Sometimes I feel a bit like Captain Montgomery Scott in the Star Trek Next Generation episode Relics. The scene where he tells the holodeck computer he doesn’t want to see no bloody Enterprise A, B, C, or D. He wants the original Enterprise.
MAGA covers it all. We don’t need Ultra MAGA, MAHA, or any other catchy wordplay on MAGA.
But, I did appreciate the bit of humor in the way she pronounced it.
No doubt Fox was part of selling the steal. However, if you watch the tapes, Bill Hemmer, Brett Baier, and Martha MacCallum argued against that call on air. Maybe they were acting, I can’t say, but I remember like it was yesterday. The three of them were openly arguing on air with the two guys who made the call, Chris Stirewalt and Arnon Mishkin.
Thank you !
I wonder what percentage of our so-called “conservative influencers” got there through the old Twitter algorithms and bot armies that were meant to keep the globalists in power?
Has anyone new been anointed a “conservative influencer” since Musk took over Twitter? Or, since the launch of Truth?
I can’t think of any, but I’m very careful who I follow.
He can’t stop himself from parroting “free market capitalism” when he’s really shilling for globalist interests. His so-called “free trade” has been nothing more than transfer payments of our wealth to globalist interests.
Russia invaded Ukraine nearly four years ago. It has been unable to conquer that single country. No one with more than a half teaspoon of common sense would believe Russia is capable of attacking and defeating other European countries.
I know some parents with nonverbal kids and they are having a hard time finding a Doctor to prescribe Leucovorin. My jaded side is thinking it’s because the Trump Administration is supporting it.
I’m curious if anyone here knows why a modified form of folate is prescription only? B vitamins are water soluble so what is the danger in making this over the counter?
I didn’t know that, but I do know Robert E. Lee’s wife, Mary Anna Randolph Custis Lee was the great-granddaughter of Martha Custis Washington, the wife of George Washington, making her the step-great-granddaughter of George Washington.
https://www.womenhistoryblog.com/2008/11/mary-randolph-custis-lee.html
I agree Tina Peters isn’t going to be released anytime soon. So, we either have to conclude President Trump did something purely symbolic, or, his target is to eventually get her released.
Based on President Trump’s record, he isn’t a person who does things that are merely symbolic. I think this Federal Pardon is part of the narrative that will lead up to the eventual reveal that the 2020 election was stolen and how it was done.
A big part of the how was exploiting the patchwork state level control of Federal Elections and the fact many states intentionally fail to comply with Federal Election Standards. And, again, establishing election standards is an enumerated power given to Congress, not the States.
Obviously this all revolves around the belief the 2020 election was rigged and that irrefutable evidence will eventually be revealed. If that never happens, Tina Peters will serve out her sentence. If it does happen her jailers will be facing jail time.
Do I know what will really happen? Of course not. But, I don’t believe the Framers intended to have a situation where a citizen can be imprisoned for violating a state law that usurps an enumerated power of the Federal Government.
Edit: I am able to admit I am wrong. I will admit that I am wrong if the midterm elections are still conducted under the same shoddy conditions we’ve witnessed over the past several years.
Actually what I said came from an argument presented by her attorneys. I picked up on it in this article which speculated a Presidential Pardon might be issued to provoke a Supreme Court case.
I also don’t believe President Trump would frivolously issue a pardon without an endgame in mind. But, I’m up for checking in occasionally to see how this turns out.
This is about the Supremacy Clause and the fact Federal Election Laws take precedence over State Election Laws.
If I understand the case correctly her defense was prevented from presenting the Federal Records retention laws and that her actions were in compliance with Federal requirements. And, that the state laws she was charged with violating are in conflict with Federal Statutes.
Finally, the Elections Clause of the Constitution gives states some latitude in setting their own election laws, but gives Congress the ultimate authority to regulate elections.
TLDR from a good article on the topic:
The habeas petition cites Cunningham v. Neagle for the principle that an individual acting pursuant to federal law cannot be guilty of a state crime for those acts and explains that supremacy immunity extends to any person acting under a federal duty.
In Peters’ case that duty arises from statute and DOJ guidance.
Colorado barred her from presenting that duty and then imprisoned her for speaking about what her experts found.
If President Trump pardons her for actions taken to comply with federal election record retention law, Colorado must decide whether to accept the pardon or claim that its conviction overrides the federal interest in protecting election records.
I haven’t been able to keep up with everything being posted over the past several months, but it seems her story is sliding. My understanding is she was initially saying it was Israel, then I guess somewhere along the way claimed it was people inside TPUSA, and now it’s the U.S. military.
Am I oversimplifying what she’s claiming? I guess the only way her claims are coherent is if all these people or organizations were conspiring together. It would be nice if she could make a flowchart to illustrate how they’re all connected.
I remember reading about this back in 2020, before the election. Probably the most important aspect of this story is POTUS was prepared, his focus was on the long term, and he didn’t take their bait. Instead, he made a series of countermoves that resulted in a lot of people revealing themselves, and quite literally caught them all.
Many of us didn’t feel that way when it happened, but walking away was a master stroke. As he said many times during the 2024 campaign, the 2020 election set the stage for him to do things in this term he couldn’t have done if the true 2020 were honored.
How many times did Q say something to the effect, “Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening?”
While Flynn and Glenn Beck might enjoy a higher perch than we do, is it high enough to know BIG things aren’t happening out of their view?
I also wonder if demanding action from AG Bondi is even the right course of action? We were told in post 619 that having these DS creatures stand trial in a DC courtroom would not be wise because the judiciary is compromised. Public pressure for public trials is plays into the hands of the DS.
My belief is the Q statement “The only way is the military. Fully controlled,” is referring to tribunals. And, it seems to me we are watching a lot of maneuvering to highlight the civilian courts are hopelessly corrupted.
I don’t think our primary mandate has ever been to put pressure on our political leaders. Our mandate has been to become part of an information warfare back channel that defeats the mockingbirds and the controlled social media. And, the reason for defeating them is to help our still sleeping fellow citizens join the Great Awakening.
I’ll end by saying I am confused about what it takes to finally reach the tipping point. During the 2024 campaign POTUS said on a few occasions that 75% of the population is now MAGA. How many more people need to wake up to cause the fall of the cabal? And, what in the world will it take to wake them up?
I have a simple rule that helps me filter out all of the so called “conservative influencers” noise. The only key in the effort to dismantle the worldwide DS is President Trump and a few of his closest aids. Everything else is just noise.
Only POTUS has the ability and position to get the job done. Drop 14 tells us in the form of a rhetorical question that POTUS knows where the bodies are buried. And, unlike these influencers, POTUS has access to state of the art war gaming tech to plot the right moves and countermoves.
Am I blindly following one man? I don’t think so, I just believe he is our last and best hope. I can’t think of anyone else who could have brought us this far and keep pushing like he is.
These influencers might be used to play a role, but they aren’t the key to getting the job done. Most of them talk a lot, but really say very little. You have to sift through a lot of gravel to find a few flakes of gold.
I don’t know. I remember when she first came onto the scene someone on this board suggested she was a plant. They thought it was way too contrived that the Dems had a caricature whose name was condensed into three letters and suddenly we got one too. Their thoughts were MTG was selected to feed us red meat and appear to be a balance to AOC.
Edit: I also meant to point out her stalwart support of Kevin McCarthy caused me to lose respect for her. My observation she really changed after he was pushed out.
As always, all we can really do is wait and see.
I think POTUS knows the Republicans will never eliminate the filibuster from the Senate rules. So, my curiosity is why does he keep banging on this?
My gut says he has a reason for wanting to prolong the government shutdown. He believes the Dems would dearly love to see the Republicans nuke the filibuster before the midterms. So, they will keep holding out and, in some way, play into President Trump’s hands.
I’ve been way too busy to keep up with everyone’s thoughts here, but this is a topic that has caught my attention.
Anyone with media savvy knows one the best way to kill a story from an alternate media personality is to ignore the story. Erika Kirk has to be savvy enough to know what she is doing is actually fanning the flames of Candace Owens’ claims.
It might be an overused word here, but is their feud actually kayfabe? Was their private meeting really an opportunity to choreograph this “feud” they’re having? Are Erika Kirk’s denials actually meant to keep Charlie’s murder at the forefront of people’s minds by shining a light on what Candace is saying?