points ago +9 / -0

Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?

If Bondi charges them that is what happens, and they all walk. Just like the two guys Durham had slam dunk cases against.

The only way they are served justice is to face a military tribunal.

u/#q619

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Glad I never gave up on whole milk products, or eggs, lard, and butter for that matter.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can anyone find what a 1B redaction code means. Does it even exist?

The DOJ redaction code table starts with a letter, not a number. I’m not finding a 1B redaction code anywhere.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does anyone have the Epstein file document making this claim? The screenshot on the right talks about 2019 and 2020, but Epstein supposedly committed suicide in August 2019.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

If there was a contest for most surprising Cabinet pick it would be between Marco Rubio and Scott Bessent. They have both transformed me from deep skeptic to true believer.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was just thinking that the white hats and black hats know all the dark secrets, but the general public doesn’t.

The behind the scenes game has always been about controlling what the general public knows. The black hats want to hide the truth. The white hats release it at a rate where the normies can absorb it.

They release it in a format the normies can digest,a movie.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

My bet is they were given a glimpse of what things would look like if their Federal funds are cutoff for noncompliance.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Attorney General doesn’t bring charges in cases of Unlawful Enemy Combatants, the military does. The DOJ can support the military prosecutors, but they have no oversight of the military legal system.

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s a total master stroke to have her on the scene. Now everyone who was a part of 2020 election steal are freaking out. The FBI raid wasn’t just a law enforcement operation, it was a National Intelligence operation. As the DNI she has oversight of the FBI’s intelligence activities.

As a sitting United States Senator he should be aware of that. He’s just going to the old DS playbook where they try to delegitimize anything that will expose them.

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/what-we-do/members-of-the-ic

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Back in 1890 the Supreme Court found that a Federal Agent, carrying out their federal duty, cannot be charged with state level crimes.

Neagle case of 1890.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/135/1

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was born between those years and I think President Trump is a genius.

I do agree with you, though, there are still way too many people who claim they are members of the Republican Party, but they long for the days of politicians who say all the right things but do nothing.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Read Q drop 619 and you’ll have your answer. If you want these people prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, you don’t want it to happen in the civilian courts. Leftist judges and juries regularly nullify slam dunk cases against DS assets. If Bondi and the DOJ charge these people they will walk.

u/#q619

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

The truth is we don’t know the truth. Life doesn’t happen in a super slow motion, silent replay. What appears to take several seconds in the replay happened in an instant.

Just my opinion, if we want to get closer to the truth we need to watch at full speed from the shooting agent’s perspective. How much time elapsed from an agent shouting gun to the initial shot fired? What weapon fired that shot?

Was the shooting agent aware the suspect had been disarmed? This is the only question I will venture to answer. Sadly, he apparently wasn’t.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think if we believe there is a Q and a Q+, and we believe they will succeed, we don’t need a Convention of States to tinker with the Constitution.

I don’t trust most politicians with minor issues, why would I trust them to have that much power to amend the Constitution? How do we know this isn’t a huge bait and switch scam to save the Uniparty?

What we need are free and fair elections. One day, paper ballots, counted in a fraud proof process. If we had that we don’t need term limits or a COS.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe POTUS needed a plausible explanation for flying over in the Doomsday aircraft. .

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

It has been a long road and, from time to time, we get impatient. But, we were clearly told in post 619 that these people will not stand trial in a civilian court.

What the DS wants is for MAGA to insist the DOJ charge and try these people. Then, like Sussman and Danchenko, the corrupt court system lets them walk. If the judge doesn’t corrupt the proceedings, a lefty jury will happily nullify the charges. If this happens the chance of trying these traitors in a military tribunal go out the window.

We’re watching the case being built that will help convince normies that handling these cases in a military tribunal is necessary. Anons need to be red pilling normies on why these crimes need to be tried by the military. It’s helpful to go back to the drops about enemy combatants.

u/#q619

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

I like my theory better. The goal isn’t for the DOJ to try the traitors in a corrupt public court. The goal is to charge them as enemy combatants in a military tribunal.

Durham had two slam dunk cases that prove no matter how solid a case is, lefty judges and lefty jurors will let seditious people walk. Bondi would actually be doing these people a favor if she charges them in the civilian courts.

After all weren’t we told not to expect these people to be tried in civilian courts?

u/#q619

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t shop at Walmart often, but I was in one today. The shelves were full and I saw no signs limiting people’s purchases of any items.

11
TSearch 11 points ago +11 / -0

I disagree with this interpretation of events.

President Trump has been methodically challenging the constitutionality that a select group of unelected officials are independent from the Executive Branch, and; therefore, do not answer to the voters. The Fed Chairman is the most powerful and consequential of these positions.

This investigation isn’t about something that Powell refused to do 21 days ago. This investigation is about challenging an unconstitutional act that happened 112 years ago.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›