8
inutterable 8 points ago +8 / -0

A better way to ask this question would be asking how to discern this for ourselves.

For instance: How can we distinguish false prophets to shun, patriots to follow, and (potential) operators to assist? Without compromising.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't want to be "that guy", but that site isn't measuring at the low pressure of high altitude. It's measuring at sea level pressure.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

TheAuthority and 8bit did a run on this, but the fastest summary is:

  • These Q posts were made on a different board that Qresearch (specifically, Hivemind).
  • Qresearch is the only board that has Q's original salt saved. The rest have been refreshed.
  • Q did not confirm these from his personal board.
  • Any admin or board operator who knows the tripcode salt could fake Q's tripcode on their board.
  • Q's tripcode would be different on Hivemind than on Qresearch.
2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The > may refer to the NCAV (Net Current Asset Value) ratio. Basically saying, "Look for investment companies that aren't up to their eyeballs in debt, then find one called TG". That's TGVest.

Also, the greater-than symbol can be turned sideways as a V. Also TGV(est).

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Theory: This is to start a war with China/North Korea.

10 Days of DarNKess.

Abe and the current PM would not allow China to invade Taiwan. Japan cannot be destroyed. NK cannot enter a war with Japan willing to fight.

With the primary Nationalist movement leader gone, China and NK can move. War starts. First Taiwan. "POTUS" can mean Trump or Biden.

Who has been blackmailed, threatened, and enslaved? Us? Chinese? Taiwanese? Koreans? Everyone?

Side Note: TG> = TGVest? https://www.tgvestcapital.com/portfolio

12
inutterable 12 points ago +12 / -0

Reading Kagan's Dissenting Opinions is a two drink minimum. The Chicago gun ruling when she was new to the court, her Dissenting Opinion should have been written in crayons.

37
inutterable 37 points ago +37 / -0

"When Congress seems slow to solve problems, it may be only natural that those in the Executive Branch might seek to take matters into their own hands. But the Constitution does not authorize agencies to use pen-and-phone regulations as substitutes for laws passed by the people's representatives."

Very.

34
inutterable 34 points ago +34 / -0

Not entirely. CIA was authorized by Congress. But, the ruling can be applied to both the agency and their powers. Both have to be authorized by Congress.

11
inutterable 11 points ago +11 / -0

A single 0 delta puts it all to bed.

It's been requested before. It's being requested now. It's been granted before. ...

Trump and Q team wouldn't leave anons hanging unless there was a reason.

8
inutterable 8 points ago +8 / -0

"They're doing it in spades and they should be fired immediately! (furious look to the side)"

8kun admin > identified by ♠️ a spade on posts.

The ONLY two options for what is happening are: 1) it's really Q, or 2) it's an 8kun admin.

17
inutterable 17 points ago +18 / -1

Very important. Everyone remember that air Qs at rallies and the number 17 has shown up in nearly everything that DJT has been involved in for years now, including while Q has been dormant.

Trump said "No Games" very clearly during the rally, which may have been a comm to the first "new" post. He also came onstage at 19:58, and post 1958 says "Mouthpieces do not speak for themselves."

We need to watch for the new Q to pull an indisputable proof. Excitement good. Verification required.

6
inutterable 6 points ago +9 / -3

If that's true, then there's 5 hands in the photo.

3
inutterable 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. He said mid July on Truth. Well, he said "Definitely not July 15", which makes me wonder about those interesting July 16 deltas.

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Late to the party, but God is always on time!

Jesus Christ is the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords!

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has anyone ever noticed how similar Gregg Phillips looks to the soldier in Q post 4241? https://qalerts.app/?n=4241

Found it on Truth last night. https://truthsocial.com/@PatriotRose1/posts/108421405496320311

4
inutterable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Telling the Deep State they have 6 weeks to prep, then release early to catch them even harder off guard. They expend resources, gain nothing, stop nothing.

Same ops as the bad Intel ops before Normandy.

4
inutterable 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know, there's over a million veterans in the US. That's people who are trained, honorably discharged, and managed to hold down a job serving the country for at least a few years.

There's about 100,000 public schools, counting every K-12 grade that receives public funding.

I figure, with the amount of veterans that end up unemployed and such, these problems could meet in the middle for a solution.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, game cameras typically run around $100 for good ones and can camouflage in very well. Check local laws again about whether you're in a One Party Consent state. There should be no expectation of privacy at a public polling location.

3
inutterable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regarding the conceal carry, check your local laws very carefully. In Georgia, it is illegal to carry a weapon within 150ft of a polling location, which is where ballot boxes are located. This includes parking lots and vehicles.

Now, if you had a buddy in the local police or sheriff that you could call, who could make sure there's a unit sitting nearby investigating some unrelated suspicious activity, you may be in business to catch people in the act. Maybe on the 2nd or 3rd trip.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, before I forget to answer your question.

The verdict was only regarding whether Sussy lied to the FBI. There would be no Double Jeopardy if/when Sussmann is pulled back in to answer for other indictments.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Evidence submitted and allowed in one trial may be used in another related trial. Additionally, that evidence and any testimony can be used for future indictments or proceedings. Most importantly, the testimonies given in this trial were under oath, so any conflicting testimony in the future trials is provable perjury.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jury Nullification is when a jury knows someone is guilty, but chooses to find them not guilty anyway. It's the exact reason why we are tried before a jury of our peers, because it lets the community of citizens choose to nullify unnecessary laws.

view more: Next ›