The habeas petition cites Cunningham v. Neagle for the principle that an individual acting pursuant to federal law cannot be guilty of a state crime for those acts and explains that supremacy immunity extends to any person acting under a federal duty.
In Peters’ case that duty arises from statute and DOJ guidance.
Colorado barred her from presenting that duty and then imprisoned her for speaking about what her experts found.
If President Trump pardons her for actions taken to comply with federal election record retention law, Colorado must decide whether to accept the pardon or claim that its conviction overrides the federal interest in protecting election records.
agreed....this needs to be done and for the supreme court to look at this to examine and give a ruling. this is a good case to go through the court to shore up federal supremacy befor going after politicians in sanctuary cities and states for ignoring federal laws.
I think, by mentioning Safe and Secure Elections, and because those were Federal elections, Trump has finally grabbed the nettle by its stalk. Federal rules apply. Stuff your stinky state cockamememe rules. States are not supposed to write rules that contravene Federal law. End of.
Note that he says:
Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the “crime” of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election.
No more arguments. OK then, she committed a 'crime'. Now she is pardoned of that 'crime'.
Timing is everything. He said the 2020 election fraud will blame Obama in the next few months. Biden started the precedent of jailing presidents. It’s over (I hope)
I do not think we will have to wait 72 hours on this one. President Trump would NOT have posted this unless something big was about to happen. My guess is Federal charges against someone high up in the Colorado state system and possibly military or at least Federal Marshal intervention.
Trump hasn't posted on Truth social.
I thought he couldn't because It was State charges?
Ohh i pray that's true. But thought he couldn't because its state?
Let's see if the state Governor will release her...
I think because of the letter Ticktin wrote...she's a Federal Witness to a National Security Breach (Stolen Election) he can pardon. Now, let's see if they free her.
It was a federal election, therefore the expectation to ensure election integrity in her role was symbolically seconded to the federal government. The State may, in some cases not work in the interest of the USA. As we know. So, election integrity, and data security are up to the pedes like Tina. So, they SHOULD be making backups of the software before updates, and they SHOULD consult experts if they find something fishy. Oh and if that expert lives in another state? Screw you 'crossed state lines' rule.
The point is: I think someone woke up and realized that a federal election means federally imposed security rules, regarding data-protection. One cannot just trust the election software provider, or the state, it seems. Rottenness everywhere.
I expect Tina to now head a group that will write those election-integrity laws and even processes, when she has been nursed and fed properly.
For years, Democrats ignored Violent and Vicious Crime of all shapes, sizes, colors, and types. Violent Criminals who should have been locked up were allowed to attack again. Democrats were also far too happy to let in the worst from the worst countries so they could rip off American Taxpayers. Democrats only think there is one crime – Not voting for them! Instead of protecting Americans and their Tax Dollars, Democrats chose instead to prosecute anyone they can find that wanted Safe and Secure Elections. Democrats have been relentless in their targeting of TINA PETERS, a Patriot who simply wanted to make sure that our Elections were Fair and Honest. Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the “crime” of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!
I’d like everyone to say a prayer for Tina Peters. All the riff raff will be taken care of but she needs us to pray for her. God bless her. #freetinapeters u/#God
I think since we have a corrupt Judge, whichever Gov agency would be in charge, should just go get Tina. Ignore the ruling and make them be the ones to fight it in court. Turn the Tables!
the thing is, I am preddy sure both Trump and Scavino use a timetable for their posts. So there is something else coming with this news. Trump foreshadowed that as well, BTW.
So I have more confidence that the news is true. Just that there is the icky Colerado (note misspel, sort of like Coleric) peeps to deal with. Maybe the feds now need to root out the rigger in the woodpile, so to speak.\
Coleric: describes a personality type from ancient Greek theory, characterized by being quick-tempered, irritable, ambitious, and action-oriented, often taking charge and focusing intensely on goals, though they can seem domineering or aggressive.
I would say maybe because it involves federal elections, not state elections solely. Per a post above this " habeas petition cites Cunningham v. Neagle for the principle that an individual acting pursuant to federal law cannot be guilty of a state crime for those acts and explains that supremacy immunity extends to any person acting under a federal duty". It looks like this falls under federal guidelines which removes the state from responsibility for this whistleblower.
Like I said. It was a presidential race that was stolen. That IS federal business, just because the federal government is supposed to be for the USA. And the President represents the voice of We the people.
So, that letter expresses the ludicrous situation we were presented with in the beginning: that the president can only pardon a guilty person, of course he can pardon an innocent one as well. Duh. Tina's case ain't a matter of impeachment. So, all good.
Also the idea that he cannot wade into a State hearing - well actually he can pardon anyone he wants, especially when petitioned as he was, by Ticktin, complete with an entire website full of exonerating evidence, that she was not allowed to present in court.
And as for timing, the letter mention Dec 2, 2025 as a significant Domino. The criminal investigation into election companies submitted Carvajal's public version proffer - which according to Ticktin. A vital piece of evidence, so it was.
Especially when those who charged, arrested, tried, and imprisoned her are complicit in the treasonous election fraud.
She is the subject of a RICO conspiracy to conceal treasonous criminal acts.
All the public servants involved in this are complicit. Depending on involvement, they should at least be fired and banned from any future public office, as an example.
I’m talking about police, clerks, guards, judges, basically ANY public servant involved.
Those deeply involved should be prosecuted for treason, with appropriate punishment on conviction.
Actions need to have consequences, just like in the private sector.
Hallelujah,Attorney & friend of the President, Peter Ticktin’s idea. His interpretation of the Power to Pardon = offenses against the United States (States as “them“ each State, not “it” as in the federal Union of States) is unique & untested, being tested now!
No, the U.S. President cannot pardon someone for a state crime, even if a federal election was involved; their pardon power, granted by the Constitution, extends only to federal offenses (crimes against the U.S.). If someone faces state charges related to an election, the President can't interfere, and the individual would need clemency from state authorities (like the governor or state parole board) for those specific violations.
So I asked Grok: If a State us violating a persons Constitutional Rights can the Federal Government intercede?
Grok: Yes, the Federal Government can—and in many cases must—intercede when a state (or its officials, agencies, or local governments) violates a person’s constitutional rights. This power comes from several constitutional provisions and centuries of Supreme Court precedent.
She should have been subpoenaed as a federal witness and kept in a white collar country club prison short term while the administration sorts out their lawsuits and prosecutions.
She was convicted of state charges. Presidents can only pardon federal charges. Just because it was a federal election doesn't mean that she was convicted of federal charges.
President Trump simply does not have the Presidential powers to pardon her of the crimes she was charged with and is imprisoned for.
Trying to magically turn a state conviction into a federal conviction is not going to work in real life.
But I'm willing to wager on it.
If President Trump is actually able to pardon her and get her out of prison for the current charges she's imprisoned for, I promise I will never ever ever post here again and no one will ever have to see me pop their copium balloons again.
But if she stays in prison in Colorado under these convictions, then everyone who says that President Trump can pardon her for::insert legally implausible reason here:: has to never ever post here again, and then we won't have Anons getting their hopes up over nothing (and then getting angry and disillusioned when their pipe dreams don't come true and then storm off in a huff and we won't look like we're either ignorant of basic laws or that we're hypocrites who want to just disregard those laws when they don't go our way. All of which are things that are actively pushing people away from Q).
TLDR from a good article on the topic:
The habeas petition cites Cunningham v. Neagle for the principle that an individual acting pursuant to federal law cannot be guilty of a state crime for those acts and explains that supremacy immunity extends to any person acting under a federal duty.
In Peters’ case that duty arises from statute and DOJ guidance.
Colorado barred her from presenting that duty and then imprisoned her for speaking about what her experts found.
If President Trump pardons her for actions taken to comply with federal election record retention law, Colorado must decide whether to accept the pardon or claim that its conviction overrides the federal interest in protecting election records.
https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/11/28/colorados-clash-with-federal-law-why-tina-peters-case-poses-a-supreme-court-question/
very helpful, so thank you and this take seems promising
72 hour rule is in effect... 🕰️
She is on state charges, so will not be released.
Hoping and praying they send in the Federal Marshalls to bust her out, if need be, TONIGHT!!
agreed....this needs to be done and for the supreme court to look at this to examine and give a ruling. this is a good case to go through the court to shore up federal supremacy befor going after politicians in sanctuary cities and states for ignoring federal laws.
we have an antifa supporter here ...you can tell by the lack of understanding on what fascism actually is and how it works....
This
So Lincoln was a fascist?
I think, by mentioning Safe and Secure Elections, and because those were Federal elections, Trump has finally grabbed the nettle by its stalk. Federal rules apply. Stuff your stinky state cockamememe rules. States are not supposed to write rules that contravene Federal law. End of.
Note that he says:
No more arguments. OK then, she committed a 'crime'. Now she is pardoned of that 'crime'.
I'm not a constitutional lawyer,I hope she is freed....
I think she will be. Everyone is tired of the charade now.
The lock up the ones who put here in there!!
Her attorney makes a case for why Trump has power to pardon her. The letter is here. https://www.scribd.com/document/962977929/Sup-Cover-Letter-for-Application-for-Pardon-for-Tina-Peters#from_embed
Sounds good to me, but I'm sure it will be litigated.
This is the main question...
That is what I thought. If Trump can pardon her, why didn't he do it sooner? I pray she is released.
Timing is everything. He said the 2020 election fraud will blame Obama in the next few months. Biden started the precedent of jailing presidents. It’s over (I hope)
I do not think we will have to wait 72 hours on this one. President Trump would NOT have posted this unless something big was about to happen. My guess is Federal charges against someone high up in the Colorado state system and possibly military or at least Federal Marshal intervention.
Griswold and poleass!!! Send me to the same prison Tina is in.
No, send them to Venezuela with a one-way ticket.
Omg yes, pleaseeee!
Trump hasn't posted on Truth social. I thought he couldn't because It was State charges? Ohh i pray that's true. But thought he couldn't because its state?
Let's see if the state Governor will release her...
I think because of the letter Ticktin wrote...she's a Federal Witness to a National Security Breach (Stolen Election) he can pardon. Now, let's see if they free her.
All media saying governor will not release her.
He did post it on his Social account at least 3 hours ago.
72 hour rule. 72 jabs for the babies. 72 countries stolen by Venezuela.
That number is HOT.
Don't forget the 72 Virgins also!
72 being 8 * 9, of course.
I was hoping someone would take it there. CAP_H=8 and (9) is right next door.
The comet arrives next week on 12/19. But what's it all about?
u/#q373
I'll guess this has something to do with the forecoming proof that the 2020 election was in fact rigged.
After that, how can they hold her? Lawsuits incoming?
I hope so, I’m tired.
I trust our POTUS. Maybe he/they found a loophole... 🤔 Note the important word "Full."
It was a federal election, therefore the expectation to ensure election integrity in her role was symbolically seconded to the federal government. The State may, in some cases not work in the interest of the USA. As we know. So, election integrity, and data security are up to the pedes like Tina. So, they SHOULD be making backups of the software before updates, and they SHOULD consult experts if they find something fishy. Oh and if that expert lives in another state? Screw you 'crossed state lines' rule.
The point is: I think someone woke up and realized that a federal election means federally imposed security rules, regarding data-protection. One cannot just trust the election software provider, or the state, it seems. Rottenness everywhere.
I expect Tina to now head a group that will write those election-integrity laws and even processes, when she has been nursed and fed properly.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115703610330402175
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
For years, Democrats ignored Violent and Vicious Crime of all shapes, sizes, colors, and types. Violent Criminals who should have been locked up were allowed to attack again. Democrats were also far too happy to let in the worst from the worst countries so they could rip off American Taxpayers. Democrats only think there is one crime – Not voting for them! Instead of protecting Americans and their Tax Dollars, Democrats chose instead to prosecute anyone they can find that wanted Safe and Secure Elections. Democrats have been relentless in their targeting of TINA PETERS, a Patriot who simply wanted to make sure that our Elections were Fair and Honest. Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the “crime” of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!
2.87k
ReTruths
7.46k
Likes Dec 11, 2025, 6:49 PM
I’d like everyone to say a prayer for Tina Peters. All the riff raff will be taken care of but she needs us to pray for her. God bless her. #freetinapeters u/#God
I think since we have a corrupt Judge, whichever Gov agency would be in charge, should just go get Tina. Ignore the ruling and make them be the ones to fight it in court. Turn the Tables!
Colorado's AG has already said he won't release her.
Here's Ticktin with Bannon a few days ago on how this will play out (ending at the Supreme Court)...
https://x.com/AsheinAmerica/status/1999327259971453122
+++ has joined in with this! Something seems to be about to break...
🌪+++🌪 @01010001 State Crime??? P_Authority Over State Crime? What Else Might Be At Play...
T R E A S O N
Ooooh ty!
Here’s a link for anyone interested: https://truthsocial.com/@01010001/115703969169609969
Get her out and straight to Walter Reed where she can get regeneron as Trump did to be well during covid
If true send the federal marshalls to pick her up.
Oh this IS good news. What a welcome early gift for Christmas. ... if true, but GWP is preddy consistent, just early...
However, their sauce? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115703610330402175
the thing is, I am preddy sure both Trump and Scavino use a timetable for their posts. So there is something else coming with this news. Trump foreshadowed that as well, BTW.
So I have more confidence that the news is true. Just that there is the icky Colerado (note misspel, sort of like Coleric) peeps to deal with. Maybe the feds now need to root out the rigger in the woodpile, so to speak.\
This is great news.
This movie just keeps getting better!
Can a president pardon someone for a state conviction? 🤔 Not federal? 🤔
" Can a president pardon someone for a state conviction? "
...no...
Trump is setting up a very public fight. A nice start to the 2020 fraud.
I would say maybe because it involves federal elections, not state elections solely. Per a post above this " habeas petition cites Cunningham v. Neagle for the principle that an individual acting pursuant to federal law cannot be guilty of a state crime for those acts and explains that supremacy immunity extends to any person acting under a federal duty". It looks like this falls under federal guidelines which removes the state from responsibility for this whistleblower.
Her attorney makes a case for it here. https://www.scribd.com/document/962977929/Sup-Cover-Letter-for-Application-for-Pardon-for-Tina-Peters#from_embed
Like I said. It was a presidential race that was stolen. That IS federal business, just because the federal government is supposed to be for the USA. And the President represents the voice of We the people.
So, that letter expresses the ludicrous situation we were presented with in the beginning: that the president can only pardon a guilty person, of course he can pardon an innocent one as well. Duh. Tina's case ain't a matter of impeachment. So, all good.
Also the idea that he cannot wade into a State hearing - well actually he can pardon anyone he wants, especially when petitioned as he was, by Ticktin, complete with an entire website full of exonerating evidence, that she was not allowed to present in court.
And as for timing, the letter mention Dec 2, 2025 as a significant Domino. The criminal investigation into election companies submitted Carvajal's public version proffer - which according to Ticktin. A vital piece of evidence, so it was.
Where is that website
Especially when those who charged, arrested, tried, and imprisoned her are complicit in the treasonous election fraud.
She is the subject of a RICO conspiracy to conceal treasonous criminal acts.
All the public servants involved in this are complicit. Depending on involvement, they should at least be fired and banned from any future public office, as an example.
I’m talking about police, clerks, guards, judges, basically ANY public servant involved.
Those deeply involved should be prosecuted for treason, with appropriate punishment on conviction.
Actions need to have consequences, just like in the private sector.
No
Someone just posted to +++ 'let's hope this happens' +++ then replied" 🌪+++🌪
@01010001 Replying to @lorraineUSpatriot , @01010001 , and 1 more
Hope??? No Thanks. Moves And Countermoves. Enjoy!!!
Trump's going to give Tina a medal of freedom award.
Hallelujah,Attorney & friend of the President, Peter Ticktin’s idea. His interpretation of the Power to Pardon = offenses against the United States (States as “them“ each State, not “it” as in the federal Union of States) is unique & untested, being tested now!
https://rumble.com/v72tkoc-peter-ticktin-tina-peters-update.html
Silk interview, Diamond & Silk show on Rumble, Dec. 9, ‘25
According to ChatGPT:
No, the U.S. President cannot pardon someone for a state crime, even if a federal election was involved; their pardon power, granted by the Constitution, extends only to federal offenses (crimes against the U.S.). If someone faces state charges related to an election, the President can't interfere, and the individual would need clemency from state authorities (like the governor or state parole board) for those specific violations.
Hope someone can poke holes in this.
So I asked Grok: If a State us violating a persons Constitutional Rights can the Federal Government intercede? Grok: Yes, the Federal Government can—and in many cases must—intercede when a state (or its officials, agencies, or local governments) violates a person’s constitutional rights. This power comes from several constitutional provisions and centuries of Supreme Court precedent.
u/#trumpflag
Thank you Jesus and President Trump. A injustice has been corrected. One of many. Now get the perps to Gitmo for real justice
She should have been subpoenaed as a federal witness and kept in a white collar country club prison short term while the administration sorts out their lawsuits and prosecutions.
She was convicted of state charges. Presidents can only pardon federal charges. Just because it was a federal election doesn't mean that she was convicted of federal charges.
President Trump simply does not have the Presidential powers to pardon her of the crimes she was charged with and is imprisoned for.
Trying to magically turn a state conviction into a federal conviction is not going to work in real life.
But I'm willing to wager on it.
If President Trump is actually able to pardon her and get her out of prison for the current charges she's imprisoned for, I promise I will never ever ever post here again and no one will ever have to see me pop their copium balloons again.
But if she stays in prison in Colorado under these convictions, then everyone who says that President Trump can pardon her for::insert legally implausible reason here:: has to never ever post here again, and then we won't have Anons getting their hopes up over nothing (and then getting angry and disillusioned when their pipe dreams don't come true and then storm off in a huff and we won't look like we're either ignorant of basic laws or that we're hypocrites who want to just disregard those laws when they don't go our way. All of which are things that are actively pushing people away from Q).
How about it? Any takers?
Nice. Now send a SpecOps team to the prison to “help” with her release, before there is an accident.